The post Gymnast MyKayla Skinner Calls For A Transgender Ban — Why Her Message Is Misguided appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. -TOKYO,JAPAN July 24, 2021: USAs Mykayla Skinner competes on the beam in the womens team qualifying at the 2020 Tokyo Olympics. (Wally Skalij /Los Angeles Times via Getty Images) Los Angeles Times via Getty Images Former U.S. gymnast and Olympic silver medalist MyKayla Skinner has rejoined the global conversation surrounding transgender athlete participation in sports. In a Dec. 2 interview with The Daily Wire, an American conservative media outlet founded by Ben Shapiro, Skinner called for the International Olympic Committee (IOC) to formally ban transgender participants. “It shouldn’t even be an issue. I couldn’t imagine having to compete against a male and getting medals stripped,” Skinner told Daily Wire reporter Lynden Blake. “Especially having a daughter, she’s gonna be raised in this next generation, and I want her to have an even playing field like I had. Like we all had on the (2020) Olympic team.” Skinner first joined the hotbed conversation in June 2025, reacting to the online feud between anti-trans conservative activist Riley Gaines and seven-time Olympic gold medalist Simone Biles. When Skinner witnessed Biles’ interaction with Gaines last June, she was “heartbroken” and felt compelled to speak out in support of the conservative activist. “When that happened, I thought: ‘You know what? It’s time for me to stand up and support Riley,’” Skinner said. Since the June 2025 spar with Biles, Skinner has aligned her public interests with anti-trans advocacy. In October, she partnered with XX-XY Athletics, an athletic apparel brand founded by former U.S. elite gymnast Jennifer Sey. The company prides itself on being “the only brand standing up for female athletes and the protection of women’s sports.” Skinner’s demand for “even playing field” is rooted in the widespread anxiety among female athletes about unfair competition. Brands are “selling out women for wokeness,” the company claims.… The post Gymnast MyKayla Skinner Calls For A Transgender Ban — Why Her Message Is Misguided appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. -TOKYO,JAPAN July 24, 2021: USAs Mykayla Skinner competes on the beam in the womens team qualifying at the 2020 Tokyo Olympics. (Wally Skalij /Los Angeles Times via Getty Images) Los Angeles Times via Getty Images Former U.S. gymnast and Olympic silver medalist MyKayla Skinner has rejoined the global conversation surrounding transgender athlete participation in sports. In a Dec. 2 interview with The Daily Wire, an American conservative media outlet founded by Ben Shapiro, Skinner called for the International Olympic Committee (IOC) to formally ban transgender participants. “It shouldn’t even be an issue. I couldn’t imagine having to compete against a male and getting medals stripped,” Skinner told Daily Wire reporter Lynden Blake. “Especially having a daughter, she’s gonna be raised in this next generation, and I want her to have an even playing field like I had. Like we all had on the (2020) Olympic team.” Skinner first joined the hotbed conversation in June 2025, reacting to the online feud between anti-trans conservative activist Riley Gaines and seven-time Olympic gold medalist Simone Biles. When Skinner witnessed Biles’ interaction with Gaines last June, she was “heartbroken” and felt compelled to speak out in support of the conservative activist. “When that happened, I thought: ‘You know what? It’s time for me to stand up and support Riley,’” Skinner said. Since the June 2025 spar with Biles, Skinner has aligned her public interests with anti-trans advocacy. In October, she partnered with XX-XY Athletics, an athletic apparel brand founded by former U.S. elite gymnast Jennifer Sey. The company prides itself on being “the only brand standing up for female athletes and the protection of women’s sports.” Skinner’s demand for “even playing field” is rooted in the widespread anxiety among female athletes about unfair competition. Brands are “selling out women for wokeness,” the company claims.…

Gymnast MyKayla Skinner Calls For A Transgender Ban — Why Her Message Is Misguided

2025/12/09 09:03

-TOKYO,JAPAN July 24, 2021: USAs Mykayla Skinner competes on the beam in the womens team qualifying at the 2020 Tokyo Olympics. (Wally Skalij /Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)

Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

Former U.S. gymnast and Olympic silver medalist MyKayla Skinner has rejoined the global conversation surrounding transgender athlete participation in sports.

In a Dec. 2 interview with The Daily Wire, an American conservative media outlet founded by Ben Shapiro, Skinner called for the International Olympic Committee (IOC) to formally ban transgender participants.

“It shouldn’t even be an issue. I couldn’t imagine having to compete against a male and getting medals stripped,” Skinner told Daily Wire reporter Lynden Blake. “Especially having a daughter, she’s gonna be raised in this next generation, and I want her to have an even playing field like I had. Like we all had on the (2020) Olympic team.”

Skinner first joined the hotbed conversation in June 2025, reacting to the online feud between anti-trans conservative activist Riley Gaines and seven-time Olympic gold medalist Simone Biles. When Skinner witnessed Biles’ interaction with Gaines last June, she was “heartbroken” and felt compelled to speak out in support of the conservative activist.

“When that happened, I thought: ‘You know what? It’s time for me to stand up and support Riley,’” Skinner said.

Since the June 2025 spar with Biles, Skinner has aligned her public interests with anti-trans advocacy. In October, she partnered with XX-XY Athletics, an athletic apparel brand founded by former U.S. elite gymnast Jennifer Sey.

The company prides itself on being “the only brand standing up for female athletes and the protection of women’s sports.” Skinner’s demand for “even playing field” is rooted in the widespread anxiety among female athletes about unfair competition.

Brands are “selling out women for wokeness,” the company claims.

Though the former gymnasts continue to campaign for the sexual segregation of transgender athletes, their comments on their own sport, gymnastics, are ironic.

Skinner discussed the gendered reality in an opinion piece with Fox News. “In Olympic gymnastics, women do not compete on the rings. Why? Because men are stronger than women, and events are designed around physiological realities. It’s that simple.”

It’s actually not that simple.

The fact is: artistic gymnastics is a heavily gendered sport and exceptionally inaccessible to transgender athletes as a result. Many researchers accordingly label the sport of gymnastics as “sex segregated.” Why? Men’s and women’s gymnastics – despite their shared ‘gymnastic’ umbrella – are fundamentally different sports.

Experts argue the distinction began with aesthetics, not “physiological realities.”

Women’s Gymnastics Events As ‘Pedestals’

As in most Olympic disciplines, only men were permitted to compete in gymnastics at an Olympic game. Making its debut as an Olympic sport held 1896, gymnastics has evolved dramatically over the last century.

The IOC would not officially add floor exercise until 1930 and vault in 1934. Bizarrely, the all-around title used to include track and field events, swimming, weightlifting, and potentially rope climbing (FIG).

Women first entered the equation at the 1928 Olympics, competing on an event reminiscent to today’s floor exercise. The 1934 World Championships marked the first participation of both genders as a world event.

“Despite men and women having trained the same things side by side…segregation of sexes on the events was there from the beginning,” the FIG shares.

Dr. Georgia Cervin, a former New Zealand national team member and researcher, reports that women trained on the same events as men. “As late as the interwar era, women practiced Parallel Bars, Rings, Horizontal Bar and Pommel Horse.”

However, the sport’s governing bodies acted to separate the genders due to “stereotypes,” Cervin added. While the men’s events served to showcase the stereotypically male traits: strength and power, women’s gymnastics events would serve as pedestals: vessels for women to be observed by spectators.

(GERMANY OUT) Die tschechische Kunstturnerin Vera Caslavska während ihrer Kür auf dem Schwebebalken. . (Photo by Alert/ullstein bild via Getty Images)

ullstein bild via Getty Images

Picture this: a 16 foot-long suspended plank, hoisted four feet above the ground, under a spotlight and on display for a crowd of thousands (I’m describing the women’s balance beam). “Secondary sources suggest that both of these apparatuses promoted a style of movement where women ‘’posed’ on the apparatus, to be observed in their grace and beauty,” Cervin said.

The imposed adaptations in women’s events reinforced stereotypes of women as “weaker” and “smaller” while simultaneously avoiding “any invitation of direct comparison between the performances of men and women.”

Just like that, women’s gymnastics was born. Though its origins were steeped in heavily stereotypical undertones, Cervin argues that these foundations inadvertently helped the sport gain legitimacy faster than competing women’s sports.

“The IOC accepted Women’s Artistic Gymnastics because it was one of the few sports considered appropriate for women,” Cervin said.

“This was because it emphasized feminine traits like passivity, grace and beauty. The FIG thus promoted apparatuses and performances that demonstrated the feminine character of the sport.”

As a result, two different sports of gymnastics came to fruition. Due to their foundations, men’s and women’s gymnastics became inherently different “For better or worse, women were classed apart, and their apparatus destined to be different than men,” the International Gymnastics Federation states.

These categorical differences led to logical differing physiological requirements for each sport – after all, serving a volleyball requires a different skillset than competing a tumbling pass. The International Society of Biomechanics in Sports (ISBS) has long documented the fundamental physiological split that makes MAG and WAG two distinct disciplines.

For example, research led by Jürgen Krug of the Universität Leipzig found that, on the high bar apparatus, men endure forces of up to 6-7 times their body weight, compared to 4-5 times body weight for women (on the uneven bars).

Further, transgender athlete participation in gymnastics has not affected the sport on an Olympic or elite level throughout its storied history. Why? Most men’s and women’s gymnastics events are categorically different. Essentially, an athlete transitioning to compete in the gendered counterpart would have to learn a new sport.

Two Sports, One Label

Today, Men’s Artistic gymnasts (MAG) compete on six events, while women’s artistic gymnasts (WAG) compete on four. Though both categories include vault and floor exercise, the two disciplines are fundamentally different in their composition.

MAG: Vault, Parallel Bars, High Bar, Pommel Horse, Still Rings, Floor Exercise

WAG: Vault, Uneven Bars, Balance Beam, Floor Exercise

DeVeau’s School of Gymnastics, a U.S. training facility that has produced an Olympian and numerous elite athletes, describes the gymnastics events on their gym website. Though both men and women compete on floor – take note of the differences:

  • Men’s Floor Exercise: “Athletes perform a routine that combines powerful tumbling passes with strength elements.”
  • Women’s Floor Exercise: “Women’s floor routines blend tumbling passes with dance and choreography, showcasing artistry and athleticism.”

Men’s gymnastic disciplines focus almost entirely on immense strength, power, and agility, while women’s events combine strength with balance, artistry, and showmanship. Concurrently, Texas A&M University School of Law describes the sport as a sport in which “individuals perform optional and prescribed acrobatic feats.”

The prescriptions are often very different for the male and female categories.

Philippines’ Carlos Edriel Yulo competes in the artistic gymnastics men’s vault final during the Paris 2024 Olympic Games at the Bercy Arena in Paris, on August 4, 2024. (Photo by Lionel BONAVENTURE / AFP) (Photo by LIONEL BONAVENTURE/AFP via Getty Images)

AFP via Getty Images

Recent political moves by the Trump Administration also prohibit transgender participation at the highest levels. On July 21, 2025, the USOPC altered its “athlete safety policy,” effectively banning transgender athletes from women’s sports.

The USOPC’s move to change the policy was an effort to “ensure that women have a fair and safe competition environment consistent” with President Trump’s executive order from earlier that year. The USOPC then sent a letter to national governing bodies – including USA Gymnastics – notifying them of the need to change their policies “to comply with federal expectations.”

Thus, because of gymnastics’ highly gendered foundations and USA Gymnastics’ adherence to USOPC guidelines, transgender athlete participation at the elite level is incredibly rare. Despite Skinner and Sey’s many concerns for their sport, their fears pertaining to the sport of gymnastics are largely misguided.

NAIGC As A Safe Haven

Conversely, transgender athletes compete freely at the club level in the National Association of Intercollegiate Gymnastics Clubs (NAIGC). The organizational motto, “For the Love of the Sport,” highlights the commitment to “expanding opportunities for adult gymnastics and pushing the boundaries of the sport.”

The NAIGC is open to gymnasts of age 17 and above (there’s no age limit), and “any single competitor, regardless of gender identity, is able to compete on a selection of apparatus from among those disciplines.” Associated Press reporter Will Graves highlighted the NAIGC and its diverse competitors in a feature in early 2025.

“(We want) people to be able to continue doing gymnastics into adulthood in a way that feels comfortable and safe and supportive for them,” the NAIGC’s director of operations told Graves. At the core of athletic participation – for any and all athletes – is the love of their sport. For the NAIGC’s athletes, this reality is the bottom line. It’s not about winning or defeating their competitors.

As for Skinner and Sey’s concerns, NAIGC athletes think the reaction is overblown. After all, “we deserve to be in the sports that we love.”

“Certain people want to convince people that this is a big issue and people are losing their (minds),” a 49-year-old NAIGC athlete said. “But it’s not like that. Other groups can be uptight about that if they want. But in this group, it’s about the love of the sport.

“If you love the sport, then do the sport and have fun, no matter who you are.”

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/carolineprice/2025/12/08/gymnast-mykayla-skinner-calls-for-a-transgender-ban—why-her-message-is-misguided/

Piyasa Fırsatı
Comedian Logosu
Comedian Fiyatı(BAN)
$0.07051
$0.07051$0.07051
+0.97%
USD
Comedian (BAN) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen [email protected] ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

Trump-Backed WLFI Plunges 58% – Buyback Plan Announced to Halt Freefall

Trump-Backed WLFI Plunges 58% – Buyback Plan Announced to Halt Freefall

World Liberty Financial (WLFI), the Trump-linked DeFi project, is scrambling to stop a market collapse after its token lost over 50% of its value in September. On Friday, the project unveiled a full buyback-and-burn program, directing all treasury liquidity fees to absorb selling pressure. According to a governance post on X, the community approved the plan overwhelmingly, with WLFI pledging full transparency for every burn. The urgency of the move reflects WLFI’s steep losses in recent weeks. WLFI is trading Friday at $0.19, down from its September 1 peak of $0.46, according to CoinMarketCap, a 58% drop in less than a month. Weekly losses stand at 12.85%, with a 15.45% decline for the month. This isn’t the project’s first attempt at intervention. Just days after launch, WLFI burned 47 million tokens on September 3 to counter a 31% sell-off, sending the supply to a verified burn address. For World Liberty Financial, the buyback-and-burn program represents both a damage-control measure and a test of community faith. While tokenomics adjustments can provide short-term relief, the project will need to convince investors that WLFI has staying power beyond interventions. WLFI Launches Buyback-and-Burn Plan, Linking Token Scarcity to Platform Growth According to the governance proposal, WLFI will use fees generated from its protocol-owned liquidity (POL) pools on Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Solana to repurchase tokens from the open market. Once bought back, the tokens will be sent to a burn address, permanently removing them from circulation.WLFI Proposal Source: WLFI The project stressed that this system ties supply reduction directly to platform growth. As trading activity rises, more liquidity fees are generated, fueling larger buybacks and burns. This seeks to create a feedback loop where adoption drives scarcity, and scarcity strengthens token value. Importantly, the plan applies only to WLFI’s protocol-controlled liquidity pools. Community and third-party liquidity pools remain unaffected, ensuring the mechanism doesn’t interfere with external ecosystem contributions. In its proposal, the WLFI team argued that the strategy aligns long-term holders with the project’s future by systematically reducing supply and discouraging short-term speculation. Each burn increases the relative stake of committed investors, reinforcing confidence in WLFI’s tokenomics. To bolster credibility, WLFI has pledged full transparency: every buyback and burn will be verifiable on-chain and reported to the community in real time. WLFI Joins Hyperliquid, Jupiter, and Sky as Buyback Craze Spills Into Wall Street WLFI’s decision to adopt a full buyback-and-burn strategy places it among the most ambitious tokenomic models in crypto. While partly a response to its sharp September price decline, the move also reflects a trend of DeFi protocols leveraging revenue streams to cut supply, align incentives, and strengthen token value. Hyperliquid illustrates the model at scale. Nearly all of its platform fees are funneled into automated $HYPE buybacks via its Assistance Fund, creating sustained demand. By mid-2025, more than 20 million tokens had been repurchased, with nearly 30 million held by Q3, worth over $1.5 billion. This consistency both increased scarcity and cemented Hyperliquid’s dominance in decentralized derivatives. Other protocols have adopted variations. Jupiter directs half its fees into $JUP repurchases, locking tokens for three years. Raydium earmarks 12% of fees for $RAY buybacks, already removing 71 million tokens, roughly a quarter of the circulating supply. Burn-based models push further, as seen with Sky, which has spent $75 million since February 2025 to permanently erase $SKY tokens, boosting scarcity and governance influence. But the buyback phenomenon isn’t limited to DeFi. Increasingly, listed companies with crypto treasuries are adopting aggressive repurchase programs, sometimes to offset losses as their digital assets decline. According to a report, at least seven firms, ranging from gaming to biotech, have turned to buybacks, often funded by debt, to prop up falling stock prices. One of the latest is Thumzup Media, a digital advertising company with a growing Web3 footprint. On Thursday, it launched a $10 million share repurchase plan, extending its capital return strategy through 2026, after completing a $1 million program that saw 212,432 shares bought at an average of $4.71. DeFi Development Corp, the first public company built around a Solana-based treasury strategy, also recently expanded its buyback program to $100 million, up from $1 million, making it one of the largest stock repurchase initiatives in the digital asset sector. Together, these cases show how buybacks, whether in tokenomics or equities, are emerging as a key mechanism for stabilizing value and signaling confidence, even as motivations and execution vary widely
Paylaş
CryptoNews2025/09/26 19:12
Son of filmmaker Rob Reiner charged with homicide for death of his parents

Son of filmmaker Rob Reiner charged with homicide for death of his parents

FILE PHOTO: Rob Reiner, director of "The Princess Bride," arrives for a special 25th anniversary viewing of the film during the New York Film Festival in New York
Paylaş
Rappler2025/12/16 09:59
Bitcoin Peak Coming in 45 Days? BTC Price To Reach $150K

Bitcoin Peak Coming in 45 Days? BTC Price To Reach $150K

The post Bitcoin Peak Coming in 45 Days? BTC Price To Reach $150K appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Bitcoin has delivered one of its strongest performances in recent months, jumping from September lows of $108K to over $117K today. But while excitement is high, market watchers warn the clock is ticking.  History shows Bitcoin peaks don’t last forever, and analysts now believe the next major top could arrive within just 45 days, with …
Paylaş
CoinPedia2025/09/18 15:49