Donald Trump has made claims about Iran's nuclear capabilities in an attempt to justify his military strikes against the country, but according to a new analysisDonald Trump has made claims about Iran's nuclear capabilities in an attempt to justify his military strikes against the country, but according to a new analysis

Trump gives an 'obvious tell' that he has no idea what he’s doing

2026/03/05 22:00
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

Donald Trump has made claims about Iran's nuclear capabilities in an attempt to justify his military strikes against the country, but according to a new analysis from MS NOW, he did so in a way that had an "obvious tell" signaling that he had no idea what he was talking about.

The U.S. began conducting a joint military operation against Iran over the weekend alongside Israel, with counterstrikes so far claiming the lives of six American service members. Trump's justifications for this campaign have been at times vague and inconsistent, with one of his claims from Sunday being that Iran was just "two weeks" out from being able to produce a nuclear weapon.

Writing for MS NOW on Thursday, journalist Jarvis DeBerry noted that while some lawmakers have already disputed Trump's claim, his use of the "two weeks" timeframe was "enough by itself to warrant our skepticism." As he explained, Trump has repeatedly claimed during his tenure that certain deals, plans, or proposals that never came to fruition were just "two weeks" away.

"Major developments — a health care plan, a deadline for Ukraine and Russia to come to terms, evidence that President Barack Obama illegally wiretapped him — are always two weeks away, in Trump’s telling," DeBerry wrote. "But few of his promised developments materialize within that timeframe — if they materialize at all. We’d be foolish, then, not to question Trump’s claim that Iran was two weeks away from possessing such a destructive weapon. And we have every right to be angry at Trump using his 'two weeks' jibber-jabber to talk about something as gravely serious as war."

Famously, in 2018, Trump claimed that a healthcare plan to replace the Affordable Care Act was just two weeks away. In 2020, when pressed again about his plan to replace the ACA, Trump again claimed that his proposal would be ready in two weeks. For many observers, the "two weeks" claim has evolved into a sure sign that Trump has no plans regarding a certain topic or issue, but wants to seem like he does.

In the case of Trump's claim about Iran's nuclear capabilities, Joseph Cirincione, a national security analyst, previously told MS NOW that it was categorically untrue, explaining that the development of an operational nuclear weapon would be, at minimum, “several more months of work" for the Middle Eastern nation.

"Trump’s got to know we’ve heard him claim 'two weeks' many times," DeBerry concluded. "He’s got to know we don’t believe him. That he gave us his 'two weeks' jive anyway is evidence that he doesn’t care about the truth. But more than that, it’s evidence that he doesn’t believe he has to credibly justify to the American people his actions that have already brought death to many — American service members, included."

  • george conway
  • noam chomsky
  • civil war
  • Kayleigh mcenany
  • Melania trump
  • drudge report
  • paul krugman
  • Lindsey graham
  • Lincoln project
  • al franken bill maher
  • People of praise
  • Ivanka trump
  • eric trump
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Russian Central Bank Proposes Allowing Banks and Brokers to Obtain Crypto Licenses

Russian Central Bank Proposes Allowing Banks and Brokers to Obtain Crypto Licenses

The Bank of Russia has proposed allowing banks and brokerage firms to obtain licenses to operate crypto exchanges, a move that would place traditional financial
Share
Financemagnates2026/03/05 22:54
CME pushes Solana, XRP into derivatives spotlight with new options

CME pushes Solana, XRP into derivatives spotlight with new options

CME Group is launching options for Solana and XRP futures this October. The move signals a major shift, acknowledging that institutional liquidity is now firmly expanding beyond the established dominance of Bitcoin and Ether. According to a press release dated…
Share
Crypto.news2025/09/18 01:18
How The ByteDance App Survived Trump And A US Ban

How The ByteDance App Survived Trump And A US Ban

The post How The ByteDance App Survived Trump And A US Ban appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. WASHINGTON, DC – MARCH 13: Participants hold signs in support of TikTok outside the U.S. Capitol Building on March 13, 2024 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images) Getty Images From President Trump’s first ban attempt to a near-blackout earlier this year, TikTok’s five-year roller coaster ride looks like it’s finally slowing down now that Trump has unveiled a deal framework to keep the ByteDance app alive in the U.S. A look back at the saga around TikTok starting in 2020, however, shows just how close the app came to being shut out of the US – how it narrowly averted a ban and forced sale that found rare bipartisan backing in Washington. Recapping TikTok’s dramatic five-year battle When I interviewed Brendan Carr back in 2022, for example, the future FCC chairman was already certain at that point that TikTok’s days were numbered. For a litany of perceived sins — everything from the too-cozy relationship of the app’s parent company with China’s ruling regime to the app’s repeated floating of user privacy — Carr was already convinced, at least during his conversation with me, that: “The tide is going out on TikTok.” It was, in fact, one of the few issues that Washington lawmakers seemed to agree on. Even then-President Biden was on board, having resurrected Trump’s aborted TikTok ban from his first term and signed it into law. “It feels different now than it did two years ago at the end of the Trump administration, when concerns were first raised,” Carr told me then, in August of 2022. “I think, like a lot of things in the Trump era, people sort of picked sides on the issue based on the fact that it was Trump.” One thing led to another, though, and it looked like Carr was probably…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 07:29