During the United States' 2008 presidential race, the phrase "drill, baby, drill" became a Republican mantra thanks, in part, to someone who is now an outspokenDuring the United States' 2008 presidential race, the phrase "drill, baby, drill" became a Republican mantra thanks, in part, to someone who is now an outspoken

Nobel economist warns Trump can’t save Americans from soaring prices

2026/03/11 00:22
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

During the United States' 2008 presidential race, the phrase "drill, baby, drill" became a Republican mantra thanks, in part, to someone who is now an outspoken Never Trump conservative and an MS NOW host: Michael Steele. At the time, Steele was Maryland's lieutenant governor, and he went on to become chairman of the Republican National Committee (RNC) — where he continued to urge the U.S. to aggressively drill for oil.

At the 2008 Republican National Convention, Steele told a cheering crowd, "Let me make it very clear: drill, baby, drill — and drill now."

Then-Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin used the phrase that year during her vice-presidential debate with then-U.S. Sen. Joe Biden (D-Maryland) — who stressed that he wasn't against drilling for oil (his exact words were "drill we must") but also acknowledged the need to pursue green energy options.

In 2026, "drill, baby, drill" is still a GOP mantra. But liberal economist Paul Krugman, in a Substack column published on March 10, explains why drilling for oil will not protect the U.S. from rising energy prices during a war in the Middle East.

"Donald Trump talked a lot of nonsense about energy during the 2024 campaign," Krugman explains. "But in fairness, some of the underlying premises behind 'drill, baby, drill' were accepted by many people. At the very least, it was widely presumed that U.S. self-sufficiency in oil would protect America from disruptions in oil supplies overseas."

But that presumption was wrong.

The former New York Times columnist continues, "America produces a lot of oil — substantially more than we consume. Although we import some oil, mainly from Canada and Mexico, while exporting even more oil, mainly from Texas, we buy hardly any oil from the Persian Gulf. Yet the closure of the Strait of Hormuz has caused U.S. prices of oil products to soar. Self-sufficiency in oil has done nothing at all to insulate the U.S. economy from Middle East chaos."

Krugman points out that because "oil is traded on world markets," the price is more or less the same everywhere, whether it comes from Texas or the Persian Gulf.

"Some people have been shocked at the way U.S. gasoline, diesel and heating oil prices have soared over the past few days," Krugman observes. "But they shouldn't have been surprised. So does U.S. oil production give Americans no insulation at all from world market events? Not under the current rules of the game…. It's almost inconceivable that 1970s-type price controls or excess profits taxes would be imposed today. So U.S. prices of gasoline and other oil products reflect world crude prices, and the fact that America produces a lot of oil doesn't matter at all."

The economist adds, "If anything, U.S. families are more exposed to Middle East chaos than their counterparts in, say, Europe or Japan, mainly because we drive bigger, less fuel-efficient cars. The people who decided to begin this war should have seen this coming. All the evidence, however, suggests that they didn't."

  • george conway
  • noam chomsky
  • civil war
  • Kayleigh mcenany
  • Melania trump
  • drudge report
  • paul krugman
  • Lindsey graham
  • Lincoln project
  • al franken bill maher
  • People of praise
  • Ivanka trump
  • eric trump
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

The post Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson has weighed in on whether the Federal Reserve should make a 25 basis points (bps) Fed rate cut or 50 bps cut. This comes ahead of the Fed decision today at today’s FOMC meeting, with the market pricing in a 25 bps cut. Bitcoin and the broader crypto market are currently trading flat ahead of the rate cut decision. Franklin Templeton CEO Weighs In On Potential FOMC Decision In a CNBC interview, Jenny Johnson said that she expects the Fed to make a 25 bps cut today instead of a 50 bps cut. She acknowledged the jobs data, which suggested that the labor market is weakening. However, she noted that this data is backward-looking, indicating that it doesn’t show the current state of the economy. She alluded to the wage growth, which she remarked is an indication of a robust labor market. She added that retail sales are up and that consumers are still spending, despite inflation being sticky at 3%, which makes a case for why the FOMC should opt against a 50-basis-point Fed rate cut. In line with this, the Franklin Templeton CEO said that she would go with a 25 bps rate cut if she were Jerome Powell. She remarked that the Fed still has the October and December FOMC meetings to make further cuts if the incoming data warrants it. Johnson also asserted that the data show a robust economy. However, she noted that there can’t be an argument for no Fed rate cut since Powell already signaled at Jackson Hole that they were likely to lower interest rates at this meeting due to concerns over a weakening labor market. Notably, her comment comes as experts argue for both sides on why the Fed should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:36
Strategy leans on STRC to accelerate Bitcoin buying in 2026

Strategy leans on STRC to accelerate Bitcoin buying in 2026

The post Strategy leans on STRC to accelerate Bitcoin buying in 2026 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Strategy has found a new gear in its Bitcoin accumulation
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/11 03:18
Senator Alsobrooks warns that the CLARITY Act middle ground will leave everyone "a little bit unhappy"

Senator Alsobrooks warns that the CLARITY Act middle ground will leave everyone "a little bit unhappy"

Speaking at the American Bankers Association summit in Washington, US Senator from Maryland, Angela Alsobrooks, spoke bluntly to a room full of community bankers
Share
Cryptopolitan2026/03/11 03:25