LOS ANGELES–(BUSINESS WIRE)–The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of shareholders who purchased SLM CorporationLOS ANGELES–(BUSINESS WIRE)–The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of shareholders who purchased SLM Corporation

Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz Encourages SLM Corporation (SLM) Shareholders To Inquire About Securities Fraud Class Action

LOS ANGELES–(BUSINESS WIRE)–The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of shareholders who purchased SLM Corporation a/k/a Sallie Mae (“SLM” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: SLM) securities between July 25, 2025 and August 14, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”). SLM investors have until February 17, 2026 to file a lead plaintiff motion.

IF YOU SUFFERED A LOSS ON YOUR SLM CORPORATION (SLM) INVESTMENTS, CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT A CLAIM TO POTENTIALLY RECOVER YOUR LOSSES IN THE ONGOING SECURITIES FRAUD LAWSUIT.

You can also contact the Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz to discuss your legal rights by email at [email protected], by telephone at (310) 914-5007, or visit our website at www.frankcruzlaw.com.

What Happened?

On August 14, 2025, investment bank TD Cowen issued a report stating that delinquencies on SLM’s private education loans in July 2025 were overall “higher (worse) than the seasonal . . . performance for July, driven by [an increase] in early stage delinquencies.”

TD Cowen’s findings directly contradicted the statements of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Peter Graham, made less than a month earlier, which asserted that SLM was observing delinquency rates that were merely “following the normal seasonal trends[.]”

On this news, SLM’s stock price fell $2.67, or 8.1%, to close at $30.32 per share on August 15, 2025, thereby injuring investors.

What Is The Lawsuit About?

The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) SLM was experiencing a significant increase in early stage delinquencies; (2) accordingly, Defendants overstated the effectiveness of SLM’s loss mitigation and/or loan modification programs, as well as the overall stability of the Company’s PEL delinquency rates; and (3) as a result, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.

Contact Us To Participate or Learn More:

If you purchased SLM securities, wish to learn more about this action, or have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please click HERE or contact us at:

Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz

2121 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 800

Telephone: 310-914-5007

Email: [email protected]
Visit our website at: www.frankcruzlaw.com

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.

Contacts

Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz

2121 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 800

Telephone: 310-914-5007

Email: [email protected]
Visit our website at: www.frankcruzlaw.com

Market Opportunity
Sidekick Logo
Sidekick Price(K)
$0.004756
$0.004756$0.004756
+0.57%
USD
Sidekick (K) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Coinbase Data Breach Fallout: Former Employee Arrest in India Over Customer Data Case Raises Bitcoin Security Concerns

Coinbase Data Breach Fallout: Former Employee Arrest in India Over Customer Data Case Raises Bitcoin Security Concerns

The post Coinbase Data Breach Fallout: Former Employee Arrest in India Over Customer Data Case Raises Bitcoin Security Concerns appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/27 10:36
Burmese war amputees get free 3D-printed prostheses, thanks to Thailand-based group

Burmese war amputees get free 3D-printed prostheses, thanks to Thailand-based group

PROSTHETIC FEET. Silicon foot covers fitted with metal rods found in the prosthetic production unit in Mae Tao Clinic. A good prosthetic foot must absorb impact
Share
Rappler2025/12/27 10:00
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37