TLDR: A DeFi user lost $50.4M swapping aEthUSDT for aEthAAVE after confirming a 99.9% price impact warning. CoW Swap’s legacy gas ceiling and solver failure forcedTLDR: A DeFi user lost $50.4M swapping aEthUSDT for aEthAAVE after confirming a 99.9% price impact warning. CoW Swap’s legacy gas ceiling and solver failure forced

DeFi User Loses $50.4M in One Swap as MEV Bots and Protocol Failures Collide

2026/03/16 06:14
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

TLDR:

  • A DeFi user lost $50.4M swapping aEthUSDT for aEthAAVE after confirming a 99.9% price impact warning.
  • CoW Swap’s legacy gas ceiling and solver failure forced the trade through a $73K illiquid SushiSwap pool.
  • A mempool leak exposed the transaction, letting an MEV bot execute a sandwich attack for $9.9M profit.
  • Titan Builder extracted ~$34M in ETH, while Aave and CoW Swap have since patched their security gaps.

A DeFi user suffered approximately $50.4 million in losses from a single swap on the Aave platform. The user exchanged aEthUSDT for aEthAAVE through a CoW Swap widget and received only $36,000 in return.

Both Aave and CoW Swap have released detailed post-mortem reports on the incident. The reports cite a combination of user error, illiquid markets, and multiple technical failures.

MEV bots also exploited the situation, extracting tens of millions in profit from the DeFi trade.

How a Series of Technical Failures Enabled the Loss

The user manually confirmed a “High price impact (99.9%)” warning before completing the DeFi swap. Aave’s report confirmed this warning was clearly visible within the interface. The trade proceeded regardless, setting the stage for what followed.

CoW Swap’s report identified multiple system-level failures that escalated the outcome. A legacy hardcoded gas ceiling rejected better quotes that could have routed the trade efficiently.

The winning solver also failed to execute the trade on-chain as intended. Together, these two failures severely limited the options available for completing the swap.

Further complicating matters, a suspected mempool leak exposed the private transaction to public view. This meant any observer, including automated MEV bots, could see the order before confirmation. The exposure proved costly, as it directly opened the door for a targeted attack.

Because better routes were blocked, the trade was pushed through a SushiSwap AAVE/WETH pool. That pool held only about $73,000 in total liquidity at the time of the swap.

Routing a $50 million order through such a thin market caused extreme price slippage. The user ultimately received a fraction of what the trade should have returned.

MEV Bots and Block Builders Extracted Millions From the Failed Swap

Once the transaction leaked to the public mempool, an MEV bot quickly identified the opportunity. The bot front-ran the trade by buying available AAVE before the user’s order confirmed. This action drove the price of AAVE sharply higher, hurting the user’s final settlement.

The bot then sold its AAVE position immediately after the user’s trade was filled. This sandwich attack netted the bot an estimated $9.9 million in profit. @CoWSwap’s report identified the mempool leak as a central factor enabling this attack on the DeFi user.

To guarantee the correct block sequence, the MEV bot paid Titan Builder directly. The block builder extracted roughly $34 million in ETH for facilitating the arrangement. This coordination between the bot and the builder was key to the attack’s execution.

In response, @CoWSwap has patched its legacy gas limits to prevent similar routing failures. @aave is deploying “Aave Shield,” which will automatically block swaps with a price impact above 25% by default. Both protocols are now working to prevent this type of loss from recurring across DeFi.

The post DeFi User Loses $50.4M in One Swap as MEV Bots and Protocol Failures Collide appeared first on Blockonomi.

Market Opportunity
DeFi Logo
DeFi Price(DEFI)
$0.000313
$0.000313$0.000313
-2.18%
USD
DeFi (DEFI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

DBS Tests Repo With Ripple RLUSD and Franklin sgBENJI

DBS Tests Repo With Ripple RLUSD and Franklin sgBENJI

The post DBS Tests Repo With Ripple RLUSD and Franklin sgBENJI appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ripple, DBS, and Franklin Templeton launch tokenized repo pilot on DBS Exchange. Repo trades use Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin and Franklin Templeton’s sgBENJI token. sgBENJI issued on XRP Ledger enables fast collateralized lending and settlements. DBS, Ripple, and Franklin Templeton have signed a memorandum of understanding to bring repo transactions into tokenized finance. The framework pairs Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin with Franklin Templeton’s sgBENJI tokenized money market fund, listed on DBS Digital Exchange. The setup gives accredited clients a path to rebalance cash into a regulated, yield-bearing vehicle while transacting with stablecoins that settle within minutes. For institutions used to overnight repo desks, this is a first look at how traditional liquidity tools can migrate onto public blockchains. Related: Franklin Templeton Launches its DeFi Solution Benji on Ethereum Demand From Institutions Shapes the Design The three firms cited rising demand for digital asset allocations, with surveys showing nearly nine in ten institutional investors plan to increase exposure in 2025. The repo model was chosen because it mirrors an existing backbone of global funding markets: collateralized lending against short-term securities. By allowing RLUSD to trade directly against sgBENJI on DBS Digital Exchange, desks can manage intraday liquidity, park stablecoin reserves into a fund earning regulated yield, and unwind positions quickly when cash is needed. DBS to Expand Collateralized Lending The next phase extends sgBENJI beyond a trading instrument into repo collateral. DBS plans to let investors pledge sgBENJI against credit lines arranged through the bank or third-party lenders. That opens deeper liquidity pools with the assurance that collateral sits inside a regulated balance sheet. For trading desks, that means onchain repo could eventually function like its traditional counterpart, rolling positions overnight, secured by tokenized assets that settle in near real-time. XRP Ledger as the Settlement Rail Franklin Templeton will issue sgBENJI tokens on…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 20:25
Pepeto Attracts Capital As Early Shiba Inu And Pepe Investors Hunt Big Gains And The Next 100x Story

Pepeto Attracts Capital As Early Shiba Inu And Pepe Investors Hunt Big Gains And The Next 100x Story

The post Pepeto Attracts Capital As Early Shiba Inu And Pepe Investors Hunt Big Gains And The Next 100x Story appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Early Shiba Inu and PEPE stories are legendary. Some first movers turned $1,000 into well over $1,000,000 as SHIB ran more than 26,000% in 2021, while PEPE delivered multi-thousand % bursts for the earliest entries. After riding those arcs, many of those holders are hunting the next big move, shifting from SHIB to PEPE and …
Share
CoinPedia2025/09/18 19:02
A 3821% surge in 20 years: Why are Pokémon cards valuable investments?

A 3821% surge in 20 years: Why are Pokémon cards valuable investments?

By David Unyime Nkanta Compiled by: TechFlow The Pokémon trading card game is extremely popular around the world, especially in Japan. These cards are very valuable, especially the rare ones. (Image source: Twitter / FADA Pack Magic @FadaPackMagic) Pokémon trading cards have gone from amusement park items to one of the world's hottest alternative investments. According to data from analytics firm Card Ladder, the Pokémon card market has grown 3,821% in value since 2004, far outpacing the S&P 500's 483% increase and Meta Platforms' 1,844% growth. From hobby to high-yield asset Pokémon trading cards, launched by Nintendo in 1996, have become a popular investment, traded across platforms including eBay, TCGplayer, and international expos. The market has seen explosive growth during the pandemic, as stimulus policies and lockdowns have driven collectors toward alternative assets. For some, the investment has yielded life-changing returns. Lucas Shaw, a 27-year-old account manager in Ohio, said the profits from selling the cards helped him pay for his wedding rings and celebrations. Similarly, Justin Wilson, a 32-year-old advertising manager in Oklahoma City, estimates the total value of his collection of 500 cards and 100 sealed items at about $100,000. He considers Pokémon cards part of his investment portfolio, alongside his Roth IRA and securities accounts. The appeal of Pokémon cards lies not only in financial gain but also in their emotional resonance. "You have to collect them all," Wilson said, referencing the series's classic slogan. For many, the cards represent both childhood nostalgia and speculative opportunity. Where does the value of rare Pokémon cards come from? A classic Poké Ball toy with matching Pokémon trading cards. Zapdos, Ninetales, and a trainer card are clearly visible. Image credit: Thimo Pedersen/Unsplash Unlike stocks, Pokémon cards don't generate dividends; their value depends on their rarity, condition, and cultural significance. Cards graded as perfect PSA 10 by the Professional Sports Authenticator (PSA) often fetch exorbitant prices. The most dramatic example occurred in 2022, when influencer Logan Paul purchased a near-perfect "Pikachu Illustrator" card for $5.3 million, setting a Guinness World Record for the most expensive Pokémon card ever sold privately. This event further ignited market interest and highlighted the speculative potential of high-level cards. Risks of the Pokémon Card Market Financial advisors warn against considering collectibles as the core of a portfolio. Card prices are extremely volatile, influenced by hype, media coverage, and collector sentiment. Counterfeit cards also remain a potential threat, with scams frequently occurring. Image source: Flickr/c0rnnibblets Still, the resilience of the Pokémon brand provides some stability to the market. Pokémon spans video games, movies, and merchandise, and unlike sports trading cards, the characters are immune to scandals, making them a safer investment for some collectors. The Future of Collectibles Investing The rapid rise of Pokémon cards reflects a broader shift in people's perception of value. As digital assets like Bitcoin face regulatory scrutiny and tech stocks undergo a market correction, tangible collectibles offer a nostalgic and potentially profitable haven. While the sustainability of its value remains uncertain, the 3,821% growth over the past 20 years has established Pokémon trading cards as the most vivid example of how a childhood hobby can transform into a multi-million dollar investment.
Share
PANews2025/09/18 18:00