The Brain Built for Control—and the Obsession Required to Break It
\ As startups, founders, and builders, we tell ourselves that we are pursuing growth, progress, and a future that. However, our brains don't align with that narrative. Our brains are not designed for transformation, but rather as predictive machines designed for control, endlessly repeating patterns they already know.
Herein lies the trap. The moment we recognize something as "something we already know," the predictive loop closes. We stop trying to see things and simply try to assimilate them. To break that loop, we need something that our brains actively resist: sustained disruption.
\
The Trap: Assimilation (Why We Get Stuck)
The brain prioritizes efficiency over truth. When we encounter complex, high-calorie data, the default is a lazy hack that forces new information into old boxes. Piaget called this "assimilation." It's that moment of relief when you look at a dire market or some weird user metric and think, "Oh, yeah. This looks like X." Don't trust that feeling. That “know” moment is not insight. Rendering error.
The brain smoothes out friction so it doesn't have to do the heavy lifting of rebuilding its internal architecture. As long as we assimilate, we feel calm, but we don't really see. It remains trapped in the existing.
\
As long as we continue to assimilate, nothing will change.
Confusion is the Only Way Out.
To break this loop, we need the opposite of Assimilation. Piaget called it Accommodation—the painful process of dismantling the old structure to build a new one. But here is the hard truth: The only trigger for Accommodation is confusion. Friction. The visceral sense that the map no longer matches the territory.
The antidote is Accommodation—breaking the old model. But the only trigger is friction. When the map breaks, the brain screams "Danger." I ignore it. That confusion is the only proof I’ve left the simulation and hit reality.
\
Friston's Free Energy Principle describes what happens. The brain updates its internal model only when it encounters this discrepancy. Without the error signal, nothing changes. This error is necessary for our evolution.
The system cannot learn. Piaget observed the same thing from a different angle. He called it Disequilibrium. Intelligence evolves to a higher dimension only when the system loses its balance. It is the prerequisite for growth. When we experience stress and confusion, our brain releases noradrenaline. This chemical does something specific: it pulls us out of automatic processing. It makes our synapses plastic—soft enough to be rewired.
\ 1. Why Our Brain Lies (The Hardware Specs) Our brain was not designed to be accurate. It was designed to be cheap. Learning rewires neural circuits. That is metabolically expensive. Our brain is only 2% of your body weight but burns 20% of your energy. To survive, it defaults to Power Save Mode—recycling old predictions instead of processing new data. Over 90% of our visual field is hallucination generated by memory. The retina sends a thin stream of data—just enough to verify the prediction. The rest is the past, rendered in real time.
\ 2. Confirmation Bias is Just Error Avoidance "Confirmation Bias" isn't a personality flaw. It’s a feature of Predictive Coding designed to reduce latency.
- When data contradicts your model, the brain flags it as "noise" and discards it to save processing power.
- When data matches your model, the brain releases dopamine. That feeling of "I knew it!" isn't wisdom. It’s the system sighing in relief because it didn't have to spend energy updating the code.
\ 3. The "Cognitive Ease."
Trap Daniel Kahneman identified a fatal bug in our UX: Cognitive Ease. The brain is hardwired to interpret "smooth processing" as "Truth." It interprets complexity or contradiction as "Error." It’s just our brain choosing the path that was cheapest to compute. The mechanism is relentless.
\ Friction and confusion are the only things that break the predictive loop. If we are comfortable, our brain is static.
To override the brain's desire for safety, we need a protocol. I borrowed this stack from early Buddhist logic (Abhidharma)—stripped of spirituality, applied purely as system architecture. This is where Buddhism comes in.
\
The Debugging Protocol: 3 Cognitive Overrides
For us, the early Buddhist analysis (Abhidharma).==It is a rigorous cognitive protocol designed to debug the brain’s auto-complete function. It is a tool to catch the brain lying to itself. \n
1. Concept: Bare Attention / Sati
Raw Data Access (Sati) Stop the labeling. When the brain flags an event as "I know this," treat it as a false positive. Kill the judgment immediately. Look at the raw telemetry—the specific metrics, the exact user behavior, the physical tightness in your chest—without attaching a name to them.
- The Logic: You are stripping the metadata. Without the label, the brain cannot "Assimilate." It is forced to process the reality from scratch.
2. Concept: Analytical Deconstruction / Vibhaja
Component Deconstruction (Vibhaja) Break the "Monster" into mechanics. Cognitive loops thrive on vague, high-level abstractions like "Failure," "Disaster," or "Impossible." These are just emotional zip files. Unzip them.
- The Loop: Brain sees "Failure" → Executes "Panic.exe".
- The Fix: Deconstruct "Failure" into physics. It doesn't exist. What exists? "A 12% drop in retention." "A cortisol spike." "A specific recursive thought."
- The Logic: The brain cannot attach old emotional tags to disassembled components. You can't fear a list of parts. \n
3. Concept: Emptiness / Sunyata as "The Void."
System Reboot Endurance (Sunyata) Sit in the friction. When you shatter an old loop, there is a lag before the new model compiles. This is "The Void." It registers as confusion, meaninglessness, or panic.
- The Action: Do not rush to patch it. Do not force a hotfix just to feel safe.
- The Logic: That uncomfortable silence is the loading screen for your new architecture. The ability to endure this state without reverting to the old code is the defining skill of a builder.
It’s not enough to rely on intellectual judgment alone; change requires lived emotional experience. That's why we embrace discomfort, confusion, obsession, and conflict.
The New Frontier of Obsession
This process is not a "flow". That's not "fun". It takes a stronger force than the gravitational pull of comfort.
Its power is so strong that it threatens us.
We’ve been taught to fear this force.
We’ve called it obsession and treated it as something pathological—a dangerous mental condition to be avoided.
But that framing misses what’s actually happening. Obsession isn’t about losing control. It’s about refusing relief. It’s the capacity to stay with friction when the mind demands resolution, when comfort would be easier, and when assimilation is the quickest escape.
To see the world as it is, rather than as the brain prefers it to be.
If you’re holding that door open—pushing back against the weight of your own mind—I can recognize you.
You May Also Like
Trump Media & Crypto.com Partner For Shareholder Token Airdrop
Tria’s $20m beta surge: How a self-custodial neobank is redefining onchain finance
