Jupiter revenues climbed to $46M in Q3 as the app captured fees across spot and perpetual markets on Solana.Jupiter revenues climbed to $46M in Q3 as the app captured fees across spot and perpetual markets on Solana.

Jupiter revenues surge on Solana: Q3 fees, TVL and risks

Jupiter revenues climbed to $46M in Q3 as the app captured fees across spot and perpetual markets on Solana, the company reported on October 23, 2025.

What drove jupiter solana revenues on Solana in Q3 and how is the revenue split by solana perpetual futures fees?

Define total Q3 revenues and identify main fee sources

Jupiter posted $46M revenues Q3, with a large share coming from derivatives. Per the quarterly report, perpetual futures generated $24.6M perpetual futures, roughly half of the quarter’s receipts.

The report described the platform as “locking in over $46M in revenues for Q3,” underlining derivatives as the dominant margin line.

How do spot volumes factor into fee generation?

High spot activity amplified fee income, supported by $176.8B spot volumes for Q3. The mix of spot and derivatives trading created diversified revenue streams and positioned Jupiter among the top fee producers on Solana. Read the company report for details: Jupiter quarterly report.

How have jupiter trading volumes and jupiter total value locked evolved, and what role do validators play? In brief,

What are the headline volume, TVL and wallet metrics?

Jupiter’s Q3 spot volumes reached $176.8B, while TVL $3.28B and the network recorded 8.4M active wallets. Those metrics point to substantial on-chain throughput and sustained user engagement on Solana.

How significant are validator locks and ecosystem support?

Validators contributed materially, with validator locks >$1B providing staking and network security that supports trading throughput. Operationally, larger validator stakes can reduce failed transaction rates and help preserve effective fee capture across busy market periods.

In brief, Jupiter’s volumes, TVL and validator stake have combined to sustain fee capture in Q3 while opening room for product expansion into derivatives and staking flows.

What expansion activities did Jupiter undertake into perpetual futures and launchpad services?

How large were perpetual futures fees and what else expanded?

Perpetual futures fees amounted to $24.6M, a core revenue driver. Jupiter also reported JupSOL revenues $531.4K from liquid staking-related flows, adding another income line and broadening the protocol’s monetization channels.

What was the launchpad performance and token support?

The launchpad recorded $1.32B launchpad volumes and supported 34K launched tokens, indicating aggressive product expansion beyond simple order routing. These services widened Jupiter’s fee base and diversified revenue sources.

What is the near-term outlook and risks for jupiter revenues on Solana?

JUP price ~ $0.35 Oct 23 and platform fees stood at $4.1M fees as of Oct 23, showing active revenue flows but limited upside without sustained volumes. Market depth and derivatives activity will determine whether revenues hold or decline.

What are the principal risks and valuation concerns?

Ttoken unlock pressure and market volatility could weigh on JUP and platform economics. Observers cite narratives that JUP token is potentially jup token undervalued and watch shifts in the jupiter fee producers ranking as factors investors should monitor.

Market Opportunity
RWAX Logo
RWAX Price(APP)
$0.0001428
$0.0001428$0.0001428
-1.92%
USD
RWAX (APP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Future of Metalworking: Advancements and Innovations

The Future of Metalworking: Advancements and Innovations

The demand for precision and efficiency in manufacturing processes continues to rise, leading to groundbreaking advancements in metalworking. This sector constantly
Share
Techbullion2026/02/07 19:24
Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum

Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum

The post Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A crypto whale lost more than $6 million in staked Ethereum (stETH) and Aave-wrapped Bitcoin (aEthWBTC) after approving malicious signatures in a phishing scheme on Sept. 18, according to blockchain security firm Scam Sniffer. According to the firm, the attackers disguised their move as a routine wallet confirmation through “Permit” signatures, which tricked the victim into authorizing fund transfers without triggering obvious red flags. Yu Xian, founder of blockchain security company SlowMist, noted that the victim did not recognize the danger because the transaction required no gas fees. He wrote: “From the victim’s perspective, he just clicked a few times to confirm the wallet’s pop-up signature requests, didn’t spend a single penny of gas, and $6.28 million was gone.” How Permit exploits work Permit approvals were originally designed to simplify token transfers. Instead of submitting an on-chain approval and paying fees, a user can sign an off-chain message authorizing a spender. That efficiency, however, has created a new attack surface for malicious players. Once a user signs such a permit, attackers can combine two functions—Permit and TransferFrom—to drain assets directly. Because the authorization takes place off-chain, wallet dashboards show no unusual activity until the funds move. As a result, the assets are gone when the approval executes on-chain, and tokens are redirected to the attacker’s wallet. This loophole has made permit exploits increasingly attractive for malicious actors, who can siphon millions without needing complex hacks or high-cost gas wars. Phishing losses The latest theft highlights a wider trend of escalating phishing campaigns. Scam Sniffer reported that in August alone, attackers stole $12.17 million from more than 15,200 victims. That figure represented a 72% jump in losses compared with July. According to the firm, the most significant share of August’s damages came from three large accounts that accounted for nearly half…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 02:31
WHALE ALERT: $351 MILLION Bitcoin Dump Incoming

WHALE ALERT: $351 MILLION Bitcoin Dump Incoming

One crypto whale transferred 5,000 Bitcoin, which is worth about 351 million, to Binance. Ash Crypto reported this transfer. It happened only several days after
Share
Coinfomania2026/02/07 19:36