A new research report examining Bitcoin’s exposure to future quantum computing breakthroughs suggests the risk is real but distant. In a joint study titled “BitcoinA new research report examining Bitcoin’s exposure to future quantum computing breakthroughs suggests the risk is real but distant. In a joint study titled “Bitcoin

Ark Invest Report: 35% of Bitcoin Supply Theoretically Vulnerable to Quantum Computing

2026/03/15 20:30
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

A new research report examining Bitcoin’s exposure to future quantum computing breakthroughs suggests the risk is real but distant.

In a joint study titled “Bitcoin and Quantum Computing,” published on March 12, 2026, analysts from Ark Invest and Unchained concluded that roughly 35% of the Bitcoin supply could theoretically be vulnerable if powerful quantum machines are eventually developed, but current technology remains far from that capability.

The researchers argue that while the theoretical attack surface exists, the Bitcoin network would likely have years or decades to adapt before quantum computing poses a practical threat.

Nearly 6.9 Million BTC Could Be Theoretically Exposed

The report estimates that about 6.9 million BTC, representing roughly 34.6% of the total supply, sits in address types that could become vulnerable if a cryptographically relevant quantum computer (CRQC) were created.

These coins fall into several categories based on how their cryptographic keys are exposed on-chain.

The largest group involves reused addresses, where public keys have already been revealed during previous transactions. Researchers estimate that roughly 5 million BTC, or about 25% of supply, falls into this category.

Another 1.7 million BTC (around 8.6%) sits in older Pay-to-Public-Key (P2PK) addresses. In these early Bitcoin address formats, the public key is visible directly on the blockchain. This category includes an estimated 1 million BTC believed to belong to Bitcoin’s creator, Satoshi Nakamoto.

The report also highlights about 200,000 BTC (roughly 1%) linked to Taproot (P2TR) addresses that could potentially be migrated in the future because certain key-path transaction mechanics expose public keys during spending.

Quantum Hardware Remains Far From Breaking Bitcoin

Despite these theoretical vulnerabilities, the report stresses that current quantum technology remains far from being capable of breaking Bitcoin’s cryptography.

Bitcoin relies on elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) for securing transactions. To break this system, researchers estimate that a quantum computer would require around 2,330 logical qubits along with billions of quantum operations.

Today’s quantum computers operate within what researchers call the “Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum” (NISQ) era. Current systems typically have only around 100 logical qubits, far below the level needed to threaten Bitcoin’s security.

Ark Invest researcher David Puell argues that the development of quantum capabilities will likely occur gradually rather than through a sudden breakthrough sometimes described as “Q-Day.”

If quantum computing progresses through visible milestones, developers would likely have significant time to introduce upgrades to Bitcoin’s security framework.

Quantum Breakthrough Would Impact Entire Internet

Another key point in the report is that Bitcoin would likely not be the first system affected by a major quantum breakthrough.

The same cryptographic algorithms used by Bitcoin are widely deployed across the global internet, banking infrastructure, and digital communication systems. A quantum computer powerful enough to break Bitcoin signatures would likely compromise many existing security protocols across governments and financial institutions.

Such a development would likely trigger a coordinated global transition toward post-quantum cryptography across multiple industries.

Developers Already Exploring Post-Quantum Solutions

According to the report, the Bitcoin ecosystem has already begun exploring ways to mitigate potential future quantum risks.

One possible approach would involve introducing quantum-resistant address formats through a soft fork, allowing users to migrate funds into wallets protected by newer cryptographic algorithms such as ML-DSA or SLH-DSA.

Another development referenced in the research is BIP-360, a proposal known as Pay-to-Merkle-Root (P2MR). This upgrade aims to disable certain key-path spending mechanisms that currently reveal public keys during transactions.

Over time, the community could encourage users to move coins into new address formats that remain secure even against future quantum computers.

Solana Payment Volume Up 755%: The Ecosystem Map Shows Why

Potential Governance Decisions Ahead

One long-term scenario discussed in the report involves how the Bitcoin community might handle coins that remain in vulnerable address formats.

If quantum threats ever became realistic, developers and network participants might need to decide whether to freeze or restrict coins that have not migrated to safer cryptographic formats.

Such decisions would likely require extensive discussion and consensus across the ecosystem.

Long Timeline for Quantum Risk

Ark Invest and Unchained ultimately conclude that quantum computing represents a long-term technological consideration rather than an immediate security threat.

While a portion of Bitcoin’s supply sits in theoretically vulnerable address formats, the gap between current quantum hardware and the capabilities needed to break Bitcoin’s encryption remains substantial.

For now, the report suggests the Bitcoin network has significant time to evolve its cryptographic defenses before quantum computing becomes a practical risk.

The post Ark Invest Report: 35% of Bitcoin Supply Theoretically Vulnerable to Quantum Computing appeared first on ETHNews.

Market Opportunity
QUANTUM Logo
QUANTUM Price(QUANTUM)
$0.002801
$0.002801$0.002801
-0.03%
USD
QUANTUM (QUANTUM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
New Crypto Investors Are Backing Layer Brett Over Dogecoin After Topping The Meme Coin Charts This Month

New Crypto Investors Are Backing Layer Brett Over Dogecoin After Topping The Meme Coin Charts This Month

Climbing to the top of the meme coin charts takes more than a viral mascot or celebrity tweets. Hype may spark attention, but only momentum, utility, and adaptability keep it alive. That’s why the latest debate among crypto enthusiasts is catching attention. While Dogecoin remains a household name, a new player has entered the arena […] The post New Crypto Investors Are Backing Layer Brett Over Dogecoin After Topping The Meme Coin Charts This Month appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2025/09/18 00:30
XRP Price Prediction 2026: Pepeto’s Presale Math Overshadows XRP and Solana as Wall Street Pushes $540 Million Into SOL ETFs

XRP Price Prediction 2026: Pepeto’s Presale Math Overshadows XRP and Solana as Wall Street Pushes $540 Million Into SOL ETFs

Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and Citadel collectively poured over $540 million into U.S. spot Solana ETFs in a single quarter. When the most conservative names
Share
Techbullion2026/03/16 05:37