The post Eliza Labs Files Lawsuit Against Musk’s xAI Alleging Monopolistic Behavior appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Agentic AI project Eliza Labs has filed a lawsuit against Elon Musk’s xAI, claiming that the AI company engaged in monopolistic practices meant to “deplatform” agentic AI launchpads. The lawsuit claims that xAI attempted to “extract” valuable information, including technical documentation and usage figures related to the development of Eliza Labs’ platform, to copy its ideas before “banishing” Eliza Labs from xAI. Eliza Labs co-founder Shaw Walters argues in the lawsuit that the relationship between the two companies started off amicably, with xAI inviting Walters to share ideas. He also said that they built on xAI’s application programming interface (API) because it was free. Walters added: “The collaborative tone turned transactional, just as X was launching Ani and a new version of Grok. Suddenly, they were demanding we pay $50,000 a month for an enterprise license — $600,000 a year — or face legal action.  We were already paying them over $20,000 annually through various licenses and fees,” Walters continued. Cointelegraph reached out to Walters, but he declined to provide any further comment. The Eliza Labs lawsuit against xAI. Source: Court Listener The lawsuit highlights the litigious nature of the artificial intelligence sector, as legal action continues to pile up surrounding monopolistic practices, intellectual property rights, and legal liabilities of AI service providers. Related: Eliza Labs launches auto.fun, a no-code AI spin on Pump.Fun Lawsuits mount in the nascent AI sector The AI industry is still in its infancy, with key regulatory and legal questions left unanswered about the nascent technology. These regulatory grey zones exist alongside the legal issues traditionally faced by tech companies, such as trademark and patent infringement, making the AI sector a battleground ripe for litigation. In February 2024, Elon Musk filed a lawsuit against Sam Altman, the founder of OpenAI, and OpenAI itself, over the… The post Eliza Labs Files Lawsuit Against Musk’s xAI Alleging Monopolistic Behavior appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Agentic AI project Eliza Labs has filed a lawsuit against Elon Musk’s xAI, claiming that the AI company engaged in monopolistic practices meant to “deplatform” agentic AI launchpads. The lawsuit claims that xAI attempted to “extract” valuable information, including technical documentation and usage figures related to the development of Eliza Labs’ platform, to copy its ideas before “banishing” Eliza Labs from xAI. Eliza Labs co-founder Shaw Walters argues in the lawsuit that the relationship between the two companies started off amicably, with xAI inviting Walters to share ideas. He also said that they built on xAI’s application programming interface (API) because it was free. Walters added: “The collaborative tone turned transactional, just as X was launching Ani and a new version of Grok. Suddenly, they were demanding we pay $50,000 a month for an enterprise license — $600,000 a year — or face legal action.  We were already paying them over $20,000 annually through various licenses and fees,” Walters continued. Cointelegraph reached out to Walters, but he declined to provide any further comment. The Eliza Labs lawsuit against xAI. Source: Court Listener The lawsuit highlights the litigious nature of the artificial intelligence sector, as legal action continues to pile up surrounding monopolistic practices, intellectual property rights, and legal liabilities of AI service providers. Related: Eliza Labs launches auto.fun, a no-code AI spin on Pump.Fun Lawsuits mount in the nascent AI sector The AI industry is still in its infancy, with key regulatory and legal questions left unanswered about the nascent technology. These regulatory grey zones exist alongside the legal issues traditionally faced by tech companies, such as trademark and patent infringement, making the AI sector a battleground ripe for litigation. In February 2024, Elon Musk filed a lawsuit against Sam Altman, the founder of OpenAI, and OpenAI itself, over the…

Eliza Labs Files Lawsuit Against Musk’s xAI Alleging Monopolistic Behavior

2025/08/30 14:38

Agentic AI project Eliza Labs has filed a lawsuit against Elon Musk’s xAI, claiming that the AI company engaged in monopolistic practices meant to “deplatform” agentic AI launchpads.

The lawsuit claims that xAI attempted to “extract” valuable information, including technical documentation and usage figures related to the development of Eliza Labs’ platform, to copy its ideas before “banishing” Eliza Labs from xAI.

Eliza Labs co-founder Shaw Walters argues in the lawsuit that the relationship between the two companies started off amicably, with xAI inviting Walters to share ideas. He also said that they built on xAI’s application programming interface (API) because it was free. Walters added:

We were already paying them over $20,000 annually through various licenses and fees,” Walters continued. Cointelegraph reached out to Walters, but he declined to provide any further comment.

The Eliza Labs lawsuit against xAI. Source: Court Listener

The lawsuit highlights the litigious nature of the artificial intelligence sector, as legal action continues to pile up surrounding monopolistic practices, intellectual property rights, and legal liabilities of AI service providers.

Related: Eliza Labs launches auto.fun, a no-code AI spin on Pump.Fun

Lawsuits mount in the nascent AI sector

The AI industry is still in its infancy, with key regulatory and legal questions left unanswered about the nascent technology.

These regulatory grey zones exist alongside the legal issues traditionally faced by tech companies, such as trademark and patent infringement, making the AI sector a battleground ripe for litigation.

In February 2024, Elon Musk filed a lawsuit against Sam Altman, the founder of OpenAI, and OpenAI itself, over the company’s proposal to become a for-profit enterprise.

Musk argued that the company abandoned its original mission as a non-profit, open-source project that would create tools for the public good.

Elon Musk’s lawsuit against Sam Altman and OpenAI. Source: Courthouse News

The lawsuit was withdrawn several months later, in June, but was withdrawn without prejudice, meaning that Musk can continue to reintroduce the lawsuit until it is dismissed or withdrawn with prejudice.

In July 2024, The New York Times sued OpenAI over the use of copyrighted material in the company’s large-language model (LLM), ChatGPT, demanding that detailed source material be provided for AI-generated content.

Xai, an Ethereum-focused gaming company, sued Elon Musk’s xAI over trademark infringement in August 2025, alleging that the similarity of the trademarks has confused consumers and damaged its business.

Magazine: Everybody hates GPT-5, AI shows social media can’t be fixed: AI Eye

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/eliza-labs-sues-elon-musk-xai?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

American Bitcoin’s $5B Nasdaq Debut Puts Trump-Backed Miner in Crypto Spotlight

American Bitcoin’s $5B Nasdaq Debut Puts Trump-Backed Miner in Crypto Spotlight

The post American Bitcoin’s $5B Nasdaq Debut Puts Trump-Backed Miner in Crypto Spotlight appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways: American Bitcoin (ABTC) surged nearly 85% on its Nasdaq debut, briefly reaching a $5B valuation. The Trump family, alongside Hut 8 Mining, controls 98% of the newly merged crypto-mining entity. Eric Trump called Bitcoin “modern-day gold,” predicting it could reach $1 million per coin. American Bitcoin, a fast-rising crypto mining firm with strong political and institutional backing, has officially entered Wall Street. After merging with Gryphon Digital Mining, the company made its Nasdaq debut under the ticker ABTC, instantly drawing global attention to both its stock performance and its bold vision for Bitcoin’s future. Read More: Trump-Backed Crypto Firm Eyes Asia for Bold Bitcoin Expansion Nasdaq Debut: An Explosive First Day ABTC’s first day of trading proved as dramatic as expected. Shares surged almost 85% at the open, touching a peak of $14 before settling at lower levels by the close. That initial spike valued the company around $5 billion, positioning it as one of 2025’s most-watched listings. At the last session, ABTC has been trading at $7.28 per share, which is a small positive 2.97% per day. Although the price has decelerated since opening highs, analysts note that the company has been off to a strong start and early investor activity is a hard-to-find feat in a newly-launched crypto mining business. According to market watchers, the listing comes at a time of new momentum in the digital asset markets. With Bitcoin trading above $110,000 this quarter, American Bitcoin’s entry comes at a time when both institutional investors and retail traders are showing heightened interest in exposure to Bitcoin-linked equities. Ownership Structure: Trump Family and Hut 8 at the Helm Its management and ownership set up has increased the visibility of the company. The Trump family and the Canadian mining giant Hut 8 Mining jointly own 98 percent…
Share
2025/09/18 01:33
Ranking the “XRP Killers”: Why Digitap ($TAP) Takes the #1 Spot for 2025

Ranking the “XRP Killers”: Why Digitap ($TAP) Takes the #1 Spot for 2025

The post Ranking the “XRP Killers”: Why Digitap ($TAP) Takes the #1 Spot for 2025 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XRP opted for the banks-first approach with a long list of impressive partnerships. But a decade later, and no meaningful volume executed has seen a new cohort rise up. Consumers-first is how the new projects are positioning themselves. Stablecoins own the cross-border narrative, and Ripple is being pushed out of the spotlight.  The project that turns these digital dollars into everyday money will take the crown. Here’s the 2025 ranking for ‘XRP Killers’—and why Digitap ($TAP) sits on top. 1. Digitap ($TAP)—The world’s first omni-bank with Visa, Apple Pay, and Google Pay live.2. Stellar (XLM)—A cross-border network with steady enterprise integrations. 3. Remittix (RTX)—A remittance-focused newcomer aiming to bring stablecoin flows into everyday payouts.  Why XRP Never Worked XRP always targeted correspondent banking, not consumers. The story sounded incredible a decade ago, but stablecoins have changed the game. Dollar-pegged assets that run on faster rails than the XRP ledger with broader distribution. XRP’s vision has failed, but the cross-border payment disruption trade is still very much open. But in 2025, adoption matters, and the products that make digital dollars usable in ordinary life will be the biggest winners.  1) Digitap ($TAP): World’s First Omni-Bank with Growing Distribution Digitap is built to make every form of money behave the same. No more siloes, no more juggling multiple accounts, just all forms of value together on a single interface. Fiat, stablecoins, and crypto sit inside a single balance, and thousands of users have downloaded the app today and are using it to send funds.  In many ways, Digitap is an interoperability layer that stitches money together. Blockchain networks and established legacy banking systems are included in the multi-rail design, meaning money can truly travel on any system. Digitaps’ AI system optimizes for speed and cost whenever a user presses send, swap, or…
Share
2025/10/26 05:21