TRON’s latest proposal only allows full SELFDESTRUCT removal for contracts created and eliminated within the same transaction. It would keep contracts intact outsideTRON’s latest proposal only allows full SELFDESTRUCT removal for contracts created and eliminated within the same transaction. It would keep contracts intact outside

TRON Seeks to Align SELFDESTRUCT Behavior With Ethereum EIP-6780

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]
  • TRON’s latest proposal only allows full SELFDESTRUCT removal for contracts created and eliminated within the same transaction.
  • It would keep contracts intact outside same-transaction destruction and transfer balances to a target address.

TRON has proposed activating TIP-6780 on its mainnet, bringing the network’s SELFDESTRUCT behavior in line with Ethereum’s EIP-6780. TIP-6780 will apply changes already included in GreatVoyage v4.8.1 at the protocol level if approved.

Listed as Proposal 94, it limits full contract deletion to cases where a contract is created and destroyed within the same transaction. In all other cases, the contract would remain onchain, while its assets would move to the target address. The update will also set the opcode’s fixed Energy cost to 5,000.

TRON linked the proposal to its earlier deprecation path for SELFDESTRUCT, as outlined in TIP-652. The new plan moves further in that direction while keeping closer compatibility with Ethereum

According to the proposal, the change preserves the common pattern where a contract is created and self-destructed in a single transaction. That pattern accounts for nearly all observed SELFDESTRUCT-related internal transactions in TRON’s 2025 data sample. The network says that 957,316 out of 957,324 such transactions followed the same-transaction pattern.

This week, TRON DAO joined the Linux Foundation’s Agentic AI Foundation as a gold member and took a seat on the governing board. We reported that Circle and JPMorgan are also part of the group.

TRON’s Proposal Targets Limited Contract Deletion 

Under the proposed rules, when SELFDESTRUCT runs outside the transaction that created the contract, the current execution frame would stop immediately. However, the contract code, storage, and account would stay in place. The account’s assets, including TRX, staked TRX, and TRC10 tokens, would instead transfer to the chosen target address.

If the beneficiary is the contract itself, the assets would not be burned in such cases, and there would be no net change in the balance. By contrast, if SELFDESTRUCT occurs in the same transaction as contract creation, the behavior remains as before, including deletion of account data and balance transfer.

The proposal said a contract would count as newly created only when deployment succeeds through CREATE, CREATE2, or a similar method within the same transaction. TRON’s account activation rules will stay the same under this change.

Contracts that depend on redeployment to the same address through CREATE2 after SELFDESTRUCT would no longer work as intended unless destruction occurs in the same transaction as creation. In addition, patterns that depend on SELFDESTRUCT for account removal or asset burning will also change outside that limited case.

TRON’s published onchain analysis showed limited ecosystem exposure. Few contracts contain the SELFDESTRUCT opcode, fewer hold assets, and none in the reviewed group executed an actual SELFDESTRUCT transaction.

Previously, CNF outlined TRON’s AI push as the network introduced the onchain Bank of AI through AINFT. The system lets autonomous agents make payments, manage assets, and access DeFi with x402 payments and 8004 identities.

]]>
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Gold continues to hit new highs. How to invest in gold in the crypto market?

Gold continues to hit new highs. How to invest in gold in the crypto market?

As Bitcoin encounters a "value winter", real-world gold is recasting the iron curtain of value on the blockchain.
Share
PANews2025/04/14 17:12
XRP Multi-Year Accumulation Signals Potential 1000% Breakout

XRP Multi-Year Accumulation Signals Potential 1000% Breakout

The post XRP Multi-Year Accumulation Signals Potential 1000% Breakout appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XRP Builds Multi-Year Base as Whales Accumulate and Volume
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/21 00:04