The post ALGO Weekly Analysis Feb 3 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. ALGO, within the downtrend, stabilized at the $0.11 level with a modest weekly 2.22% recoveryThe post ALGO Weekly Analysis Feb 3 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. ALGO, within the downtrend, stabilized at the $0.11 level with a modest weekly 2.22% recovery

ALGO Weekly Analysis Feb 3

4 min read

ALGO, within the downtrend, stabilized at the $0.11 level with a modest weekly 2.22% recovery, while the $0.1066 resistance forms a critical turning point. Although the market structure suggests a cautious accumulation phase, Bitcoin’s downward bias increases risks for altcoins.

ALGO in the Weekly Market Summary

ALGO exhibited narrow consolidation in the $0.10 – $0.11 range last week, recording a modest 2.22% rise. With the price positioned at $0.11, trading volume remained limited at 24.12 million dollars amid the prevailing overall market downtrend. RSI at 38.25 is in the neutral-bearish zone, MACD shows a negative histogram, and the price below EMA20 ($0.12) gives a bearish short-term signal. In the big picture, ALGO is approaching critical supports in the long-term downtrend; this week’s narrow band between $0.1050 – $0.1066 will test the trend structure. For portfolio managers, the position of this level will determine accumulation/distribution phases. For more detailed spot data, check the ALGO detailed spot analysis page.

Trend Structure and Market Phases

Long-Term Trend Analysis

The market structure shows that ALGO’s long-term downtrend remains intact; on higher timeframes (weekly and monthly), a lower high/lower low formation dominates. The price trading below EMA50 and EMA200 confirms the bearish trend filter. Although momentum indicators (RSI monthly around 35) are approaching oversold, MACD’s negative divergence signals that the trend strength is preserved. This structure is a continuation of the decline of up to 80% from the peaks at the end of 2025; however, the $0.0947 major support could be an inflection point for a potential trend change. For long-term portfolio positions, the trend should be managed with the principle of “intact as long as below $0.1066.”

Accumulation/Distribution Analysis

Volume profile and price action exhibit accumulation phase characteristics in the $0.10 – $0.1050 range: low-volume tests and wicky candles suggest smart money buying from lows. However, volume-less rises above $0.11 carry signs of distribution patterns (fakeout higher). According to Wyckoff methodology, this narrow range could be accumulation before a ‘spring’ or ‘shakeout,’ but in the downtrend context, false breakout risk is high. According to scored levels ($0.0947: 75/100 support), accumulation strength is increasing; a break above $0.1066 is awaited for distribution. This phase offers R/R optimization opportunities for position traders.

Multi-Timeframe Confluence

Daily Chart View

On the daily chart, ALGO is squeezed between $0.1050 support and $0.1066 resistance; 1D has 2 support/2 resistance confluence. Price bearish below EMA20, RSI at 38 neutral without divergence signal. Recent candles are doji-heavy, indicating momentum loss. Critical: A break below $0.1050 accelerates the daily downtrend, above triggers short-covering. For futures market, follow ALGO futures market data.

Weekly Chart View

From a weekly perspective, ALGO closed with a bearish candle despite lower timeframe rally; 1W has 2 supports/3 resistances (total 8 strong levels). Supertrend bearish, volume decline implies trend fatigue. $0.11 level is weekly pivot, below opens path to $0.0947. 3D timeframe 2S/0R confluence strengthens support test; confluence reinforces bearish bias.

Critical Decision Points

Main supports: $0.0947 (75/100, major confluence), $0.1050 (64/100, short-term). Resistances: $0.1066 (74/100, breakout level), $0.1593 (65/100, upside target). These levels will define direction: above $0.1066 bullish flip, below continuation of downtrend. Downside risk $0.0514 (22/100). Visit the ALGO and other analyses page for all analyses. Market structure says “key inflection point at $0.1066.”

Weekly Strategy Recommendation

In Bullish Case

On $0.1066 breakout and close, activate long positions for $0.1593 target (R/R ~2:1, 44% upside). Stop-loss below $0.1050; trail with EMA20. With accumulation phase confirmation, portfolio allocation can shift 5-10% to ALGO if BTC stable.

In Bearish Case

On $0.1050 breakdown, shorts to $0.0947 intermediate, ultimate $0.0514 target (R/R ~1.5:1, 53% downside). Stop above $0.1066. Bearish scenario confirms distribution; add BTC short for hedge.

Bitcoin Correlation

BTC in downtrend at $78,236 level (+0.06% 24h), supertrend bearish and rising dominance signals caution for altcoins. ALGO highly correlated with BTC (0.85+); if BTC breaks $77,400 support, ALGO tests $0.1050. Watch BTC resistances $79,364/$82,602 – BTC rally can carry ALGO to $0.13, decline accelerates to $0.09. Scale altcoin positions according to BTC key levels.

Conclusion: Key Points for Next Week

Next week, watch $0.1050-$0.1066 breakout; volume increase will confirm direction. BTC below $77k risks altcoin dump. If trend remains intact, short bias; long on confluence bullish flip. Position traders stay R/R focused, cautious in macro cycle down phase.

This analysis uses Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal’s market views and methodology.

Strategy Analyst: David Kim

Macro market analysis and portfolio management

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/algo-technical-analysis-february-3-2026-weekly-strategy

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Vitalik Buterin Challenges Ethereum’s Layer 2 Paradigm

Vitalik Buterin Challenges Ethereum’s Layer 2 Paradigm

Vitalik Buterin challenges the role of layer 2 solutions in Ethereum's ecosystem. Layer 2's slow progress and Ethereum’s L1 scaling impact future strategies.
Share
Coinstats2026/02/04 04:08
USAA Names Dan Griffiths Chief Information Officer to Drive Secure, Simplified Digital Member Experiences

USAA Names Dan Griffiths Chief Information Officer to Drive Secure, Simplified Digital Member Experiences

SAN ANTONIO–(BUSINESS WIRE)–USAA today announced the appointment of Dan Griffiths as Chief Information Officer, effective February 5, 2026. A proven financial‑services
Share
AI Journal2026/02/04 04:15