TLDRs; Xiaomi recalls 116,877 SU7 EVs after a fatal crash tied to flaws in driver-assist software. The recall affects vehicles produced between February 2024 and August 2025, according to Chinese regulators. Xiaomi will release an OTA update to improve system performance and safety compliance. Tesla and BYD have also faced major recalls, highlighting industry-wide EV [...] The post Fatal Accident Triggers Xiaomi SU7 EV Recall Covering Nearly 117,000 Cars appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDRs; Xiaomi recalls 116,877 SU7 EVs after a fatal crash tied to flaws in driver-assist software. The recall affects vehicles produced between February 2024 and August 2025, according to Chinese regulators. Xiaomi will release an OTA update to improve system performance and safety compliance. Tesla and BYD have also faced major recalls, highlighting industry-wide EV [...] The post Fatal Accident Triggers Xiaomi SU7 EV Recall Covering Nearly 117,000 Cars appeared first on CoinCentral.

Fatal Accident Triggers Xiaomi SU7 EV Recall Covering Nearly 117,000 Cars

2025/09/21 00:41

TLDRs;

  • Xiaomi recalls 116,877 SU7 EVs after a fatal crash tied to flaws in driver-assist software.
  • The recall affects vehicles produced between February 2024 and August 2025, according to Chinese regulators.
  • Xiaomi will release an OTA update to improve system performance and safety compliance.
  • Tesla and BYD have also faced major recalls, highlighting industry-wide EV software challenges.

Xiaomi, best known for its smartphones and consumer electronics, has been aggressively pushing into the electric vehicle (EV) industry with its flagship SU7 sedan.

However, the company is now facing one of its first major roadblocks. The State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) announced that 116,877 SU7 vehicles manufactured between February 6, 2024, and August 30, 2025, are being recalled after safety risks were identified in the model’s driver-assistance software.

The regulatory body explained that the software may fail to adequately detect certain scenarios, falling short of standards required for Level 2 autonomous driving systems. This flaw increases the risk of accidents if drivers rely too heavily on the system for safety warnings.

Fatal Crash Raised Alarms

The recall was prompted by a fatal accident involving an SU7 sedan earlier this year. Authorities did not disclose the full circumstances, but regulators linked the incident to the vehicle’s driver-assist functions, which reportedly failed to issue timely alerts.

In response, Xiaomi admitted shortcomings in the system and pledged to roll out an over-the-air (OTA) software update to address the safety gap. The company said the fix would strengthen detection algorithms and ensure compliance with both Chinese regulatory standards and global expectations for semi-autonomous driving.

This incident marks a pivotal moment for Xiaomi’s automotive ambitions. Having entered the EV market less than two years ago, the company faces pressure to balance innovation, speed-to-market, and consumer safety.

Other EV Giants Also Hit by Recalls

Xiaomi’s recall reflects a wider trend in the EV industry, where even established players have faced safety setbacks.

Earlier this year, Tesla pulled back over 376,000 cars in the U.S. due to faults in its power-assisted steering, while BYD recalled nearly 97,000 vehicles in China after regulators flagged a steering unit defect that posed fire risks.

Both incidents show how reliance on complex software and electronic systems has made recalls more common, underscoring that no automaker is immune to safety challenges in the race toward smarter, autonomous vehicles.

Balancing Innovation and Consumer Trust

For Xiaomi, this recall could slow momentum just as the SU7 was gaining traction in China’s crowded EV market. The company has positioned its vehicles as affordable yet advanced alternatives to Tesla and BYD, with a focus on smart integration and autonomous features.

Industry experts say the recall underscores the double-edged nature of rapid innovation. While advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) can enhance safety, gaps in their performance can have serious consequences. Regulators worldwide continue to stress that such systems are supportive tools, not replacements for attentive human driving.

Despite the setback, Xiaomi’s quick acknowledgment and commitment to an OTA remedy may help minimize damage to its reputation. The company also announced it would strengthen internal testing and validation processes for future models. Analysts believe that how Xiaomi manages this crisis will determine whether consumers remain confident in its EV push.

The post Fatal Accident Triggers Xiaomi SU7 EV Recall Covering Nearly 117,000 Cars appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Why Bitcoin Loses to Gold in 2025

Why Bitcoin Loses to Gold in 2025

Author: Liam, TechFlow Remember the end of 2024, when everyone was writing asset forecasts for 2025. Stock investors are keeping an eye on the S&P and the A-share market, while people in the crypto circle are betting on Bitcoin. But if someone told you at that time that the best-performing asset in 2025 would not be Bitcoin or stocks, but the "antique" gold that is disliked by Generation Z, you would definitely think that person was joking. But reality is so magical. Over the past five years, Bitcoin has outperformed gold by nearly 10 times, with a surge exceeding 1,000%, repeatedly topping the annual top asset list. However, by 2025, the story has completely reversed: while gold has risen by over 50% since January, Bitcoin has only risen by 15%. The aunties who bought gold early laughed, and the elite traders in the crypto industry fell silent. What's even more bizarre is that gold and Bitcoin seem to have entered a parallel world: when gold rises, Bitcoin falls; when Bitcoin falls, gold rises. On October 21st, gold suffered a heavy blow, falling 5% in a single day. Bitcoin, like a shot of chicken blood, reversed its downward trend and began to rise... Why is Bitcoin, known as digital gold, decoupled from physical gold? Buying gold in troubled times Who will be the most enthusiastic gold buyers in 2025? Not retail investors, not institutions, but central banks around the world. The data doesn't lie: In 2024, global central banks' net gold purchases reached 1,045 tons, exceeding 1,000 tons for three consecutive years. According to the World Gold Council's Q2 2025 data, Poland increased its holdings by 18.66 tons, followed closely by Kazakhstan with an increase of 15.65 tons. The People's Bank of China took a steady approach, increasing its holdings by 6.22 tons. Why are developing countries increasing their gold holdings? Looking at the proportion of gold reserves held by central banks of various countries, developed countries and developing countries are completely two different worlds: 77.85% of the United States' asset reserves are gold, with holdings of 8,133 tons, far ahead of second-place Germany at 3,350 tons, followed by Italy and France, which hold 2,452 tons and 2,437 tons of gold respectively. The gold reserves of the People's Bank of China only account for 6.7% of the total asset reserves, but the absolute amount has reached 2,299 tons and is continuing to increase. This contrast is stark: emerging market countries still have ample room to increase their gold holdings. Economies like China hold less than 7% of their reserves in gold, while developed countries in Europe and the United States generally hold over 70%. This is like a catch-up lesson: the greater the gap, the stronger the drive to catch up. What is exaggerated is that the proportion of central bank gold purchases in total demand has soared from less than 10% in the 2000s to 20%, becoming an important support for gold prices. Why are central banks suddenly so obsessed with gold? The answer is simple: the world is in chaos and the US dollar is no longer trustworthy. The Russia-Ukraine conflict, the situation in the Middle East, the Sino-US trade frictions...the global village has become as chaotic as the Warring States Period. The US dollar has long been a core foreign exchange reserve for central banks around the world, serving as a safe haven. However, the US is now struggling to cope with its own problems, with $36 trillion in debt, a ratio of 124% to GDP. The Trump administration is volatile, making enemies externally and facing internal divisions. Especially after the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, when the United States could freeze other countries' foreign exchange reserves at will, countries realized that only the gold kept in their own safes is their true wealth. Although gold does not generate interest, at least it will not suddenly "disappear" due to the policies of a certain country. Gold is a risk hedge for both individuals and countries. The more chaotic the world is, the more sought after gold is. However, when news came that "the Russia-Ukraine war may be ending", the sharp drop in gold prices was understandable. Digital gold or digital Tesla? The most embarrassing asset in 2025 may be Bitcoin. Its long-term narrative is "digital gold", but it has become "digital Tesla". Data from Standard Chartered Bank shows that Bitcoin's correlation with the Nasdaq is now as high as 0.5, having even reached 0.8 at the beginning of the year. And its correlation with gold? A measly 0.2, having even been zero at the beginning of the year. Translated into human language, it means: Bitcoin is now tied to technology stocks. It rises when the Nasdaq rises, and it falls when the Nasdaq falls. Everything has cause and effect. Under the Trump administration, the US's attitude towards Bitcoin has changed from "illegal cult" to "welcome to join." The approval of the Bitcoin spot ETF in 2024 marked the official incorporation of Bitcoin into the US dollar system. This is a good thing, proving the legitimacy of Bitcoin. But the problem is that when you become part of the system, it is difficult to fight against it. The initial charm of Bitcoin lies in its rebellious spirit, its independence from any government and its non-control by any central bank. But what about now? Wall Street giants like BlackRock have become the market's largest buyers, and Bitcoin's rise and fall are completely dependent on the Federal Reserve and Trump's mood. So much so that cryptocurrency traders now have to stay up late to listen to Powell and Trump's speeches, turning themselves into dollar macro analysts. In terms of consensus, Bitcoin is still in the stage of understanding "what the hell is this" in many parts of the world, while gold is already something that "even my grandmother's grandmother likes." The number of Chinese aunties who own gold bracelets and gold necklaces may be greater than the number of Bitcoin HODLers in the world. Compared to gold, the young Bitcoin still has a long way to go in its evangelism. Gold in the left hand, Bitcoin in the right hand Many people like to choose between gold and Bitcoin, but smart investors know that this is a fill-in-the-blank question. While central banks around the world are frantically buying gold, sending its price soaring, this trend cannot continue indefinitely. When the price of gold reaches a certain level, problems with the storage, transportation, and delivery of physical gold will arise, and this is when Bitcoin's advantages become apparent. Imagine a specific scenario where a war breaks out in a country and the rich find that gold is too heavy and too conspicuous to transfer wealth quickly. At this time, Bitcoin in a hardware wallet becomes the best option. Such an incident has already happened to Russia. Simply put, gold is a "bulky store of value" and Bitcoin is a "light store of value." If the price of gold reaches a very high level, funds need to look for alternatives with similar properties but cheaper prices. In this case, Bitcoin has the opportunity to gradually break away from the gravity of the US dollar and Trump, obtain capital overflow from gold, and move closer to "digital gold" again. In summary, the relationship between Bitcoin and gold should not be understood as one replacing the other, but rather as one of inheritance and evolution. Gold is the wealth memory of human civilization, and Bitcoin is the wealth imagination of the digital age. 70-year-old Aunt Li buys gold jewelry, 25-year-old programmer Li Xiaoming hoards Bitcoin, and everyone has a bright future.
Share
2025/10/23 17:00
Share