While the Murdochs just ended their civil war to keep the news, the Ellisons are spending $108B to buy the culture. With David Ellison’s hostile bid for Warner Bros., a new dynasty is replacing the old guard. 🧵 Here’s the tale of the tape: Tech Money vs. Legacy PowerWhile the Murdochs just ended their civil war to keep the news, the Ellisons are spending $108B to buy the culture. With David Ellison’s hostile bid for Warner Bros., a new dynasty is replacing the old guard. 🧵 Here’s the tale of the tape: Tech Money vs. Legacy Power

Media Titans: Murdochs vs Ellisons

2025/12/09 13:28

Recent news indicates David Ellison's Paramount Skydance has launched a hostile bid for the entire Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) company, challenging Netflix's prior offer. \n

Assuming David Ellison's Paramount Skydance succeeded in acquiring the entire Warner Bros. Discovery (including the Global Networks division), the combined company would control an unprecedented array of media assets. As you might have noticed from his last name, David Ellison is Oracle CEO and world's second richest person Larry Ellison's son.

\ Here is a list of the major combined media assets, categorized for clarity:

Television Networks & Cable Channels

The merger would combine the vast TV portfolios of both companies, creating a massive cable and broadcast footprint. \n

| Category | Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) Channels | Paramount Skydance Channels | |----|----|----| | Broadcast | The CW | CBS (Broadcast Network) | | News | CNN Worldwide (CNN, HLN) | CBS News (Absorbed/Merged with CNN in some proposals) | | Premium | HBO (and its sister channels like HBO2, HBO Signature), Cinemax | Showtime, The Movie Channel, Flix | | Entertainment | TBS, TNT, TruTV, TCM, Adult Swim | Paramount Network, Comedy Central, TV Land, Pop TV, Smithsonian Channel | | Kids/Family | Cartoon Network, Boomerang, Cartoonito (block) | Nickelodeon, Nick Jr. Channel, Nick at Nite, TeenNick, Nicktoons | | Reality/Lifestyle | Discovery Channel, TLC, HGTV, Food Network, Animal Planet, Investigation Discovery (ID), Travel Channel, Science Channel, Destination America, Discovery Life, OWN, Magnolia Network | VH1, MTV, BET, CMT | | Sports | TNT Sports (including Bleacher Report), Eurosport (international) | CBS Sports, CBS Sports Network |

\

Film & Television Studios

The combined company would own two of Hollywood's "Big Six" major film studios and powerhouse TV production houses. \n

  • Film Studios:
  • Warner Bros. Pictures Group (including Warner Bros. Pictures, New Line Cinema, Warner Bros. Pictures Animation)
  • Paramount Motion Pictures Group (including Paramount Pictures, Paramount Animation, Paramount Players, Republic Pictures)
  • Television Studios:
  • Warner Bros. Television Group (including Warner Bros. Television Studios, Warner Horizon Unscripted, Telepictures, Alloy Entertainment)
  • CBS Studios (including Big Ticket Television, CBS Media Ventures)
  • Paramount Television Studios (including Skydance Television, MTV Entertainment Studios, Nickelodeon Productions)
  • Skydance Productions (Skydance Media's TV/Film production arm)
  • Animation Studios:
  • Warner Bros. Animation
  • Cartoon Network Studios
  • Hanna-Barbera Studios Europe
  • Nickelodeon Animation Studio
  • Skydance Animation

\

Streaming Services

The combined entity would instantly become a streaming behemoth with multiple major platforms.

\

  • Flagship SVOD: HBO Max (Likely absorbing Paramount+ and Discovery+ into one super-service, potentially keeping the HBO Max branding or rebranding entirely)
  • Ad-Supported/FAST: Pluto TV (One of the largest Free Ad-supported Streaming TV platforms)
  • Niche/International: Discovery+, BET+, Paramount+ (Likely consolidated into HBO Max), CNN app, CBS Sports HQ, My5 (UK), 10 Play (Australia). \n

Content Libraries, Franchises, & IP

This would be arguably the most valuable part of the merger, creating a library unmatched by any competitor outside of Disney.

\

| Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) IP | Paramount Skydance IP | |----|----| | DC Comics Universe (Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, etc.) | Star Trek | | Wizarding World (Harry Potter, Fantastic Beasts) | Mission: Impossible | | Middle-earth (The Lord of the Rings/The Hobbit films) | Transformers | | Tolkien (The Lord of the Rings/The Hobbit films) | Indiana Jones | | HBO Originals (Game of Thrones, House of the Dragon, The Sopranos, Succession, The Last of Us) | South Park (through Comedy Central deal) | | Classic Warner Bros. (Casablanca, Looney Tunes, Scooby-Doo, Tom and Jerry) | SpongeBob SquarePants & Nickelodeon IP | | Film Franchises (The Matrix, Ocean's Trilogy, A Nightmare on Elm Street) | Top Gun | | TV Classics (Friends, The Big Bang Theory, Seinfeld, ER, Abbott Elementary) | Halo (TV Series) | | Discovery/Unscripted (Shark Week, Gold Rush, 90 Day Fiancé) | NCIS, CSI, Survivor, The Amazing Race (CBS franchises) | | DC Entertainment (DC Comics, DC Black Label, MAD magazine) | Miramax (49% stake in films like Pulp Fiction, Kill Bill) |

\

Other Assets

  • Publishing/Comics: DC Comics, MAD magazine
  • Gaming: Warner Bros. Games (Mortal Kombat, Batman: Arkham, Hogwarts Legacy) and Skydance Interactive
  • Websites/Digital: CNET, ZDNet, GameSpot, Metacritic, Bleacher Report
  • International: Channel 5 (UK), Network 10 (Australia), Telefe (Argentina), Chilevisión (Chile)
  • Theatrical: Ownership stakes in cinema ventures like Showcase Cinemas and UCI Cinemas (Brazil).

\ This combined entity would be a behemoth, essentially merging the historic studios and content libraries of Warner Bros., HBO, Paramount, CBS, and the massive unscripted/cable library of Discovery and Viacom, creating a single, enormous competitor to companies like Disney and Netflix.

The new titans

If David Ellison's acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) succeeds, the Ellison family empire will be significantly larger than the Murdoch family empire by nearly every financial and operational metric.

\ While the Murdochs have been the dominant media dynasty for decades, this deal would mark the official passing of the torch to a new, tech-backed dynasty.

\ Here is the breakdown of how the two "empires" compare in terms of Wealth, Media Scale, and Influence.

Financial Firepower (Net Worth)

The most staggering difference is in the raw capital backing the two families. David Ellison’s ambitions are supported by the immense wealth of his father, Larry Ellison (Oracle founder).

\

  • The Ellison Family:
  • Net Worth: ~$360 Billion+ (Larry Ellison is currently ranked the world’s #2 richest person as of late 2025).
  • Source: Primary wealth is derived from Oracle (Market Cap ~$620 Billion). This tech wealth allows them to make all-cash offers that legacy media families cannot match.
  • The Murdoch Family:
  • Net Worth: ~$24 Billion (Rupert Murdoch & Family).
  • Source: Derived from Fox Corp and News Corp. While incredibly wealthy, they lack the "sovereign nation" level of capital that the Ellisons possess.

\ Winner: Ellison (by a factor of ~15x)

Media Footprint (Revenue & Assets)

If David Ellison combines Paramount Skydance with Warner Bros. Discovery, he creates a media giant that dwarfs the current Murdoch holdings (which were significantly reduced after they sold 21st Century Fox to Disney in 2019).

\

| Metric | Hypothetical Ellison Media Empire | Current Murdoch Empire | |----|----|----| | Primary Entities | Paramount + Warner Bros. Discovery | Fox Corp + News Corp | | Est. Annual Revenue | ~$70 Billion *(~$30B Paramount + \~$40B WBD)* | ~$27 Billion *(\~$16.5B Fox + \~$10.5B News Corp)* | | Key Studios | Warner Bros., Paramount Pictures, Skydance | None (Sold 20th Century Fox to Disney) | | Streaming | HBO Max, Paramount+, Pluto TV | Tubi, Fox Nation | | Cable News | CNN | Fox News |

\ Winner: Ellison (by a factor of ~2.5x)

\

  • The Difference: The Murdochs are now primarily a News & Sports business. The Ellison entity would be a Content Engine controlling the two most historic film studios in Hollywood and a massive streaming portfolio.

\

Cultural & Political Influence

This is the only category where the contest remains competitive. \n

  • The Murdoch Empire: Despite being smaller financially, the Murdochs arguably retain more direct political influence in the US and UK through Fox News, The Wall Street Journal, The New York Post, and The Times (UK). They shape the daily political conversation in a way entertainment studios do not.
  • The Ellison Empire: This new entity would control culture. By owning the DC Universe, Harry Potter, Star Trek, Mission: Impossible, and HBO, they control the stories the world watches. Additionally, owning CNN and CBS News gives them a massive news footprint, though these networks typically wield less partisan power than Fox News.

Summary

The Ellison Empire is the clear victor in size. The era of the "media mogul" who built a fortune solely on newspapers and TV stations (like Murdoch or Redstone) is effectively over. The Ellison empire represents the new era: Tech-funded media consolidation. Think Elon Musk and X/Twitter, or Jeff Bezos and Washington Post. \n

With a $108 billion enterprise value on the WBD deal alone, David Ellison isn't just building a media company; he is buying a legacy that took the Warner, Paramount, and Redstone families a century to build, and he is doing it with a checkbook the Murdochs can no longer match.

\n

\

Piyasa Fırsatı
CreatorBid Logosu
CreatorBid Fiyatı(BID)
$0.02819
$0.02819$0.02819
-1.98%
USD
CreatorBid (BID) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen [email protected] ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

The post SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a pivotal week for crypto infrastructure, the Solana network
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:44
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41