The post XLM Technical Analysis Feb 4 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XLM is stuck at the 0.18$ level and positioned near critical supports within a downtrendThe post XLM Technical Analysis Feb 4 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XLM is stuck at the 0.18$ level and positioned near critical supports within a downtrend

XLM Technical Analysis Feb 4

4 min read

XLM is stuck at the 0.18$ level and positioned near critical supports within a downtrend. Despite RSI at 29.89 being in the oversold region, rejections at resistances could trigger a decline.

Current Price Position and Critical Levels

XLM is trading at the 0.18$ level with a slight 0.23% increase over the last 24 hours, but the overall structure remains dominated by a downtrend. The price continues to stay below EMA20 (0.20$) and the Supertrend indicator is giving a bearish signal, pointing to 0.21$ as resistance. A total of 12 strong levels were detected across 1D, 3D, and 1W timeframes: 2 supports/3 resistances on 1D, 2 supports/1 resistance on 3D, 1 support/4 resistance confluence on 1W. This multi-timeframe (MTF) alignment increases the strength of the levels. Volume is low at 102.10M$, indicating that big players are waiting for liquidity hunts. The price is in a narrow consolidation between 0.17$-0.18$; the breakout direction will determine the trend.

Support Levels: Buyer Zones

Primary Support

The strongest support level is at 0.1655$ (score: 79/100), prominently appearing as an order block on 1D and 3D timeframes. This level has been tested three times in recent weeks and rejected each time with strong buying volume; for example, it forms a 20% demand zone on the 1W chart. MTF confluence is high: it overlaps with EMA50 (around 0.166$), and has held multiple times in the past as a Fibonacci 0.618 retracement level. Volume profile is concentrated here, a region where institutional buyers accumulate liquidity for stop-loss hunts. A break below this level could lead to a downside target of 0.0941$ (R/R ratio around 1:4).

Secondary Support and Stop Levels

Secondary support at 0.1747$ (score: 68/100) stands out as a short-term supply/demand transition. It is the swing low of the recent decline on the 1D chart and a breaker block on 3D; tested twice and rejected upward, it held even in low-volume tests. It provides confluence with EMA100 (around 0.175$). Invalidation is a close below 0.1655$; if broken, buyer stop-losses will trigger, accelerating toward 0.16$ with a liquidity sweep. This area carries bounce potential with oversold RSI (29.89), but caution is advised due to the bearish trend.

Resistance Levels: Seller Zones

Near-Term Resistances

The near-term first resistance is at 0.1819$ (score: 72/100), just above the current price and a strong resistance node on the 1D timeframe. This level has been rejected four times in recent rallies; sellers enter when tested without volume increase. It aligns with Supertrend resistance (0.21$) and overlaps with daily VWAP. A breakout requires high volume; otherwise, fakeout risk is high. The second resistance is at 0.1888$ (score: 60/100), forming equal highs on 1W and a Fibonacci 0.382 extension.

Main Resistance and Targets

The main resistance at 0.2721$ (score: 60/100) is a long-term target and premium liquidity zone with 3D/1W confluence. It functioned as a major supply block in the past bull market, turning down after five tests with strong selling volume. It perfectly overlaps with EMA200 weekly (around 0.27$). Upside target 0.2393$ (score: 33) is an intermediate target between these resistances; a break would increase momentum. However, in a downtrend, these levels can be used as seller traps, with big players accumulating liquidity for short positions.

Liquidity Map and Big Players

The liquidity map shows dense stop-loss clusters below 0.1655$; this is a pool that smart money will target for a sweep. Above, equal highs between 0.1819$-0.1888$ hold short squeeze liquidity. Big players (institutions) may be accumulating positions in buyer blocks at 0.1747$-0.1655$ during the downtrend; there are traces of quiet buying when volume is low. Imbalances (fair value gaps) on 1W will be filled if price pushes to 0.2721$. Overall, liquidity is downward under the bearish Supertrend; a BTC decline is expected to cause a cascade effect in XLM.

Bitcoin Correlation

BTC is in a downtrend at 76,534$ with a -2% decline; XLM has high correlation to BTC (+0.85), and BTC testing supports at 75,666$ and 72,963$ could pressure XLM to 0.1655$. If BTC resistances at 77,817$-81,773$ break, an altcoin rally could follow, targeting 0.1888$ for XLM. BTC Dominance is rising and Supertrend is bearish; caution for altcoins, watch support near 0.00000236$ on the XLM BTC pair.

Trading Plan and Level-Based Strategy

Bearish outlook: Short on rejection at 0.1819$ with stop at 0.1747$, target 0.1655$ (high R/R). Bullish scenario: Long on 0.1819$ breakout + volume, target 0.1888$, invalidation below 0.1747$. Check detailed charts in XLM Spot Analysis and XLM Futures Analysis. This is a level-based outlook; DYOR and risk management are essential (risk 1-2% of position). Wait for MTF confirmation, volume spikes as catalysts.

This analysis uses Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal’s market views and methodology.

Trading Analyst: Emily Watson

Short-term trading strategies expert

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/xlm-technical-analysis-february-4-2026-support-resistance-levels

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Solana Hits $4B in Corporate Treasuries as Companies Boost Reserves

Solana Hits $4B in Corporate Treasuries as Companies Boost Reserves

TLDR Solana-based corporate treasuries have surpassed $4 billion in value. These reserves account for nearly 3% of Solana’s total circulating supply. Forward Industries is the largest holder with over 6.8 million SOL tokens. Helius Medical Technologies launched a $500 million Solana treasury reserve. Pantera Capital has a $1.1 billion position in Solana, emphasizing its potential. [...] The post Solana Hits $4B in Corporate Treasuries as Companies Boost Reserves appeared first on CoinCentral.
Share
Coincentral2025/09/18 04:08
SHIB Price Prediction: Mixed Signals Point to $0.0000085 Target by February End

SHIB Price Prediction: Mixed Signals Point to $0.0000085 Target by February End

Technical analysis reveals SHIB trading near oversold levels with RSI at 35.06. Despite bearish MACD momentum, support levels suggest potential recovery toward $
Share
BlockChain News2026/02/04 16:04
CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon

CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon

The post CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlighted Polygon’s lead in global bonds, Spiko US T-Bill, and Spiko Euro T-Bill. Polygon published an X post to share that its roadmap to GigaGas was still scaling. Sentiments around POL price were last seen to be bearish. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal shared key pointers from the Dune and RWA.xyz report. These pertain to highlights about RWA on Polygon. Simultaneously, Polygon underlined its roadmap towards GigaGas. Sentiments around POL price were last seen fumbling under bearish emotions. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal on Polygon RWA CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlighted three key points from the Dune and RWA.xyz report. The Chief Executive of Polygon maintained that Polygon PoS was hosting RWA TVL worth $1.13 billion across 269 assets plus 2,900 holders. Nailwal confirmed from the report that RWA was happening on Polygon. The Dune and https://t.co/W6WSFlHoQF report on RWA is out and it shows that RWA is happening on Polygon. Here are a few highlights: – Leading in Global Bonds: Polygon holds 62% share of tokenized global bonds (driven by Spiko’s euro MMF and Cashlink euro issues) – Spiko U.S.… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) September 17, 2025 The X post published by Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal underlined that the ecosystem was leading in global bonds by holding a 62% share of tokenized global bonds. He further highlighted that Polygon was leading with Spiko US T-Bill at approximately 29% share of TVL along with Ethereum, adding that the ecosystem had more than 50% share in the number of holders. Finally, Sandeep highlighted from the report that there was a strong adoption for Spiko Euro T-Bill with 38% share of TVL. He added that 68% of returns were on Polygon across all the chains. Polygon Roadmap to GigaGas In a different update from Polygon, the community…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:10