Gurhan Kiziloz, BlockDAG, and the Web of 2025 Crypto Presales: What Investors Are Really Saying

In the midst of a crowded crypto presale landscape in 2025, a few names and projects keep appearing together not just in marketing press releases but in heated community discussions across Reddit and other forums. Among these, BlockDAG and Little Pepe (LILPEPE) have drawn the most attention, with investors increasingly linking patterns of promotion, fundraising tactics, and communication behavior to a broader ecosystem of presale activity.

At the center of many of these discussions is the name Gurhan Kiziloz, referenced by some community members as a behind-the-scenes figure tied to marketing strategies and promotional channels associated with multiple presale narratives. This article walks through the publicly visible press coverage, how these presales are interconnected in messaging and positioning, and what many investors are saying online about risk, transparency, and possible red flags.

How Major Crypto Press Releases Present 2025 Presale Projects

Across multiple mainstream and crypto-oriented media outlets, BlockDAG and other tokens have been featured together in comparative presale coverage.

For example, Digital Journal published a comparison of three headline presales BlockDAG, Little Pepe, and Bitcoin Hyper highlighting massive fundraising figures and positioning BlockDAG as a major competitor based on its claims of infrastructure and strategic partnerships. In that piece, BlockDAG is portrayed as having raised nearly $420 million, far outpacing others and suggesting broad investor interest and momentum.
Source: https://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/news/indnewswire/little-pepe-vs-blockdag-vs-1939493607.html

Similarly, The Portugal News listed BlockDAG alongside several other presales such as DeepSnitch, Little Pepe, and Remittix, describing them as part of the 2025 presale cycle and emphasizing the diversity of investor themes from AI security tools to meme-driven ecosystems and cross-border payments. In that article, BlockDAG is again cast as a presale leader due to large capital raise figures and its hybrid technical narrative combining scalability and security claims.
Source: https://www.theportugalnews.com/news/2025-10-28/best-presale-crypto-2025-blockdag-deepstitch-little-pepe-remittix-dominating-early-buyer-attention/908826

Across these press sources, a consistent theme emerges: BlockDAG and Little Pepe appear together in lists of the largest, most visible 2025 presale projects, alongside others like Remittix, DeepSnitch, and Bitcoin Hyper. This cross-coverage creates an impression of these tokens as part of a broader cohort of early-stage opportunities even though the underlying projects differ significantly in technical claims and community reception.

Patterns of Shared Promotion and Media Saturation

One commonality between these press pieces is the repetition of project names and marketing narratives across multiple outlets, often with very similar language. Many of these articles are structured like promotional press releases rather than independent analysis, amplifying hype about early investment potential and massive presale totals.

Investors familiar with marketing patterns note that the same presale names keep circulating across multiple news services, often hundreds of unrelated crypto sites, giving a sense of omnipresence and urgency around buying in.

This saturation contributes to a perception that there may be a centralized promotional engine amplifying these presale narratives, rather than purely organic investor interest. According to reports from some Reddit threads, this is exactly how many retail participants discovered BlockDAG and Little Pepe in the first place through repeated news links rather than independent technical research.

In 2025’s competitive crypto landscape, this kind of cross-project press visibility has two contrasting effects:

It drives awareness and traffic from prospective investors.

It also triggers scrutiny from community members who see familiar patterns of paid promotion across different tokens.

What Crypto Communities Are Saying About BlockDAG

While press coverage paints BlockDAG as a high-profile presale with huge fundraising, investor conversations online tell a different, more skeptical story.

Across Reddit threads dedicated to crypto discussion, several themes recur:
Lengthy Presale Periods: Multiple posts note that BlockDAG’s presale has been ongoing far longer than many typical crypto launches, with stages extended repeatedly while technical rollout remains incomplete.
https://www.reddit.com//r/Crypto_Currency_News/comments/1nd869n?utm_source.com

External Control of Platforms: Some community members claim that the official presale website and dashboard are not controlled directly by the core development team, but rather by an external contractor or marketing partner. This has raised questions about transparency and data handling.

Delayed Deliverables: Users report multiple postponements of mainnet and launch dates, with many expressing frustration that initial timelines have passed without clear execution milestones.

https://cryptonews.com/cryptocurrency/is-blockdag-a-scam-or-legit/?utm_source.com

Mixed Sentiment: Posts on forums like r/CryptoScams and r/Crypto_Currency_News include strong cautionary language, with some users warning others to treat BlockDAG’s ongoing fundraising with extreme care.

One notable Reddit post described the presale as “ongoing” with aggressive price incentives and referral campaigns that emphasize short-term gains rather than proof of delivery.
https://www.reddit.com//r/Crypto_Currency_News/comments/1nd869n?utm_source.com

These discussions highlight a disconnect between how mainstream press describes BlockDAG’s prospects and how grassroots investor communities perceive risk and progress.

Little Pepe and Meme-Driven Presales: A Parallel Narrative

Like BlockDAG, Little Pepe (LILPEPE) appears regularly in broad “best presale” lists alongside other tokens, promoting strong early stage sales and potential utility. Press coverage reports millions raised and token stages selling out quickly.
https://indiatimes.com/partner/forget-solana-sol-cardano-ada-why-little-pepe-lilpepe-is-emerging-as-the-next-big-crypto-sensation-in-2025-672595.html?utm_source.com

However, community feedback paints a different picture for Little Pepe:
Reddit users have raised red flags about anonymity, lack of technical proof, and restrictive vesting schedules for presale buyers. Many express concern that the team behind Little Pepe remains anonymous, with no public roadmap or visible development activity.
https://www.reddit.com//r/CryptoScamReport/comments/1m00vz2/beware_of_little_pepe_lilpepe_potential_scam/?utm_source.com

Multiple community members report being banned or censored in Telegram and other official channels when critical questions are asked a behavior that fuels distrust.

Independent analysis indicates that while smart contract audits exist, they cover only basic token code and do not verify any promised Layer-2 blockchain or future infrastructure, leaving investors uncertain about what they are actually buying.
https://cryptomaniaks.com/news/is-little-pepe-legit-is-lilpepe-presale-a-scam?utm_source.com

These concerns are echoed in broader online reviews and analysis, which note that aggressive marketing, high presale valuations, and incentivized giveaways seem designed to amplify FOMO (fear of missing out) rather than reflect a fully substantiated project roadmap.
https://cryptona.co/little-pepe-big-scam-anonymous-team-no-tech-and-unrealistic-1000x-promises/?utm_source.com

In communities like r/CryptoScams, several posts specifically warn other investors about Little Pepe’s presale behavior, including permanent bans for dissent and forced holding periods on tokens that prevent early exit, contributing to a narrative of retail buyers being locked in while insiders benefit.
https://www.reddit.com//r/CryptoScams/comments/1m0j1ce/beware_of_little_pepe_lilpepe_potential_scam/?utm_source.com

How These Presales Appear Interlinked Through Marketing and Messaging

When comparing how BlockDAG and Little Pepe are positioned across press releases and community discussions, a few notable patterns emerge:

Shared Visibility Across Mainstream Outlets

Both tokens are repeatedly featured together in general “top presale” news lists, alongside other tokens such as Bitcoin Hyper, Remittix, and DeepSnitch. This repeated pairing creates the impression that these projects are part of the same generation of 2025 presales a narrative that raises both interest and skepticism.
https://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/news/indnewswire/little-pepe-vs-blockdag-vs-1939493607.html

Heavy Press Promotion Regardless of Delivery Status

In each case, marketing emphasizes fundraising milestones (tens to hundreds of millions raised) and strategic narratives but the technical substance on public chains remains incomplete or unclear according to investor feedback.
https://cryptonews.com/cryptocurrency/is-blockdag-a-scam-or-legit/?utm_source.com

Aggressive Presale Incentives

Both presales feature bright banners advertising limited-time pricing and referral bonuses designed to accelerate contributions. Such tactics are common in marketing but are also cited by community members as classic FOMO-driven fundraising tactics seen in high-risk presales.
https://eand.co/blockdag-presale-extension-at-discount-draws-scrutiny-from-crypto-community?utm_source.com

These intersecting narratives of hype, repeated press coverage, and investor skepticism help explain why many retail participants are no longer looking at each project in isolation, but rather seeing them as part of a broader pattern of heavily marketed presales with underwhelming technical transparency.

What This Means for Investors Today

Whether it is BlockDAG, Little Pepe, or any of the other presales that appear alongside them in mainstream lists, what unites investor concern is not necessarily one person or one event, but the combination of marketing tactics, extended timelines, delayed delivery, and community reports of mixed or negative experiences.

For many retail participants browsing Reddit and similar forums, the key takeaways expressed by other users include:

“Marketing seems louder than development.”
https://cryptonews.com/cryptocurrency/is-blockdag-a-scam-or-legit/?utm_source.com

“No mainnet, no verifiable code, but still raising massive sums.”
https://www.reddit.com//r/BlockDAGInvestors/comments/1p1ohy0/lets_face_the_facts/?utm_source.com

“Community questions are often banned or ignored.”
https://www.reddit.com//r/CryptoScams/comments/1m0j1ce/beware_of_little_pepe_lilpepe_potential_scam/?utm_source.com

“Presale dashboards are run by marketing, not the core team.”
https://www.reddit.com//r/CryptoScams/comments/1oz2w6w/blockdag_community_please_read_this_regarding_the/?utm_source.com

These voices, whether cautious or critical, reflect a broader sentiment that visibility and fundraising success alone are not sufficient evidence of a project’s legitimacy or eventual success.

Conclusion: Informed Caution

In the fast-moving world of crypto presales, it is entirely normal for projects to attract enthusiastic coverage. However, when the same names recur across paid press releases, aggressive marketing patterns, and investor complaints about transparency and delivery, it’s also reasonable for cautious participants to step back and ask deeper questions.

The purpose of summarizing these narratives from mainstream coverage to Reddit feedback is to give a balanced, detailed view of why many members of the crypto community are urging others to do extensive homework, verify facts independently, and understand risk thoroughly before committing funds.
When press narratives promise massive returns and community feedback warns of prolonged fundraising without verified results, the safest approach as many seasoned investors suggest is to follow the evidence, not the hype.

Gurhan Kiziloz, BlockDAG, and the Web of 2025 Crypto Presales: What Investors Are Really Saying was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.