Social media platform Reddit has sued Perplexity for unlawfully scraping its data to train the AI startup’s AI-based search engine, accusing it of building a $20 billion firm off stolen data. According to reports, Reddit sued three other companies in a New York federal court on Wednesday, alleging that the data-scraping companies circumvented its data […]Social media platform Reddit has sued Perplexity for unlawfully scraping its data to train the AI startup’s AI-based search engine, accusing it of building a $20 billion firm off stolen data. According to reports, Reddit sued three other companies in a New York federal court on Wednesday, alleging that the data-scraping companies circumvented its data […]

Reddit sues Perplexity for copyright infringement

2025/10/23 05:00

Social media platform Reddit has sued Perplexity for unlawfully scraping its data to train the AI startup’s AI-based search engine, accusing it of building a $20 billion firm off stolen data.

According to reports, Reddit sued three other companies in a New York federal court on Wednesday, alleging that the data-scraping companies circumvented its data protection measures to “steal data that Perplexity desperately needs” to train its “answer engine.” This latest case is one of the many filed by content creators against tech firms over the alleged misuse of copyrighted material to train their AI systems.

News publishers in particular argue that AI firms’ actions of using their content without authorization are taking away their readership and their advertising revenue, subsequently threatening already fragile business models.

Perplexity defends itself against Reddit’s “threats”

In response to Reddit’s allegations, Perplexity defended its methods.

“Our approach remains principled and responsible as we provide factual answers with accurate AI, and we will not tolerate threats against openness and the public interest,” the startup said in a statement.

In June this year, Reddit, which is comprised of thousands of interest-based “subreddit” communities, filed a similar lawsuit against another AI startup Anthropic, which is still ongoing.

Reddit claims it is the most commonly cited source for AI-generated answers. It has licensing agreements with other major tech companies like Google and OpenAI for training their AI systems.

In the latest lawsuit, it alleges that Perplexity, which currently does not have a licensing agreement with Reddit to use its content, worked with at least three data-scrapping companies, namely Lithuania-based Oxylabs, Russia-based AWMProxy, and SerpApi, which is based in Texas. Reddit is accusing these firms of illegally scraping its data from billions of search results.

According to the court papers, Reddit sent Perplexity a cease-and-desist letter last year. But Perplexity allegedly went on and “increased the volume of citations to Reddit forty-fold” after receiving the letter.

Spokespersons for the other three companies did not immediately comment on the matter. Reddit is also reportedly asking for unspecified monetary damages and an order to block Perplexity from using its data.

For Perplexity, this is not new, as it adds to a string of legal actions against the AI startup over copyright infringement.

In August, two major Japanese media groups, Nikkei and Asahi Shimbun, jointly filed a lawsuit at a Tokyo District Court against Perplexity AI over copyright infringement.  As was previously reported by Cryptopolitan, they also alleged that the AI search engine firm provided incorrect information attributed to their articles, which could potentially hurt their credibility, according to the media groups.

Nikkei and Asahi Shimbun were demanding 2.2 billion yen or $14.7 million in damages each. They also asked Perplexity to delete their stored articles.

But that’s not all. Prior to this, the New York Post and Rupert Murdoch’s Dow Jones also alleged that Perplexity was hurting their businesses by diverting customers and revenues away from news publishers through using their content to respond to questions on their platforms via its chatbot.

Adding to the list of publishers, the BBC also demanded that Perplexity cease to use their content in a “cease and desist” letter. Other news outlets, such as the New York Times and Conde Nast, have also delivered similar letters to the AI company asking them to cease using their content without permission.

Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

How One Man Cryptojacked Ethereum from His Former Workplace

How One Man Cryptojacked Ethereum from His Former Workplace

The post How One Man Cryptojacked Ethereum from His Former Workplace appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A Minnesota man was sentenced to fines and probation after a yearlong Ethereum cryptojacking scheme. He compromised his former employer’s systems to mine ETH every night for around a year. Despite causing $45,000 in server costs, the culprit earned less than $6,000. Economic desperation fueled this low-profile crime, and deteriorating circumstances may lead to similar incidents. Ethereum Cryptojacking Explained Cryptojacking, exploiting a computer to mine digital assets, is an old scheme in the crypto space that has popped back up periodically. Recently, a Minnesota man was sentenced to three years of probation and a $45,000 fine for cryptojacking his former employer to mine Ethereum. Sponsored Sponsored According to local press, Joshua Paul Armbrust used a cryptojacking scheme to surreptitiously mine Ethereum for over a year. After resigning from Digital River, a payment processing and e-commerce firm, he used his AWS access to making the firm’s computers mine ETH from 6 PM to 7 AM on a daily basis. “The defendant’s conduct strikes at the core of digital trust and security. Companies rely on former employees to act ethically, even after separation, and to respect corporate systems and data. Unauthorized access to corporate cloud infrastructure… exposes sensitive systems to potential compromise,” said Assistant US Attorney Bradley Endicott. However, compared to some previous cryptojacking schemes, this Ethereum mining operation was rather small. In total, Armbrust only managed to mine and liquidate $5,895 worth of ETH. These activities cost Digital River upwards of $45,000 in service fees. All things considered, this wasn’t an effective operation. Still, the defendant accepted responsibility for these actions, claiming that he used the funds to care for his ailing mother. This, and the fact that he didn’t cover his tracks, helped him win a light sentence. Although Armbrust will have to recoup Digital River’s server costs and serve…
Share
2025/10/23 08:03
Share