TLDR Kraken parent Payward sued PowerTrade over claims tied to $7.2 million in digital assets and unrealized gains. Payward alleges PowerTrade used unauthorizedTLDR Kraken parent Payward sued PowerTrade over claims tied to $7.2 million in digital assets and unrealized gains. Payward alleges PowerTrade used unauthorized

Kraken Legal Fight Puts PowerTrade’s $7.2M Transfers Under Fire

2026/06/26 00:32
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

TLDR

  • Kraken parent Payward sued PowerTrade over claims tied to $7.2 million in digital assets and unrealized gains.
  • Payward alleges PowerTrade used unauthorized account “corrections” to reverse profitable trades that had already settled.
  • The filing says Kraken’s account moved from more than $6 million to nearly $2 million negative after disputed transactions.
  • Payward has secured an interim worldwide freezing order from the DIFC Courts against PowerTrade and its co-founders.
  • Kraken is seeking U.S. court discovery to trace assets and support legal proceedings against PowerTrade.

Payward, the parent company of Kraken, has sued derivatives platform PowerTrade over disputed funds. The company claims PowerTrade and its founders misappropriated $7.2 million in digital assets and unrealized gains. The case centers on alleged account changes, blocked withdrawals, and bitcoin collateral.

Kraken Parent Seeks Court Discovery

Payward asked a U.S. federal court to allow discovery from U.S.-based financial institutions. It says the records will support legal proceedings against PowerTrade and its co-founders.

A Kraken spokesperson said Payward wants the assets returned. “PowerTrade and its co-founders misappropriated $7.2 million of Payward’s digital assets and unrealized gains,” the spokesperson said.

The spokesperson said Payward has obtained a worldwide freezing order from the DIFC Courts. The Dubai International Financial Centre order targets PowerTrade and its co-founders.

Payward said it has started legal proceedings in other jurisdictions. However, the U.S. request focuses on identifying assets tied to PowerTrade and its founders.

The filing describes PowerTrade as operated from El Salvador and based in the U.A.E. It names CEO Mario Gomez Lozada and CFO Bernd Sischka as co-founders.

Payward began crypto derivatives trading on PowerTrade in 2022. Later, the relationship broke down after market pressure raised liquidity concerns.

PowerTrade Accused Of Reversing Trades

According to the filing, Payward tried to withdraw funds from PowerTrade in October 2025. It says bitcoin prices fell that month, and markets declined.

Payward claims PowerTrade did not return the funds. Instead, it says PowerTrade used unauthorized transactions to change Payward’s account position.

The filing says Payward’s account held more than $6 million before those transactions. After the changes, PowerTrade showed the account with a negative balance of nearly $2 million.

Payward says PowerTrade used about 100 “corrections” to create that balance. Those entries allegedly involved trades that had expired or settled months earlier.

The company claims PowerTrade canceled profitable trades from Payward’s account. It says those cancellations helped create a debt that Payward disputes.

Payward also alleges PowerTrade sought to use that debt to claim Payward’s bitcoin collateral. The filing says the collateral remained at risk after disputed changes.

Kraken’s parent company now seeks records that could identify funds, accounts, and assets. The case continues after the DIFC freezing order and U.S. filing.

The post Kraken Legal Fight Puts PowerTrade’s $7.2M Transfers Under Fire appeared first on Blockonomi.

Market Opportunity
FIGHT Logo
FIGHT Price(FIGHT)
$0.003311
$0.003311$0.003311
-0.77%
USD
FIGHT (FIGHT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

The post UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. British crypto holders may soon face a very different landscape as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) moves to expand its regulatory reach in the industry. A new consultation paper outlines how the watchdog intends to apply its rulebook to crypto firms, shaping everything from asset safeguarding to trading platform operation. According to the financial regulator, these proposals would translate into clearer protections for retail investors and stricter oversight of crypto firms. UK FCA plans Until now, UK crypto users mostly encountered the FCA through rules on promotions and anti-money laundering checks. The consultation paper goes much further. It proposes direct oversight of stablecoin issuers, custodians, and crypto-asset trading platforms (CATPs). For investors, that means the wallets, exchanges, and coins they rely on could soon be subject to the same governance and resilience standards as traditional financial institutions. The regulator has also clarified that firms need official authorization before serving customers. This condition should, in theory, reduce the risk of sudden platform failures or unclear accountability. David Geale, the FCA’s executive director of payments and digital finance, said the proposals are designed to strike a balance between innovation and protection. He explained: “We want to develop a sustainable and competitive crypto sector – balancing innovation, market integrity and trust.” Geale noted that while the rules will not eliminate investment risks, they will create consistent standards, helping consumers understand what to expect from registered firms. Why does this matter for crypto holders? The UK regulatory framework shift would provide safer custody of assets, better disclosure of risks, and clearer recourse if something goes wrong. However, the regulator was also frank in its submission, arguing that no rulebook can eliminate the volatility or inherent risks of holding digital assets. Instead, the focus is on ensuring that when consumers choose to invest, they do…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:52
Thinking of Buying Bittensor? Watch These TAO Price Correction Levels First

Thinking of Buying Bittensor? Watch These TAO Price Correction Levels First

Bittensor (TAO) is navigating a rough patch as broader market conditions turn shaky. TAO just took a hit along with the rest of the AI token crowd, but if you look
Share
Captainaltcoin2026/04/03 00:30
China Nabs Another Huione Group Core Member in Cambodia Extradition

China Nabs Another Huione Group Core Member in Cambodia Extradition

The post China Nabs Another Huione Group Core Member in Cambodia Extradition appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Li Xiong, a senior figure at Huione Group, an
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/04/02 17:54

Newbies:Deposit $100, Get $1,000

Newbies:Deposit $100, Get $1,000Newbies:Deposit $100, Get $1,000

Plus Up to a $50 Referral Bonus