Liquidity providers in concentrated AMMs face a trade-off between fee income and impermanent loss, with optimal range selection depending on volatility, tradingLiquidity providers in concentrated AMMs face a trade-off between fee income and impermanent loss, with optimal range selection depending on volatility, trading

Liquidity Providers Face a Trade-Off Between Fees and Loss in Concentrated AMMs

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Constant function markets and concentrated liquidity

  • Constant function markets
  • Concentrated liquidity market

3. The wealth of liquidity providers in CL pools

  • Position value
  • Fee income
  • Fee income: pool fee rate
  • Fee income: spread and concentration risk
  • Fee income: drift and asymmetry
  • Rebalancing costs and gas fees

4. Optimal liquidity provision in CL pools

  • The problem
  • The optimal strategy
  • Discussion: profitability, PL, and concentration risk
  • Discussion: drift and position skew

5. Performance of strategy

  • Methodology
  • Benchmark
  • Performance results

6. Discussion: modelling assumptions

  • Discussion: related work

7. Conclusions And References

\

Conclusions

We studied the dynamics of the wealth of an LP in a CPM with CL who implements a selffinancing strategy that dynamically adjusts the range of liquidity. The wealth of the LP consists of the position value and fee revenue. We showed that the position value depreciates due to PL and the LP widens her liquidity range to minimise her exposure to PL. On the other hand, the fee revenue is higher for narrow ranges, but narrow ranges also increase concentration risk. We derived the optimal strategy to provide liquidity in a CPM with CL when the LP maximises expected utility of terminal wealth. This strategy is found in closed-form for log-utility of wealth, and it shows that liquidity provision is subject to a profitability condition. In particular, the potential gains from fees, net of gas fees and concentration costs, must exceed PL. Our model shows that the LP strategically adjusts the spread of her position around the reference exchange rate; the spread depends on various market features including tthe volatility of the rate, the liquidity taking activity in the pool, and the drift of the rate.

\

References

Adams, H., Zinsmeister, N., Salem, M., Keefer, R., Robinson, D., 2021. Uniswap v3 core. Technical Report.

Angeris, G., Chitra, T., Evans, A., 2022. When does the tail wag the dog? curvature and market making .

Angeris, G., Kao, H.T., Chiang, R., Noyes, C., Chitra, T., 2021. An analysis of uniswap markets.

Avellaneda, M., Stoikov, S., 2008. High frequency trading in a limit order book. Quantitative Finance 8, 217–224. doi:10.1080/14697680701381228.

Barger, W., Lorig, M., 2019. Optimal liquidation under stochastic price impact. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance 22, 1850059.

Bergault, P., Bertucci, L., Bouba, D., Gueant, O., Guilbert, J., 2024. Price-aware automated market makers: Models ´ beyond brownian prices and static liquidity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.03496 .

Bergault, P., Drissi, F., Gueant, O., 2022. Multi-asset optimal execution and statistical arbitrage strategies un- ´ der Ornstein–Uhlenbeck dynamics. SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics 13, 353–390. doi:10.1137/ 21M1407756.

Bergault, P., Evangelista, D., Gueant, O., Vieira, D., 2021. Closed-form approximations in multi-asset market making. ´ Applied Mathematical Finance 28, 101–142. doi:10.1080/1350486X.2021.1949359.

Biais, B., 1993. Price formation and equilibrium liquidity in fragmented and centralized markets. The Journal of Finance 48, 157–185.

Biais, B., Capponi, A., Cong, L.W., Gaur, V., Giesecke, K., 2023. Advances in blockchain and crypto economics. Management Science 69, 6417–6426.

Capponi, A., Jia, R., 2021. The adoption of blockchain-based decentralized exchanges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.08842 .

Capponi, A., Jia, R., Yu, S., 2023a. Price discovery on decentralized exchanges. Available at SSRN 4236993 .

Capponi, A., Jia, R., Zhu, B., 2023b. The paradox of just-in-time liquidity in decentralized exchanges: More providers can sometimes mean less liquidity. Available at SSRN .

Cartea, A., Donnelly, R., Jaimungal, S., 2017. Algorithmic trading with model uncertainty. SIAM Journal on Financial ´ Mathematics 8, 635–671. Cartea, A., Donnelly, R., Jaimungal, S., 2018. Enhancing trading strategies with order book signals. Applied Mathe- ´ matical Finance 25, 1–35. Cartea, A., Drissi, F., Monga, M., 2022. Decentralised finance and automated market making: Execution and specu- ´ lation. Available at SSRN 4144743 .

Cartea, A., Drissi, F., Monga, M., 2023a. Execution and statistical arbitrage with signals in multiple automated market ´ makers, in: 2023 IEEE 43rd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCSW), IEEE. pp. 37–42.

Cartea, A., Drissi, F., Monga, M., 2023b. Predictable losses of liquidity provision in constant function markets and ´ concentrated liquidity markets. Applied Mathematical Finance 30, 69–93.

Cartea, A., Drissi, F., S ´ anchez-Betancourt, L., Siska, D., Szpruch, L., 2023c. Automated market makers designs ´ beyond constant functions. Available at SSRN 4459177 .

Cartea, A., Jaimungal, S., Penalva, J., 2015. Algorithmic and high-frequency trading. Cambridge University Press.

Cartea, A., Jaimungal, S., Ricci, J., 2014. Buy low, sell high: A high frequency trading perspective. SIAM Journal on ´ Financial Mathematics 5, 415–444.

Cartea, A., Jaimungal, S., S ´ anchez-Betancourt, L., 2021. Latency and liquidity risk. International Journal of Theoret- ´ ical and Applied Finance 24, 2150035.

Cartea, A., S ´ anchez-Betancourt, L., 2021. The shadow price of latency: Improving intraday fill ratios in foreign ´ exchange markets. SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics 12, 254–294.

Cartea, A., Wang, Y., 2020. Market making with alpha signals. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied ´ Finance 23, 2050016.

Chiu, J., Koeppl, T.V., 2019. Blockchain-based settlement for asset trading. The Review of Financial Studies 32, 1716–1753.

Donnelly, R., 2022. Optimal execution: A review. Applied Mathematical Finance 29, 181–212.

Donnelly, R., Lorig, M., 2020. Optimal trading with differing trade signals. Applied Mathematical Finance 27, 317–344. Drissi, F., 2022. Solvability of differential riccati equations and applications to algorithmic trading with signals. Applied Mathematical Finance 29, 457–493. doi:10.1080/1350486X.2023.2241130.

Drissi, F., 2023. Models of market liquidity: Applications to traditional markets and automated market makers. Available at SSRN 4424010 . Engel, D., Herlihy, M., 2021a. Composing networks of automated market makers, in: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies, pp. 15–28.

Engel, D., Herlihy, M., 2021b. Presentation and publication: Loss and slippage in networks of automated market makers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.09872 .

Fan, Z., Marmolejo-Cossio, F., Moroz, D.J., Neuder, M., Rao, R., Parkes, D.C., 2021. Strategic liquidity provision in uniswap v3. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.12033 .

Fan, Z., Marmolejo-Coss´ıo, F.J., Altschuler, B., Sun, H., Wang, X., Parkes, D., 2022. Differential liquidity provision in uniswap v3 and implications for contract design, in: Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on AI in Finance, pp. 9–17.

Forde, M., Sanchez-Betancourt, L., Smith, B., 2022. Optimal trade execution for Gaussian signals with power-law ´ resilience. Quantitative Finance 22, 585–596.

Fukasawa, M., Maire, B., Wunsch, M., 2023. Model-free hedging of impermanent loss in geometric mean market makers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.11118 .

Goyal, M., Ramseyer, G., Goel, A., Mazieres, D., 2023. Finding the right curve: Optimal design of constant function ` market makers, in: Proceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pp. 783–812.

Gueant, O., 2016. The Financial Mathematics of Market Liquidity: From optimal execution to market making. ´ volume 33. CRC Press.

Gueant, O., 2017. Optimal market making. Applied Mathematical Finance 24, 112–154. doi: ´ 10.1080/1350486X. 2017.1342552.

He, X.D., Yang, C., Zhou, Y., 2024. Liquidity pool design on automated market makers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.13291 .

Heimbach, L., Schertenleib, E., Wattenhofer, R., 2022. Risks and returns of Uniswap v3 liquidity providers.

Ho, T.S., Stoll, H.R., 1983. The dynamics of dealer markets under competition. The Journal of Finance 38, 1053– 1074.

Lı, T., Naik, S., Papanicolaou, A., Schonleber, L., 2023. Yield farming for liquidity provision . ¨

Lipton, A., Treccani, A., 2021. Blockchain and Distributed Ledgers: Mathematics, Technology, and Economics. World Scientific.

Lommers, K., Kim, J., Skidan, B., 2023. The case for stochastically dynamic AMMs. Preprint.

Milionis, J., Moallemi, C.C., Roughgarden, T., 2023. Automated market making and arbitrage profits in the presence of fees. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14604 .

Milionis, J., Moallemi, C.C., Roughgarden, T., Zhang, A.L., 2022. Automated market making and loss-versusrebalancing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.06046 .

:::info Authors:

  1. Alvaro Cartea ´
  2. Fayc¸al Drissia
  3. Marcello Monga

:::

:::info This paper is available on arxiv under CC0 1.0 Universal license.

:::

\

Market Opportunity
Polytrade Logo
Polytrade Price(TRADE)
$0.05054
$0.05054$0.05054
-0.68%
USD
Polytrade (TRADE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

From random auctions to forward contracts, how does ETHGas transform block space into a priced resource?

From random auctions to forward contracts, how does ETHGas transform block space into a priced resource?

Key points: ETHGas redefines Ethereum block space as a priced resource, moving beyond transaction fees that fluctuate with demand. Through block space futures and
Share
PANews2025/12/26 14:00
Whales Dump 200 Million XRP in Just 2 Weeks – Is XRP’s Price on the Verge of Collapse?

Whales Dump 200 Million XRP in Just 2 Weeks – Is XRP’s Price on the Verge of Collapse?

Whales offload 200 million XRP leaving market uncertainty behind. XRP faces potential collapse as whales drive major price shifts. Is XRP’s future in danger after massive sell-off by whales? XRP’s price has been under intense pressure recently as whales reportedly offloaded a staggering 200 million XRP over the past two weeks. This massive sell-off has raised alarms across the cryptocurrency community, as many wonder if the market is on the brink of collapse or just undergoing a temporary correction. According to crypto analyst Ali (@ali_charts), this surge in whale activity correlates directly with the price fluctuations seen in the past few weeks. XRP experienced a sharp spike in late July and early August, but the price quickly reversed as whales began to sell their holdings in large quantities. The increased volume during this period highlights the intensity of the sell-off, leaving many traders to question the future of XRP’s value. Whales have offloaded around 200 million $XRP in the last two weeks! pic.twitter.com/MiSQPpDwZM — Ali (@ali_charts) September 17, 2025 Also Read: Shiba Inu’s Price Is at a Tipping Point: Will It Break or Crash Soon? Can XRP Recover or Is a Bigger Decline Ahead? As the market absorbs the effects of the whale offload, technical indicators suggest that XRP may be facing a period of consolidation. The Relative Strength Index (RSI), currently sitting at 53.05, signals a neutral market stance, indicating that XRP could move in either direction. This leaves traders uncertain whether the XRP will break above its current resistance levels or continue to fall as more whales sell off their holdings. Source: Tradingview Additionally, the Bollinger Bands, suggest that XRP is nearing the upper limits of its range. This often points to a potential slowdown or pullback in price, further raising concerns about the future direction of the XRP. With the price currently around $3.02, many are questioning whether XRP can regain its footing or if it will continue to decline. The Aftermath of Whale Activity: Is XRP’s Future in Danger? Despite the large sell-off, XRP is not yet showing signs of total collapse. However, the market remains fragile, and the price is likely to remain volatile in the coming days. With whales continuing to influence price movements, many investors are watching closely to see if this trend will reverse or intensify. The coming weeks will be critical for determining whether XRP can stabilize or face further declines. The combination of whale offloading and technical indicators suggest that XRP’s price is at a crossroads. Traders and investors alike are waiting for clear signals to determine if the XRP will bounce back or continue its downward trajectory. Also Read: Metaplanet’s Bold Move: $15M U.S. Subsidiary to Supercharge Bitcoin Strategy The post Whales Dump 200 Million XRP in Just 2 Weeks – Is XRP’s Price on the Verge of Collapse? appeared first on 36Crypto.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/17 23:42
zkPass Listing: Upbit’s Strategic Move to Boost Privacy-Focused Crypto Adoption

zkPass Listing: Upbit’s Strategic Move to Boost Privacy-Focused Crypto Adoption

BitcoinWorld zkPass Listing: Upbit’s Strategic Move to Boost Privacy-Focused Crypto Adoption In a significant move for the privacy-focused cryptocurrency sector
Share
bitcoinworld2025/12/26 14:45