THE Philippines is considering raising the price cap on imported rice to P45 per kilogram when a higher tariff takes effect on Jan. 16, with a weaker peso and shiftsTHE Philippines is considering raising the price cap on imported rice to P45 per kilogram when a higher tariff takes effect on Jan. 16, with a weaker peso and shifts

DA may hike price cap on imported rice to P45 per kilo

THE Philippines is considering raising the price cap on imported rice to P45 per kilogram when a higher tariff takes effect on Jan. 16, with a weaker peso and shifts in global prices driving up import costs.

This after rice imports to the Philippines fell to a four-year low of 3.37 million metric tons (MMT) in 2025 following a four-month import freeze that began in September, according to the Department of Agriculture (DA).

Agriculture Secretary Francisco P. Tiu Laurel, Jr. said on Thursday that the approved 20% tariff rate is to be implemented on Jan. 16.

“The peso [depreciated on Wednesday against the US dollar] to about P59.35,” Mr. Laurel told a Palace briefing.

He said that if the exchange rate remains at that level by Jan. 16 — alongside a potential 5% increase in other cost factors — the government is likely to issue a new maximum suggested retail price (MSRP) of P45 per kilogram to reflect market realities.

The current MSRP for imported rice is P43 per kilogram.

A new MSRP will be announced on Jan. 15 and will depend on currency movements and international rice prices, Mr. Laurel said.

Beginning this year, the Philippines will resume rice imports under a “flexible” tariff system that allows duties to be adjusted in response to global price movements.

Data from the Bureau of Plant Industry showed that rice import volumes fell by 29.99% to 3.37 MMT from a record-high 4.81 MMT in 2024. The government banned rice imports from September to December.

This was the lowest volume of rice imports since the 2.77 MMT imported in 2021.

Despite the drop in imports, the DA said domestic rice prices remained relatively stable, indicating that earlier import volumes may have exceeded the country’s actual requirements.

“We’ve shown that even without imported rice, prices did not spike. This means the inflow was beyond what the country needs. Previous imports were excessive,” Agriculture Assistant Secretary Arnel V. De Mesa told reporters at a briefing in mixed English and Filipino.

Mr. De Mesa said rice imports are expected to arrive starting next week. “Because January to February is the lean season, we don’t have a harvest, so imported rice should really come in,” he said.

However, the DA expects overall import volumes to remain relatively low this year as it targets higher domestic palay (unmilled rice) output, supported by increased production assistance and assuming no major weather disruptions.

Mr. Laurel said imports in 2026 are projected at a minimum of 3.6 MMT and could reach as much as 3.8 MMT if estimated domestic palay production is at 20.3 MMT. The DA considers these levels sufficient to meet demand without depressing farmgate prices.

Meanwhile, Jayson H. Cainglet, executive director of the Samahang Industriya ng Agrikultura, said the government’s rice price cap is effectively an admission that tariff cuts failed to lower rice prices.

“The price cap (MSRP) is already an admission of the failure of tariff reduction to reduce rice prices,” he said via Viber.

Despite record-high imports in 2024 and a sharp drop of about 50% in global rice prices — alongside reduced tariffs — local retail rice prices barely fell, he noted.

Instead, Mr. Cainglet said, the impact was borne by farmers, with palay prices collapsing to P8-12 per kilo, well below production costs, while consumers saw only minimal relief and importers captured most of the gains.

The policy also led to at least P25 billion in foregone tariff revenues, he said.

Mr. Cainglet called for reinstating higher rice import tariffs, arguing that import liberalization has undermined domestic producers without delivering meaningful benefits to consumers. — Chloe Mari A. Hufana and Vonn Andrei E. Villamiel

Market Opportunity
Capverse Logo
Capverse Price(CAP)
$0.12869
$0.12869$0.12869
+0.49%
USD
Capverse (CAP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Institutions Now Control Nearly a Quarter of Available Bitcoin Supply

Institutions Now Control Nearly a Quarter of Available Bitcoin Supply

The post Institutions Now Control Nearly a Quarter of Available Bitcoin Supply appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin 21 September 2025 | 11:00 Fresh figures from BitcoinTreasuries reveal just how concentrated Bitcoin ownership has become among institutions. According to the data, about 3.74 million BTC — nearly 18% of all coins in circulation — are now in the hands of companies, funds, governments, and other organizations. The biggest share belongs to ETFs and publicly listed companies, which have expanded their holdings rapidly since the U.S. approved spot Bitcoin ETFs earlier this year. In total, 332 entities are known to hold reserves: 192 public firms, 44 funds, 68 private companies, 13 governments, 11 DeFi projects, and four major custodians or exchanges. Share of the Available Supply When adjusted for coins that are unlikely to ever move — including the estimated 1.1 million BTC mined by Satoshi Nakamoto and up to 3.7 million that are believed lost — institutional ownership represents closer to 23–25% of the effective supply. Global Distribution The United States leads the pack, with 118 entities reporting Bitcoin reserves. Canada comes next with 43, followed by the UK (21), Japan (12), and Hong Kong (12). Together, these countries dominate the institutional landscape of Bitcoin adoption, both through corporate treasuries and financial products. Growing Influence The sharp increase in institutional ownership coincides with two trends: the arrival of regulated ETFs in major markets and the rise of digital asset treasury firms that manage crypto reserves in the same way corporations handle cash. The shift has accelerated in 2025, further solidifying Bitcoin’s role as a strategic asset in global finance. With nearly a quarter of liquid supply now in institutional hands, Bitcoin’s trajectory is increasingly tied to the strategies of companies, funds, and even governments — raising new questions about how decentralized the ecosystem really is. The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/21 16:01
XRP bulls brace for key support retest as Bloomberg’s McGlone sounds alarm

XRP bulls brace for key support retest as Bloomberg’s McGlone sounds alarm

XRP hovers on key support as Bloomberg’s McGlone warns of a breakdown while CryptoBull bets on a long consolidation before a major upside breakout. Bloomberg Senior
Share
Crypto.news2026/01/27 18:04
Tourism in Asia is returning, but not in the way it did before

Tourism in Asia is returning, but not in the way it did before

Tourism across Asia is entering a more complex phase. The region is seeing a patchwork of demand shaped by shifting traveler preferences and market segmentation
Share
Bworldonline2026/01/27 16:00