The post Polygon Co-Founder Blasts Ethereum Leaders for Downplaying Polygon’s Layer-2 Role ⋆ ZyCrypto appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Advertisement &nbsp &nbsp Sandeep Nailwal has slammed the Ethereum community for downplaying Polygon’s contributions to the wider network. The Polygon co-founder joins a list of industry experts hitting the network hard this week over emerging issues. While the blockchain remains under fire, ETH enthusiasts pointed to the gains made over the last decade.  Polygon Deserves Ethereum Recognition In a recent social media post, Nailwal protested against the treatment of Polygon by the Ethereum community. According to him, the Ethereum layer 2 network has made several contributions, many of which have gone unnoticed. The potential of Ethereum drew Nailwal to crypto as he sought to build a new ideal financial ecosystem, unlike many who backed Bitcoin. Nailwal noted that over the years, he has received direct support from the Ethereum Foundation, yet he still feels a strong sense of loyalty despite the cost. “NGL, I’ve started questioning my loyalty toward Ethereum. I did not come into crypto because of Bitcoin but because of Ethereum. I also have a lot of gratitude toward @VitalikButerin — someone I looked up to as an ideal for how things should be built in this world. Though I/we never got any direct support from the EF or the Ethereum CT community — in fact, the reverse.” Furthermore, he pointed to a lack of a reward system where founders question what they do in the ecosystem. This has made other devs taunt him for not walking away and pivoting Polygon to a layer 1 network. Blockchain developer Akshay leaned toward Polygon in the early days before contributing to Solana due to the socialist nature of the Ethereum ecosystem.  Advertisement &nbsp “At worst, people have started questioning my fiduciary and moral duty toward Polygon. It’s widely believed that if Polygon ever decided to call itself an… The post Polygon Co-Founder Blasts Ethereum Leaders for Downplaying Polygon’s Layer-2 Role ⋆ ZyCrypto appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Advertisement &nbsp &nbsp Sandeep Nailwal has slammed the Ethereum community for downplaying Polygon’s contributions to the wider network. The Polygon co-founder joins a list of industry experts hitting the network hard this week over emerging issues. While the blockchain remains under fire, ETH enthusiasts pointed to the gains made over the last decade.  Polygon Deserves Ethereum Recognition In a recent social media post, Nailwal protested against the treatment of Polygon by the Ethereum community. According to him, the Ethereum layer 2 network has made several contributions, many of which have gone unnoticed. The potential of Ethereum drew Nailwal to crypto as he sought to build a new ideal financial ecosystem, unlike many who backed Bitcoin. Nailwal noted that over the years, he has received direct support from the Ethereum Foundation, yet he still feels a strong sense of loyalty despite the cost. “NGL, I’ve started questioning my loyalty toward Ethereum. I did not come into crypto because of Bitcoin but because of Ethereum. I also have a lot of gratitude toward @VitalikButerin — someone I looked up to as an ideal for how things should be built in this world. Though I/we never got any direct support from the EF or the Ethereum CT community — in fact, the reverse.” Furthermore, he pointed to a lack of a reward system where founders question what they do in the ecosystem. This has made other devs taunt him for not walking away and pivoting Polygon to a layer 1 network. Blockchain developer Akshay leaned toward Polygon in the early days before contributing to Solana due to the socialist nature of the Ethereum ecosystem.  Advertisement &nbsp “At worst, people have started questioning my fiduciary and moral duty toward Polygon. It’s widely believed that if Polygon ever decided to call itself an…

Polygon Co-Founder Blasts Ethereum Leaders for Downplaying Polygon’s Layer-2 Role ⋆ ZyCrypto

2025/10/24 03:44
Advertisement

Sandeep Nailwal has slammed the Ethereum community for downplaying Polygon’s contributions to the wider network. The Polygon co-founder joins a list of industry experts hitting the network hard this week over emerging issues. While the blockchain remains under fire, ETH enthusiasts pointed to the gains made over the last decade. 

Polygon Deserves Ethereum Recognition

In a recent social media post, Nailwal protested against the treatment of Polygon by the Ethereum community. According to him, the Ethereum layer 2 network has made several contributions, many of which have gone unnoticed. The potential of Ethereum drew Nailwal to crypto as he sought to build a new ideal financial ecosystem, unlike many who backed Bitcoin.

Nailwal noted that over the years, he has received direct support from the Ethereum Foundation, yet he still feels a strong sense of loyalty despite the cost.

NGL, I’ve started questioning my loyalty toward Ethereum. I did not come into crypto because of Bitcoin but because of Ethereum. I also have a lot of gratitude toward @VitalikButerin — someone I looked up to as an ideal for how things should be built in this world. Though I/we never got any direct support from the EF or the Ethereum CT community — in fact, the reverse.”

Furthermore, he pointed to a lack of a reward system where founders question what they do in the ecosystem. This has made other devs taunt him for not walking away and pivoting Polygon to a layer 1 network. Blockchain developer Akshay leaned toward Polygon in the early days before contributing to Solana due to the socialist nature of the Ethereum ecosystem. 

Advertisement

 

At worst, people have started questioning my fiduciary and moral duty toward Polygon. It’s widely believed that if Polygon ever decided to call itself an L1, it would probably be valued 2–5× higher than it is today. Like, think about it, Hedera Hashgraph an L1, is valued higher than Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Scroll combined,” he added. 

In a swift reaction, Ethereum’s co-founder Vitalik Buterin acknowledged Polygon’s contribution to the network, pointing to the largest prediction network and the CryptoRelief program. Buterin added that Polygon has hosted several applications in need of high scalability and built the required infrastructure for proof aggregation. Nailwal’s comments followed a similar criticism from Peter Szilagyi, an Ethereum insider. Szilagyi slammed the network’s growing centralization concerns.

Source: https://zycrypto.com/polygon-co-founder-blasts-ethereum-leaders-for-downplaying-polygons-layer-2-role/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
2025/09/18 03:26