Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently launched Kohaku, a privacy and compliance solution, which is quite interesting. The key difference is that it differs from previous solutions like Tornado and Railgun, employing ZooKeeper and elliptic curve cryptography generation techniques. In simple terms, in the past, when Alice initiated an on-chain transfer to Bob's public address, everyone could see that Bob received the money. Now, Bob will generate a "one-time temporary address" to receive funds. Bob can legally use this money, but no one will know that the money belongs to Bob. Previous privacy solutions, such as Tornado, Railgun, and Aztec, used coin mixing or ZK solutions, where all the money was routed into a black box. Because the box had a large transaction capacity, the actual transfer path of the money was no longer visible. Kohaku's privacy solution involves Bob generating a Stealth Meta-Address master key. When receiving payments, a temporary, one-time receiving address is randomly generated (based on elliptic curve cryptography). Everyone can see that money has been received at this temporary address, but the address is invalidated after it is used up. Bob, who actually owns the master key, can control the money and claim it at some point in the future. To put it in a more abstract technical way: Bob's wallet permanently stores a master stealth key pair (public key + private key). When Alice transfers money to Bob, Alice/Bob's wallet generates a one-time temporary private key. Using Bob's public key and this temporary private key, an elliptic curve algorithm is performed to calculate a shared secret. This secret is then used to derive a completely new and entirely random one-time address. When Alice transfers money to this address, no one on the blockchain can tell it's related to Bob, but Bob can easily control the money using his master key and private key. above. It seems that only elliptic curve cryptography is needed, and it has nothing to do with ZK. However, if you use Kohaku technology to transfer money to a compliant institution, you may be required to attach a ZK proof to prove the source and true identity of the money, but at the same time you don't want to expose your privacy. This is where lightweight ZK verification comes in handy. Therefore, the combination of elliptic curve cryptography and ZooKeeper (ZK) technology has upgraded anonymity solutions into compliant privacy protection solutions. Consider the past: why were coin mixing pool solutions blocked? Because absolute "anonymity" provided opportunities for money laundering and other malicious activities. The combination of privacy addresses and ZK technology is the optimal solution to meet regulatory trends. Believe in somETHing!Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently launched Kohaku, a privacy and compliance solution, which is quite interesting. The key difference is that it differs from previous solutions like Tornado and Railgun, employing ZooKeeper and elliptic curve cryptography generation techniques. In simple terms, in the past, when Alice initiated an on-chain transfer to Bob's public address, everyone could see that Bob received the money. Now, Bob will generate a "one-time temporary address" to receive funds. Bob can legally use this money, but no one will know that the money belongs to Bob. Previous privacy solutions, such as Tornado, Railgun, and Aztec, used coin mixing or ZK solutions, where all the money was routed into a black box. Because the box had a large transaction capacity, the actual transfer path of the money was no longer visible. Kohaku's privacy solution involves Bob generating a Stealth Meta-Address master key. When receiving payments, a temporary, one-time receiving address is randomly generated (based on elliptic curve cryptography). Everyone can see that money has been received at this temporary address, but the address is invalidated after it is used up. Bob, who actually owns the master key, can control the money and claim it at some point in the future. To put it in a more abstract technical way: Bob's wallet permanently stores a master stealth key pair (public key + private key). When Alice transfers money to Bob, Alice/Bob's wallet generates a one-time temporary private key. Using Bob's public key and this temporary private key, an elliptic curve algorithm is performed to calculate a shared secret. This secret is then used to derive a completely new and entirely random one-time address. When Alice transfers money to this address, no one on the blockchain can tell it's related to Bob, but Bob can easily control the money using his master key and private key. above. It seems that only elliptic curve cryptography is needed, and it has nothing to do with ZK. However, if you use Kohaku technology to transfer money to a compliant institution, you may be required to attach a ZK proof to prove the source and true identity of the money, but at the same time you don't want to expose your privacy. This is where lightweight ZK verification comes in handy. Therefore, the combination of elliptic curve cryptography and ZooKeeper (ZK) technology has upgraded anonymity solutions into compliant privacy protection solutions. Consider the past: why were coin mixing pool solutions blocked? Because absolute "anonymity" provided opportunities for money laundering and other malicious activities. The combination of privacy addresses and ZK technology is the optimal solution to meet regulatory trends. Believe in somETHing!

Analysis of Kohaku, the Regulatory-Friendly Privacy Solution Launched by Vitalik Buterin

2025/11/18 18:00

Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently launched Kohaku, a privacy and compliance solution, which is quite interesting. The key difference is that it differs from previous solutions like Tornado and Railgun, employing ZooKeeper and elliptic curve cryptography generation techniques.

In simple terms, in the past, when Alice initiated an on-chain transfer to Bob's public address, everyone could see that Bob received the money. Now, Bob will generate a "one-time temporary address" to receive funds. Bob can legally use this money, but no one will know that the money belongs to Bob.

Previous privacy solutions, such as Tornado, Railgun, and Aztec, used coin mixing or ZK solutions, where all the money was routed into a black box. Because the box had a large transaction capacity, the actual transfer path of the money was no longer visible.

Kohaku's privacy solution involves Bob generating a Stealth Meta-Address master key. When receiving payments, a temporary, one-time receiving address is randomly generated (based on elliptic curve cryptography). Everyone can see that money has been received at this temporary address, but the address is invalidated after it is used up. Bob, who actually owns the master key, can control the money and claim it at some point in the future.

To put it in a more abstract technical way: Bob's wallet permanently stores a master stealth key pair (public key + private key). When Alice transfers money to Bob, Alice/Bob's wallet generates a one-time temporary private key. Using Bob's public key and this temporary private key, an elliptic curve algorithm is performed to calculate a shared secret. This secret is then used to derive a completely new and entirely random one-time address. When Alice transfers money to this address, no one on the blockchain can tell it's related to Bob, but Bob can easily control the money using his master key and private key.

above.

It seems that only elliptic curve cryptography is needed, and it has nothing to do with ZK. However, if you use Kohaku technology to transfer money to a compliant institution, you may be required to attach a ZK proof to prove the source and true identity of the money, but at the same time you don't want to expose your privacy. This is where lightweight ZK verification comes in handy.

Therefore, the combination of elliptic curve cryptography and ZooKeeper (ZK) technology has upgraded anonymity solutions into compliant privacy protection solutions. Consider the past: why were coin mixing pool solutions blocked? Because absolute "anonymity" provided opportunities for money laundering and other malicious activities. The combination of privacy addresses and ZK technology is the optimal solution to meet regulatory trends.

Believe in somETHing!

Piyasa Fırsatı
Wink Logosu
Wink Fiyatı(LIKE)
$0.003897
$0.003897$0.003897
+3.64%
USD
Wink (LIKE) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen [email protected] ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

Trump-Backed WLFI Plunges 58% – Buyback Plan Announced to Halt Freefall

Trump-Backed WLFI Plunges 58% – Buyback Plan Announced to Halt Freefall

World Liberty Financial (WLFI), the Trump-linked DeFi project, is scrambling to stop a market collapse after its token lost over 50% of its value in September. On Friday, the project unveiled a full buyback-and-burn program, directing all treasury liquidity fees to absorb selling pressure. According to a governance post on X, the community approved the plan overwhelmingly, with WLFI pledging full transparency for every burn. The urgency of the move reflects WLFI’s steep losses in recent weeks. WLFI is trading Friday at $0.19, down from its September 1 peak of $0.46, according to CoinMarketCap, a 58% drop in less than a month. Weekly losses stand at 12.85%, with a 15.45% decline for the month. This isn’t the project’s first attempt at intervention. Just days after launch, WLFI burned 47 million tokens on September 3 to counter a 31% sell-off, sending the supply to a verified burn address. For World Liberty Financial, the buyback-and-burn program represents both a damage-control measure and a test of community faith. While tokenomics adjustments can provide short-term relief, the project will need to convince investors that WLFI has staying power beyond interventions. WLFI Launches Buyback-and-Burn Plan, Linking Token Scarcity to Platform Growth According to the governance proposal, WLFI will use fees generated from its protocol-owned liquidity (POL) pools on Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Solana to repurchase tokens from the open market. Once bought back, the tokens will be sent to a burn address, permanently removing them from circulation.WLFI Proposal Source: WLFI The project stressed that this system ties supply reduction directly to platform growth. As trading activity rises, more liquidity fees are generated, fueling larger buybacks and burns. This seeks to create a feedback loop where adoption drives scarcity, and scarcity strengthens token value. Importantly, the plan applies only to WLFI’s protocol-controlled liquidity pools. Community and third-party liquidity pools remain unaffected, ensuring the mechanism doesn’t interfere with external ecosystem contributions. In its proposal, the WLFI team argued that the strategy aligns long-term holders with the project’s future by systematically reducing supply and discouraging short-term speculation. Each burn increases the relative stake of committed investors, reinforcing confidence in WLFI’s tokenomics. To bolster credibility, WLFI has pledged full transparency: every buyback and burn will be verifiable on-chain and reported to the community in real time. WLFI Joins Hyperliquid, Jupiter, and Sky as Buyback Craze Spills Into Wall Street WLFI’s decision to adopt a full buyback-and-burn strategy places it among the most ambitious tokenomic models in crypto. While partly a response to its sharp September price decline, the move also reflects a trend of DeFi protocols leveraging revenue streams to cut supply, align incentives, and strengthen token value. Hyperliquid illustrates the model at scale. Nearly all of its platform fees are funneled into automated $HYPE buybacks via its Assistance Fund, creating sustained demand. By mid-2025, more than 20 million tokens had been repurchased, with nearly 30 million held by Q3, worth over $1.5 billion. This consistency both increased scarcity and cemented Hyperliquid’s dominance in decentralized derivatives. Other protocols have adopted variations. Jupiter directs half its fees into $JUP repurchases, locking tokens for three years. Raydium earmarks 12% of fees for $RAY buybacks, already removing 71 million tokens, roughly a quarter of the circulating supply. Burn-based models push further, as seen with Sky, which has spent $75 million since February 2025 to permanently erase $SKY tokens, boosting scarcity and governance influence. But the buyback phenomenon isn’t limited to DeFi. Increasingly, listed companies with crypto treasuries are adopting aggressive repurchase programs, sometimes to offset losses as their digital assets decline. According to a report, at least seven firms, ranging from gaming to biotech, have turned to buybacks, often funded by debt, to prop up falling stock prices. One of the latest is Thumzup Media, a digital advertising company with a growing Web3 footprint. On Thursday, it launched a $10 million share repurchase plan, extending its capital return strategy through 2026, after completing a $1 million program that saw 212,432 shares bought at an average of $4.71. DeFi Development Corp, the first public company built around a Solana-based treasury strategy, also recently expanded its buyback program to $100 million, up from $1 million, making it one of the largest stock repurchase initiatives in the digital asset sector. Together, these cases show how buybacks, whether in tokenomics or equities, are emerging as a key mechanism for stabilizing value and signaling confidence, even as motivations and execution vary widely
Paylaş
CryptoNews2025/09/26 19:12
Son of filmmaker Rob Reiner charged with homicide for death of his parents

Son of filmmaker Rob Reiner charged with homicide for death of his parents

FILE PHOTO: Rob Reiner, director of "The Princess Bride," arrives for a special 25th anniversary viewing of the film during the New York Film Festival in New York
Paylaş
Rappler2025/12/16 09:59
Bitcoin Peak Coming in 45 Days? BTC Price To Reach $150K

Bitcoin Peak Coming in 45 Days? BTC Price To Reach $150K

The post Bitcoin Peak Coming in 45 Days? BTC Price To Reach $150K appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Bitcoin has delivered one of its strongest performances in recent months, jumping from September lows of $108K to over $117K today. But while excitement is high, market watchers warn the clock is ticking.  History shows Bitcoin peaks don’t last forever, and analysts now believe the next major top could arrive within just 45 days, with …
Paylaş
CoinPedia2025/09/18 15:49