The post Crypto carnage — Is Bitcoin’s 4-year cycle over? Trade Secrets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Is this crypto market cycle over after four years — or should the four-year crypto market cycle theory itself be consigned to history? Swan Bitcoin CEO and Bitcoin advocate Cory Klippsten leans toward the latter view. “There is a very good chance that Bitcoin’s famous four-year price cycles are over, killed by institutional adoption,” Klippsten tells Magazine. The debate has Bitcoin analysts around the world divided. Some insist the four-year cycle is still alive; others say it is dead and argue that Bitcoin is following a completely different path altogether. So who’s right? We’re now halfway through what’s usually Bitcoin’s strongest month of the year, yet the price is now lower today than it was on Jan. 1. At the time of writing, Bitcoin was trading at $92,170, down almost 13% over the past seven days. Not exactly great news for the Tom Lees and Arthur Hayes of the world who were calling for $250,000 by the end of the year. If Bitcoin’s four-year cycle were still in play, Bitcoin’s October all-time high of $125,100 would technically mark the cycle top. That’s roughly 18 months after the April 2024 Bitcoin halving event, which fits the traditional pattern of an 18-month post-halving bull run, followed by a steep correction and a long downturn that typically lasts until the next halving. Klippsten argues that if Bitcoin hits a new all-time high in 2026 or avoids a drawdown of more than 70%, it would show that the four-year cycle is finished. He thinks that’s likely because the launch of the Bitcoin ETFs in January 2024 changed the game. Bitcoin is down 14% over the past 30 days. (CoinMarketCap) Spot Bitcoin ETFs changed Bitcoin’s supply-demand dynamics Echoing Klippsten, Michaël van de Poppe, founder of MN Trading Capital, says the spot Bitcoin ETF inflows are… The post Crypto carnage — Is Bitcoin’s 4-year cycle over? Trade Secrets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Is this crypto market cycle over after four years — or should the four-year crypto market cycle theory itself be consigned to history? Swan Bitcoin CEO and Bitcoin advocate Cory Klippsten leans toward the latter view. “There is a very good chance that Bitcoin’s famous four-year price cycles are over, killed by institutional adoption,” Klippsten tells Magazine. The debate has Bitcoin analysts around the world divided. Some insist the four-year cycle is still alive; others say it is dead and argue that Bitcoin is following a completely different path altogether. So who’s right? We’re now halfway through what’s usually Bitcoin’s strongest month of the year, yet the price is now lower today than it was on Jan. 1. At the time of writing, Bitcoin was trading at $92,170, down almost 13% over the past seven days. Not exactly great news for the Tom Lees and Arthur Hayes of the world who were calling for $250,000 by the end of the year. If Bitcoin’s four-year cycle were still in play, Bitcoin’s October all-time high of $125,100 would technically mark the cycle top. That’s roughly 18 months after the April 2024 Bitcoin halving event, which fits the traditional pattern of an 18-month post-halving bull run, followed by a steep correction and a long downturn that typically lasts until the next halving. Klippsten argues that if Bitcoin hits a new all-time high in 2026 or avoids a drawdown of more than 70%, it would show that the four-year cycle is finished. He thinks that’s likely because the launch of the Bitcoin ETFs in January 2024 changed the game. Bitcoin is down 14% over the past 30 days. (CoinMarketCap) Spot Bitcoin ETFs changed Bitcoin’s supply-demand dynamics Echoing Klippsten, Michaël van de Poppe, founder of MN Trading Capital, says the spot Bitcoin ETF inflows are…

Crypto carnage — Is Bitcoin’s 4-year cycle over? Trade Secrets

6 min read

Is this crypto market cycle over after four years — or should the four-year crypto market cycle theory itself be consigned to history?

Swan Bitcoin CEO and Bitcoin advocate Cory Klippsten leans toward the latter view. “There is a very good chance that Bitcoin’s famous four-year price cycles are over, killed by institutional adoption,” Klippsten tells Magazine.

The debate has Bitcoin analysts around the world divided. Some insist the four-year cycle is still alive; others say it is dead and argue that Bitcoin is following a completely different path altogether.

So who’s right?

We’re now halfway through what’s usually Bitcoin’s strongest month of the year, yet the price is now lower today than it was on Jan. 1. At the time of writing, Bitcoin was trading at $92,170, down almost 13% over the past seven days. Not exactly great news for the Tom Lees and Arthur Hayes of the world who were calling for $250,000 by the end of the year.

If Bitcoin’s four-year cycle were still in play, Bitcoin’s October all-time high of $125,100 would technically mark the cycle top.

That’s roughly 18 months after the April 2024 Bitcoin halving event, which fits the traditional pattern of an 18-month post-halving bull run, followed by a steep correction and a long downturn that typically lasts until the next halving.

Klippsten argues that if Bitcoin hits a new all-time high in 2026 or avoids a drawdown of more than 70%, it would show that the four-year cycle is finished. He thinks that’s likely because the launch of the Bitcoin ETFs in January 2024 changed the game.

Bitcoin is down 14% over the past 30 days. (CoinMarketCap)

Spot Bitcoin ETFs changed Bitcoin’s supply-demand dynamics

Echoing Klippsten, Michaël van de Poppe, founder of MN Trading Capital, says the spot Bitcoin ETF inflows are fundamentally altering Bitcoin’s supply-demand dynamics.

“60K Bitcoin has been bought in the past 18 months in the Bitcoin ETFs, which is a significant constant demand through institutions,” he said. However, van de Poppe warns that declaring the cycle dead is “short-sighted.” 

(Adam Back)

While van de Poppe admitted that “this cycle has been proven to act differently,” he emphasized that October’s all-time high still has a chance of being the cycle top.

“We’re on the crossroads of market changes, maturing of an asset like Bitcoin and therefore, different market dynamics,” van de Poppe said.

Bitwise chief investment officer Matt Hougan is more confident that Bitcoin is moving away from the typical four-year cycle after the recent market downturn. “The biggest risk was [if] we ripped into the end of 2025 and then we got a pullback,” Hougan said, explaining it would have fit the four-year thesis.

BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes dismisses the idea that Bitcoin is sticking to the traditional cycle. He went quiet on his $250,000 year-end prediction in his latest Substack post and argued that Bitcoin will only push into new highs once markets “puke enough” to force central banks back into aggressive money printing.

Swyftx lead analyst Pav Hundal is also looking closely at the macroeconomic data, telling Magazine that it’s too early to call a top for this cycle.

“Any drop in inflation or concern over labour figures will just push us back onto the path of rate cuts,” Hundal says. 

Read also

Features

The truth behind Cuba’s Bitcoin revolution: An on-the-ground report

Features

‘Everything feels like it’s going to shit’: Peter McCormack reveals new podcast

“Every time the market expects a drop in US rates, we see a bid and rally and then we just get this huge unwinding of risk when rate cut hopes are dashed,” Hundal says.

Is Bitcoin heading for a five-year cycle?

(Wist)

After a bout of uncertainty recently stirred up by the Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, the odds of a December rate cut have plunged to just 40.9%, according to CME’s FedWatch Tool. 

Hundal says the market is essentially “fumbling its way through the dark at the moment” until clearer data arrives.

“This isn’t just a Bitcoin problem. It’s a flashing red light for all risk assets,” he adds.

The Fed cutting interest rates is typically bullish for Bitcoin and other crypto assets as traditional assets like bonds and term deposits become less lucrative to investors.

There’s also another group of Bitcoiners who are adamant that the four-year cycle never really existed at all. The Bitcoin Therapist argues it was just Bitcoin moving in sync with the broader business cycle.

Real Vision founder Raoul Pal argued a similar idea, claiming the global business cycle now runs on a five-year period, which may put Bitcoin’s cycle high somewhere in 2026.

Read also

Features

Bitcoin OG Kyle Chassé is one strike away from a YouTube permaban

Features

Boston nurse fired for nudes on OnlyFans launches crypto porn app

Crypto analyst Jesse Eckel said, “In hindsight, it’ll be obvious we were headed into a bull market in 2026 and knowing how to count to four wasn’t a real investment strategy.”

“Five Year Cycle,” Eckel emphasized.

No, it’s a four-year cycle, and it just ended

But some analysts and executives have been saying for months the four-year cycle was likely to still be in play, and the current market carnage supports that perspective… for now at least.

Prominent crypto analyst Rekt Capital said in July that only “a very small sliver of time and price expansion” remained in the current run.More recently, Rekt cautioned that it may take a long time “to conclude whether Bitcoin is in a lengthened cycle or ultimately it wasn’t after all.”

Crypto exchange Gemini’s APAC head Saad Ahmed also believes some kind of repeating cycle will persist, telling Cointelegraph at Token2049 that “the reality is that it’s very likely that we’ll continue to see some form of a cycle.”

“It ultimately stems from people getting really excited and overextending themselves, and then you kind of see a crash, and then it kind of corrects to an equilibrium,” Ahmed said.

Even crypto analytics platform Glassnode said earlier this year, before Bitcoin set new highs in October, that Bitcoin’s price action still appeared to be tracking the historical halving pattern.

On Monday, crypto analyst Colin Talks Crypto said that the party may be over for Bitcoin’s price for now.

“Without a quick recovery in the next day or two, this suggests we’re entering a bear market/bigger corrective period,” Colin Talks Crypto said.

Ciaran Lyons

Ciaran Lyons is an Australian crypto journalist. He’s also a standup comedian and has been a radio and TV presenter on Triple J, SBS and The Project.

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/magazine/bitcoin-price-four-year-cycle-analysts-split-trade-secrets/?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound

Market Opportunity
4 Logo
4 Price(4)
$0.01195
$0.01195$0.01195
-2.84%
USD
4 (4) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Vitalik Buterin Challenges Ethereum’s Layer 2 Paradigm

Vitalik Buterin Challenges Ethereum’s Layer 2 Paradigm

Vitalik Buterin challenges the role of layer 2 solutions in Ethereum's ecosystem. Layer 2's slow progress and Ethereum’s L1 scaling impact future strategies.
Share
Coinstats2026/02/04 04:08
USAA Names Dan Griffiths Chief Information Officer to Drive Secure, Simplified Digital Member Experiences

USAA Names Dan Griffiths Chief Information Officer to Drive Secure, Simplified Digital Member Experiences

SAN ANTONIO–(BUSINESS WIRE)–USAA today announced the appointment of Dan Griffiths as Chief Information Officer, effective February 5, 2026. A proven financial‑services
Share
AI Journal2026/02/04 04:15