Blockchain investigator ZachXBT urged traders to exercise caution as a new Soulja Boy–backed memecoin gained momentum on social media. The post ZachXBT Raises RedBlockchain investigator ZachXBT urged traders to exercise caution as a new Soulja Boy–backed memecoin gained momentum on social media. The post ZachXBT Raises Red

ZachXBT Raises Red Flags Over New Soulja Boy–Promoted Memecoin

  • American rapper Soulja Boy is facing renewed public criticism from the analytics firm Bubblemaps over his history of paid crypto and NFT promotions that allegedly collapsed.
  • The rapper issued a public apology, claiming he ran past promotions without understanding the market or knowing a promoter linked to fraudulent schemes (Sahil Arora) was involved, a defense critics have largely dismissed.
  • The controversy is magnified by prior allegations from investigator ZachXBT linking Soulja Boy to 73 crypto and 16 NFT projects flagged as scams, and by a Base network co-founder appearing to amplify a new Soulja Boy-linked memecoin.

American rapper Soulja Boy is facing backlash again for his history of paid crypto and NFT promotions, after on-chain analytics firm Bubblemaps publicly criticised him and resurfaced allegations of repeated involvement in token campaigns that later collapsed.

Soulja Boy’s immediate response was a public apology on X. He said he ran paid promotions in the past without understanding the crypto and NFT market, and that he did not know a well-known memecoin promoter, Sahil Arora, was involved or paying him to push anything fraudulent. 

He apologised to people who lost money and framed it as a lesson learned, while also admitting he did not do enough due diligence at the time. But the apology didn’t change public sentiment, because critics interpret it as a standard “I didn’t know” defense rather than a substantive explanation of what happened.

Read more: Do Kwon Sentenced to 15 Years Over Terraform Collapse

Full Backlash

Bubblemaps rejected the explanation and framed his conduct as cyclical. In a sarcastic timeline, it alleged he promoted numerous tokens during the 2021 peak, profited while prices later fell to near-zero, left the sector, then returned years later to launch memecoins via PumpFun that also went to zero. 

Bubblemaps also said that after it highlighted these claims, Soulja Boy blocked the platform’s X account, then attempted to distance himself by attributing responsibility to Arora while continuing to associate with new crypto initiatives, including activity on Coinbase’s Base network.

The current backlash draws on earlier reporting from blockchain investigator ZachXBT. In 2023, ZachXBT alleged Soulja Boy was connected to 73 crypto promotions and 16 NFT projects later flagged as scams, and claimed the promotions generated more than US$730,000 (AU$1,116,900) in compensation during the period reviewed. ZachXBT has again warned traders to be cautious as a new Soulja Boy-linked memecoin circulates on social media.

The controversy expanded after Jesse Pollak, a co-founder of Base, posted what he described as proof of a US$1,500 (AU$2,295) Ether purchase used to buy the token, prompting ZachXBT to question why a major network figure would amplify a promoter with that track record. 

ZachXBT’s prior thread cited several endorsed tokens that he said were later abandoned or became “rug pulls,” a scam where insiders withdraw liquidity and leave holders with near-worthless tokens.

Related: Australia Loosens the Reins on Stablecoins

The post ZachXBT Raises Red Flags Over New Soulja Boy–Promoted Memecoin appeared first on Crypto News Australia.

Market Opportunity
RedStone Logo
RedStone Price(RED)
$0.2316
$0.2316$0.2316
-1.02%
USD
RedStone (RED) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
U.S. Banks Near Stablecoin Issuance Under FDIC Genius Act Plan

U.S. Banks Near Stablecoin Issuance Under FDIC Genius Act Plan

The post U.S. Banks Near Stablecoin Issuance Under FDIC Genius Act Plan appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. U.S. banks could soon begin applying to issue payment
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/17 02:55
Turmoil Strikes Theta Labs with New Legal Allegations

Turmoil Strikes Theta Labs with New Legal Allegations

Cryptocurrency often sees its fair share of lawsuits, with many concluding without much ado. However, a fresh legal battle has surfaced involving a well-known altcoin
Share
Coinstats2025/12/17 03:06