The Graph is supporting two emerging standards that could enable AI agents to transact autonomously across blockchains. Here's what developers need to know. (ReadThe Graph is supporting two emerging standards that could enable AI agents to transact autonomously across blockchains. Here's what developers need to know. (Read

The Graph Backs x402 and ERC-8004 Standards for AI Agent Economy

3 min read

The Graph Backs x402 and ERC-8004 Standards for AI Agent Economy

Jessie A Ellis Feb 03, 2026 19:06

The Graph is supporting two emerging standards that could enable AI agents to transact autonomously across blockchains. Here's what developers need to know.

The Graph Backs x402 and ERC-8004 Standards for AI Agent Economy

The Graph protocol is throwing its weight behind two emerging standards designed to let AI agents operate autonomously across blockchains—handling payments, verifying identities, and executing tasks without human intervention.

The indexing protocol announced support for ERC-8004, an Ethereum standard for agent identity and reputation, alongside x402, a payment protocol that revives a dormant HTTP error code to enable machine-to-machine micropayments. Both standards address a fundamental bottleneck: AI agents currently lack standardized ways to verify each other's trustworthiness or settle payments efficiently.

What These Standards Actually Do

ERC-8004 functions as a digital passport for AI agents. Beyond simple identification, it includes registries tracking an agent's behavioral history and validation proofs for completed tasks. An agent on Base could query another agent's reputation on Arbitrum through a single Subgraph lookup—no blockchain scanning required.

x402 tackles the payment side. The protocol, which Coinbase has been developing, enables agents to pay fractions of a cent for individual data queries or compute resources. This matters because traditional payment infrastructure wasn't built for machines making thousands of micro-requests per minute.

The Gas Problem and GraphTally

Here's where it gets interesting for traders watching infrastructure plays. Raw x402 implementation hits a wall with gas fees—paying $0.0001 for data while spending $0.05 on transaction fees breaks the economics entirely.

The Graph's solution, GraphTally, has been live since late 2024. Instead of settling every micropayment immediately, agents issue cryptographically signed vouchers that get batched and settled later. Core developers have contributed these principles directly to the x402 specification.

The practical result: agents can now pay for Subgraph queries using x402, with full gateway compatibility still in development. The Graph is also maintaining dedicated ERC-8004 Subgraphs across eight blockchains in partnership with Agent0, the project behind the standard's authors.

Why This Matters Now

The agentic economy remains largely theoretical. Most blockchain users still manually bridge assets, approve transactions, and manage gas—the tedious work agents promise to automate. These standards don't guarantee adoption, but they do provide the missing plumbing.

For GRT holders, the play here is positioning. If AI agents need structured blockchain data to function, and The Graph controls the indexing layer for that data, increased agent activity translates directly to query volume. The protocol is essentially betting that becoming the data marketplace for machine-to-machine transactions beats competing on human-facing features alone.

Developers can already access ERC-8004 Subgraphs through The Graph Explorer. Whether the broader market cares about agent infrastructure in 2026 remains the open question.

Image source: Shutterstock
  • the graph
  • grt
  • ai agents
  • x402
  • erc-8004
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
“Vibes Should Match Substance”: Vitalik on Fake Ethereum Connections

“Vibes Should Match Substance”: Vitalik on Fake Ethereum Connections

Vitalik Buterin criticized L2s that use optimistic bridges without adding meaningful technical innovation. Ethereum’s base layer is scaling, reducing the need for
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2026/02/06 11:30
Why Bitcoin Crashed Below $69,000 — Causes & Outlook

Why Bitcoin Crashed Below $69,000 — Causes & Outlook

Cryptsy - Latest Cryptocurrency News and Predictions Cryptsy - Latest Cryptocurrency News and Predictions - Experts in Crypto Casinos Bitcoin crash explained:
Share
Cryptsy2026/02/06 11:20