In a cautious, BTC-led market, ICP crypto is stuck under key daily averages and fighting to avoid further downside while other majors stabilize. Daily Chart (D1In a cautious, BTC-led market, ICP crypto is stuck under key daily averages and fighting to avoid further downside while other majors stabilize. Daily Chart (D1

Bearish Trend and Short-Term Stabilization for ICP Crypto: What Needs to Flip the Script

ICP crypto internet computer

In a cautious, BTC-led market, ICP crypto is stuck under key daily averages and fighting to avoid further downside while other majors stabilize.

Daily Chart (D1): Clear Bearish Bias

Daily timeframe sets the main scenario: for ICPUSDT, that scenario is bearish.

Trend Structure – EMAs

Price vs EMAs (D1)
Close: $3.42
EMA 20: $3.82
EMA 50: $4.20
EMA 200: $4.76

Price is below all three key EMAs, and those EMAs are stacked bearishly (20 < 50 < 200). That is textbook downtrend structure. It tells us ICP crypto is in the discount bin for a reason: rallies into the low $3.80s–$4.20s are structurally vulnerable to selling until price can reclaim and hold above them.

Momentum – RSI

RSI 14 (D1): 38.62

RSI is below the midline but not yet oversold. That is classic controlled downside: bears are in charge, but there is no sign of capitulation. It usually means there is still room for price to drift lower or chop sideways without triggering an aggressive short-covering squeeze.

Momentum Confirmation – MACD

MACD line (D1): -0.34
Signal line (D1): -0.33
Histogram (D1): ~0

MACD is negative but flat, with the line essentially on top of the signal. The downtrend is established but momentum has cooled. Bears are not accelerating the move anymore; they are just maintaining pressure. That often precedes either a consolidation base or a weak bounce, not an immediate trend reversal.

Volatility & Range – Bollinger Bands and ATR

Bollinger Bands (D1):
Mid band: $3.77
Upper band: $4.37
Lower band: $3.17
Close: $3.42

Price is hugging the lower half of the band structure, closer to the lower band than the upper. That is consistent with a grind-down environment: sellers are keeping price suppressed, but you are not seeing a volatility blowout. It signals controlled downside rather than panic.

ATR 14 (D1): $0.26

A daily ATR near $0.26 for a $3–$4 coin means roughly 7–8% typical daily swings. Volatility is elevated but not extreme for altcoins. There is enough movement to trade, but nothing that screams crash mode.

Reference Levels – Daily Pivot

Daily pivot point (PP): $3.41
R1: $3.45
S1: $3.38

ICP is trading almost exactly on the daily pivot. That shows an intraday stalemate inside a broader downtrend. The market is pausing to decide whether $3.40 is a floor worth defending or just another stop on the way to the lower Bollinger band around $3.17.

1-Hour Chart (H1): Neutral, Short-Term Balance

The 1H chart is where the story starts to diverge from the daily. Here, ICPUSDT is no longer in outright sell mode; it has flipped to neutral, with signs of short-term balance.

Trend & Structure – EMAs

Close (H1): $3.42
EMA 20: $3.40
EMA 50: $3.42
EMA 200: $3.52

Price is slightly above the 20 EMA and essentially on the 50 EMA, but still well below the 200 EMA. Short term, that is a reset to equilibrium: intraday participants are no longer pushing ICP lower; they are trading around a fair value zone in the low $3.40s. The big-picture downtrend (price < 200 EMA) remains intact.

Momentum – RSI

RSI 14 (H1): 52.54

RSI on the hourly is just above neutral. That shows balanced order flow. Neither side is pressing hard, and the market is happy to consolidate. For a daily downtrend, this type of hourly RSI is often a staging area either for a continuation leg lower or for a corrective bounce.

MACD – Flat Tape

MACD (H1): line, signal, and histogram all around 0

Hourly MACD is flat at the zero line, which is exactly what a neutral regime looks like. Momentum has reset: the earlier downside impulse has been fully digested and the tape is waiting for the next catalyst.

Volatility & Range – Bollinger Bands and ATR

Bollinger Bands (H1):
Mid band: $3.40
Upper band: $3.44
Lower band: $3.36
Close: $3.42

Price is slightly above the mid band, inside a tight envelope. That is compression, not expansion: volatility is being bottled up. A squeeze on the hourly after a downtrend can break either way, but statistically it more often continues in the direction of the higher timeframe trend unless there is a strong catalyst.

ATR 14 (H1): $0.04

An hourly ATR of four cents underscores how compressed the market is intraday. The coin is moving about 1%–1.5% per hour at most. For traders, this is a wait-for-the-break environment, not a chase-the-move setup.

Intraday Pivot

Hourly pivot point (PP): $3.42
R1: $3.43
S1: $3.41

Again, price sits right at the pivot. Bulls have not been able to build value above $3.43, and bears have not forced a decisive move below $3.41. It is a tight, directionless box.

15-Min Chart (M15): Execution Context, Micro Neutral

The 15-minute chart is purely for fine-tuning entries and risk; it does not change the broader bias.

Short-Term EMAs

Close (M15): $3.42
EMA 20: $3.41
EMA 50: $3.40
EMA 200: $3.41

All three EMAs are essentially on top of each other with price sitting slightly above. That is a textbook micro-range condition. There is no clear intraday trend, just oscillation around $3.41–$3.42.

Momentum & Volatility

RSI 14 (M15): 54.35
MACD (M15): line, signal, histogram ≈ 0
ATR 14 (M15): $0.01

Short-term momentum is mildly positive, volatility is tiny, and MACD is flat. This is a scalper’s tape, not a swing trader’s. Moves are likely to get faded quickly unless backed by higher timeframe participation.

15-Min Pivot Levels

Pivot (M15): $3.42
R1: $3.42
S1: $3.41

On this micro timeframe, the market is literally rotating around $3.42 with near-zero separation between pivot and resistance. Liquidity is clustering here; it is where both breakout and breakdown attempts will be tested.

Market Context: Fearful, BTC-Led Tape

Broad crypto market cap is around $3.23T with a positive 24h change of about 2%, yet the fear and greed index is at 29 (Fear). Bitcoin dominance at 57%+ tells you where the money is hiding: majors, not speculative altcoins like ICP.

In practice, that means even if the market is up on the day, marginal capital is cautious. ICP crypto will likely lag any market-wide bounce and could sell off faster if fear intensifies. The current regime favors trend-following on weakness rather than aggressively bottom fishing minor alts.

Putting It Together: Scenarios for ICP Crypto

Baseline View

The main scenario is bearish, defined by the daily timeframe: price below all major EMAs, RSI sub-50, MACD negative, and price pressing the lower half of the Bollinger structure. The 1H and 15m charts do not contradict the downtrend; they simply say the market is taking a breather around $3.40.

Bullish Scenario: Oversold Relief Rally

For a constructive bullish case, ICP needs to turn this intraday neutrality into a proper relief rally.

What a bullish path looks like:

  • On the 1H, price holds above the pivot region around $3.40–$3.42 and starts building higher lows, pushing consistently above the upper hourly Bollinger band near $3.44.
  • RSI on the 1H sustains above 55–60 while MACD on the hourly turns clearly positive, showing actual buying pressure rather than just random chop.
  • On the daily, ICP reclaims the Bollinger mid band near $3.77–$3.80 and challenges the 20-day EMA at $3.82. That is the first real signal that the downtrend is losing its grip.
  • A stronger bullish extension would then aim at the $4.20 region (50-day EMA) as the next magnet and key battle line.

What would invalidate the bullish scenario?

If price loses the short-term floor around $3.38–$3.40 and daily RSI rolls back down toward the low 30s while MACD widens deeper into negative territory, the idea of an imminent relief rally is off the table. A daily close near or below the lower Bollinger band (around $3.17) would be a clear signal that the market chose continuation over bounce.

Bearish Scenario: Trend Continuation Lower

The bearish path is essentially more of the same, with the daily trend reasserting itself after this intraday pause.

What a bearish continuation looks like:

  • On the 1H, price fails repeatedly at $3.44–$3.45 (R1 and upper band), generating lower highs just under that zone.
  • Hourly RSI drifts back below 45 and MACD crosses back under zero with an expanding negative histogram, marking a fresh downside impulse.
  • Price breaks and closes (on 1H then on D1) below the $3.38 support or pivot S1, opening the way toward the Bollinger lower band around $3.17.
  • If fear in the broader market worsens, a spike in daily ATR beyond the current $0.26 could accompany a sharper leg down, with markets testing psychological levels below $3.

What would invalidate the bearish scenario?

A sustained reclaim of the daily 20 EMA around $3.82 would be the first serious blow to the bearish thesis. If ICP can then hold that level as support on subsequent pullbacks and compress under the 50 EMA at $4.20, the downtrend is no longer in full control. In other words, daily closes back in the $3.80s that stick would force bears to reassess the situation for ICP crypto on this chart.

How to Think About Positioning and Risk about ICP crypto

From a trading perspective, ICP crypto is in a macro downtrend with micro neutral consolidation. That combination usually rewards patience.

  • Momentum traders typically wait for the hourly squeeze to resolve: either a clean breakdown below $3.38 to lean with the daily trend, or a breakout above $3.45–$3.50 that has enough strength to challenge the daily 20 EMA.
  • Mean-reversion traders might nibble near the lower daily band only if volatility spikes and sentiment gets more extreme, but that is fighting the main trend and demands very tight risk control.

The key is acknowledging the uncertainty. The indicators are aligned on the daily (bearish), but flat on the intraday frames (neutral). That conflict means there is no must-trade setup here. There are only conditional trades depending on how price behaves around the current $3.40 pivot and the $3.17–$3.80 daily band corridor.

Position sizing, hard stops, and respect for volatility (that 7–8% daily average range) matter more than any single indicator right now. In this kind of tape, it is usually better to let price confirm direction rather than trying to predict the exact turning point.

Trading ToolsIf you want to monitor markets with professional charting tools and real-time data, you can open an account on Investing using our partner link:

Open your Investing.com account

This section contains a sponsored affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no additional cost to you.

Disclaimer: This market commentary is for informational and educational purposes only and reflects a technical view of the ICPUSDT chart at a specific point in time. It is not investment, trading, or financial advice, and it does not take into account your individual objectives, financial situation, or risk tolerance. Crypto assets are highly volatile and can result in total loss of capital. Always conduct your own research and use independent judgment before making any trading decisions.

In summary, ICP remains in a broad downtrend with short-term stabilization, and traders are better served by waiting for confirmation rather than anticipating a reversal.

Piyasa Fırsatı
Internet Computer Logosu
Internet Computer Fiyatı(ICP)
$3.075
$3.075$3.075
-0.74%
USD
Internet Computer (ICP) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen [email protected] ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

South Korea Launches Innovative Stablecoin Initiative

South Korea Launches Innovative Stablecoin Initiative

The post South Korea Launches Innovative Stablecoin Initiative appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. South Korea has witnessed a pivotal development in its cryptocurrency landscape with BDACS introducing the nation’s first won-backed stablecoin, KRW1, built on the Avalanche network. This stablecoin is anchored by won assets stored at Woori Bank in a 1:1 ratio, ensuring high security. Continue Reading:South Korea Launches Innovative Stablecoin Initiative Source: https://en.bitcoinhaber.net/south-korea-launches-innovative-stablecoin-initiative
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 17:54
Trump Cancels Tech, AI Trade Negotiations With The UK

Trump Cancels Tech, AI Trade Negotiations With The UK

The US pauses a $41B UK tech and AI deal as trade talks stall, with disputes over food standards, market access, and rules abroad.   The US has frozen a major tech
Paylaş
LiveBitcoinNews2025/12/17 01:00
Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API

Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API

Turn lengthy earnings call transcripts into one-page insights using the Financial Modeling Prep APIPhoto by Bich Tran Earnings calls are packed with insights. They tell you how a company performed, what management expects in the future, and what analysts are worried about. The challenge is that these transcripts often stretch across dozens of pages, making it tough to separate the key takeaways from the noise. With the right tools, you don’t need to spend hours reading every line. By combining the Financial Modeling Prep (FMP) API with Groq’s lightning-fast LLMs, you can transform any earnings call into a concise summary in seconds. The FMP API provides reliable access to complete transcripts, while Groq handles the heavy lifting of distilling them into clear, actionable highlights. In this article, we’ll build a Python workflow that brings these two together. You’ll see how to fetch transcripts for any stock, prepare the text, and instantly generate a one-page summary. Whether you’re tracking Apple, NVIDIA, or your favorite growth stock, the process works the same — fast, accurate, and ready whenever you are. Fetching Earnings Transcripts with FMP API The first step is to pull the raw transcript data. FMP makes this simple with dedicated endpoints for earnings calls. If you want the latest transcripts across the market, you can use the stable endpoint /stable/earning-call-transcript-latest. For a specific stock, the v3 endpoint lets you request transcripts by symbol, quarter, and year using the pattern: https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={q}&year={y}&apikey=YOUR_API_KEY here’s how you can fetch NVIDIA’s transcript for a given quarter: import requestsAPI_KEY = "your_api_key"symbol = "NVDA"quarter = 2year = 2024url = f"https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={quarter}&year={year}&apikey={API_KEY}"response = requests.get(url)data = response.json()# Inspect the keysprint(data.keys())# Access transcript contentif "content" in data[0]: transcript_text = data[0]["content"] print(transcript_text[:500]) # preview first 500 characters The response typically includes details like the company symbol, quarter, year, and the full transcript text. If you aren’t sure which quarter to query, the “latest transcripts” endpoint is the quickest way to always stay up to date. Cleaning and Preparing Transcript Data Raw transcripts from the API often include long paragraphs, speaker tags, and formatting artifacts. Before sending them to an LLM, it helps to organize the text into a cleaner structure. Most transcripts follow a pattern: prepared remarks from executives first, followed by a Q&A session with analysts. Separating these sections gives better control when prompting the model. In Python, you can parse the transcript and strip out unnecessary characters. A simple way is to split by markers such as “Operator” or “Question-and-Answer.” Once separated, you can create two blocks — Prepared Remarks and Q&A — that will later be summarized independently. This ensures the model handles each section within context and avoids missing important details. Here’s a small example of how you might start preparing the data: import re# Example: using the transcript_text we fetched earliertext = transcript_text# Remove extra spaces and line breaksclean_text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text).strip()# Split sections (this is a heuristic; real-world transcripts vary slightly)if "Question-and-Answer" in clean_text: prepared, qna = clean_text.split("Question-and-Answer", 1)else: prepared, qna = clean_text, ""print("Prepared Remarks Preview:\n", prepared[:500])print("\nQ&A Preview:\n", qna[:500]) With the transcript cleaned and divided, you’re ready to feed it into Groq’s LLM. Chunking may be necessary if the text is very long. A good approach is to break it into segments of a few thousand tokens, summarize each part, and then merge the summaries in a final pass. Summarizing with Groq LLM Now that the transcript is clean and split into Prepared Remarks and Q&A, we’ll use Groq to generate a crisp one-pager. The idea is simple: summarize each section separately (for focus and accuracy), then synthesize a final brief. Prompt design (concise and factual) Use a short, repeatable template that pushes for neutral, investor-ready language: You are an equity research analyst. Summarize the following earnings call sectionfor {symbol} ({quarter} {year}). Be factual and concise.Return:1) TL;DR (3–5 bullets)2) Results vs. guidance (what improved/worsened)3) Forward outlook (specific statements)4) Risks / watch-outs5) Q&A takeaways (if present)Text:<<<{section_text}>>> Python: calling Groq and getting a clean summary Groq provides an OpenAI-compatible API. Set your GROQ_API_KEY and pick a fast, high-quality model (e.g., a Llama-3.1 70B variant). We’ll write a helper to summarize any text block, then run it for both sections and merge. import osimport textwrapimport requestsGROQ_API_KEY = os.environ.get("GROQ_API_KEY") or "your_groq_api_key"GROQ_BASE_URL = "https://api.groq.com/openai/v1" # OpenAI-compatibleMODEL = "llama-3.1-70b" # choose your preferred Groq modeldef call_groq(prompt, temperature=0.2, max_tokens=1200): url = f"{GROQ_BASE_URL}/chat/completions" headers = { "Authorization": f"Bearer {GROQ_API_KEY}", "Content-Type": "application/json", } payload = { "model": MODEL, "messages": [ {"role": "system", "content": "You are a precise, neutral equity research analyst."}, {"role": "user", "content": prompt}, ], "temperature": temperature, "max_tokens": max_tokens, } r = requests.post(url, headers=headers, json=payload, timeout=60) r.raise_for_status() return r.json()["choices"][0]["message"]["content"].strip()def build_prompt(section_text, symbol, quarter, year): template = """ You are an equity research analyst. Summarize the following earnings call section for {symbol} ({quarter} {year}). Be factual and concise. Return: 1) TL;DR (3–5 bullets) 2) Results vs. guidance (what improved/worsened) 3) Forward outlook (specific statements) 4) Risks / watch-outs 5) Q&A takeaways (if present) Text: <<< {section_text} >>> """ return textwrap.dedent(template).format( symbol=symbol, quarter=quarter, year=year, section_text=section_text )def summarize_section(section_text, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024"): if not section_text or section_text.strip() == "": return "(No content found for this section.)" prompt = build_prompt(section_text, symbol, quarter, year) return call_groq(prompt)# Example usage with the cleaned splits from Section 3prepared_summary = summarize_section(prepared, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024")qna_summary = summarize_section(qna, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024")final_one_pager = f"""# {symbol} Earnings One-Pager — {quarter} {year}## Prepared Remarks — Key Points{prepared_summary}## Q&A Highlights{qna_summary}""".strip()print(final_one_pager[:1200]) # preview Tips that keep quality high: Keep temperature low (≈0.2) for factual tone. If a section is extremely long, chunk at ~5–8k tokens, summarize each chunk with the same prompt, then ask the model to merge chunk summaries into one section summary before producing the final one-pager. If you also fetched headline numbers (EPS/revenue, guidance) earlier, prepend them to the prompt as brief context to help the model anchor on the right outcomes. Building the End-to-End Pipeline At this point, we have all the building blocks: the FMP API to fetch transcripts, a cleaning step to structure the data, and Groq LLM to generate concise summaries. The final step is to connect everything into a single workflow that can take any ticker and return a one-page earnings call summary. The flow looks like this: Input a stock ticker (for example, NVDA). Use FMP to fetch the latest transcript. Clean and split the text into Prepared Remarks and Q&A. Send each section to Groq for summarization. Merge the outputs into a neatly formatted earnings one-pager. Here’s how it comes together in Python: def summarize_earnings_call(symbol, quarter, year, api_key, groq_key): # Step 1: Fetch transcript from FMP url = f"https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={quarter}&year={year}&apikey={api_key}" resp = requests.get(url) resp.raise_for_status() data = resp.json() if not data or "content" not in data[0]: return f"No transcript found for {symbol} {quarter} {year}" text = data[0]["content"] # Step 2: Clean and split clean_text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text).strip() if "Question-and-Answer" in clean_text: prepared, qna = clean_text.split("Question-and-Answer", 1) else: prepared, qna = clean_text, "" # Step 3: Summarize with Groq prepared_summary = summarize_section(prepared, symbol, quarter, year) qna_summary = summarize_section(qna, symbol, quarter, year) # Step 4: Merge into final one-pager return f"""# {symbol} Earnings One-Pager — {quarter} {year}## Prepared Remarks{prepared_summary}## Q&A Highlights{qna_summary}""".strip()# Example runprint(summarize_earnings_call("NVDA", 2, 2024, API_KEY, GROQ_API_KEY)) With this setup, generating a summary becomes as simple as calling one function with a ticker and date. You can run it inside a notebook, integrate it into a research workflow, or even schedule it to trigger after each new earnings release. Free Stock Market API and Financial Statements API... Conclusion Earnings calls no longer need to feel overwhelming. With the Financial Modeling Prep API, you can instantly access any company’s transcript, and with Groq LLM, you can turn that raw text into a sharp, actionable summary in seconds. This pipeline saves hours of reading and ensures you never miss the key results, guidance, or risks hidden in lengthy remarks. Whether you track tech giants like NVIDIA or smaller growth stocks, the process is the same — fast, reliable, and powered by the flexibility of FMP’s data. Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Paylaş
Medium2025/09/18 14:40