The post SBF Claims FTX Was Never Insolvent, Says Creditors Paid 120% appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a surprising twist, Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) resurfaced on X this week with a detailed report claiming that FTX was never insolvent. The post, shared via his account @SBF_FTX, argues that the exchange always had enough assets to repay all customers in full, and accuses bankruptcy lawyers of “destroying value” through mismanagement. The report marks the most comprehensive rebuttal yet from the former FTX founder since his conviction. And it reignites a difficult question: was the collapse of FTX a true insolvency, or a liquidity crisis that spiraled out of control? [SBF says:] This is where the money went. https://t.co/HVRwEw5Z1k https://t.co/5DrA13L5YE pic.twitter.com/O6q77DvmTn — SBF (@SBF_FTX) October 31, 2025 SBF Says FTX Had Enough to Cover All Claims According to the report, FTX’s collapse was not caused by missing funds. Instead, SBF argues that the exchange held more than enough assets to cover the $8 billion in customer liabilities at the time of bankruptcy. He claims that 98% of creditors have already been repaid 120%, with total recoveries expected between 119% and 143% of their original claims. “FTX was never insolvent,” the report states. “The money never left. The $8 billion owed was always there, mismanaged, maybe, but not missing.” The filing also claims that even after covering all customer repayments and $1 billion in legal fees, the FTX bankruptcy estate still holds $8 billion. SBF: FTX was never insolvent. The $8 billion in customer assets owed when FTX filed for bankruptcy protection never left the platform, and all customers will receive 119% to 143% repayment, with about 98% of creditors already paid 120%. After covering $8 billion in claims and $1… — Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) October 31, 2025 $136 Billion in Assets, “Destroyed by Mismanagement” The 38-page document lays out a staggering asset list that SBF says was misused or… The post SBF Claims FTX Was Never Insolvent, Says Creditors Paid 120% appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a surprising twist, Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) resurfaced on X this week with a detailed report claiming that FTX was never insolvent. The post, shared via his account @SBF_FTX, argues that the exchange always had enough assets to repay all customers in full, and accuses bankruptcy lawyers of “destroying value” through mismanagement. The report marks the most comprehensive rebuttal yet from the former FTX founder since his conviction. And it reignites a difficult question: was the collapse of FTX a true insolvency, or a liquidity crisis that spiraled out of control? [SBF says:] This is where the money went. https://t.co/HVRwEw5Z1k https://t.co/5DrA13L5YE pic.twitter.com/O6q77DvmTn — SBF (@SBF_FTX) October 31, 2025 SBF Says FTX Had Enough to Cover All Claims According to the report, FTX’s collapse was not caused by missing funds. Instead, SBF argues that the exchange held more than enough assets to cover the $8 billion in customer liabilities at the time of bankruptcy. He claims that 98% of creditors have already been repaid 120%, with total recoveries expected between 119% and 143% of their original claims. “FTX was never insolvent,” the report states. “The money never left. The $8 billion owed was always there, mismanaged, maybe, but not missing.” The filing also claims that even after covering all customer repayments and $1 billion in legal fees, the FTX bankruptcy estate still holds $8 billion. SBF: FTX was never insolvent. The $8 billion in customer assets owed when FTX filed for bankruptcy protection never left the platform, and all customers will receive 119% to 143% repayment, with about 98% of creditors already paid 120%. After covering $8 billion in claims and $1… — Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) October 31, 2025 $136 Billion in Assets, “Destroyed by Mismanagement” The 38-page document lays out a staggering asset list that SBF says was misused or…

SBF Claims FTX Was Never Insolvent, Says Creditors Paid 120%

In a surprising twist, Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) resurfaced on X this week with a detailed report claiming that FTX was never insolvent.

The post, shared via his account @SBF_FTX, argues that the exchange always had enough assets to repay all customers in full, and accuses bankruptcy lawyers of “destroying value” through mismanagement.

The report marks the most comprehensive rebuttal yet from the former FTX founder since his conviction. And it reignites a difficult question: was the collapse of FTX a true insolvency, or a liquidity crisis that spiraled out of control?

SBF Says FTX Had Enough to Cover All Claims

According to the report, FTX’s collapse was not caused by missing funds. Instead, SBF argues that the exchange held more than enough assets to cover the $8 billion in customer liabilities at the time of bankruptcy.

He claims that 98% of creditors have already been repaid 120%, with total recoveries expected between 119% and 143% of their original claims.

The filing also claims that even after covering all customer repayments and $1 billion in legal fees, the FTX bankruptcy estate still holds $8 billion.

$136 Billion in Assets, “Destroyed by Mismanagement”

The 38-page document lays out a staggering asset list that SBF says was misused or sold off at fire-sale prices by bankruptcy administrators.

According to his report, FTX’s petition-date holdings are now worth about $136 billion, including:

$14.3B in Anthropic equity

$7.6B in Robinhood stock

$1.2B in Genesis Digital Assets

$600M in SpaceX (via K5 Global)

58M SOL worth around $12.4B

890M SUI valued at $2.9B

205,000 BTC ($2.3B)

225.4M XRP ($600M)

112,600 ETH ($500M)

$1.7B in cash

$345.2M in stablecoins

The report alleges that John Ray III and the legal firm Sullivan & Cromwell, who have managed the bankruptcy process, “seized FTX for profit” and “destroyed over $136 billion in value” by liquidating key holdings at deep discounts.

SBF accuses them of turning a “short-term liquidity crunch into a years-long legal drain.”

98% of Creditors Already Paid

In the report, SBF emphasizes that creditors have not only been made whole, they’ve been repaid more than they were owed.

According to him, 98% of creditors have received 120% repayments, with the remaining 2% still undergoing reconciliation. After accounting for all claims and legal fees, the estate allegedly retains $8 billion in surplus assets.

If accurate, it would mean that the billions once thought “lost” were never actually missing, only frozen during restructuring.

ZachXBT Calls Out “Misleading” Recovery Claims

Not everyone agrees with SBF’s new narrative.

On-chain investigator ZachXBT challenged the claim, arguing that FTX creditors were repaid based on November 2022 prices, not current market values.

That means users who held volatile assets like SOL or BTC at the time of bankruptcy received dollar-denominated compensation at the asset’s bottom, missing out on massive gains since then.

For example, Solana (SOL) has risen dramatically since the FTX collapse, trading around $196, according to CoinMarketCap, compared to under $15 when the exchange went under. That means users who held SOL lost the upside, even if they technically got “120% repayment.”

FTX’s Asset Fire Sales and Alleged Missteps

The report goes further to allege that FTX’s restructuring team “liquidated core assets prematurely”, particularly Solana, Anthropic, and Robinhood shares.

SBF accuses the lawyers of “self-enrichment,” claiming that “value destruction” came not from missing funds but from “fire-sale transactions and prolonged litigation.”

He points to Anthropic, the AI startup whose valuation soared from a few billion in 2022 to tens of billions in 2025. The report suggests that had those shares been held, creditors could have received even higher recoveries.

A Possible Bid for Redemption?

The timing of the report has raised speculation that SBF may be seeking a public rehabilitation or potential legal appeal.

The document’s tone, part financial breakdown, part defense statement, appears aimed at reframing his legacy from “fraudulent collapse” to “mismanaged solvency.”

With 98% of creditors reportedly repaid and the exchange’s asset base valued higher than ever, SBF’s supporters argue he may have grounds to request leniency or even a presidential pardon.

However, legal experts remain skeptical. FTX’s bankruptcy process has already spent nearly $1 billion in legal fees, and regulators previously described the firm’s internal accounting as “unreliable and misleading.”

A Divided Reaction Across Crypto Twitter

Crypto Twitter has been split in response to SBF’s comeback.

Some users see the report as an attempt to rewrite history, while others argue that the data, if verified, could reshape how the FTX saga is remembered.

@CryptoRand shared the view that the claims were “a desperate PR move,” while others praised the transparency in the breakdown of remaining assets.

The debate highlights an ongoing divide within the crypto community: was FTX a case of fraud, mismanagement, or both?

What Comes Next for FTX and Its Creditors

With repayments ongoing and major asset sales completed, FTX’s bankruptcy may soon reach its closing phase. But SBF’s new report ensures the debate over what really happened will continue for years.

If accurate, the claim that $8 billion remains after full creditor repayment would mark one of the most unusual turnarounds in bankruptcy history.

Still, critics maintain that solvency after-the-fact doesn’t erase wrongdoing. Even if FTX had the funds, decisions that led to its collapse, including commingling of assets and lack of transparency, remain central to SBF’s conviction.

Sam Bankman-Fried’s latest report reopens a complex chapter in the FTX saga. It paints a picture of a platform that was never truly insolvent, only frozen by legal overreach and internal panic.

Yet, on-chain analysts and former customers remain unconvinced.

If 98% of creditors were paid 120%, that’s a remarkable recovery. But whether that absolves the man at the center of it all, or rewrites crypto’s biggest downfall, remains to be seen.

Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services.

Follow us on Twitter @nulltxnews to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, Distributed Computing, and Metaverse news!

Source: https://nulltx.com/sbf-claims-ftx-was-never-insolvent-says-creditors-paid-120/

Market Opportunity
Octavia Logo
Octavia Price(VIA)
$0.0016557
$0.0016557$0.0016557
-0.28%
USD
Octavia (VIA) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Spur Protocol Daily Quiz 21 February 2026: Claim Free Tokens and Boost Your Crypto Wallet

Spur Protocol Daily Quiz 21 February 2026: Claim Free Tokens and Boost Your Crypto Wallet

Spur Protocol Daily Quiz February 21 2026: Today’s Correct Answer and How to Earn Free In-App Tokens The Spur Protocol Daily Quiz for February 21, 2026, is
Share
Hokanews2026/02/21 17:10
Alex Acosta Tells Congress He Has No ‘Remorse’ For Jeffrey Epstein ‘Sweetheart Deal,’ Lawmaker Says

Alex Acosta Tells Congress He Has No ‘Remorse’ For Jeffrey Epstein ‘Sweetheart Deal,’ Lawmaker Says

The post Alex Acosta Tells Congress He Has No ‘Remorse’ For Jeffrey Epstein ‘Sweetheart Deal,’ Lawmaker Says appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline A central figure in the Jeffrey Epstein sexual abuse saga—former prosecutor Alex Acosta, who granted in 2007 the former financier what’s been widely blasted as a “sweetheart deal” for his alleged crimes—has no regrets about the agreement, a Democratic lawmaker told CNN on Friday, as the former Trump official faces questioning from the House Oversight Committee. Alex Acosta, center, arrives for a House Oversight Committee deposition about Jeffrey Epstein on September 19 in Washington D.C. CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images Key Facts This story is breaking and will be updated. Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/09/19/prosecutor-acosta-who-gave-epstein-sweetheart-deal-testifies-he-no-remorse-lawmaker-says/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/20 06:37