Author: TM Compiled by Tim, PANews I probably shouldn’t have posted this because it’s so insightful. Let’s delve into the world of crypto marketing: A masterclass in psychological tactics. If you don't know what psychological tactics mean? It means you've been manipulated your entire adult life. Welcome to the world of Meme Wars. Milady Example 1: Kalshi enters the crypto market Let's start with Kalshi. This isn't to spread FUD; in fact, I admire their execution. I'm just sharing my personal thoughts on the Kalshi case, though nothing here is confirmed. As the meme coin craze faded, prediction markets began to gain traction, and some influencers, including John Wang, began to push the narrative. There's no doubt that prediction markets are fairer than memecoins. Memecoins are a brutal 1-vs-1,000 game, while prediction markets at least even out the odds. But let's be honest: crypto enthusiasts simply love tokens, and they always have. So the question becomes: How to capture the memecoin market share without issuing new coins while challenging leading platforms like Polymarket? Answer: Psychological warfare This is what happened: John Wang signed with Kalshi long before the official announcement. In the previous months, social interactions and researcher citations had boosted his account's popularity. When the news finally broke, the publicity campaign was coordinated: news outlets, influencers, and "research" pages all reported the hiring of the same KOL. News reports on hiring cryptocurrency influencers This was framed as a major event, as if Kalshi had just poached an executive from Google or Apple. A simple yet clever psychological tactic: turning a personnel change into a full-scale marketing campaign. Kalshi isn’t just entering the crypto space; he’s making it look like a paradigm shift. They paid these websites, research institutions, and influencers to discuss the announcement. A personnel shakeup that caused a stir. Kalshi officially entered the crypto market with a fanfare comparable to the FAANG stock listings. A simple but effective psychological tactic: they take the announcement and spin it into a massive marketing campaign. Is John Wang the marketing manager of Kalshi? Example 2: ai16z flywheel Now, let's talk about ai16z This idea was truly genius, and it made people (including me) really look forward to the future of Crypto x AI integration. The script is this: They launched a Meme DAO around the idea of tokenizing venture capital giant a16z. Marc Andreessen himself responded, verifying the dissemination value of this meme. Suddenly, the entire industry's attention was focused on this "new AI fund." Then came the product launch: Eliza AI Agent. It quickly shot to the top of the GitHub charts. The timing was perfect, and the buzz was unstoppable. Shaw is showing off But at the bottom level, it is just a GPT wrapper. To put it bluntly, it just connects the API of the existing large language model to the front end, which is nothing groundbreaking. Who cares? Actually, no one cares. The product works, the atmosphere is right, and that's all that matters. The psychological tactics here are as much about narrative as they are about technique. Joining the ai16z DAO has become a status symbol. Like wearing a Rolex in its early days, becoming an "ai16z partner" signifies insider status, a title that attracts developers from top universities and deep-pocketed believers. The DAO’s market capitalization soared to $2.5 billion (but liquidity was laughably low). This set in motion a flywheel effect: hype attracted liquidity, liquidity attracted investors, and investors fueled more hype. But then the question arises: how to cash out without ruining the chart? Answer: You don’t. Instead, ai16z “sells” their technology to other crypto AI projects in exchange for up to 10% of the token distribution agreement and marketing support. The result? An overflow of half-baked AI projects. Support, pump-and-dump. Shaw after selling off his free crypto AI tokens The psychological tactics worked. Liquidity was drained, and now ai16z is plotting a comeback. The essence of psychological tactics The problem is: the same routine cannot succeed twice Once people figure out the gimmick, it's gone. They'll move on to the next new thing. That's why so many projects keep recycling the same old buzzwords: airdrop Roadmap Buyback flywheel Economic Model If you're listening to this, it's early days for this project. In this market, talking is out; delivering is key. Welcome to the Meme Wars Crypto marketing today is not advertising, it’s warfare. Narratives are weapons, and interactions are ammunition. Every announcement, collaboration, or controversy is a battle for mindshare. Winning projects aren’t just selling technology; they’re executing coordinated psychological tactics: weaving stories, memes, and strategies that the target audience is willing to believe. Not everyone plays by the same rules. So if you want to grab market share in this industry, you better arm yourself. Assemble your team like a Roman warlord ready to conquer. Because in crypto, it’s a war.Author: TM Compiled by Tim, PANews I probably shouldn’t have posted this because it’s so insightful. Let’s delve into the world of crypto marketing: A masterclass in psychological tactics. If you don't know what psychological tactics mean? It means you've been manipulated your entire adult life. Welcome to the world of Meme Wars. Milady Example 1: Kalshi enters the crypto market Let's start with Kalshi. This isn't to spread FUD; in fact, I admire their execution. I'm just sharing my personal thoughts on the Kalshi case, though nothing here is confirmed. As the meme coin craze faded, prediction markets began to gain traction, and some influencers, including John Wang, began to push the narrative. There's no doubt that prediction markets are fairer than memecoins. Memecoins are a brutal 1-vs-1,000 game, while prediction markets at least even out the odds. But let's be honest: crypto enthusiasts simply love tokens, and they always have. So the question becomes: How to capture the memecoin market share without issuing new coins while challenging leading platforms like Polymarket? Answer: Psychological warfare This is what happened: John Wang signed with Kalshi long before the official announcement. In the previous months, social interactions and researcher citations had boosted his account's popularity. When the news finally broke, the publicity campaign was coordinated: news outlets, influencers, and "research" pages all reported the hiring of the same KOL. News reports on hiring cryptocurrency influencers This was framed as a major event, as if Kalshi had just poached an executive from Google or Apple. A simple yet clever psychological tactic: turning a personnel change into a full-scale marketing campaign. Kalshi isn’t just entering the crypto space; he’s making it look like a paradigm shift. They paid these websites, research institutions, and influencers to discuss the announcement. A personnel shakeup that caused a stir. Kalshi officially entered the crypto market with a fanfare comparable to the FAANG stock listings. A simple but effective psychological tactic: they take the announcement and spin it into a massive marketing campaign. Is John Wang the marketing manager of Kalshi? Example 2: ai16z flywheel Now, let's talk about ai16z This idea was truly genius, and it made people (including me) really look forward to the future of Crypto x AI integration. The script is this: They launched a Meme DAO around the idea of tokenizing venture capital giant a16z. Marc Andreessen himself responded, verifying the dissemination value of this meme. Suddenly, the entire industry's attention was focused on this "new AI fund." Then came the product launch: Eliza AI Agent. It quickly shot to the top of the GitHub charts. The timing was perfect, and the buzz was unstoppable. Shaw is showing off But at the bottom level, it is just a GPT wrapper. To put it bluntly, it just connects the API of the existing large language model to the front end, which is nothing groundbreaking. Who cares? Actually, no one cares. The product works, the atmosphere is right, and that's all that matters. The psychological tactics here are as much about narrative as they are about technique. Joining the ai16z DAO has become a status symbol. Like wearing a Rolex in its early days, becoming an "ai16z partner" signifies insider status, a title that attracts developers from top universities and deep-pocketed believers. The DAO’s market capitalization soared to $2.5 billion (but liquidity was laughably low). This set in motion a flywheel effect: hype attracted liquidity, liquidity attracted investors, and investors fueled more hype. But then the question arises: how to cash out without ruining the chart? Answer: You don’t. Instead, ai16z “sells” their technology to other crypto AI projects in exchange for up to 10% of the token distribution agreement and marketing support. The result? An overflow of half-baked AI projects. Support, pump-and-dump. Shaw after selling off his free crypto AI tokens The psychological tactics worked. Liquidity was drained, and now ai16z is plotting a comeback. The essence of psychological tactics The problem is: the same routine cannot succeed twice Once people figure out the gimmick, it's gone. They'll move on to the next new thing. That's why so many projects keep recycling the same old buzzwords: airdrop Roadmap Buyback flywheel Economic Model If you're listening to this, it's early days for this project. In this market, talking is out; delivering is key. Welcome to the Meme Wars Crypto marketing today is not advertising, it’s warfare. Narratives are weapons, and interactions are ammunition. Every announcement, collaboration, or controversy is a battle for mindshare. Winning projects aren’t just selling technology; they’re executing coordinated psychological tactics: weaving stories, memes, and strategies that the target audience is willing to believe. Not everyone plays by the same rules. So if you want to grab market share in this industry, you better arm yourself. Assemble your team like a Roman warlord ready to conquer. Because in crypto, it’s a war.

Uncovering the Secrets Behind the Popularity of Kalshi and ai16z: The "Psychological Tactics" of the Crypto Market

2025/09/01 18:35

Author: TM

Compiled by Tim, PANews

I probably shouldn’t have posted this because it’s so insightful. Let’s delve into the world of crypto marketing: A masterclass in psychological tactics.

If you don't know what psychological tactics mean? It means you've been manipulated your entire adult life.

Welcome to the world of Meme Wars.

 Milady

Example 1: Kalshi enters the crypto market

Let's start with Kalshi. This isn't to spread FUD; in fact, I admire their execution. I'm just sharing my personal thoughts on the Kalshi case, though nothing here is confirmed.

As the meme coin craze faded, prediction markets began to gain traction, and some influencers, including John Wang, began to push the narrative.

There's no doubt that prediction markets are fairer than memecoins. Memecoins are a brutal 1-vs-1,000 game, while prediction markets at least even out the odds. But let's be honest: crypto enthusiasts simply love tokens, and they always have.

So the question becomes: How to capture the memecoin market share without issuing new coins while challenging leading platforms like Polymarket?

Answer: Psychological warfare

This is what happened:

  • John Wang signed with Kalshi long before the official announcement.
  • In the previous months, social interactions and researcher citations had boosted his account's popularity.
  • When the news finally broke, the publicity campaign was coordinated: news outlets, influencers, and "research" pages all reported the hiring of the same KOL.
 News reports on hiring cryptocurrency influencers

This was framed as a major event, as if Kalshi had just poached an executive from Google or Apple.

A simple yet clever psychological tactic: turning a personnel change into a full-scale marketing campaign.

Kalshi isn’t just entering the crypto space; he’s making it look like a paradigm shift.

They paid these websites, research institutions, and influencers to discuss the announcement. A personnel shakeup that caused a stir. Kalshi officially entered the crypto market with a fanfare comparable to the FAANG stock listings.

A simple but effective psychological tactic: they take the announcement and spin it into a massive marketing campaign.

 Is John Wang the marketing manager of Kalshi?

Example 2: ai16z flywheel

Now, let's talk about ai16z

This idea was truly genius, and it made people (including me) really look forward to the future of Crypto x AI integration.

The script is this:

  • They launched a Meme DAO around the idea of tokenizing venture capital giant a16z.
  • Marc Andreessen himself responded, verifying the dissemination value of this meme.
  • Suddenly, the entire industry's attention was focused on this "new AI fund."
  • Then came the product launch: Eliza AI Agent.

It quickly shot to the top of the GitHub charts. The timing was perfect, and the buzz was unstoppable.

 Shaw is showing off

But at the bottom level, it is just a GPT wrapper. To put it bluntly, it just connects the API of the existing large language model to the front end, which is nothing groundbreaking.

Who cares? Actually, no one cares. The product works, the atmosphere is right, and that's all that matters.

The psychological tactics here are as much about narrative as they are about technique.

Joining the ai16z DAO has become a status symbol. Like wearing a Rolex in its early days, becoming an "ai16z partner" signifies insider status, a title that attracts developers from top universities and deep-pocketed believers.

The DAO’s market capitalization soared to $2.5 billion (but liquidity was laughably low). This set in motion a flywheel effect: hype attracted liquidity, liquidity attracted investors, and investors fueled more hype.

But then the question arises: how to cash out without ruining the chart?

Answer: You don’t. Instead, ai16z “sells” their technology to other crypto AI projects in exchange for up to 10% of the token distribution agreement and marketing support.

The result? An overflow of half-baked AI projects. Support, pump-and-dump.

 Shaw after selling off his free crypto AI tokens

The psychological tactics worked. Liquidity was drained, and now ai16z is plotting a comeback.

The essence of psychological tactics

The problem is: the same routine cannot succeed twice

Once people figure out the gimmick, it's gone. They'll move on to the next new thing. That's why so many projects keep recycling the same old buzzwords:

  • airdrop
  • Roadmap
  • Buyback
  • flywheel
  • Economic Model

If you're listening to this, it's early days for this project. In this market, talking is out; delivering is key.

Welcome to the Meme Wars

Crypto marketing today is not advertising, it’s warfare.

Narratives are weapons, and interactions are ammunition. Every announcement, collaboration, or controversy is a battle for mindshare.

Winning projects aren’t just selling technology; they’re executing coordinated psychological tactics: weaving stories, memes, and strategies that the target audience is willing to believe.

Not everyone plays by the same rules.

So if you want to grab market share in this industry, you better arm yourself. Assemble your team like a Roman warlord ready to conquer.

Because in crypto, it’s a war.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
2025/09/18 03:26