Physical targeting of crypto users or their relatives—commonly described as “wrench attacks”—has moved from the periphery of risk discussions to a tangible threatPhysical targeting of crypto users or their relatives—commonly described as “wrench attacks”—has moved from the periphery of risk discussions to a tangible threat

Wrench Attacks Jump 75% in 2025, $41M Lost (CertiK)

7 min read
Wrench Attacks Jump 75% In 2025, $41m Lost (Certik)

Physical targeting of crypto users or their relatives—commonly described as “wrench attacks”—has moved from the periphery of risk discussions to a tangible threat, according to a security audit by CertiK. In a report on wrench attacks released on Sunday, CertiK said there were 72 verified cases worldwide in 2025 in which crypto holders faced direct physical harm. The firm notes that such attacks are “no longer edge cases,” with physical assaults and kidnappings rising by roughly 75% versus 2024. The early data indicate a crisis that could influence behavior across the ecosystem, from founders to high-net-worth individuals, as risk management extends beyond digital defenses into the real world.

“Beyond direct losses, the psychological and reputational fallout is reshaping behavior across the industry, pushing founders and high-net-worth individuals toward operational anonymity and geographical relocation,” CertiK stated. “2025 marks a clear inflection point: physical violence is now a core threat vector in the crypto ecosystem.”

According to the audit, losses confirmed to date total $40.9 million, though CertiK cautions the figure may be understated due to under-reporting, silent settlements, and ransoms that leave little trace. France recorded the largest number of attacks in 2025 with 19 confirmed incidents, while all of Europe accounted for about 40% of global wrench-attacks activity that year. The security community is now grappling with a threat that blends street-level danger with the same financial complexities that have shaped crypto crime for years.

In a related context, observers have highlighted that the threat matrix goes beyond the wallet. A piece on wrench-attacks dynamics, including rising violence, underscores how the community must adapt from purely digital security practices to holistic risk mitigation that acknowledges the real-world risks faced by holders. The discussion has also encompassed debates around how to improve safety without disclosing wealth or inviting targeted surveillance.

Among the most high-profile incidents in 2025 were cases that drew international attention: the kidnapping of Ledger founder David Balland and his wife, Amandine, in January, which underscored how high-profile crypto figures can become targets. A separate case in May involved an Italian crypto holder who was reportedly kidnapped and tortured during a visit to New York City. These events illustrate the severity and unpredictability of wrench-attacks, prompting calls for a more layered security approach that spans home security, travel protocols, and protective logistics for principals and their families.

Industry voices have long warned that no amount of online security can fully avert physical risk if wealth is openly discussed or visible. “Every week, there is a Bitcoiner, at least one in the world, who gets kidnapped, tortured, extorted, and sometimes even worse,” said Alena Vranova, founder of SatoshiLabs, in August, emphasizing that even in the crypto space, personal safety remains a critical concern. “We have seen cases of kidnappings for as little as $6,000 worth of crypto, and we have seen people murdered for $50,000 in crypto.”

Possible solutions to wrench attacks

To counter the threat, researchers and practitioners have proposed protective measures such as “panic wallets” that could trigger emergency responses, wipe balances under duress, or generate decoys to mislead attackers. The concept aims to provide a rapid, verifiable means of signaling danger without exposing a holder’s entire holdings or wealth. Nonetheless, security professionals caution that effective risk management goes beyond gadgetry; it requires disciplined personal security practices. Experts advise that crypto holders should limit the visibility of their holdings and avoid broadcasting wealth in public settings, a principle that remains a cornerstone of physical-security best practices.

Several voices in the field emphasize that technology alone cannot solve the problem. Even with new tools, industry watchers remind investors to exercise situational awareness at events and in daily routines, since high-profile gatherings can attract attention from would-be attackers. As the dialogue around wrench attacks evolves, the community continues to weigh the balance between privacy, precaution, and the practicalities of safeguarding digital assets in a world where violence can intersect with financial crime.

Magazine: 6 weirdest devices people have used to mine Bitcoin and crypto

https://www.youtube.com/embed/kyNQ5YoFkWo

Key takeaways

  • 72 verified wrench-attack cases were recorded worldwide in 2025, with physical assaults and kidnappings up about 75% versus 2024.
  • Confirmed losses reached $40.9 million, though actual figures may be higher due to under-reporting and untraceable ransoms.
  • France had the most incidents in 2025 (19 confirmed), while Europe accounted for roughly 40% of global wrench-attacks activity.
  • High-profile cases, including the January kidnapping of Ledger founder David Balland and his spouse, and a May kidnapping in New York City, highlight the real-world stakes.
  • Experts advocate for safety innovations like panic-wallet concepts while stressing conventional precautions—don’t disclose wealth, stay aware at events, and integrate physical-security planning into crypto strategies.

Market context: The wrench-attacks trend unfolds against a backdrop of evolving crypto risk management. As custody services, insurance offerings, and regulatory scrutiny advance, physical risk remains a nontrivial factor that intersects with digital security and crime-fighting efforts, influencing how the industry approaches user protection and privacy.

Why it matters

For users and investors, the CertiK findings translate into a tangible reminder that wealth in crypto is not solely at risk from hacks or exploits. The realization that violence and coercion can threaten individuals and families adds a human dimension to risk models that previously focused on on-chain threats. Institutions, including exchanges and wallet providers, must weigh whether to integrate protective protocols for high-net-worth clients, alongside standard security measures like secure storage and risk assessments. The report also prompts developers and policymakers to consider pragmatic safety features—without creating new avenues for misuse—that can complement existing security protocols and insurance products.

For builders and operators, the wrench-attack phenomenon underscores the importance of a holistic security posture. This means blending digital safeguards with physical-security standards, controlled disclosure practices, and travel security guidance. In an environment where attackers may exploit social and geographical vulnerabilities, the industry’s resilience depends on coordinated efforts across technical teams, legal counsel, and security professionals to minimize exposure while preserving user privacy and decentralization principles.

What to watch next

  • Updates from CertiK on wrench-attack patterns and any escalation in 2026, including regional hotspots and new attack vectors.
  • Adoption and evaluation of panic-wallet concepts or other safety tools by crypto firms and high-net-worth individuals.
  • Regulatory or insurer responses that address physical risk in crypto ownership, including travel and personal security guidelines for executives.
  • Industry benchmarks on safe disclosure practices and privacy-preserving protections for holders in high-risk environments.

Sources & verification

  • CertiK wrench-attacks report: 72 verified 2025 cases and $40.9 million in confirmed losses.
  • France recorded 19 incidents in 2025; Europe accounted for about 40% of global wrench-attacks activity.
  • High-profile cases: Ledger founder David Balland and spouse kidnapped in January 2025; a separate Italian investor reportedly kidnapped in NYC in May 2025.
  • Quote from Alena Vranova, SatoshiLabs founder, on weekly kidnappings and related risk narratives.
  • Discussion of panic-wallet concepts as potential mitigation alongside cautions about public disclosure of holdings.

Why it matters

In sum, wrench attacks compel a rethinking of crypto security that bridges digital safeguards with real-world safety measures. The ongoing incidents reinforce the need for practical risk management among individuals and institutions, including physical-security planning, incident response protocols, and prudent communication about holdings. For users, this translates into a more cautious posture when traveling, attending events, or discussing wealth in public. For the broader market, the trend highlights how security challenges remain diverse—spanning on-chain exploits, regulatory developments, and the human element that underpins the crypto economy’s continued growth and trust.

This article was originally published as Wrench Attacks Jump 75% in 2025, $41M Lost (CertiK) on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Vitalik Buterin Challenges Ethereum’s Layer 2 Paradigm

Vitalik Buterin Challenges Ethereum’s Layer 2 Paradigm

Vitalik Buterin challenges the role of layer 2 solutions in Ethereum's ecosystem. Layer 2's slow progress and Ethereum’s L1 scaling impact future strategies.
Share
Coinstats2026/02/04 04:08
USAA Names Dan Griffiths Chief Information Officer to Drive Secure, Simplified Digital Member Experiences

USAA Names Dan Griffiths Chief Information Officer to Drive Secure, Simplified Digital Member Experiences

SAN ANTONIO–(BUSINESS WIRE)–USAA today announced the appointment of Dan Griffiths as Chief Information Officer, effective February 5, 2026. A proven financial‑services
Share
AI Journal2026/02/04 04:15