Bitcoin etfs face renewed outflows as jitters mount; outlines price targets, key support zones, and implications for risk management.Bitcoin etfs face renewed outflows as jitters mount; outlines price targets, key support zones, and implications for risk management.

Market jitters grow as bitcoin etfs face heavy outflows and test key support levels

bitcoin etfs

After several weeks of volatility, bitcoin etfs are again in the spotlight as traders debate whether this is a normal correction or the prelude to a deeper reversal.

Large capital outflows from Bitcoin ETFs unsettle investors

Since the end of January, Bitcoin exchange-traded funds have seen significant net outflows, triggering renewed caution among market participants. Over just a few sessions, several hundred million dollars exited these products, increasing skepticism among institutional investors and adding fuel to existing concerns.

This persistent selling coincided with a clear rise in BTC supply on the market, pushing the price sharply below key psychological thresholds. However, ETF flow data tends to be volatile by nature and usually reacts quickly to price swings, which makes short-term readings more complex.

Moreover, part of the recent btc selling pressure likely comes from short-term traders exploiting arbitrage opportunities or reallocating capital toward other assets that appear briefly more attractive. A few isolated sessions of positive flows already suggest that some investors are selectively buying the dip.

Understanding flows and Bitcoin market structure

It is crucial to place these numbers within the broader bitcoin market structure. ETFs still represent only a portion of the total circulating supply, even if their role in price discovery has increased since their launch. That said, long-term ownership patterns continue to act as an important stabilizing force.

A substantial quantity of Bitcoin remains locked in the hands of long-term holders who historically react less to short-term volatility. As long as these actors avoid broad capitulation, it seems premature to speak of an imminent structural collapse based solely on ETF data.

In this context, the recent wave of bitcoin etf outflows should be interpreted more as a sentiment indicator than as a definitive signal of trend reversal. However, persistent and accelerating redemptions over several weeks would undeniably warrant closer monitoring by all market participants.

Price targets and support zones for a potential BTC bottom

The ongoing correction has reopened the question of possible btc price targets on the downside. After registering an all-time high at the end of 2025, BTC has already given back a significant portion of its gains, which naturally feeds the most pessimistic forecasts within the community.

From a technical perspective, several bitcoin support levels stand out. A first major zone sits between $70,000 and $75,000, corresponding to a previous accumulation range where substantial volumes changed hands. However, if this region were to break decisively, the market could search for liquidity lower.

In such a scenario, price could move toward the $60,000 area, which would still fit within a large-scale bull cycle, even if it would be psychologically painful for many new entrants. Moreover, corrections of this magnitude have already occurred in past bullish phases without invalidating the broader uptrend.

Longer-term indicators continue to show that Bitcoin trades well above its deepest structural supports. That said, current weakness appears more related to position rebalancing and profit-taking than to a profound loss of confidence in the asset itself.

Are bitcoin etfs signaling a new crash or a pause in the cycle?

For now, data suggests that the latest wave of turbulence in bitcoin etfs reflects a market that is digesting previous gains, re-evaluating risk, and adjusting exposure across different instruments. However, the persistence of outflows remains a key metric to watch in the coming weeks.

In conclusion, ETF redemptions are an important piece of information but do not, by themselves, confirm the start of a new crash. The balance between short-term speculative flows, long-term holders, and key price supports will determine whether this phase evolves into a deeper downturn or simply a healthy consolidation within an ongoing bull market.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00