Tesla ended 2025 with a full-on collapse in several of Europe’s biggest car markets, according to data from France’s national auto association and other regionalTesla ended 2025 with a full-on collapse in several of Europe’s biggest car markets, according to data from France’s national auto association and other regional

Tesla ends 2025 with full-on collapses in Europe’s biggest car markets

Tesla ended 2025 with a full-on collapse in several of Europe’s biggest car markets, according to data from France’s national auto association and other regional registries.

Tesla delivered 1,942 vehicles in France in December, a 66% crash from the same time last year. In Sweden, December turned into a total flop, with Tesla’s deliveries falling 71%. The full-year figure didn’t do any damage control either, 67% lower than 2024.

Even with electric vehicles becoming more popular across the continent, Tesla couldn’t keep up.While the rest of the battery-powered car industry enjoyed a 27% growth in registrations during the first eleven months, Tesla’s total registrations during that same stretch tanked 28%.

Only Norway stuck with the brand. The country recorded 5,679 new Tesla registrations in December, nearly 90% higher than the previous year. It’s no surprise, 96% of new cars sold in Norway last year were fully electric.

European buyers turn away as Musk’s politics stir backlash

Sales didn’t just fall because of car prices or competitors. There was also the Elon Musk factor. Across Germany and the UK, Tesla faced a wave of customer pushback after Musk openly backed far-right political figures.

That didn’t help brand loyalty. Some buyers looked elsewhere.

Elon hasn’t backed down though. He’s still betting hard on Tesla’s Full Self-Driving feature, known as FSD, to drive future sales in Europe.

But that plan has one big problem, it’s not legal there yet. European regulators haven’t approved it, and Tesla is now clashing with the exact agency it needs a greenlight from.

RDW, the Dutch authority that handles vehicle approvals for the EU, is supposed to be the company’s “main path” to clearance, according to a post by Tesla on Musk’s X platform. The post claimed RDW “has committed to granting Netherlands National approval in February 2026.” That statement didn’t land well.

The very next day, RDW said that was false. “We do not share details about ongoing applications from manufacturers,” the agency said in a public statement.

“Both RDW and Tesla are aware of the efforts needed to reach a decision on this matter in February. Whether this timeline will be met is yet to be determined in the coming period.”

Tesla pushes for FSD approval while regulators push back

Elon isn’t sitting quietly about the delay. During Tesla’s annual shareholder meeting earlier this month, he told investors, “Pressure from our customers in Europe to push the regulators to approve would be appreciated.”

That speech came right before the company quietly updated its website with new FSD safety data, data that has already been called out by critics for weak comparisons and flawed methods.

After the meeting, Tesla’s Europe team posted a link to RDW’s contact page, asking supporters to thank the agency for supposedly greenlighting the system. The regulator did not take that well. A statement went up on RDW’s site the following day, saying:

“We thank everyone who has already done so, but would like to urge people not to contact us about this matter. It takes up unnecessary time for our customer service. Furthermore, this will have no impact whatsoever on whether or not the schedule will be met.”

Back on the numbers side, analysts expect Tesla to report an 11% drop in global deliveries for the fourth quarter. Tesla, clearly bracing for worse, put out its own estimate suggesting that drop might actually be closer to 15%.

Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.

Market Opportunity
1 Logo
1 Price(1)
$0.026234
$0.026234$0.026234
+33.05%
USD
1 (1) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Solana Prepares Major Consensus Upgrade with Alpenglow Protocol

Solana Prepares Major Consensus Upgrade with Alpenglow Protocol

TLDR: Alpenglow reduces Solana finality from 12.8 seconds to 100-150 milliseconds, a 100-fold improvement. Votor enables one or two-round block finalization through
Share
Blockonomi2026/01/03 02:29
The Role of Reference Points in Achieving Equilibrium Efficiency in Fair and Socially Just Economies

The Role of Reference Points in Achieving Equilibrium Efficiency in Fair and Socially Just Economies

This article explores how a simple change in the reference point can achieve a Pareto-efficient equilibrium in both free and fair economies and those with social justice.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 22:30