In this conversation, Marnix van Stiphout of ING addresses a misconception that still dominates many […] The post ING: Adoption, Not Ideas, Is the Bottleneck appearedIn this conversation, Marnix van Stiphout of ING addresses a misconception that still dominates many […] The post ING: Adoption, Not Ideas, Is the Bottleneck appeared

ING: Adoption, Not Ideas, Is the Bottleneck

2026/01/30 18:52
3 min read

In this conversation, Marnix van Stiphout of ING addresses a misconception that still dominates many innovation discussions in banking: that progress is limited by a lack of ideas or weak business cases. In reality, he argues, the opposite is true. ING — like many large institutions — has no shortage of strong ideas, compelling use cases, or financially sound initiatives. The real challenge lies elsewhere.

According to van Stiphout, the defining bottleneck today is organisational adoption at scale. The question is no longer whether solutions work, or whether they can technically scale. Instead, it is whether the organisation itself can scale with them. That means ensuring teams across different countries, business units, and functions are ready to operate new solutions consistently and confidently.

This challenge is fundamentally human and organisational. Scaling innovation requires people to work differently, acquire new skills, and take on new responsibilities. It also demands that risk processes, governance frameworks, and operational controls evolve in parallel. Without these foundations, even the strongest innovations risk becoming isolated successes rather than enterprise-wide capabilities.

Van Stiphout is clear that ING already has “big cases” running — initiatives that deliver real value and are actively used in the business. But he is equally candid about the gap between having a handful of large-scale initiatives and running hundreds of them simultaneously. Closing that gap requires ING to continue developing as an organisation, not just as a technology adopter.

The challenge is compounded by ING’s global footprint. Rolling out new capabilities across regions means dealing with different regulatory environments, cultural norms, and levels of maturity. A solution that works well in one market may require entirely different operating models, skills, or controls in another. Preparing the entire ecosystem — people, processes, and governance — becomes the critical path.

This perspective reframes how success should be measured. Progress is not defined by the number of pilots launched or proofs of concept completed. Instead, it is defined by the organisation’s capacity to absorb change repeatedly, without increasing risk or operational fragility. Adoption, not invention, becomes the ultimate competitive advantage.

Van Stiphout’s message is pragmatic and forward-looking. Innovation in banking has entered a new phase — one where the winners will not be those with the most ideas, but those who can turn good ideas into everyday, repeatable practice at global scale.

The post ING: Adoption, Not Ideas, Is the Bottleneck appeared first on FF News | Fintech Finance.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

A longtime adversary of President Donald Trump has a plan for a key group to take away what Trump craves the most — attention. EX-CNN journalist Jim Acosta, who
Share
Rawstory2026/02/04 01:19
Why Bitcoin Is Struggling: 8 Factors Impacting Crypto Markets

Why Bitcoin Is Struggling: 8 Factors Impacting Crypto Markets

Failed blockchain adoption narratives and weak fee capture have undercut confidence in major crypto projects.
Share
CryptoPotato2026/02/04 01:05