Key takeaways: The Ethereum Name Service is a network that enables crypto enthusiasts to rename their cryptocurrency addresses into something simpler, making them easier to remember. Renaming crypto addresses through ENS will enable users to recollect and write them quickly. Even though Ethereum Name Service is based on the Ethereum blockchain, it uses its cryptocurrency, […]Key takeaways: The Ethereum Name Service is a network that enables crypto enthusiasts to rename their cryptocurrency addresses into something simpler, making them easier to remember. Renaming crypto addresses through ENS will enable users to recollect and write them quickly. Even though Ethereum Name Service is based on the Ethereum blockchain, it uses its cryptocurrency, […]

Ethereum Name Service price prediction 2025-2031: Is ENS a good investment?

2025/09/18 01:38

Key takeaways:

  • Ethereum Name Service price prediction suggests a peak price of $27.47 in 2025.
  • By 2028, ENS could see significant growth, with predictions suggesting a potential maximum price of $90.31
  • ENS could achieve its highest price yet, reaching up to $268.90 by 2031.

The Ethereum Name Service is a network that enables crypto enthusiasts to rename their cryptocurrency addresses into something simpler, making them easier to remember. Renaming crypto addresses through ENS will enable users to recollect and write them quickly.

Even though Ethereum Name Service is based on the Ethereum blockchain, it uses its cryptocurrency, ENS. ENS is used for governance purposes on the blockchain network. Users can also send and receive any cryptocurrency with the system’s wallet. The price of ENS has experienced ups and downs since it launched on the market, dropping to as low as $6.7 and hitting an ATH of $85.69.

As decentralized identities and Web3 technology are adopted, ENS positions itself as a key player in this transformative space. How will this affect investors’ perceptions of the Ethereum Name Service (ENS) token?

Will ENS go up? How high can ENS go? Will ENS recapture its ATH soon? Let’s get into the Ethereum Name Service price prediction for 2025-2031.

Overview

CryptocurrencyEthereum Name Service
TokenENS
Price$23.21
Market Cap$858.77M
Trading Volume (24-hour)$53.96Million
Circulating Supply100 Million ENS
All-time High$85.69, Nov 11, 2021
All-time Low$6.70, Oct 19, 2023
24-h High$23.74
24-h Low$22.97

Ethereum Name Service technical analysis

MetricValue
Price Volatility (30-day Volatility)-25.07%
50-Day SMA$ 25.15
14-Day RSI48.47
SentimentBearish
Fear & Greed Index53 (Neutral)
Green Days14/30 (47%)
200-Day SMA$ 21.93

Ethereum Name Service price analysis

TL;DR Breakdown:

  • ENS is consolidating near $23.30 on the 1-day chart with support at $23.10 and resistance at $24.87
  • The 4-hour chart shows price near $23.05 with critical support at $22.59 and fading bearish momentum
  • A rebound toward $23.92 is possible if support holds but a drop to $22 could follow if it breaks

Ethereum Name Service 1-day price chart

ENSUSD chart by TradingViewENSUSD chart by TradingView

The 1-day chart for Ethereum Name Service (ENS) on Sept 17 shows that it is starting to consolidate after a recent drop. The price is now around $23.30, just above the middle Bollinger Band at $23.10. This suggests that this area is short-term support. Resistance stands at $24.87, aligned with the upper band. A 46.13 RSI shows weak momentum, which keeps ENS slightly bearish but not oversold. MACD is still negative, which shows that selling pressure is still there. If bulls can keep the price above $23.10, it could go back up to $24.80. But if this level isn’t protected, it could fall to the $21.34 support level. In general, ENS is trading with a cautious sense of neutrality.

ENS/USD 4-hour price chart analysis

ENSUSD chart by TradingView

Ethereum Name Service (ENS) is trading around $23.05 on the 4-hour chart. This shows that it is consolidating after recent drops. The price is close to the lower Bollinger Band at $22.59, which could be a support zone. The price is also close to the upper Bollinger Band at $23.92, which could be a resistance zone. The MACD histogram shows that bearish momentum is fading, but the signals are still negative, which means that there isn’t much upside pressure right now. Balance of Power at -0.62 shows that bears are in charge. If $22.59 holds, ENS might try to bounce back toward $23.26 and $23.92 resistance. But if you don’t defend support, you could be at risk of going down to $22.00. Sentiment in the short term is still weak, but it could improve near support.

ENS technical indicators: Levels and action

Daily simple moving average (SMA)

PeriodValueAction
SMA 3$22.58SELL
SMA 5$24.21SELL
SMA 10$24.42SELL
SMA 21$ 23.78SELL
SMA 50$25.15SELL
SMA 100$ 23.67SELL
SMA 200$21.93BUY

Daily exponential moving average (EMA)

PeriodValueAction
EMA 3$ 23.14BUY
EMA 5$23.24BUY
EMA 10$ 23.78SELL
EMA 21$24.72SELL
EMA 50$24.99SELL
EMA 100$ 24.04SELL
EMA 200$23.32SELL

What to expect from ENS?

The 1-day chart shows that ENS is holding steady around $23.30 after a recent drop. Support is near $23.10 and resistance is at $24.87. The RSI at 46 shows that the market is moving in a neutral direction, but the MACD shows that bearish pressure is still there. The price is hovering around $23.05 on the 4-hour chart, which is close to the lower Bollinger Band at $22.59. This shows that this is an important support zone. The MACD histogram shows that bearish strength is fading, but sellers are still in charge because the Balance of Power is weak. A bounce back to $23.92 is possible if $22.59 holds. But if it fails, it could go down even more, to $22. Traders should take caution in the short term due to potential range-bound action.

Is ENS a good investment?

Ethereum Name Service (ENS) can be a good investment if you believe in the long-term potential of decentralized domain names and the growing adoption of blockchain technology. ENS offers a unique utility by allowing users to register human-readable names for Ethereum addresses, which simplifies transactions and interactions within the Ethereum ecosystem. Its value could increase as more users and businesses adopt decentralized web services.

Will ENS recover?

The ENS price has experienced a sharp drop followed by a gradual recovery, indicating some resilience in the market. While there has been a rebound from the low, whether ENS will recover depends on continued buying interest and broader market conditions.

Will ENS reach $100?

Forecasts for ENS indicate significant growth potential over the coming years, with the price projected to reach $107.73 on average by 2029. This implies that reaching $100 is plausible within the next few years, driven by positive market trends and increasing adoption.

Will ENS reach $500?

Forecasts for ENS indicate significant growth potential over the coming years. However, attaining $500, while attainable, might not happen anytime soon.

Does ENS have a good long-term future?

Ethereum Name Service (ENS) shows a strong long-term potential based on current predictions. The price is expected to increase significantly over the next several years, with forecasts extending to $268.90 by 2031. This indicates a positive outlook for ENS, supported by ongoing market developments and growing investor interest.

Recent news/opinion on Ethereum Name Service

Ethereum Name Service (ENS) community, the team behind eth.box has unveiled a new feature allowing users to seamlessly transform their .eth domain into a live website. This offering comes at no cost, requiring no additional setup or fees, and ensures that the original ENS domain remains untouched. The service provides users with a free .eth.box subdomain, simplifying the process of hosting content under an ENS identity. This development marks a significant step toward broader web3 adoption, making decentralized web publishing more accessible to domain holders within the Ethereum ecosystem.

Ethereum Name Service price prediction September 2025

In September 2025 Ethereum Name Service (ENS) forecast suggests an average price of $23.22 and a maximum price of $23.88. The minimum price for ENS could reach $21.23

MonthMinimum PriceAverage PriceMaximum Price
September$21.23$23.88$28.16

Ethereum Name Service price prediction 2025

Ethereum Name Service (ENS) forecast for 2025 suggests an average price of $25.12 and a maximum price of $27.47. The minimum price for ENS could reach $24.02.

YearMinimum PriceAverage PriceMaximum Price
2025$24.02$25.12$27.47

Ethereum Name Service price predictions 2026 – 2031

YearMinimum priceAverage priceMaximum price
2026$36.70$37.96$42.40
2027$51.67$53.57$64.30
2028$74.41$77.09$90.31
2029$104.65$107.73$126.96
2030$154.20$159.59$180.84
2031$226.14$234.12$268.90

Ethereum Name Service price prediction 2026

In 2026, the Ethereum Name Service price prediction is projected to experience significant growth. The maximum forecasted price is $42.40 with an expected average trading price of $37.96 and a minimum of $36.70.

Ethereum Name Service price prediction 2027

The Ethereum Name Service price forecast for 2027 projects a peak price of $64.30. The average price is projected to stabilize around $53.57, with the minimum price being $51.80.

Ethereum Name Service price prediction 2028

In 2028, Ethereum Name Service is expected to reach a minimum price of $74.41, a maximum price of $90.31, and an average value of $77.09.

Ethereum Name Service price prediction 2029

The price of Ethereum Name Service is expected to reach a minimum level of $104.65 in 2029. Traders can expect a maximum level of $126.96 and an average price of $107.73.

Ethereum Name Service price prediction 2030

Ethereum Name Service’s price for 2030 suggests a minimum of $154.20. According to expert analysis, ENS could reach a maximum possible level of $180.84, and an average price of $159.59.

Ethereum Name Service price prediction 2031

In 2031, the price of Ethereum Name Service is forecasted to be around a minimum value of $226.14. Ethereum Name Service (ENS) can reach a maximum price of $268.90, and an average trading value of $234.12.

Ethereum Name Service price prediction 2025 - 2031Ethereum Name Service price prediction 2025 – 2031

Ethereum Name Service market price prediction: Analysts’ ENS price forecast

Firm Name20252026
Coincodex$ 16.81$34.28
Digitalcoinprice$47.28$56.02

Cryptopolitan’s Ethereum Name Service (ENS) price prediction

Cryptopolitan’s overall Ethereum Name Service price predictions present a promising outlook through 2031. ENS is expected to experience substantial growth, with 2025 projections showing a peak of about $26.66. Also, prices will rise to a maximum of $255.80 by 2031.

Ethereum Name Service historic price sentiment

ENS price history ⏐ Source: CoinGeckoENS price history ⏐ Source: CoinGecko
  • ENS started at $10.75 in January 2022, peaked at $15.21 in March, then declined to $9.28 by June. The price stabilized around $8.01 in September and rebounded to $10.75 by December.
  • In early 2023, ENS rose sharply from $15.90 to $22.41 in March, driven by high trading volumes. It then dropped to $9.28 by June and saw a modest recovery to $9.67 by December.
  • By 2024, ENS surged to $30.69 by March, fell to $14.60 in April, and rebounded to $25.85 in May. It peaked at $31.06 in July, reached $21.1 in September, and is currently trading between $17.18 and $18.88 in October.
  • In November, ENS hit a peak price of $46.76. By mid-December, the coin reached a high of $50.22 and closed the year at $32.96.
  • ENS opened trading in 2025 at $32.96 and is currently trading between $30.13 and $32.42.
  • However, the closing price for ENS in January was $31.52.
  • As of February 2025, ENS was trading at $26.4.
  • ENS value decreased further in March as it dipped to the $20 range.
  • In April, ENS is trading between $12 and $15.
  • ENS ended April at $16.27. At the start of May, the ENS price is trading between $12.54 and $19.4
  • ENS ended May at $22.85. In June, ENS is trading between $20.1 and $25.0 and ended the month at $18.64
  • As of the beginning of July, the ENS price is currently trading between $18.66 and $19.23.
  • ENS declined from around $26.76 on July 31 to $25.37 on August 1 (a drop of approximately –5.5%), then further dipped to $24.47 by August 2. 
  • The token recovered, closing at about $25.45 on August 3, rising to $27.09 on August 4, and then settling near $25.96 by August 5–6.
  • Ethereum Name Service traded around $25 to $26 in early August before beginning its climb.
  • The price peaked in mid-August reaching nearly $30 before momentum slowed.
  • By late August into September 1, it declined steadily, closing near $21.8

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Ethereum's "double crisis": core talent continues to leave, and technical debt quietly accumulates

Ethereum's "double crisis": core talent continues to leave, and technical debt quietly accumulates

By Eric, Foresight News On the evening of the 19th Beijing time, Bankless co-founder David Hoffman posted a message on X to "mourn" Dankrad Feist, the longest-serving researcher at the Ethereum Foundation, who chose to leave Ethereum and join the stablecoin L1 Tempo. David Hoffman believes the issue of for-profit companies co-opting the talent cultivated by the Ethereum open-source community is significant, and argues that these companies do not, as they claim, bring greater benefits to Ethereum. He bluntly stated, "In my view, Tempo's purpose is to intercept the trillions of dollars in stablecoins expected to flow in over the next decade and place them on their private blockchain. While this will certainly expand the market, Tempo still intends to grab as much of the pie as possible." He believes Tempo will inevitably be constrained by compliance issues, which even issuing tokens cannot address. While both Tempo and Ethereum will bring change to the world, Ethereum is uniquely suited to serve as a trusted, neutral global settlement layer, without shareholders and unconstrained by law. The feeling of disappointment with Ethereum began to surface when its price began to lag behind Bitcoin's in this cycle. However, over time, people began to realize that the exodus of talented individuals from the Ethereum community seemed irreversible. When dreams conflicted with self-interest, many ultimately chose the latter, a fact that many in the industry have long worried about. Dankrad Feist is not the first and will not be the last Dankrad Feist announced his joining Tempo at X on the 17th of this month and stated that he would continue to serve as a research advisor for the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol Cluster's three strategic initiatives: scaling Layer 1, scaling Blobs, and improving user experience. He stated, "Ethereum has strong values and technology choices that make it unique. Tempo will be a great complement, building on similar technology and values while pushing boundaries in scale and speed. I believe this will be a significant benefit to Ethereum. Tempo's open-source technology can be easily integrated back into Ethereum, benefiting the entire ecosystem." According to LinkedIn, Dankrad Feist officially joined Ethereum as a researcher in 2019, focusing on sharding technology, which can scale the Ethereum mainnet. Danksharding, one of the core components of Ethereum's current scaling roadmap, is named after him. Danksharding is a key technical path for Ethereum to achieve high-throughput and low-cost transactions, and is widely considered by the community to be the most important upgrade direction after Ethereum 2.0. Dankrad Feist promoted Proto-Danksharding (EIP-4844), a predecessor of Danksharding. This EIP introduced the blob transaction type, providing a cheaper and more efficient data availability layer for Rollup, significantly reducing the data publishing cost of Rollup. In addition, he had a public debate with Geth development lead Péter Szilágyi on the MEV issue, which eventually prompted Vitalik to step in to coordinate and promote the community's attention to MEV mitigation mechanisms (such as PBS, Proposer-Builder Separation). Tempo researcher Mallesh Pai introduced the members joining Tempo in September, and Liam Horne, former CEO of OP Labs and co-founder of ETHGlobal, also appeared on the list. Before Dankrad Feist, the person who surprised the industry was Danny Ryan, who co-founded Etherealize, a $40 million funding round. A former core member of the Ethereum Foundation and known as the "Chief Engineer of Ethereum 2.0," Ryan joined Etherealize just six months after announcing his indefinite departure in September 2024. However, given that Etherealize shares similarities with ConsenSys, founded by Ethereum co-founder Joseph Lubin 11 years prior amidst controversy over commercialization, Ryan's departure has been widely understood. What really worries David Hoffman are companies like Tempo and Paradigm. Well-known Ethereum developer Federico Carrone expressed a similar sentiment, retweeting David Hoffman's tweet about Dankrad Feist joining Tempo and stating that he has been saying for the past two years that Paradigm's influence within Ethereum could become a tail risk for the entire ecosystem. Federico Carrone wrote that the sole goal of a venture capital fund is to maximize returns for its limited partners. Ethereum shouldn't become deeply dependent on the technology of a venture capital firm that is playing its cards with extreme strategic skill. Following the FTX debacle, Paradigm removed nearly all cryptocurrency-related branding and made a high-profile shift to AI. Carrone believes this is proof enough of his point. After Trump returned to the White House, Paradigm re-entered the Web3 space, aggressively recruiting top researchers from the community, funding key Ethereum open-source libraries, and supporting Stripe's launch of Tempo. Carrone believes that while Paradigm claims its work is beneficial to Ethereum—more funding, more tools, more testing grounds, and the potential for new ideas to feed back into Ethereum—are all potential benefits, but when corporations have excessive visibility and influence over open-source projects, priorities shift from the community's long-term vision to corporate profits. Ethereum’s technical debt is accumulating The simple loss of talent in the Ethereum open source community may not cause widespread concern, but if the loss of talent is accompanied by the accumulation of technical debt, it is worthy of high vigilance. A week ago, a community user posted a screenshot on X, revealing that Solidity's top contributors have all but ceased development. Only Cameel continues to raise new issues and advance the technology, but appears to be in maintenance mode. He believes the community needs to invest more resources in supporting the programming language. Some users in the comments questioned why efforts were being expended on continuously improving and upgrading Solidity rather than simply maintaining it to ensure stability and security. The user who tweeted explained that even changing the Solidity compiler wouldn't change any deployed contracts, but could improve security, enhance the development experience, or support the use of new contracts. As can be seen in the chart above, development activity began to decline sharply at the beginning of the previous bull market. Federico Carrone also expressed his concern, stating that his biggest concern is that the numerous core tools and libraries built around Solidity may not receive long-term maintenance. Even the latest Solidity compiler is currently supported by only a handful of developers. Furthermore, companies involved in L2 and ZK technologies are downsizing, leaving the final iteration of cutting-edge technologies to a handful of companies. With increasing gas limits, many execution clients have not seen substantial performance improvements, and judging by the libraries, the development teams of these clients appear to be lagging behind. Federico Carrone said, “Ethereum’s technical debt continues to accumulate, not only because the protocol itself must continue to evolve, but also because many of its dependencies and surrounding repositories have become stagnant. The entire ecosystem continues to expand, protecting tens of billions of dollars in assets, while part of its foundation is quietly eroding.” Open source communities cannot simply "generate power with love" For an open-source community like Ethereum, which carries a vast amount of value that can be measured in real money, balancing "generate power with love" and economic incentives is a problem without any real precedent. This should be a matter of great concern to the Ethereum Foundation, but it seems to have been overlooked. Péter Szilágyi, who joined the Ethereum Foundation in 2015 and is responsible for the development and maintenance of Geth, clearly pointed out the three most disappointing problems in a letter to the leadership of the Ethereum Foundation a year and a half ago: being portrayed as a leader externally but marginalized internally; the serious disproportion between income and the growth of Ethereum's market value; and Vitalik and a small group of people around him having too much say in the Ethereum ecosystem. In late 2024, Péter Szilágyi discovered that the Ethereum Foundation was secretly incubating an independent fork of Geth. He was subsequently fired due to a dispute with the Ethereum Foundation and repeatedly declined rehire. The Ethereum Foundation even offered Szilágyi $5 million to separate Geth from the Foundation, but was rejected. Currently, Szilágyi maintains the Geth codebase as an independent contributor. Rumors of corruption within the Ethereum Foundation have been circulating, but this is a problem that should have been anticipated from the moment the Ethereum Foundation was founded. As the saying goes, "where there are people, there are gangs." We can't eliminate human greed, but we also can't allow Ethereum to gradually lose its core value due to commercialization. Ethereum's market capitalization of hundreds of billions of dollars, having handled trillions of dollars in on-chain value transfers for years, is built on infrastructure built by a professional technical team, centered on a permissionless, open-source ethos, and commercialized by a large number of businesses. However, simply maintaining such a massive system requires a significant workforce, and as we've discussed, these individuals are leaving due to disappointment or opting for other projects driven by financial gain. The Ethereum Foundation underwent drastic reforms this year, but so far, they haven't produced any significant results. Ethereum can still be called the world's computer, and its potential for commercial applications is still being explored by talented teams. However, as the foundation of all this, Ethereum cannot continue to disappoint those who still hold on to its ideals.
Share
2025/10/23 09:01
Share