The post Best and Worst Fantasy Matchups By Position appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. ARLINGTON, TX – NOVEMBER 12: Dak Prescott #4 of the Dallas Cowboys talks with CeeDee Lamb #88 after an NFL football game against the New York Giants at AT&T Stadium on November 12, 2023 in Arlington, Texas. (Photo by Cooper Neill/Getty Images) Getty Images It’s week three, and your fantasy team is starting to show itself. So whether you are rushing to the waiver wire or just sitting back and chillin, it’s a good thing to know what matchups are going to give you a high ceiling and what ones are looking for the floor to fall out. Again, it is only week three, the fantasy season has just begun, so even if you are rushing to the waiver wire, don’t panic. Last week was a mixed bag of untimely injuries, the ole switcheroo and just some men underperforming. It happens. Let’s mitigate the possibility. If the Thursday Night Showdown between the Miami Dolphins and the Buffalo Bills has taught us anything, it is that it’s early. Counting out the Dolphins and Tyreek Hill, well, that was slightly premature. So, let’s carry on this crazy week and see what the best and worst plays by position are for week three. ForbesFantasy Football Start Or Sit Week 3: Jacory Croskey-Merritt, Tony Pollard And MoreBy Steve Bradshaw Quarterback Best And Worst Matchup Week 3 Best Quarterback Matchup Week 3: Dak Prescott at Chicago, Chicago -1.5, 49.5 o/u This isn’t only about Prescott attempting 52 passes last week and finishing with 361 passing yards, two passing touchdowns, and only one interception. This has a lot to do with the Bears’ defense, which helped J.J. McCarthy win NFC Offensive Player of the Week in week one. The Bears’ coverage defense is 32nd in passing yards per attempt (9.8) and passing touchdowns per game (3.5).… The post Best and Worst Fantasy Matchups By Position appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. ARLINGTON, TX – NOVEMBER 12: Dak Prescott #4 of the Dallas Cowboys talks with CeeDee Lamb #88 after an NFL football game against the New York Giants at AT&T Stadium on November 12, 2023 in Arlington, Texas. (Photo by Cooper Neill/Getty Images) Getty Images It’s week three, and your fantasy team is starting to show itself. So whether you are rushing to the waiver wire or just sitting back and chillin, it’s a good thing to know what matchups are going to give you a high ceiling and what ones are looking for the floor to fall out. Again, it is only week three, the fantasy season has just begun, so even if you are rushing to the waiver wire, don’t panic. Last week was a mixed bag of untimely injuries, the ole switcheroo and just some men underperforming. It happens. Let’s mitigate the possibility. If the Thursday Night Showdown between the Miami Dolphins and the Buffalo Bills has taught us anything, it is that it’s early. Counting out the Dolphins and Tyreek Hill, well, that was slightly premature. So, let’s carry on this crazy week and see what the best and worst plays by position are for week three. ForbesFantasy Football Start Or Sit Week 3: Jacory Croskey-Merritt, Tony Pollard And MoreBy Steve Bradshaw Quarterback Best And Worst Matchup Week 3 Best Quarterback Matchup Week 3: Dak Prescott at Chicago, Chicago -1.5, 49.5 o/u This isn’t only about Prescott attempting 52 passes last week and finishing with 361 passing yards, two passing touchdowns, and only one interception. This has a lot to do with the Bears’ defense, which helped J.J. McCarthy win NFC Offensive Player of the Week in week one. The Bears’ coverage defense is 32nd in passing yards per attempt (9.8) and passing touchdowns per game (3.5).…

Best and Worst Fantasy Matchups By Position

2025/09/20 02:19

ARLINGTON, TX – NOVEMBER 12: Dak Prescott #4 of the Dallas Cowboys talks with CeeDee Lamb #88 after an NFL football game against the New York Giants at AT&T Stadium on November 12, 2023 in Arlington, Texas. (Photo by Cooper Neill/Getty Images)

Getty Images

It’s week three, and your fantasy team is starting to show itself. So whether you are rushing to the waiver wire or just sitting back and chillin, it’s a good thing to know what matchups are going to give you a high ceiling and what ones are looking for the floor to fall out. Again, it is only week three, the fantasy season has just begun, so even if you are rushing to the waiver wire, don’t panic.

Last week was a mixed bag of untimely injuries, the ole switcheroo and just some men underperforming. It happens. Let’s mitigate the possibility.

If the Thursday Night Showdown between the Miami Dolphins and the Buffalo Bills has taught us anything, it is that it’s early. Counting out the Dolphins and Tyreek Hill, well, that was slightly premature. So, let’s carry on this crazy week and see what the best and worst plays by position are for week three.

ForbesFantasy Football Start Or Sit Week 3: Jacory Croskey-Merritt, Tony Pollard And More

Quarterback Best And Worst Matchup Week 3

Best Quarterback Matchup Week 3: Dak Prescott at Chicago, Chicago -1.5, 49.5 o/u

This isn’t only about Prescott attempting 52 passes last week and finishing with 361 passing yards, two passing touchdowns, and only one interception. This has a lot to do with the Bears’ defense, which helped J.J. McCarthy win NFC Offensive Player of the Week in week one.

The Bears’ coverage defense is 32nd in passing yards per attempt (9.8) and passing touchdowns per game (3.5). In addition to the McCarthy fiasco, they just allowed Detroit Lions’ Jared Goff to pass for 334 yards and five touchdowns on just 28 passing attempts.

Worst Quarterback Matchup Week 3: Geno Smith at Washington, Washington -3.5, 47.5 o/u

Smith had one of the worst games of his career last week against the Los Angeles Chargers. Smith went 24-of-43 for 180 yards, zero touchdowns, and three interceptions, making his touchdown-to-interception ratio for the past two weeks 1:4. The Chargers sacked him three times.

Now he will face the Commanders, who generate pressure on the quarterback at the second-highest rate.

Running Back Best And Worst Matchup Week 3

Best Running Back Matchup Week 3: Isiah Pacheco at New York Giants, Chiefs-6.5, 42.5 o/u

This is a hard sale because Pacheo hasn’t been playing particularly well. He does have a 53% snap share, a 37.6% route share, and has 15 of the 29 running back carries. Pacheco also has zero explosive runs and on nine touches is averaging 28.5 yards.

But if he is ever going to turn things around, this is the matchup to do it. The Giants have allowed the most rushing yards per game (177.5), the second most yards after contact, and the seventh highest explosive run rate.

Last week, Dallas Cowboys’ Javonte Williams collected 97 yards on 18 attempts and managed to get in a 30-yard run against them.

Worst Running Back Matchup Week 3: Quinshon Judkins v Green Bay Packers, Packers -7.5, 43.5 o/u

On the opposite end of the spectrum, there is rookie Judkins, who played his first NFL game last week. In that game, he had 26.4% snap share, 50% of the running back carries, and collected 71 total yards on 13 touches.

This week is his “welcome to the NFL rookie moment”, going against the Micah Parsons-led Green Bay Packers defense. The Packers defense has allowed the second fewest rushing yards per game (48.5 behind only the Browns), they have given up the fewest yards after contact, and no rusher has an explosive run against them.

Wide Receiver Best And Worst Matchup Week 3

Best Wide Receiver Matchup Week 3: D.K. Metcalf at New England, Steelers -1.5, 44.5 o/u

Last week, the Patriots soft-launched the resurgence of the Miami Dolphins’ receiving corps. Tyreek Hill collected 109 receiving yards. The week prior Las Vegas Raiders’ duo of Brock Bowers and Jakobi Meyers combined for 200 receiving yards against them.

Without cornerback Christian Gonzalez, the Patriots’ secondary is a sieve.

Enter 6’4”, 229-pound Metcalf, who clocked 4.33 in the 40-yard dash. The man is a physical freak who has a 34.4% first read share and is in dire need of a stat boost. The Patriots’ secondary has been providing that boost in the last two weeks.

Worst Wide Receiver Matchup Week 3: Chris Olave at Seattle, Seattle -7.5, 42.5 o/u

Olave has a 28.1% first read share and is second on the team with red zone targets (2). In two weeks, he has averaged 54 receiving yards. Olave also plays the majority of his 92.4% snap share on the perimeter.

The Seahawks’ defense has given up the second-fewest PPR points per target and the third-fewest receiving yards per game to the perimeter wide receivers.

Tight End Best and Worst Matchup Week 3

Best Tight End Matchup Week 3: Kyle Pitts at Carolina, Falcons -5.5, 44.5 o/u

Per fantasypros, the Panthers’ coverage is the perfect matchup for Pitts. The Panthers’ defense plays single high on 56.5% of their defensive snaps.

Against single high, Pitt has a 28.6% target share (⇡ 8.0%) and a 25% (⇡5.4%) first read share. And then, of course, there is the fact that in the past two weeks, the Panthers have given up the third most fantasy points (11.0) and the most yards per reception (87.5) to the tight end position.

Worst Tight End Matchup Week 3: Mark Andrews v Detroit, Ravens -5.5, 52.5 o/u

There is no Isaiah Likely to blame; Andrews has just not been productive. After two weeks, he has 2.9 fantasy points on four targets. He has an 8.9% target share, has run 39 routes, and has seven total receiving yards.

Now add in that the Lions’ defense has allowed the third-worst catch rate to tight ends (64.9%) and has held tight ends to the fewest fantasy points per game (8.9).

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/gladyslouisetyler/2025/09/19/nfl-2025-week-3-bestworst-fantasy-football-matchups-by-position/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Bitcoin Loans Usher In a New BTC Era – Bitcoin Hyper Tipped as the Next 1000x Crypto

Bitcoin Loans Usher In a New BTC Era – Bitcoin Hyper Tipped as the Next 1000x Crypto

What to Know: Bitcoin loans mark a shift from passive holding to active $BTC deployment, broadening access and reinforcing Bitcoin’s monetary role.  Active $BTC lending can tighten liquidity loops: more collateralization, deeper markets, and stronger institutional incentives to hold $BTC.  Bitcoin Hyper aims to make $BTC fast and programmable via an SVM-based Layer 2 with ZK settlement to Bitcoin.  $HYPER’s strong presale momentum and large whale purchases fit perfectly into the current $BTC-focused cycle – one that’s fueled by real utility rather than pure hype. A Canadian Bitcoin-native company just issued its first Bitcoin-backed loan. That’s not a small tweak to the status quo. It’s a signal that $BTC is edging from ‘digital gold’ into an active financial asset, one that non-crypto users can finally access through a familiar product: lending. The firm’s goal is simple: accumulate $BTC and deploy it productively, yet the implication is big. More ways to borrow and build with Bitcoin usually mean stronger demand, deeper liquidity, and a broader user funnel. This design shift matters because utility beats narrative over a full cycle. Loans let institutions put idle $BTC to work and give businesses a way to leverage $BTC without selling it. The feedback loop is obvious: lending platforms attract borrowers, borrowers source $BTC, hodlers see new yield paths, and liquidity improves for everyone. Every service that treats $BTC as collateral, rather than a speculative asset, boosts its monetary credibility. That sets a timely backdrop for Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER), a $BTC-centric Layer 2 project built to make Bitcoin fast, programmable, and dApp-ready, and one many investors are already eyeing as the next 1000x crypto. If Bitcoin is stepping into mainstream finance, a chain that bridges $BTC into high-throughput smart contracts sits right in the slipstream. Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) Turns $BTC Into A High-Speed, Programmable Asset Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) proposes a Bitcoin Layer-2 that uses an SVM-based execution environment, canonical bridging, and ZK proofs to move $BTC at near-instant speed with low fees. The aim is to retain Bitcoin-grade security while unlocking staking, DeFi, and on-chain apps for $BTC itself. This approach directly addresses a pain point that lending alone can’t solve: throughput and programmability on Bitcoin. If loans expand demand for $BTC as collateral, a performant L2 expands what that collateral can actually do. The flow is straightforward. Users bridge $BTC, transact on Layer 2 with high throughput, then periodically settle back to Bitcoin L1 with cryptographic proofs. In practice, that means cheaper payments, faster markets, and room for dApps that rely on programmability without compromising the trust people expect from Bitcoin. The more services reference $BTC, like the newly launched loans, the more a generalized execution layer becomes useful for builders who prefer to stay within the Bitcoin ecosystem rather than porting value elsewhere. Utility also needs clear developer pathways. The $HYPER whitepaper emphasizes developer experience, observability, and infrastructure, enabling teams to ship quickly. If the project can make building on $BTC feel familiar to teams used to modern VM stacks, it lowers switching costs and accelerates innovation. That’s the kind of narrative institutions understand: faster rails, safer settlement, and broader use cases. Get on the $HYPER train before it’s too late.  Presale Momentum Meets A $BTC Lending Tailwind Momentum is real. The Bitcoin Hyper presale has reached $26.9M, and you can buy $HYPER right now for just $0.013265. That’s a solid show of demand for a $BTC-first L2 at a time when Bitcoin’s financialization is visibly accelerating. If lending adoption widens the $BTC gateway, $BTC-native infrastructure stands to benefit directly. On-chain activity adds another datapoint. A recent transaction sent about 63.8 ETH, roughly $226K, into the presale contract, resulting in a transfer of 16.8M HYPER. While one whale doesn’t define a market, large buyers usually do their homework and often act as early liquidity. That fits the pattern of growing presale participation and the broader rotation toward $BTC-aligned narratives. What does the $HYPER price prediction look like in simple terms? Using the current price as a base, a year-end 2025 target of $0.02595 implies roughly 1.96x from here if the team delivers core milestones and listings. A 2026 scenario at $0.08625 would be about 6.51x if the DAO and incentive programs mature as planned. As Bitcoin-backed lending marks a new phase in $BTC’s financial integration, Bitcoin Hyper stands out as the infrastructure built to support that momentum. With its Layer 2 approach and growing presale, $HYPER could play a key role in turning the latest Bitcoin lending headlines into lasting on-chain utility. This article is for informational purposes only and doesn’t constitute financial advice. Always do your own research (DYOR) before investing in crypto. Authored by Aaron Walker, NewsBTC – https://www.newsbtc.com/news/bitcoin-loans-usher-in-a-new-btc-era-bitcoin-hyper-tipped-as-the-next-1000x-crypto
Share
NewsBTC2025/11/13 00:35
7-Year Death Cross Pattern Shows Bitcoin Likely to Bottom at $95K Then Shoot to $145K

7-Year Death Cross Pattern Shows Bitcoin Likely to Bottom at $95K Then Shoot to $145K

Seven years’ worth of death cross data since the beginning of the 2017 bull run shows that Bitcoin might bottom around $95K before shooting for the stars at $145K. Bitcoin analyst Sykodelic observed that in the last 7+ years, every time the 1D 50SMA and 200SMA cross over to the downside, also known as “a death cross”, it has marked at least a local bottom within about 5 days, with at minimum a 45% rally afterwards. According to him, “We are about to get the next death cross in about 5 days from now.” Bitcoin’s Death Cross Nailed Every Bottom Since 2018 In 2018, the local bottom formed when the death cross occurred at $6,480, and the price went on to rally 50%. Similarly, in March 2020, Bitcoin bottomed days before the death cross at $3,907, and the price went on to 17x to $68,000.Source: X/Sykodelic Just recently, in April 2025, following the first tariff panic, Bitcoin dumped from the then-high of around $120K and bottomed out exactly on the day of the death cross formation around $74K. The Bitcoin analyst confirmed that we are currently about 2 or 3 days away from it happening, which means that if the bottom is not in, we would expect it to be so by November 21st. Sykodelic believes that if the price continues lower from here, the bottom target is $95K, but with a quick reversal. However, in the near-term, he believes “Bitcoin is going to rally to at least $145,000 from here.” Bitcoin has always bounced at least 50% from the local bottom after a death cross, and it is looking like it’d repeat that again as price still holds close to the 1W 50SMA with liquidity pointing to the upside. “Even if you are in the belief that the market has topped and you want to exit, you don’t do it at the pico lows when the data is telling you that there will be a decent bounce at the very least.” “The worst thing you can do in this game is sell the lows in panic,” Sykodelic advised crypto traders who believe the bull run is over. Intel Data Flashes Same Bottom Signal That Preceded April’s 69% Rally Data from CryptoQuant also supports the Bitcoin bottom formation observation. Onchain data shows that there are now more than 5 million Bitcoins in loss, and the last time this happened was on April 7, before Bitcoin went on a 69% rally to new highs. On April 7, 2025, when 1 BTC traded for $74,508, the amount of Bitcoin lost was exactly 5,159,000. Recently, on November 5, 2025, when Bitcoin dipped to $98,966 for the first time since April, the amount of BTC in loss rose back to 5,639,000. CoinCare market insight also revealed that the Bitcoin Net Unrealized Profit (NUP) is signaling a potential bottom. Bitcoin NUP represents the total amount of unrealized profits held by investors whose coins are currently in profit. Historically, during the bull cycle, short-term bottoms have formed whenever the NUP fell below 0.5.Source: CryptoQuant Currently, the NUP is sitting at 0.476, indicating that Bitcoin might be approaching a short-term market bottom. CoinCare analysts say, “We can expect a rebound in the near term.” Technical Analysis On the technical front, crypto chart analyst CryptoFabrik revealed that BTC is forming a falling wedge pattern on the 4H timeframe chart. According to the structure, Bitcoin is likely to remain inside the wedge for the next few days, and a potential breakout can be expected next week.Source: X/CryptoFabik If Bitcoin manages to break out successfully, it could see a strong rally towards the $120K zone
Share
CryptoNews2025/11/13 00:06