The post How Coinbase’s latest deal turned a 10X token boom into a costly lesson for retail traders appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Coinbase spent 2025 positioning itself as the infrastructure layer for retail crypto access, absorbing teams and technology that could accelerate its “everything exchange” vision. A Nov. 21 announcement that it acquired Vector.fun, Solana’s fastest-moving DEX aggregator, fit the pattern: acquire the rails, sunset the product, integrate the speed. But the deal carved out an unusual exception. While Coinbase takes Vector’s team and infrastructure, the Tensor Foundation retains the NFT marketplace and the TNSR token. Token holders keep their governance rights but lose the asset that justified the token’s existence. The separation raises a question: if equity holders capture value from acquisitions while token holders get stripped of core assets with no compensation, why buy tokens from Coinbase’s platforms at all? TNSR traded at $0.0344 on Nov. 19, down 92% year-to-date. By Nov. 20, it peaked at $0.3650, an 11-fold gain in 48 hours. Volume spiked from months of sub-$10 million days to $735 million on Nov. 19, then $1.9 billion on Nov. 20. As of Nov. 21, TNSR dumped 37.3% in 24 hours to $0.1566, logging $960 million in selling volume. The pattern suggests a classic front-running: someone knew, someone bought, and retail arrived late. The logic behind stripping Vector from Tensor Coinbase framed the acquisition as a bet on Solana infrastructure. Per the announcement, Solana DEX volume already topped $1 trillion in 2025, and Vector’s technology identifies new tokens the moment they launch on-chain or through major launchpads. That speed matters for Coinbase’s DEX trading integration, which needs to compete with native Solana apps that onboard users directly into high-velocity trading. But Vector wasn’t a standalone product. It was Tensor’s consumer-facing play, designed to drive utility for TNSR and channel liquidity back to the NFT marketplace. Separating the two makes sense only if Coinbase wanted the infrastructure without the… The post How Coinbase’s latest deal turned a 10X token boom into a costly lesson for retail traders appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Coinbase spent 2025 positioning itself as the infrastructure layer for retail crypto access, absorbing teams and technology that could accelerate its “everything exchange” vision. A Nov. 21 announcement that it acquired Vector.fun, Solana’s fastest-moving DEX aggregator, fit the pattern: acquire the rails, sunset the product, integrate the speed. But the deal carved out an unusual exception. While Coinbase takes Vector’s team and infrastructure, the Tensor Foundation retains the NFT marketplace and the TNSR token. Token holders keep their governance rights but lose the asset that justified the token’s existence. The separation raises a question: if equity holders capture value from acquisitions while token holders get stripped of core assets with no compensation, why buy tokens from Coinbase’s platforms at all? TNSR traded at $0.0344 on Nov. 19, down 92% year-to-date. By Nov. 20, it peaked at $0.3650, an 11-fold gain in 48 hours. Volume spiked from months of sub-$10 million days to $735 million on Nov. 19, then $1.9 billion on Nov. 20. As of Nov. 21, TNSR dumped 37.3% in 24 hours to $0.1566, logging $960 million in selling volume. The pattern suggests a classic front-running: someone knew, someone bought, and retail arrived late. The logic behind stripping Vector from Tensor Coinbase framed the acquisition as a bet on Solana infrastructure. Per the announcement, Solana DEX volume already topped $1 trillion in 2025, and Vector’s technology identifies new tokens the moment they launch on-chain or through major launchpads. That speed matters for Coinbase’s DEX trading integration, which needs to compete with native Solana apps that onboard users directly into high-velocity trading. But Vector wasn’t a standalone product. It was Tensor’s consumer-facing play, designed to drive utility for TNSR and channel liquidity back to the NFT marketplace. Separating the two makes sense only if Coinbase wanted the infrastructure without the…

How Coinbase’s latest deal turned a 10X token boom into a costly lesson for retail traders

5 min read

Coinbase spent 2025 positioning itself as the infrastructure layer for retail crypto access, absorbing teams and technology that could accelerate its “everything exchange” vision.

A Nov. 21 announcement that it acquired Vector.fun, Solana’s fastest-moving DEX aggregator, fit the pattern: acquire the rails, sunset the product, integrate the speed.

But the deal carved out an unusual exception.

While Coinbase takes Vector’s team and infrastructure, the Tensor Foundation retains the NFT marketplace and the TNSR token. Token holders keep their governance rights but lose the asset that justified the token’s existence.

The separation raises a question: if equity holders capture value from acquisitions while token holders get stripped of core assets with no compensation, why buy tokens from Coinbase’s platforms at all?

TNSR traded at $0.0344 on Nov. 19, down 92% year-to-date. By Nov. 20, it peaked at $0.3650, an 11-fold gain in 48 hours.

Volume spiked from months of sub-$10 million days to $735 million on Nov. 19, then $1.9 billion on Nov. 20. As of Nov. 21, TNSR dumped 37.3% in 24 hours to $0.1566, logging $960 million in selling volume.

The pattern suggests a classic front-running: someone knew, someone bought, and retail arrived late.

The logic behind stripping Vector from Tensor

Coinbase framed the acquisition as a bet on Solana infrastructure. Per the announcement, Solana DEX volume already topped $1 trillion in 2025, and Vector’s technology identifies new tokens the moment they launch on-chain or through major launchpads.

That speed matters for Coinbase’s DEX trading integration, which needs to compete with native Solana apps that onboard users directly into high-velocity trading.

But Vector wasn’t a standalone product. It was Tensor’s consumer-facing play, designed to drive utility for TNSR and channel liquidity back to the NFT marketplace.

Separating the two makes sense only if Coinbase wanted the infrastructure without the governance entanglements of holding or backing a token.

By leaving TNSR with the Tensor Foundation, Coinbase avoids regulatory exposure while extracting the operational layer that made Vector valuable.

Token holders are left with a governance token for a marketplace that just lost its most promising growth driver.

Omar Kanji, investor at Dragonfly, framed the disconnect bluntly:

The comment speaks to a larger friction in crypto’s dual-class system. Equity investors in Coinbase capture the upside when the company acquires technology. Meanwhile, token holders in projects like Tensor are forced to absorb asset stripping without a seat at the negotiation table.

The infrastructure that makes separation possible

Account abstraction and modular blockchain architecture let companies slice products into components and acquire only the pieces they need.

Vector’s infrastructure sits between on-chain liquidity sources and user interfaces, routing trades across automated market makers, order books, and liquidity pools.

Coinbase can plug that routing layer into its DEX integration, rebranding the experience as native functionality while discarding Vector’s consumer app.

Solana’s sub-second finality and low transaction costs let aggregators like Vector process thousands of trades per second. That speed matters for meme token launches and NFT mints, where price discovery happens in minutes.

Coinbase now controls that speed advantage, which it can deploy to compete with Raydium, Orca, and Jupiter for retail order flow on Solana.

The Tensor Foundation keeps the NFT marketplace, a slower-moving, out-of-the-narrative, lower-margin business that Coinbase likely sees as non-core.

What breaks if this becomes the norm

If token holders consistently get stripped of assets during acquisitions, the incentive to hold governance tokens collapses. Tokens become short-term bets on hype cycles rather than long-term stakes in protocol value.

Jon Charbonneau, co-founder of investment firm DBA, pointed out the reputational cost:

The front-running pattern compounds the problem. TNSR’s $1.9 billion volume spike on Nov. 20, one day before the announcement, suggests information leaked.

The largest daily volume TNSR recorded in 2025 before Nov. 19 was $83.7 million on Mar. 10. The 25-fold increase in volume doesn’t happen organically.

Someone likely bought ahead of the news, and retail traders who chased the pump absorbed the exit liquidity when the announcement hit.

Regulatory scrutiny around crypto insider trading remains inconsistent, but the optics could damage Coinbase’s positioning as the clean, compliant onramp for institutional capital.

The company spent years distancing itself from offshore exchanges that operate with looser disclosure standards. If its acquisitions now trigger the same front-running patterns that define pump-and-dump schemes, the distinction blurs.

What this means for token launches and platform credibility

Coinbase plans to expand its token listing infrastructure, positioning itself as the primary venue for new asset launches in US markets. The Vector acquisition undermines that pitch.

If developers and early investors know that Coinbase will acquire their technology while leaving token holders with depreciated governance rights, they can structure deals to favor equity over tokens.

That shifts capital formation away from decentralized models and back toward traditional venture-backed structures, where equity holders control exits and token holders provide liquidity without representation.

The alternative would require Coinbase to compensate token holders during acquisitions, either through token buybacks, equity conversion, or direct payouts. None of those options is simple.

Buybacks could trigger securities law concerns. Equity conversion would require treating tokens as investment contracts, which Coinbase avoids for regulatory reasons.

Direct payouts would set a precedent that every acquisition must include token consideration, limiting Coinbase’s flexibility to cherry-pick infrastructure without governance baggage.

Every token launch on Coinbase’s platform now carries the implicit risk that the company will later acquire the underlying project, extract the valuable assets, and leave token holders with depreciated governance rights.

If Coinbase wants to dominate token launches, it needs a better answer than “equity holders benefit, token holders don’t.” The Vector deal proves it doesn’t have one yet. The market will decide whether that matters.

Mentioned in this article

Source: https://cryptoslate.com/how-coinbases-latest-deal-turned-a-token-boom-into-a-costly-lesson-for-retail-traders/

Market Opportunity
TokenFi Logo
TokenFi Price(TOKEN)
$0.003683
$0.003683$0.003683
-0.70%
USD
TokenFi (TOKEN) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Vitalik Buterin Challenges Ethereum’s Layer 2 Paradigm

Vitalik Buterin Challenges Ethereum’s Layer 2 Paradigm

Vitalik Buterin challenges the role of layer 2 solutions in Ethereum's ecosystem. Layer 2's slow progress and Ethereum’s L1 scaling impact future strategies.
Share
Coinstats2026/02/04 04:08
USAA Names Dan Griffiths Chief Information Officer to Drive Secure, Simplified Digital Member Experiences

USAA Names Dan Griffiths Chief Information Officer to Drive Secure, Simplified Digital Member Experiences

SAN ANTONIO–(BUSINESS WIRE)–USAA today announced the appointment of Dan Griffiths as Chief Information Officer, effective February 5, 2026. A proven financial‑services
Share
AI Journal2026/02/04 04:15