The post What The Outcome Of Trump’s Meeting With Zelensky Means For Putin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. WASHINGTON, DC – OCTOBER 17: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky (L) attends a lunch meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump (R) at the White House on October 17, 2025, in Washington, DC. President Trump, fresh off a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas, is hosting President Zelensky for a bilateral lunch in the Cabinet Room in hopes of advancing a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images) Getty Images On Friday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy met with U.S. President Donald Trump to discuss the latest developments in the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine. The summit marked Zelenskyy’s third visit to the White House since Trump took office in January. During the meeting, the Ukrainian president stated that he believed that Trump could help bring Russia’s invasion to an end. Zelenskyy also made his case for the need for advanced U.S. weaponry, such as Tomahawk cruise missiles, which the Ukrainians would use to defend themselves against Russian aggression. The Ukrainian president even proposed a potential swap of Ukrainian drones for Tomahawks. Zelenskyy has previously stated that long-range missiles would give Ukrainians the necessary capabilities to strike Russian military targets deep within Russian territory. The Ukrainian president also argued that such capabilities would put pressure on Russian President Vladimir Putin, as they would allow the Ukrainians to destroy capabilities that enable the Russians to continue their war in Ukraine, such as ammunition depots and energy facilities. Trump initially stated that he would be interested in an exchange between Ukrainian drones and American Tomahawks. But when pressed further on the issue, the U.S. president said that the U.S. already had its own fleet of drones. Trump then issued a warning about the dangers of Tomahawks. He also stated that he would prefer to have peace between Russia and Ukraine, rather… The post What The Outcome Of Trump’s Meeting With Zelensky Means For Putin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. WASHINGTON, DC – OCTOBER 17: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky (L) attends a lunch meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump (R) at the White House on October 17, 2025, in Washington, DC. President Trump, fresh off a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas, is hosting President Zelensky for a bilateral lunch in the Cabinet Room in hopes of advancing a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images) Getty Images On Friday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy met with U.S. President Donald Trump to discuss the latest developments in the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine. The summit marked Zelenskyy’s third visit to the White House since Trump took office in January. During the meeting, the Ukrainian president stated that he believed that Trump could help bring Russia’s invasion to an end. Zelenskyy also made his case for the need for advanced U.S. weaponry, such as Tomahawk cruise missiles, which the Ukrainians would use to defend themselves against Russian aggression. The Ukrainian president even proposed a potential swap of Ukrainian drones for Tomahawks. Zelenskyy has previously stated that long-range missiles would give Ukrainians the necessary capabilities to strike Russian military targets deep within Russian territory. The Ukrainian president also argued that such capabilities would put pressure on Russian President Vladimir Putin, as they would allow the Ukrainians to destroy capabilities that enable the Russians to continue their war in Ukraine, such as ammunition depots and energy facilities. Trump initially stated that he would be interested in an exchange between Ukrainian drones and American Tomahawks. But when pressed further on the issue, the U.S. president said that the U.S. already had its own fleet of drones. Trump then issued a warning about the dangers of Tomahawks. He also stated that he would prefer to have peace between Russia and Ukraine, rather…

What The Outcome Of Trump’s Meeting With Zelensky Means For Putin

2025/10/18 19:03

WASHINGTON, DC – OCTOBER 17: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky (L) attends a lunch meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump (R) at the White House on October 17, 2025, in Washington, DC. President Trump, fresh off a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas, is hosting President Zelensky for a bilateral lunch in the Cabinet Room in hopes of advancing a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

Getty Images

On Friday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy met with U.S. President Donald Trump to discuss the latest developments in the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine. The summit marked Zelenskyy’s third visit to the White House since Trump took office in January.

During the meeting, the Ukrainian president stated that he believed that Trump could help bring Russia’s invasion to an end. Zelenskyy also made his case for the need for advanced U.S. weaponry, such as Tomahawk cruise missiles, which the Ukrainians would use to defend themselves against Russian aggression. The Ukrainian president even proposed a potential swap of Ukrainian drones for Tomahawks.

Zelenskyy has previously stated that long-range missiles would give Ukrainians the necessary capabilities to strike Russian military targets deep within Russian territory. The Ukrainian president also argued that such capabilities would put pressure on Russian President Vladimir Putin, as they would allow the Ukrainians to destroy capabilities that enable the Russians to continue their war in Ukraine, such as ammunition depots and energy facilities.

Trump initially stated that he would be interested in an exchange between Ukrainian drones and American Tomahawks. But when pressed further on the issue, the U.S. president said that the U.S. already had its own fleet of drones. Trump then issued a warning about the dangers of Tomahawks. He also stated that he would prefer to have peace between Russia and Ukraine, rather than supplying the cruise missiles to Ukraine.

“Tomahawks are very dangerous weapons,” Trump told reporters at the White House. “We’d much rather have Ukraine not need Tomahawks.” Trump also added that providing Tomahawks to Ukraine would have been seen as an “escalation” in the war.

The U.S. president then went on to state that enough blood had been shed during the Russian invasion of Ukraine. During the meeting, Trump reiterated the need for peace, and he hoped that the war would end soon. Trump concluded the session by discussing his upcoming meeting with Putin, stating that they would soon be meeting in Budapest. The exact time and date of their summit in Hungary, however, has not been finalized.

Following the summit at the White House, Zelenskyy told reporters that he believed that he and Trump were “beginning to understand each other.” He added that the U.S. president was also beginning to understand “more details of the war.” But these developments have not resulted in the Ukrainians receiving Tomahawk cruise missiles. Instead, the Ukrainians will need to see how Trump’s meeting with Putin unfolds before the U.S. decides whether to send new aid to Ukraine.

Trump’s Attempts In 2025 To End Russia’s War In Ukraine

While Trump did not affirmatively state that he would not provide Tomahawk cruise missiles to Ukraine, the Ukrainians were disappointed that they did not obtain new defense weapons and capabilities after the White House visit on Friday. Instead, the Ukrainians will be left to defend themselves against Russia’s ongoing invasion with their current capabilities.

For nearly four years, the Ukrainian Armed Forces and Ukrainian volunteer battalions have fought against the ongoing Russian invasion. Thousands of Ukrainians have died during the war, and numerous cities, villages, and towns have been destroyed. Meanwhile, the Russians have sustained over one million casualties, and lost tens of billions of dollars in defense equipment.

Realizing this devastation and destruction, Trump has attempted to broker an end to the war. His attempts, however, have not resulted in a lasting peace. Since February, the U.S. president and members of his administration have regularly met with their Ukrainian and Russian counterparts to discuss strategies on how to end the war. For example, the United States attempted to implement a 30-day ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine on the energy infrastructure in both countries. Reuters and the Kyiv Independent, however, found that the Russian Federation violated the proposed ceasefire at least 30 times.

Trump then issued several two-week ultimatums to Putin, calling for an end to the war. In addition, the U.S. president threatened to impose new sanctions on Russia’s energy exports. He also stated that the U.S. would penalize countries that purchase Russian oil and gas. Finally, Trump implemented a new defense aid program for Ukraine, where the United States would sell Western weapons to NATO members in Europe so that the aid could be transported to Ukraine. Despite these developments, the Russian invasion of Ukraine continues.

ANCHORAGE, ALASKA – AUGUST 15: U.S. President Donald Trump (R) walks with Russian President Vladimir Putin as they arrives at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson on August 15, 2025 in Anchorage, Alaska. The two leaders are meeting for peace talks aimed at ending the war in Ukraine. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

Getty Images

Putin Undeterred By U.S. Ultimatums As Peace Talks Stall

To date, current U.S. attempts to bring an end to Russia’s war in Ukraine have not deterred Putin. Instead, Russia has continued to launch drone and missile strikes across Ukraine. As the Russian attacks have persisted, ABC News reported that these Russian bombardments are the worst attacks on Ukraine since the war began. This suggests that Russia is escalating its war.

Why is this the case? According to a report published by The New York Times, Putin is “convinced that Russia’s battlefield superiority is growing.” Additionally, the Russian president believes that “Ukraine’s defense may collapse in the coming months.” Finally, Putin has stated on several occasions that he will not end his conquest “without extensive concessions [made] by Ukraine.” Given these beliefs, it is unlikely that the Russian president would willingly agree to a ceasefire or peace talks as he believes he has an edge over Zelenskyy and Ukraine. As a result, Putin is content to continue the Russian invasion of Ukraine as he believes the Russian Federation is capable of winning the war.

Furthermore, Putin has not felt threatened by statements made by Trump. Over the past eight months, the U.S. president has issued ultimatums to Russia, such as imposing sanctions on the Russian energy sector, to try to force the Russians to a peace agreement with Ukraine. But the United States has not followed through with these threats. The United States has not imposed new sanctions on Russia’s energy exports this year. Additionally, Trump paused various weapon shipments to Ukraine in March and July. Finally, the United States has opted not to provide new forms of defense assistance to Ukraine, which would allow the Ukrainians to defend themselves as well as strike Russian military targets.

By withholding defense aid and new capabilities from Ukraine, Putin understands that the Ukrainians will not have the necessary equipment to defend themselves against Russia’s ongoing military incursion. As a result, Russia has no incentive to stop its war as it does not feel pressured to do so, and by extension, uphold any ceasefire agreement or peace talks. Thus, the Russian invasion of Ukraine continues.

With this in mind, international observers of the Russian invasion of Ukraine will be curious to see what will unfold from the upcoming meeting between Trump and Putin in Budapest. After the U.S. president’s meeting with Zelenskyy at the White House on Friday, it is unclear if anything will change.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/marktemnycky/2025/10/18/what-the-outcome-of-trumps-meeting-with-zelensky-means-for-putin/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon

CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon

The post CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlighted Polygon’s lead in global bonds, Spiko US T-Bill, and Spiko Euro T-Bill. Polygon published an X post to share that its roadmap to GigaGas was still scaling. Sentiments around POL price were last seen to be bearish. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal shared key pointers from the Dune and RWA.xyz report. These pertain to highlights about RWA on Polygon. Simultaneously, Polygon underlined its roadmap towards GigaGas. Sentiments around POL price were last seen fumbling under bearish emotions. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal on Polygon RWA CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlighted three key points from the Dune and RWA.xyz report. The Chief Executive of Polygon maintained that Polygon PoS was hosting RWA TVL worth $1.13 billion across 269 assets plus 2,900 holders. Nailwal confirmed from the report that RWA was happening on Polygon. The Dune and https://t.co/W6WSFlHoQF report on RWA is out and it shows that RWA is happening on Polygon. Here are a few highlights: – Leading in Global Bonds: Polygon holds 62% share of tokenized global bonds (driven by Spiko’s euro MMF and Cashlink euro issues) – Spiko U.S.… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) September 17, 2025 The X post published by Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal underlined that the ecosystem was leading in global bonds by holding a 62% share of tokenized global bonds. He further highlighted that Polygon was leading with Spiko US T-Bill at approximately 29% share of TVL along with Ethereum, adding that the ecosystem had more than 50% share in the number of holders. Finally, Sandeep highlighted from the report that there was a strong adoption for Spiko Euro T-Bill with 38% share of TVL. He added that 68% of returns were on Polygon across all the chains. Polygon Roadmap to GigaGas In a different update from Polygon, the community…
Share
2025/09/18 01:10
Cryptos Signal Divergence Ahead of Fed Rate Decision

Cryptos Signal Divergence Ahead of Fed Rate Decision

The post Cryptos Signal Divergence Ahead of Fed Rate Decision appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto assets send conflicting signals ahead of the Federal Reserve’s September rate decision. On-chain data reveals a clear decrease in Bitcoin and Ethereum flowing into centralized exchanges, but a sharp increase in altcoin inflows. The findings come from a Tuesday report by CryptoQuant, an on-chain data platform. The firm’s data shows a stark divergence in coin volume, which has been observed in movements onto centralized exchanges over the past few weeks. Bitcoin and Ethereum Inflows Drop to Multi-Month Lows Sponsored Sponsored Bitcoin has seen a dramatic drop in exchange inflows, with the 7-day moving average plummeting to 25,000 BTC, its lowest level in over a year. The average deposit per transaction has fallen to 0.57 BTC as of September. This suggests that smaller retail investors, rather than large-scale whales, are responsible for the recent cash-outs. Ethereum is showing a similar trend, with its daily exchange inflows decreasing to a two-month low. CryptoQuant reported that the 7-day moving average for ETH deposits on exchanges is around 783,000 ETH, the lowest in two months. Other Altcoins See Renewed Selling Pressure In contrast, other altcoin deposit activity on exchanges has surged. The number of altcoin deposit transactions on centralized exchanges was quite steady in May and June of this year, maintaining a 7-day moving average of about 20,000 to 30,000. Recently, however, that figure has jumped to 55,000 transactions. Altcoins: Exchange Inflow Transaction Count. Source: CryptoQuant CryptoQuant projects that altcoins, given their increased inflow activity, could face relatively higher selling pressure compared to BTC and ETH. Meanwhile, the balance of stablecoins on exchanges—a key indicator of potential buying pressure—has increased significantly. The report notes that the exchange USDT balance, around $273 million in April, grew to $379 million by August 31, marking a new yearly high. CryptoQuant interprets this surge as a reflection of…
Share
2025/09/18 01:01