TLDR:  Gold and silver continue rising amid strong safe-asset demand and policy uncertainty. Bitcoin remains range-bound as short-term holders increase selling TLDR:  Gold and silver continue rising amid strong safe-asset demand and policy uncertainty. Bitcoin remains range-bound as short-term holders increase selling

Gold and Silver Rise While Bitcoin Remains Range-Bound Amid Weak Demand

TLDR: 

  • Gold and silver continue rising amid strong safe-asset demand and policy uncertainty.
  • Bitcoin remains range-bound as short-term holders increase selling pressure.
  • Apparent demand for Bitcoin has recently turned negative, limiting upward momentum.
  • Institutional capital favors gold and silver, keeping Bitcoin’s short-term gains capped.

Gold and silver have maintained upward momentum over the past three months, while Bitcoin remains largely range-bound. 

Market conditions reflect safe-asset flows, weaker short-term Bitcoin demand, and the influence of short-term holder activity.

Safe-Asset Demand Supports Precious Metals

Gold and silver have seen consistent support due to increased demand amid geopolitical tensions and policy uncertainty. Investors continue shifting capital toward traditional safe assets, reflecting expectations of lower real interest rates. Silver has benefited further from tighter supply conditions and higher speculative sensitivity.

CryptoQuant.com analyst, XWIN Research Japan, reported that gold and silver continue rising while Bitcoin remains range-bound. 

This trend reflects a structural preference for precious metals by institutional capital. Precious metals have a long-term buyer base, making them less sensitive to price fluctuations. This stability contrasts with Bitcoin, which remains more influenced by short-term positioning.

Institutional investors can easily allocate funds to gold and silver, contributing to sustained upward pressure. 

The combination of safety, liquidity, and lower volatility encourages ongoing investment in these metals. As a result, gold and silver maintain steady growth even when other risk assets face uncertainty.

Bitcoin Faces Limited Upside Due to Weak Demand

Bitcoin has not mirrored the gains in gold and silver because it remains a high-beta risk asset rather than a primary safe haven. 

Risk-off environments drive capital first to gold and government bonds, leaving Bitcoin as a secondary option. Its market movement depends heavily on marginal demand and short-term holders.

CryptoQuant data supports this perspective. Apparent Bitcoin demand has recently turned negative, suggesting limited expansion of new buying interest. 

In addition, Short-Term Holder (STH) SOPR has frequently remained below 1, indicating that short-term holders are selling at a loss or near breakeven, adding pressure on the market.

XWIN Research Japan noted that Bitcoin’s price action reflects weak internal demand, which caps its short-term upside. 

Unless apparent demand turns positive and STH SOPR stabilizes above 1, Bitcoin may continue consolidating. The current divergence with gold and silver emphasizes Bitcoin’s sensitivity to short-term market behavior rather than macro tailwinds.

The post Gold and Silver Rise While Bitcoin Remains Range-Bound Amid Weak Demand appeared first on Blockonomi.

Market Opportunity
SILVER Logo
SILVER Price(SILVER)
$0.000000000000048
$0.000000000000048$0.000000000000048
+4.34%
USD
SILVER (SILVER) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
What is the Outlook for Digital Assets in 2026?

What is the Outlook for Digital Assets in 2026?

The post What is the Outlook for Digital Assets in 2026? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The crypto market cap reached $4.3 trillion in 2025 as institutions
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/25 03:23
Pudgy Penguins’ Non-Crypto Display Wraps Las Vegas Sphere, Potentially Elevating PENGU Brand Reach

Pudgy Penguins’ Non-Crypto Display Wraps Las Vegas Sphere, Potentially Elevating PENGU Brand Reach

The post Pudgy Penguins’ Non-Crypto Display Wraps Las Vegas Sphere, Potentially Elevating PENGU Brand Reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Pudgy Penguins,
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/25 03:41