The post GPT-5 on the Verge of Liquidation: Is AI Bad at Crypto Trading? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Not your market analyst Crypto too complex for AI Artificial intelligence has been hailed as the next big thing in both analytics and art. But when it comes to trading cryptocurrencies, your average “crypto degen” might beat AI at it. Not your market analyst The latest data from the CoinGlass AI Model Trading Leaderboard shows how chaotic situations can get when general-purpose AI systems are introduced into an unstable market environment. According to the leaderboard, one of the most advanced language models, GPT-5, had an incredible return of -64.22%, effectively wiping out the majority of its trading portfolio and finishing dead last. It experienced the fastest and steepest collapse of all the models that took part, resulting in a total loss of $6,367. Source: Coinglass Others, like Grok and DeepSeek, were able to report modest profits (+3 and 64%, respectively), but GPT-5’s performance clearly shows that trading skill is not solely a function of intelligence. Large language models (LLMs) are designed primarily for text generation, reasoning and problem-solving, not for analyzing high-frequency strategies or interpreting volatile market data. Crypto too complex for AI This is the simplest explanation. Active trading environments require a level of live market awareness, reaction timing and sophisticated risk management that they cannot have because their training data is static and historical. On the other hand, the specialized AI systems used by hedge funds and companies like BlackRock rely on ongoing retraining using real-time data and carefully chosen, domain-specific statistics. Those models are able to identify macrotrends, arbitrage windows and order book imbalances that general-purpose LLMs simply cannot. The leaderboard reflects that AI trading results are pretty much random, just like leaving a monkey to manage a fund. While overfitting patterns can cause some models to quickly spiral into losses, short-term volatility may help some models… The post GPT-5 on the Verge of Liquidation: Is AI Bad at Crypto Trading? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Not your market analyst Crypto too complex for AI Artificial intelligence has been hailed as the next big thing in both analytics and art. But when it comes to trading cryptocurrencies, your average “crypto degen” might beat AI at it. Not your market analyst The latest data from the CoinGlass AI Model Trading Leaderboard shows how chaotic situations can get when general-purpose AI systems are introduced into an unstable market environment. According to the leaderboard, one of the most advanced language models, GPT-5, had an incredible return of -64.22%, effectively wiping out the majority of its trading portfolio and finishing dead last. It experienced the fastest and steepest collapse of all the models that took part, resulting in a total loss of $6,367. Source: Coinglass Others, like Grok and DeepSeek, were able to report modest profits (+3 and 64%, respectively), but GPT-5’s performance clearly shows that trading skill is not solely a function of intelligence. Large language models (LLMs) are designed primarily for text generation, reasoning and problem-solving, not for analyzing high-frequency strategies or interpreting volatile market data. Crypto too complex for AI This is the simplest explanation. Active trading environments require a level of live market awareness, reaction timing and sophisticated risk management that they cannot have because their training data is static and historical. On the other hand, the specialized AI systems used by hedge funds and companies like BlackRock rely on ongoing retraining using real-time data and carefully chosen, domain-specific statistics. Those models are able to identify macrotrends, arbitrage windows and order book imbalances that general-purpose LLMs simply cannot. The leaderboard reflects that AI trading results are pretty much random, just like leaving a monkey to manage a fund. While overfitting patterns can cause some models to quickly spiral into losses, short-term volatility may help some models…

GPT-5 on the Verge of Liquidation: Is AI Bad at Crypto Trading?

2025/10/23 01:02
  • Not your market analyst
  • Crypto too complex for AI

Artificial intelligence has been hailed as the next big thing in both analytics and art. But when it comes to trading cryptocurrencies, your average “crypto degen” might beat AI at it.

Not your market analyst

The latest data from the CoinGlass AI Model Trading Leaderboard shows how chaotic situations can get when general-purpose AI systems are introduced into an unstable market environment. According to the leaderboard, one of the most advanced language models, GPT-5, had an incredible return of -64.22%, effectively wiping out the majority of its trading portfolio and finishing dead last. It experienced the fastest and steepest collapse of all the models that took part, resulting in a total loss of $6,367.

Source: Coinglass

Others, like Grok and DeepSeek, were able to report modest profits (+3 and 64%, respectively), but GPT-5’s performance clearly shows that trading skill is not solely a function of intelligence. Large language models (LLMs) are designed primarily for text generation, reasoning and problem-solving, not for analyzing high-frequency strategies or interpreting volatile market data.

Crypto too complex for AI

This is the simplest explanation. Active trading environments require a level of live market awareness, reaction timing and sophisticated risk management that they cannot have because their training data is static and historical. On the other hand, the specialized AI systems used by hedge funds and companies like BlackRock rely on ongoing retraining using real-time data and carefully chosen, domain-specific statistics. Those models are able to identify macrotrends, arbitrage windows and order book imbalances that general-purpose LLMs simply cannot.

The leaderboard reflects that AI trading results are pretty much random, just like leaving a monkey to manage a fund. While overfitting patterns can cause some models to quickly spiral into losses, short-term volatility may help some models make profitable trades.

If this leaderboard is any indication, you should not trust GPT-5 or its peers with your cryptocurrency wallet. Although LLMs are great tools for reasoning, generating texts and learning, when it comes to market execution, they are more gamblers than strategists. They were a gambler who lost everything faster than anyone else in the GPT-5 case.

Source: https://u.today/gpt-5-on-the-verge-of-liquidation-is-ai-bad-at-crypto-trading

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

ETH Whales Rebuild as Outflows Trim Supply, Price Retests $4K

ETH Whales Rebuild as Outflows Trim Supply, Price Retests $4K

The post ETH Whales Rebuild as Outflows Trim Supply, Price Retests $4K appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ethereum whales add 218K ETH, reversing mid-October sell-offs and signaling renewed confidence. Exchange outflows rise as investors move ETH to private wallets, hinting at long-term holding. ETH holds near $3,900 amid lower trading volumes, reflecting consolidation after strong October gains. Santiment shows wallets holding 100 to 10,000 ETH re-accumulated roughly 218,470 ETH over the past week. That buying offsets a slice of the ~1.36 million ETH these cohorts sold between October 5 and 16.  Whales Reverse Course and Add 218K ETH After Mid-October Selling The flip from distribution to accumulation restores part of the liquidity removed earlier in the month and sets a more constructive backdrop if demand persists. 🐳🦈 Ethereum whales and sharks holding between 100 to 10,000 $ETH are finally showing some signs of confidence. After -1.36M was dumped by this group between October 5th and 16th, they have added back close to 1/6th of it since. Positive sign for crypto’s #2 market cap. pic.twitter.com/tg1BWu60Lq — Santiment (@santimentfeed) October 24, 2025 The add-back equals about one-sixth of what was sold, a cadence often seen during range repair after sharp pullbacks. The shift lines up with steady staking participation and consistent dApp activity, factors that help anchor ETH fundamentals while price compresses. Related: Ethereum Price Prediction: ETH Tests Recovery as Liquidity Clusters Build Above $4,200 Exchange Outflows Point to Self-Custody and Longer Holds Additional data from CoinGlass gives further insight into investor behavior. The ETH Spot Inflow/Outflow chart recorded heightened movement throughout mid-October, with alternating waves of deposits and withdrawals reflecting a tug-of-war between short-term traders and accumulating investors.  Notably, outflow spikes, indicating transfers from exchanges to private wallets, have increased in recent weeks, aligning with Santiment’s findings on accumulation. Ethereum’s price trend has remained resilient through these shifts. The asset’s value climbed from under $2,000 in early 2025…
Share
2025/10/25 20:37