The Selling Out of Decentralization Decentralization was supposed to be rebellion — a digital uprising against the gatekeepers of finance and data. A way to give power back to people. Now, it’s just a new kind of marketing campaign. What began as a movement for freedom turned into a spectacle of greed. The rhetoric stayed radical, but the behavior got corporate fast. Talk of “community ownership” quietly morphed into “token incentives.” What was once anti-establishment became airdrop culture — capitalism with better branding. The irony is vicious Web3 started by promising to break the system but ended up replicating it — only faster and with worse UX. Decentralization once meant transparency, autonomy, and resilience. Now it means Discord servers filled with speculation, influencers masquerading as economists, and founders building new empires on the ashes of old ones. The same power dynamics, just distributed through wallets instead of banks. The dream of collective power collapsed under the weight of individual profit. Because when everyone’s in it for yield, nobody’s in it for freedom. The Web3 revolution didn’t get crushed by regulators or skeptics — it got sold out by its believers. The crypto economy turned participation into gamified capitalism, and the “community” into unpaid labor for hype. The deeper tragedy isn’t the scams or the rug pulls — those were predictable. It’s how easily people traded idealism for incentives. How a movement built on “trustless systems” forgot that trust — in each other, not code — was the original point. Decentralization didn’t fail because it couldn’t work. It failed because it stopped being about liberation and became about distribution — not of power, but of profit. The revolution was real for a second. Then someone built a dashboard for it, raised a Series A, and launched an NFT drop. That’s not freedom. That’s franchising. From Anarchy to Airdrops was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this storyThe Selling Out of Decentralization Decentralization was supposed to be rebellion — a digital uprising against the gatekeepers of finance and data. A way to give power back to people. Now, it’s just a new kind of marketing campaign. What began as a movement for freedom turned into a spectacle of greed. The rhetoric stayed radical, but the behavior got corporate fast. Talk of “community ownership” quietly morphed into “token incentives.” What was once anti-establishment became airdrop culture — capitalism with better branding. The irony is vicious Web3 started by promising to break the system but ended up replicating it — only faster and with worse UX. Decentralization once meant transparency, autonomy, and resilience. Now it means Discord servers filled with speculation, influencers masquerading as economists, and founders building new empires on the ashes of old ones. The same power dynamics, just distributed through wallets instead of banks. The dream of collective power collapsed under the weight of individual profit. Because when everyone’s in it for yield, nobody’s in it for freedom. The Web3 revolution didn’t get crushed by regulators or skeptics — it got sold out by its believers. The crypto economy turned participation into gamified capitalism, and the “community” into unpaid labor for hype. The deeper tragedy isn’t the scams or the rug pulls — those were predictable. It’s how easily people traded idealism for incentives. How a movement built on “trustless systems” forgot that trust — in each other, not code — was the original point. Decentralization didn’t fail because it couldn’t work. It failed because it stopped being about liberation and became about distribution — not of power, but of profit. The revolution was real for a second. Then someone built a dashboard for it, raised a Series A, and launched an NFT drop. That’s not freedom. That’s franchising. From Anarchy to Airdrops was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story

From Anarchy to Airdrops

2025/10/23 17:53
2 min read

The Selling Out of Decentralization

Decentralization was supposed to be rebellion — a digital uprising against the gatekeepers of finance and data. A way to give power back to people.
Now, it’s just a new kind of marketing campaign.

What began as a movement for freedom turned into a spectacle of greed. The rhetoric stayed radical, but the behavior got corporate fast. Talk of “community ownership” quietly morphed into “token incentives.” What was once anti-establishment became airdrop culture — capitalism with better branding.

The irony is vicious

Web3 started by promising to break the system but ended up replicating it — only faster and with worse UX.

Decentralization once meant transparency, autonomy, and resilience. Now it means Discord servers filled with speculation, influencers masquerading as economists, and founders building new empires on the ashes of old ones. The same power dynamics, just distributed through wallets instead of banks.

The dream of collective power collapsed under the weight of individual profit. Because when everyone’s in it for yield, nobody’s in it for freedom.

The Web3 revolution didn’t get crushed by regulators or skeptics — it got sold out by its believers. The crypto economy turned participation into gamified capitalism, and the “community” into unpaid labor for hype.

The deeper tragedy isn’t the scams or the rug pulls — those were predictable. It’s how easily people traded idealism for incentives. How a movement built on “trustless systems” forgot that trust — in each other, not code — was the original point.

Decentralization didn’t fail because it couldn’t work. It failed because it stopped being about liberation and became about distribution — not of power, but of profit.

The revolution was real for a second. Then someone built a dashboard for it, raised a Series A, and launched an NFT drop.

That’s not freedom. That’s franchising.


From Anarchy to Airdrops was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

‘One Battle After Another’ Becomes One Of This Decade’s Best-Reviewed Movies

‘One Battle After Another’ Becomes One Of This Decade’s Best-Reviewed Movies

The post ‘One Battle After Another’ Becomes One Of This Decade’s Best-Reviewed Movies appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline Critics have hailed Paul Thomas Anderson’s “One Battle After Another,” starring Leonardo DiCaprio, as a “masterpiece,” indicating potential Academy Awards success as it boasts near-perfect scores on review aggregators Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes based on early reviews. Leonardo DiCaprio stars in “One Battle After Another,” which opens in theaters next week. (Photo by Jeff Spicer/Getty Images for Warner Bros. Pictures) Getty Images for Warner Bros. Pictures Key Facts “One Battle After Another” boasts a nearly perfect 97 out of a possible 100 on Metacritic based on its first 31 reviews, making it the highest-rated movie of this decade on Metacritic’s best movies of all time list. The movie also has a 96% score on Rotten Tomatoes based on the first 56 reviews, with only two reviews considered “rotten,” or negative. The Associated Press hailed the movie as “an American masterpiece,” noting the movie touches on topical political themes and depicts a society where “gun violence, white power and immigrant deportations recur in an ongoing dance, both farcical and tragic.” The movie stars DiCaprio as an ex-revolutionary who reunites with former accomplices to rescue his 16-year-old daughter when she goes missing, and Anderson has said the movie was inspired by the 1990 novel, “Vineland.” Most critics have described the movie as an action thriller with notable chase scenes, which jumps in time from DiCaprio’s character’s early days with fictional revolutionary group, the French 75, to about 15 years later, when he is pursued by foe and military leader Captain Steven Lockjaw, played by Sean Penn. The Warner Bros.-produced film was made on a big budget, estimated to be between $130 million and $175 million, and co-stars Penn, Benicio del Toro, Regina Hall and Teyana Taylor. When Will ‘one Battle After Another’ Open In Theaters And Streaming? The move opens in…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 07:35
SlowMist: ClawHub is increasingly becoming a new target for attackers to poison supply chains.

SlowMist: ClawHub is increasingly becoming a new target for attackers to poison supply chains.

PANews reported on February 9th that, according to SlowMist monitoring, ClawHub, the official plugin center of the open-source AI agent project OpenClaw, is increasingly
Share
PANews2026/02/09 10:51
Not Just a Coin: How Pi Network Is Quietly Building One of the Largest Real-User Blockchain Ecosystems

Not Just a Coin: How Pi Network Is Quietly Building One of the Largest Real-User Blockchain Ecosystems

As the global crypto industry continues to evolve, a growing number of observers are beginning to question a long-standing assumption: that blockchain succe
Share
Hokanews2026/02/09 11:37