Written by Eric, Foresight News After the US market closed on the 30th, local time, Strategy, the first company to publicly trade Bitcoin DAT, released its third-quarter financial report. The report showed that Strategy's third-quarter revenue was $3.9 billion, net profit was $2.8 billion, and diluted earnings per share were $8.42. As of October 26, 2025, local time, Strategy held 640,808 Bitcoins, with a total value of $47.44 billion, and the cost per Bitcoin rose to $74,032. Year-to-date Bitcoin yielded 26% in 2025, generating $12.9 billion in revenue. Strategy CFO Andrew Kang stated that based on a year-end Bitcoin price forecast of $150,000, Strategy's full-year 2025 operating revenue is projected at $34 billion, net profit at $24 billion, and diluted earnings per share of $80. Strategy's Bitcoin-related data is largely public and unlikely to cause significant market reaction. However, based on today's Bitcoin price rebound and the company's optimistic outlook, Strategy's stock price rebounded both yesterday after hours and today before opening. As of writing, the MSTR price has rebounded from yesterday's closing price of $254.57 to around $272.65 pre-market. According to its financial report, Strategy raised a total of $5.1 billion in net proceeds through its common stock, STRK, STRF, SRD, and STRC share offerings in the three months ending September 30, and as of October 26, Strategy still had $42.1 billion in available funding. It's worth noting that Bitcoin's current price is more than 40% higher than its year-to-date low, while MSTR's closing price yesterday was only about 6% lower than its year-to-date low. Although yesterday's after-hours and today's pre-market price movements suggest that the market still approves of the earnings report in the short term, investors are actually beginning to have concerns about Strategy, or rather, DAT's business model. mNAV is nearing the brink of death. According to StrategyTracker data, Strategy's mNAV (market capitalization to the total value of its Bitcoin holdings) has reached 1.04. Even when calculated based on diluted shares, the figure is only 1.16, very close to 1. If mNAV reaches 1 or even falls below 1, it means that buying the company's stock is no longer as valuable as directly purchasing the corresponding cryptocurrency. During its earnings call at the end of July, Strategy pledged that it would not issue new MSTR common stock when the mNAV was below 2.5 times unless it was to pay preferred stock dividends or debt interest. However, just two weeks later, it removed this restriction and added a conditional exception clause in its 8-K filing: "If the company believes that an issuance is beneficial, it may continue to issue shares when the mNAV is below 2.5 times." In its recent financial report, Strategy also reinterpreted the rules for issuing common stock ATMs: While issuing common stock when mNAV is below 2.5 still prioritizes debt interest payments and preferred stock dividends, the reality is that it's now possible to finance Bitcoin purchases using common stock ATMs when mNAV is below 2.5, and financing methods for purchasing Bitcoin are no longer limited to common stock ATMs. Strategy calculates an mNAV of 1.25 in its official data, higher than third-party statistics. Although Strategy's calculation method is more complex, ordinary investors actually value the ratio of total market capitalization to the total value of their Bitcoin holdings, which is 1.04. Furthermore, Strategy has reserved the possibility of adjusting the mNAV baseline, which undoubtedly adds more variables. Strategy purchased 81,785, 69,140, and 42,706 Bitcoins in the first three quarters of this year, respectively. The continuous rise in Bitcoin's price was accompanied by a gradual decrease in purchases, indicating that Strategy had already foreseen the potential problems. If Strategy's mNAV falls below 1, it could significantly impact the overall value of DAT. A few days ago, ETHZilla, the Ethereum DAT company, opted to sell $40 million worth of Ethereum for a share buyback, aiming to boost its mNAV. On the same day, Metaplanet, the world's second-largest Bitcoin DAT company and a Japanese listed company, also announced a share buyback plan. Although this plan doesn't involve selling its Bitcoin holdings, the pressure on mNAV has already caused the world's two largest publicly disclosed Bitcoin buyers to slow down their purchases. Removed from the Nasdaq 100 index? During the US stock market trading session last night Beijing time, some investors in the Web3 community speculated that Strategy might be removed from the Nasdaq 100 index by the end of this year due to MSTR's recent weak performance. Strategy was officially selected as a component stock of the Nasdaq 100 index last December, which briefly boosted its stock price to over $500. Although the price of Bitcoin subsequently reached new highs, MSTR did not surpass that high. In reality, the possibility of Strategy being removed from the Nasdaq 100 this year is almost zero. Aside from basic situations such as transforming into a financial company, changing listing location, insufficient liquidity, or violating listing rules, a stock is typically removed from the Nasdaq 100 only if its market capitalization ranking falls directly below 125th or remains outside the top 100, or if its weighting is below 0.1% of the total market capitalization for two consecutive months, and a suitable replacement is available. According to QQQ's holdings, Strategy's current weighting is approximately 0.37%, and its market capitalization has not fallen out of the top 100. The year-end index adjustment is based on data from the end of October, suggesting that Strategy remains safe this year. There was a surge in DAT (Data Technology, Alibaba, Tencent) companies in the market this year, but it's important to note that these companies operate on a market consensus rather than a financial mechanism, and their market capitalization is not necessarily lower than the value of their assets. A good example is an article published by the Daily Economic News in August this year: Sohu, an early internet giant, had a market capitalization that, for a long time, was less than its cash holdings and the value of its office buildings. Strategy can still function for now because new entrants continue to join the game based on DAT's status as the "originator," and it also restrains a large number of vested interests based on its status as the "originator." However, if the market suddenly abandons its acceptance of this "game mechanism," the strategy of investors continuously buying new shares and cashing out at higher prices by maintaining a stable ratio between the company's market capitalization and the value of their Bitcoin holdings will become invalid. The risks involved may be greater than most people imagine. Even if this mechanism continues, the persistently high attention and funding attracted by AI could lead to continued weakness in Bitcoin prices, putting significant pressure on Strategy in the short term. While the continued implementation of the DAT model would have a positive impact on the industry, it's crucial to be vigilant against the short-term risks associated with stress testing. After all, the 2.8 billion profit is just investment income, and there are never any winners in investing.Written by Eric, Foresight News After the US market closed on the 30th, local time, Strategy, the first company to publicly trade Bitcoin DAT, released its third-quarter financial report. The report showed that Strategy's third-quarter revenue was $3.9 billion, net profit was $2.8 billion, and diluted earnings per share were $8.42. As of October 26, 2025, local time, Strategy held 640,808 Bitcoins, with a total value of $47.44 billion, and the cost per Bitcoin rose to $74,032. Year-to-date Bitcoin yielded 26% in 2025, generating $12.9 billion in revenue. Strategy CFO Andrew Kang stated that based on a year-end Bitcoin price forecast of $150,000, Strategy's full-year 2025 operating revenue is projected at $34 billion, net profit at $24 billion, and diluted earnings per share of $80. Strategy's Bitcoin-related data is largely public and unlikely to cause significant market reaction. However, based on today's Bitcoin price rebound and the company's optimistic outlook, Strategy's stock price rebounded both yesterday after hours and today before opening. As of writing, the MSTR price has rebounded from yesterday's closing price of $254.57 to around $272.65 pre-market. According to its financial report, Strategy raised a total of $5.1 billion in net proceeds through its common stock, STRK, STRF, SRD, and STRC share offerings in the three months ending September 30, and as of October 26, Strategy still had $42.1 billion in available funding. It's worth noting that Bitcoin's current price is more than 40% higher than its year-to-date low, while MSTR's closing price yesterday was only about 6% lower than its year-to-date low. Although yesterday's after-hours and today's pre-market price movements suggest that the market still approves of the earnings report in the short term, investors are actually beginning to have concerns about Strategy, or rather, DAT's business model. mNAV is nearing the brink of death. According to StrategyTracker data, Strategy's mNAV (market capitalization to the total value of its Bitcoin holdings) has reached 1.04. Even when calculated based on diluted shares, the figure is only 1.16, very close to 1. If mNAV reaches 1 or even falls below 1, it means that buying the company's stock is no longer as valuable as directly purchasing the corresponding cryptocurrency. During its earnings call at the end of July, Strategy pledged that it would not issue new MSTR common stock when the mNAV was below 2.5 times unless it was to pay preferred stock dividends or debt interest. However, just two weeks later, it removed this restriction and added a conditional exception clause in its 8-K filing: "If the company believes that an issuance is beneficial, it may continue to issue shares when the mNAV is below 2.5 times." In its recent financial report, Strategy also reinterpreted the rules for issuing common stock ATMs: While issuing common stock when mNAV is below 2.5 still prioritizes debt interest payments and preferred stock dividends, the reality is that it's now possible to finance Bitcoin purchases using common stock ATMs when mNAV is below 2.5, and financing methods for purchasing Bitcoin are no longer limited to common stock ATMs. Strategy calculates an mNAV of 1.25 in its official data, higher than third-party statistics. Although Strategy's calculation method is more complex, ordinary investors actually value the ratio of total market capitalization to the total value of their Bitcoin holdings, which is 1.04. Furthermore, Strategy has reserved the possibility of adjusting the mNAV baseline, which undoubtedly adds more variables. Strategy purchased 81,785, 69,140, and 42,706 Bitcoins in the first three quarters of this year, respectively. The continuous rise in Bitcoin's price was accompanied by a gradual decrease in purchases, indicating that Strategy had already foreseen the potential problems. If Strategy's mNAV falls below 1, it could significantly impact the overall value of DAT. A few days ago, ETHZilla, the Ethereum DAT company, opted to sell $40 million worth of Ethereum for a share buyback, aiming to boost its mNAV. On the same day, Metaplanet, the world's second-largest Bitcoin DAT company and a Japanese listed company, also announced a share buyback plan. Although this plan doesn't involve selling its Bitcoin holdings, the pressure on mNAV has already caused the world's two largest publicly disclosed Bitcoin buyers to slow down their purchases. Removed from the Nasdaq 100 index? During the US stock market trading session last night Beijing time, some investors in the Web3 community speculated that Strategy might be removed from the Nasdaq 100 index by the end of this year due to MSTR's recent weak performance. Strategy was officially selected as a component stock of the Nasdaq 100 index last December, which briefly boosted its stock price to over $500. Although the price of Bitcoin subsequently reached new highs, MSTR did not surpass that high. In reality, the possibility of Strategy being removed from the Nasdaq 100 this year is almost zero. Aside from basic situations such as transforming into a financial company, changing listing location, insufficient liquidity, or violating listing rules, a stock is typically removed from the Nasdaq 100 only if its market capitalization ranking falls directly below 125th or remains outside the top 100, or if its weighting is below 0.1% of the total market capitalization for two consecutive months, and a suitable replacement is available. According to QQQ's holdings, Strategy's current weighting is approximately 0.37%, and its market capitalization has not fallen out of the top 100. The year-end index adjustment is based on data from the end of October, suggesting that Strategy remains safe this year. There was a surge in DAT (Data Technology, Alibaba, Tencent) companies in the market this year, but it's important to note that these companies operate on a market consensus rather than a financial mechanism, and their market capitalization is not necessarily lower than the value of their assets. A good example is an article published by the Daily Economic News in August this year: Sohu, an early internet giant, had a market capitalization that, for a long time, was less than its cash holdings and the value of its office buildings. Strategy can still function for now because new entrants continue to join the game based on DAT's status as the "originator," and it also restrains a large number of vested interests based on its status as the "originator." However, if the market suddenly abandons its acceptance of this "game mechanism," the strategy of investors continuously buying new shares and cashing out at higher prices by maintaining a stable ratio between the company's market capitalization and the value of their Bitcoin holdings will become invalid. The risks involved may be greater than most people imagine. Even if this mechanism continues, the persistently high attention and funding attracted by AI could lead to continued weakness in Bitcoin prices, putting significant pressure on Strategy in the short term. While the continued implementation of the DAT model would have a positive impact on the industry, it's crucial to be vigilant against the short-term risks associated with stress testing. After all, the 2.8 billion profit is just investment income, and there are never any winners in investing.

With a net profit of 2.8 billion, Strategy's downward trend cannot be concealed. Is it possible that Strategy will be removed from the Nasdaq 100 index?

2025/11/03 09:30

Written by Eric, Foresight News

After the US market closed on the 30th, local time, Strategy, the first company to publicly trade Bitcoin DAT, released its third-quarter financial report. The report showed that Strategy's third-quarter revenue was $3.9 billion, net profit was $2.8 billion, and diluted earnings per share were $8.42.

As of October 26, 2025, local time, Strategy held 640,808 Bitcoins, with a total value of $47.44 billion, and the cost per Bitcoin rose to $74,032. Year-to-date Bitcoin yielded 26% in 2025, generating $12.9 billion in revenue. Strategy CFO Andrew Kang stated that based on a year-end Bitcoin price forecast of $150,000, Strategy's full-year 2025 operating revenue is projected at $34 billion, net profit at $24 billion, and diluted earnings per share of $80.

Strategy's Bitcoin-related data is largely public and unlikely to cause significant market reaction. However, based on today's Bitcoin price rebound and the company's optimistic outlook, Strategy's stock price rebounded both yesterday after hours and today before opening. As of writing, the MSTR price has rebounded from yesterday's closing price of $254.57 to around $272.65 pre-market.

According to its financial report, Strategy raised a total of $5.1 billion in net proceeds through its common stock, STRK, STRF, SRD, and STRC share offerings in the three months ending September 30, and as of October 26, Strategy still had $42.1 billion in available funding.

It's worth noting that Bitcoin's current price is more than 40% higher than its year-to-date low, while MSTR's closing price yesterday was only about 6% lower than its year-to-date low. Although yesterday's after-hours and today's pre-market price movements suggest that the market still approves of the earnings report in the short term, investors are actually beginning to have concerns about Strategy, or rather, DAT's business model.

mNAV is nearing the brink of death.

According to StrategyTracker data, Strategy's mNAV (market capitalization to the total value of its Bitcoin holdings) has reached 1.04. Even when calculated based on diluted shares, the figure is only 1.16, very close to 1. If mNAV reaches 1 or even falls below 1, it means that buying the company's stock is no longer as valuable as directly purchasing the corresponding cryptocurrency.

During its earnings call at the end of July, Strategy pledged that it would not issue new MSTR common stock when the mNAV was below 2.5 times unless it was to pay preferred stock dividends or debt interest. However, just two weeks later, it removed this restriction and added a conditional exception clause in its 8-K filing: "If the company believes that an issuance is beneficial, it may continue to issue shares when the mNAV is below 2.5 times."

In its recent financial report, Strategy also reinterpreted the rules for issuing common stock ATMs:

While issuing common stock when mNAV is below 2.5 still prioritizes debt interest payments and preferred stock dividends, the reality is that it's now possible to finance Bitcoin purchases using common stock ATMs when mNAV is below 2.5, and financing methods for purchasing Bitcoin are no longer limited to common stock ATMs. Strategy calculates an mNAV of 1.25 in its official data, higher than third-party statistics. Although Strategy's calculation method is more complex, ordinary investors actually value the ratio of total market capitalization to the total value of their Bitcoin holdings, which is 1.04.

Furthermore, Strategy has reserved the possibility of adjusting the mNAV baseline, which undoubtedly adds more variables. Strategy purchased 81,785, 69,140, and 42,706 Bitcoins in the first three quarters of this year, respectively. The continuous rise in Bitcoin's price was accompanied by a gradual decrease in purchases, indicating that Strategy had already foreseen the potential problems.

If Strategy's mNAV falls below 1, it could significantly impact the overall value of DAT. A few days ago, ETHZilla, the Ethereum DAT company, opted to sell $40 million worth of Ethereum for a share buyback, aiming to boost its mNAV. On the same day, Metaplanet, the world's second-largest Bitcoin DAT company and a Japanese listed company, also announced a share buyback plan. Although this plan doesn't involve selling its Bitcoin holdings, the pressure on mNAV has already caused the world's two largest publicly disclosed Bitcoin buyers to slow down their purchases.

Removed from the Nasdaq 100 index?

During the US stock market trading session last night Beijing time, some investors in the Web3 community speculated that Strategy might be removed from the Nasdaq 100 index by the end of this year due to MSTR's recent weak performance.

Strategy was officially selected as a component stock of the Nasdaq 100 index last December, which briefly boosted its stock price to over $500. Although the price of Bitcoin subsequently reached new highs, MSTR did not surpass that high.

In reality, the possibility of Strategy being removed from the Nasdaq 100 this year is almost zero. Aside from basic situations such as transforming into a financial company, changing listing location, insufficient liquidity, or violating listing rules, a stock is typically removed from the Nasdaq 100 only if its market capitalization ranking falls directly below 125th or remains outside the top 100, or if its weighting is below 0.1% of the total market capitalization for two consecutive months, and a suitable replacement is available.

According to QQQ's holdings, Strategy's current weighting is approximately 0.37%, and its market capitalization has not fallen out of the top 100. The year-end index adjustment is based on data from the end of October, suggesting that Strategy remains safe this year.

There was a surge in DAT (Data Technology, Alibaba, Tencent) companies in the market this year, but it's important to note that these companies operate on a market consensus rather than a financial mechanism, and their market capitalization is not necessarily lower than the value of their assets. A good example is an article published by the Daily Economic News in August this year: Sohu, an early internet giant, had a market capitalization that, for a long time, was less than its cash holdings and the value of its office buildings.

Strategy can still function for now because new entrants continue to join the game based on DAT's status as the "originator," and it also restrains a large number of vested interests based on its status as the "originator." However, if the market suddenly abandons its acceptance of this "game mechanism," the strategy of investors continuously buying new shares and cashing out at higher prices by maintaining a stable ratio between the company's market capitalization and the value of their Bitcoin holdings will become invalid. The risks involved may be greater than most people imagine.

Even if this mechanism continues, the persistently high attention and funding attracted by AI could lead to continued weakness in Bitcoin prices, putting significant pressure on Strategy in the short term. While the continued implementation of the DAT model would have a positive impact on the industry, it's crucial to be vigilant against the short-term risks associated with stress testing.

After all, the 2.8 billion profit is just investment income, and there are never any winners in investing.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Bitcoin Holds Price Range Despite Drop to $108K as Whale Rotation Keep Traders Cautious

Bitcoin Holds Price Range Despite Drop to $108K as Whale Rotation Keep Traders Cautious

Your daily access to the backroom
Share
Blockhead2025/11/03 15:03
NZD/USD is likely to trade with a downward bias – UOB Group

NZD/USD is likely to trade with a downward bias – UOB Group

The post NZD/USD is likely to trade with a downward bias – UOB Group appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. New Zealand Dollar (NZD) is likely to consolidate in a range of 0.5870/0.5920. In the longer run, slight increase in downward momentum suggests NZD is likely to trade with a downward bias, potentially testing 0.5850, UOB Group’s FX analysts Quek Ser Leang and Peter Chia note. Slight increase in downward momentum 24-HOUR VIEW: “In the early Asian session yesterday, when NZD was at 0.5935, we highlighted the following: ‘While NZD subsequently rose and reached a high of 0.6007, it dropped sharply from the high and continued to decline in the early Asian session today. The decline could test the support at 0.5910 before stabilising. The major support at 0.5880 is unlikely to come into view.’ We did not anticipate the rapid downward acceleration, as NZD plummeted to a low of 0.5873. The sharp drop appears excessive, but it is too soon to expect a recovery. Today, we expect NZD to consolidate, most likely in a range of 0.5870/0.5920.” 1-3 WEEKS VIEW: “After holding a positive NZD outlook for more than a week, we stated yesterday (18 Sep, spot at 0.5935) that ‘the outlook for NZD is no longer positive, but neutral.’ We also indicated that ‘for the time being, we expect NZD to trade in a range between 0.5880 and 0.5980.’ We did not expect the subsequent sharp drop in NZD which dropped below 0.5880 (low was 0.5873). Downward momentum is increasing, but not significantly. From here, NZD is likely to trade with a downward bias, potentially testing the 0.5850 level. On the upside, if NZD breaks above 0.5945, it would indicate that the current downward pressure has eased.” Source: https://www.fxstreet.com/news/nzd-usd-is-likely-to-trade-with-a-downward-bias-uob-group-202509191132
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/20 00:22
Series A funding, Series B retirement: A crash course in wealth for crypto founders

Series A funding, Series B retirement: A crash course in wealth for crypto founders

Source: Fortune Original title: Crypto founders are getting very rich, very fast—again Compiled and edited by: BitpushNews In the startup world, we are used to stories where founders work hard for years and eventually become millionaires when their companies go public or are acquired. Such wealth stories are also playing out in the cryptocurrency field, only this path to riches is often much shorter. A prime example is Bam Azizi. He founded the crypto payments company Mesh in 2020, and this year completed an $82 million Series B funding round. Normally, this kind of financing should all be invested in the company's development, but this time at least $20 million went directly into Azizi's personal pocket. This money comes from "secondary sales"—investors buying shares from founders or other early participants. This means that while the funding amount looks impressive, the actual amount reaching the company's account may be significantly less. However, for founders, they don't need to wait years; they can achieve financial freedom in the blink of an eye. This isn't necessarily a bad thing. A Mesh spokesperson pointed out that the company's partnership with PayPal and the launch of its AI wallet are progressing well. However, the problem is that in the current bull market, founders are cashing out early through secondary sales, making a fortune before the company has truly proven its value. Luxury mansion worth tens of millions Azizi is not an isolated case. In this bull market that began last year, Bitcoin has soared from $45,000 to $125,000, creating countless wealth myths. In mid-2024, the crypto social platform Farcaster completed a $150 million Series A funding round, with at least $15 million used to acquire shares held by founder Dan Romero. This former Coinbase employee has never hidden his wealth. In an interview with Architectural Digest, he showed in detail his $7.3 million mansion on Venice Beach, a four-building estate that the magazine called an "Italian-style garden." Although the renovation was a success, Farcaster's development has not been smooth sailing. According to reports, the platform currently has fewer than 5,000 daily active users, far behind competitors such as Zora. Romero has not responded to this. Omer Goldberg also benefited. Of the $55 million Series A funding round his security company Chaos Labs raised this year, $15 million went to him personally. This company, backed by PayPal Ventures, has become a significant voice in the blockchain security field, but has also remained silent about the deal. Why are venture capitalists willing to pay? According to industry insiders, secondary sales are becoming increasingly common in the current hot cryptocurrency market and popular sectors such as AI. Top venture capital firms like Paradigm and Andreessen Horowitz often agree to acquire shares from founders to secure lead funding for high-quality projects. For investors, this is essentially a gamble. The common equity they acquire offers limited returns, far less than preferred stock in conventional financing. But in an industry accustomed to making grand promises, whether it's appropriate to be so generous in rewarding founders who haven't yet succeeded is certainly debatable. Veteran cryptocurrency observers will be familiar with this scenario. During the ICO craze of 2016, countless projects easily raised hundreds of millions of dollars by issuing tokens. They promised to revolutionize blockchain technology and surpass Ethereum, but most have since disappeared. At the time, investors tried to use "governance tokens" to constrain the founders, but one venture capitalist admitted, "They're called governance tokens, but they don't actually govern anything." By the time the new bull market arrived in 2021, financing models began to resemble the traditional Silicon Valley model, but the phenomenon of founders cashing out in advance still existed. In a $555 million funding round, executives at payment company MoonPay cashed out $150 million. The market was beginning to cool down when the media reported that the CEO had spent $40 million to buy a luxury mansion in Miami. OpenSea, a once-star project, followed a similar path, with its founding team cashing out a significant portion of their funding. However, as the NFT craze faded, the company is now forced to seek a transformation. You are building a faith community. Why don't venture capitalists stick to a more traditional incentive model—allowing founders to meet their basic financial needs in Series B or C rounds, but only allowing them to receive huge returns once the company truly succeeds? Veteran trading lawyer Derek Colla pointed out the key: most cryptocurrency companies are "asset-light" and do not require the huge capital investment that is required in the chip industry, so this capital naturally flows to the founders. He further explained, "This industry is extremely reliant on influence marketing; there are far too many people willing to throw money at founders. Essentially, you're building a belief community." Secondary market expert Glen Anderson put it more bluntly: "In hype cycles like AI and cryptocurrency, you can easily cash out as long as you tell a good story." However, he emphasized that founders cashing out does not mean they have lost faith in the project. Colla, the lawyer, believes that massive cash-outs do not diminish a founder's enthusiasm. He cites MoonPay as an example: although the founder faced criticism over the mansion incident, the company's business continued to thrive. Farcaster's failure was not due to the founder's lack of effort; "he worked harder than most people." However, he also acknowledged that truly great entrepreneurs choose to hold shares for the long term because they believe these shares will multiply in value when the company goes public. "Great founders never want to sell on the secondary market," Colla concluded. In this industry brimming with both opportunities and bubbles, wealth comes and goes quickly. As a new wave of wealth creation sweeps in, perhaps we should consider: what kind of incentives can truly nurture great companies?
Share
PANews2025/11/03 15:00