The post Binance’s Stablecoin Liquidity Drops for the Third Week: Is This a Warning Signal? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TLDR: Binance logs three straightThe post Binance’s Stablecoin Liquidity Drops for the Third Week: Is This a Warning Signal? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TLDR: Binance logs three straight

Binance’s Stablecoin Liquidity Drops for the Third Week: Is This a Warning Signal?

2025/12/13 08:59

TLDR:

  • Binance logs three straight weeks of stablecoin outflows, signaling a sustained pullback from major market participants.
  • USDC and ERC20 USDT lead the retreat, with billions moving to external wallets across the November–December cycle.
  • Whales reduce exposure through heavy ERC20 withdrawals, while retail users continue depositing TRC20 USDT.
  • Reduced institutional “dry powder” weakens spot-market depth as traders watch for a rebound in ERC20 inflows.

Binance’s stablecoin liquidity continues to trend lower as the exchange enters its third consecutive week of net outflows. 

On-chain data shows a persistent pullback from larger market participants, reducing the available buying power on the platform. This shift is creating a cautious atmosphere as traders assess whether the pattern signals a broader change in market positioning.

The steady movement of capital away from the exchange has drawn attention from analysts who track liquidity cycles. 

With withdrawals affecting multiple stablecoin segments, the trend is raising questions about institutional appetite and short-term demand for spot market activity.

Three Weeks of Outflows Suggest a Sustained Liquidity Shift

The current withdrawal cycle began during the week of November 24, when Binance recorded nearly $1.35 billion in USDC outflows. 

This initial reduction marked the start of a consistent drainage of stablecoins, primarily from large wallets associated with professional entities.

The pattern continued into the week of December 1. During this period, the exit widened as USDT on Ethereum (ERC20) turned negative, with more than $759 million leaving the exchange. 

Source: cryptoQuant

The dual pressure from USDC and USDT withdrawals weakened the immediate capital available for potential market entries.

Several market trackers brought attention to this shift, noting that the exits appear concentrated among high-volume users. 

The current week maintains that trend. More than $560 million in USDT (ERC20) and nearly $300 million in USDC have already moved off the exchange, pointing to sustained caution among major holders.

Institutional Retreat vs. Retail Activity Creates a Divided Market

A clear separation has emerged between institutional flows and retail behavior. ERC20-based stablecoins, often used by whales and advanced traders, continue to show sharp outflows. 

Many of these transfers appear directed toward DeFi platforms or long-term storage, reflecting reduced reliance on centralized trading venues.

In contrast, TRC20 USDT remains the only major stablecoin posting net inflows. Retail users, who often favor the lower transaction fees on the TRON network, have sent more than $336 million into Binance this week. 

This creates a unique structure in which smaller accounts continue depositing while larger participants reduce their exposure.

Market commentators circulating on social platforms noted that this widening gap reduces available “dry powder” from institutional players. 

With less ERC20 liquidity on the exchange, the order book carries weaker depth, limiting its ability to absorb aggressive selling. Analysts observe that a recovery in ERC20 inflows would serve as the earliest sign of returning institutional strength, making it a key metric to monitor moving forward.

The post Binance’s Stablecoin Liquidity Drops for the Third Week: Is This a Warning Signal? appeared first on Blockonomi.

Source: https://blockonomi.com/binances-stablecoin-liquidity-drops-for-the-third-week-is-this-a-warning-signal/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like