The United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has released a statement on new cryptocurrency regulations. The intentions of these guidelines ought to be clear; they should provide a defined picture of what is considered legal and illegal for companies operating in crypto, allowing innovation while protecting consumers and upholding market integrity.  The move will be […]The United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has released a statement on new cryptocurrency regulations. The intentions of these guidelines ought to be clear; they should provide a defined picture of what is considered legal and illegal for companies operating in crypto, allowing innovation while protecting consumers and upholding market integrity.  The move will be […]

FCA Crypto Regulation: Striking a Balance Between Innovation and Consumer Safety

2025/09/18 12:00
FCA Crypto Regulation
  • FCA crypto regulations aim to strike a balance, bringing innovation, protection, and balance to the marketplace.
  • The FCA crypto regulation rendering firms to be under FCA supervision in order to conform to the industry standards
  • FCA seeks public input on the handling of complaints and the application of “Consumer Duty” on crypto companies.

The United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has released a statement on new cryptocurrency regulations. The intentions of these guidelines ought to be clear; they should provide a defined picture of what is considered legal and illegal for companies operating in crypto, allowing innovation while protecting consumers and upholding market integrity. 

The move will be the latest step in the UK authorities’ regulation of digital currencies. In a report published on Wednesday, the FCA suggests new minimum standards for crypto firms. Surely, if these rules are implemented, the crypto space would be overseen by the FCA. 

Also Read: UK FCA Opens Retail Crypto ETNs Access, Derivatives Remain Banned

David Geale, Executive Director of Payments and Digital Finance at FCA, said: “Businesses that have applied for registration prior to the 16 December deadline and are listed on the Financial Services Register will be able to continue trading under the FCA’s temporary registration regime while waiting for their applications to be processed. When the proposed legislation becomes effective, a new UA check will no longer be performed.

Risks and Stability Covered in FCA Crypto Regulations

The FCA crypto regulation won’t make the investment risks associated with crypto go away. However, they will benefit businesses in providing more transparent products for those interested in crypto investments.

Geale said the consultation paper compared these new measures to traditional bank standards. Many of these regulations are concerned with operational resiliency and financial crime. These are critical gaps that need to be filled in order for the crypto space to work securely.

The handling of complaints is another major issue of the FCA crypto regulation. The FCA is a regulator, and the act called the ” Financial Ombudsman Service” is the agency currently responsible for accepting complaints about consumers and their treatment by financial services firms. This may potentially bring higher levels of consumer trust for crypto companies.

FCA Considers “Consumer Duty” for Crypto in Light of Global Cooperation

The consultation paper is looking for feedback on the “Consumer Duty” which requires all financial companies to act in the best interests of their customers following FCA crypto regulations. The FCA is considering applying this rule to crypto companies. 

This followed the creation of a crypto bill by the UK government in April. The bill would subject crypto exchanges and dealers to the same financial regulatory firewalls applied to all other financial service firms.

The UK has made it clear that it was not ‘open for business’ and was intent on addressing crypto fraud and abuse. This indicates that the country is committed to regulating the crypto space while at the same time opening space for innovation and development. These regulations are considered essential to guarantee an equal playing field in the cryptocurrency industry.

Also, there is growing international crypto regulation cooperation. The United Kingdom and the US have been working on ways they could tighten their cooperation on digital currencies. 

These discussions have included members from leading crypto companies such as Coinbase and Ripple, as well as banks such as Bank of America and Barclays, suggesting that there is an increasing global impetus to regulate crypto.

A significant impact on the digital asset industry could result from the FCA crypto regulation. The goal is to strike a balance between innovation and consumer protection. However, public feedback would be important in determining the UK’s approach to conducting these rules; public sentiment shapes the direction of crypto regulation in the UK.

Also Read: UK Moves In on Crypto, What the FCA’s Plan Could Mean for the Market

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

No L2s, No Mass Adoption. Period.

No L2s, No Mass Adoption. Period.

ETH Can’t Do It Alone ETH mainnet is powerful but let’s be honest, it’s pricey AF. $50 swaps, $100 NFT mints. Perfect for whales flexing, useless for billions of everyday users. That’s why Layer 2s (L2s) exist. They’re Ethereum’s highways: same security, but faster and dirt cheap. No L2s = crypto stays niche. With them, ETH finally goes global. Why Ethereum Alone Can’t Scale 2021 gas fees were brutal. People spent rent money on swaps. NFT mints sometimes cost more than the art. Ethereum nailed security, but it was locked behind insane fees. Rollups solved that by bundling transactions, compressing data, and anchoring it back to Ethereum. Think of ETH as the courthouse. L2s are the highways around it. Same rules, way more traffic can flow. Rollups Two main flavors run the show: Optimistic Rollups (Arbitrum, Optimism): “Innocent until proven guilty.” Transactions go through unless someone proves fraud. Efficient, but withdrawals to mainnet take ~7 days. ZK Rollups (zkSync, Starknet, Scroll): “Math doesn’t lie.” Validity is proved upfront with cryptography. Harder tech, but faster and more secure. Either way → fees drop from $20 to cents. That’s the unlock. Why L2s Matter for Mass Adoption Mass adoption = billions of cheap, everyday transactions. That’s impossible on L1, but normal on L2. DeFi: Swapping $50 shouldn’t cost $20. On L2s, anyone can farm, lend, and trade. Gaming + NFTs: $5 skins, collectibles, and in-game items actually make sense. SocialFi: Billions of likes, tips, and posts daily. Reddit already runs Community Points on Arbitrum Nova. Without L2s, Ethereum is boutique. With them, it becomes global infrastructure. It’s Already Happening Arbitrum: The DeFi king. GMX, Radiant, Uniswap all live here. Nova powers gaming + social. The BoLD upgrade decentralizes validation. Optimism: Playing the meta game. The OP Stack lets anyone spin up an L2. Coinbase’s Base, Zora, Worldcoin all sparks from the same match. Together = the Superchain. ZK Rollups: zkSync, Starknet, Scroll are still early, but building for instant, trustless scaling. Then came Dencun (2024). Ethereum introduced blobs, slashing L2 fees by ~95%. Overnight, “cheap” became “basically free.” The Messy Bits 👀 L2s are the backbone, but they’re not perfect: Sequencers = Central chokepoints. Today, one operator orders all transactions. Risk of censorship + MEV capture is real. Optimism is testing “shared sequencers.” Espresso + Astria are building neutral ones. Bridges = Speed vs. trust. Optimistic rollups force a 7 day wait. Fast bridges fix UX but add risk over $2B lost in hacks shows the danger. ZK rollups may cut this, but proofs are still heavy. Liquidity = Fragmentation risk. Superchain sounds , but liquidity could scatter across 20 OP chains. Imagine Uniswap split across Base, Zora, Optimism. Without cross-chain messaging, composability breaks. Governance = Growing pains. Arbitrum DAO controls ~$3B, but drama over 750M ARB transfers showed fragility. Optimism’s RetroPGF funds public goods after impact bold but unproven long term. The Road Ahead For L2s to truly onboard billions, three things must click: Decentralized Sequencers → no single chokepoint. Seamless Interop → bridging feels invisible. Invisible UX → normies don’t care what chain they’re on. When that happens, no one says “I bridged to Arbitrum.” They just say: “I sent crypto. It was instant. It was cheap.” Final Take Ethereum is the air. Without it, nothing runs. L2s are the engines. They move the people, the culture, the transactions. No L2s = crypto stays niche. With L2s = we onboard billions. They’re not a side quest. They’re the backbone of Ethereum’s future. Period. Key Takeaways Ethereum is secure but too expensive to scale alone. L2s bundle transactions and slash fees by 95%+. Arbitrum leads DeFi today, while Optimism builds the Superchain for tomorrow. ZK rollups are early but promise instant security at scale. Main challenges: sequencer centralization, bridge risks, liquidity fragmentation, DAO politics. Long-term success depends on decentralization, interop, and invisible UX. Bottom line: No L2s, no mass adoption. With them, Ethereum scales to billions. No L2s, No Mass Adoption. Period. was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
2025/09/22 15:18