TLDR: Three coordinated wallet clusters control approximately 57% of JELLYJELLY’s total circulating supply Largest cluster holds 326M tokens worth $42.41M accumulatedTLDR: Three coordinated wallet clusters control approximately 57% of JELLYJELLY’s total circulating supply Largest cluster holds 326M tokens worth $42.41M accumulated

JELLYJELLY Rebounds 3x as Three Wallet Clusters Control 57% of Token Supply

2025/12/20 01:23
3 min read

TLDR:

  • Three coordinated wallet clusters control approximately 57% of JELLYJELLY’s total circulating supply
  • Largest cluster holds 326M tokens worth $42.41M accumulated primarily through Gate exchange platform
  • Token crashed 85% from $0.35 peak to current $0.07 level showing extreme volatility and risk factors
  • MACD shows bullish momentum building while DMI indicates weakening trend and market indecision ahead

JELLYJELLY has staged a remarkable recovery, climbing nearly three times from its bottom following an almost 90% decline from all-time highs. 

On-chain analysis reveals a concentrated supply structure where three coordinated wallet clusters control approximately 57% of total token circulation. 

This pattern mirrors previous observations in PIPPIN, suggesting insider coordination rather than organic market activity.

Coordinated Wallet Clusters Dominate Token Distribution

The largest cluster comprises top externally owned accounts that accumulated primarily through Gate exchange. 

These wallets collectively hold 326,226,487.04 JELLYJELLY tokens worth roughly $42.41 million. This group forms what analysts describe as the core supply backbone of the token’s market structure.

A second cluster consists of medium-sized accounts accumulating tokens from Bitget exchange. 

Together, these wallets control 141,078,919.70 JELLYJELLY valued at approximately $18.34 million. The coordinated accumulation pattern across different exchanges suggests planned activity rather than random retail participation.

The third cluster includes numerous smaller wallets sourcing tokens from Raydium decentralized exchange. 

Despite their size, these wallets display synchronized behavior that distinguishes them from typical retail traders. Combined, the three clusters hold 470,348,304.20 JELLYJELLY worth about $61.15 million.

Technical Indicators Show Mixed Signals Amid Extreme Volatility

Current trading data shows JELLYJELLY at $0.07022, representing a 36.10% decline from recent peaks. 

The token experienced a dramatic surge to approximately $0.35 in late October before crashing precipitously. Price action has since formed a consolidation base between $0.07 and $0.10.

The MACD indicator displays emerging bullish momentum as the blue line crosses above the signal line with green histogram bars appearing. 

Source: TradingView

This development suggests renewed buying interest despite the significant drawdown from peak levels. However, the Directional Movement Index shows ADX declining, indicating weakening overall trend strength.

Evening Trader Group’s analysis emphasizes that price movement depends primarily on whether controlling clusters choose to distribute their holdings. 

The DMI shows convergence between positive and negative directional indicators around the 30-50 range, reflecting market indecision. The 85% correction from peak levels underscores the extreme volatility characteristic of this asset class.

Market observers note the supply concentration creates conditions where price action depends more on insider decisions than on broader market fundamentals or narrative strength.

The post JELLYJELLY Rebounds 3x as Three Wallet Clusters Control 57% of Token Supply appeared first on Blockonomi.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

ETH Technical Analysis Feb 18

ETH Technical Analysis Feb 18

The post ETH Technical Analysis Feb 18 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ethereum price is trading close to a critical support region at the 1.992$ level; as
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/18 11:37
ABC Also Pulled Jimmy Kimmel’s Predecessor After Controversial Comments

ABC Also Pulled Jimmy Kimmel’s Predecessor After Controversial Comments

The post ABC Also Pulled Jimmy Kimmel’s Predecessor After Controversial Comments appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jimmy Kimmel (Photo by Media Access Awards Presented By Easterseals/Getty Images for Easterseals) Getty Images for Easterseals The shock decision by ABC to pull Jimmy Kimmel Live! “indefinitely” after the late-night host’s remarks about the killing of Charlie Kirk has created a rare moment in modern TV media: A major show abruptly taken off the air, with its network forced into crisis-management mode. Rare, that is, but not unprecedented. What might go unnoticed by many people reacting to the news about Kimmel and his potential cancellation is that this is not the first time ABC has made such a move. In fact, a version of the same thing happened to Kimmel’s predecessor program — Bill Maher’s Politically Incorrect, which once had Kimmel’s slot and which ABC cancelled in the wake of a firestorm around comments Maher made in the immediate aftermath of the September 11 terrorist attacks. (Notice, by the way, that I said cancelled “in the wake of” and not “because of.” More on that in a moment.) Here’s what happened: Less than a week after 9/11, Maher and a panel were talking about then-President George W. Bush’s use of the word “cowards” to describe the hijackers. “We have been the cowards,” Maher interjected, referencing the practice of “lobbing cruise missiles from 2,000 miles away. That’s cowardly.” But Maher then went even farther over the line: Actually staying in an airplane as it hits a building? “Not cowardly.” You can read more about the ensuing uproar in this ABC news story from 2001, which includes a statement that Maher issued through his publicist: “In no way was I intending to say, nor have I ever thought, that the men and women who defend our nation in uniform are anything but courageous and valiant, and I offer my apologies to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 11:02
Onchain Gold and RWA Projects Withstand Market Pullback with Solid TVL Growth

Onchain Gold and RWA Projects Withstand Market Pullback with Solid TVL Growth

The post Onchain Gold and RWA Projects Withstand Market Pullback with Solid TVL Growth appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The decentralized finance (DeFi) landscape
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/18 11:00