The post Launchpads Are Funding Ideas, Not Products appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Opinion by: Tim Hafner, founder and CEO of OpenServ Launchpads were introduced to give Web3 projects access to early investors. As they operate today, however, they too often result in cash grabs over long-term success. This has resulted in a flood of half-formed products hitting the market without real support for builders.  Virtuals Protocol has facilitated over 17,000 AI agent token launches as of February 2025, indicating that infrastructure for token launches is not slowing down. Questions remain, however, regarding the long-term sustainability and accountability of launchpads.  Projects with no substance are securing funding, ultimately resulting in failure, reflecting a deeper problem in the industry. Launchpads have become hollow funnels that fund projects without requiring a real product or technical foundation. What launchpads were meant to be Designed as the meeting point for builders and believers, launchpads help new projects raise funds and increase brand awareness while allowing global investors to get in early on promising technologies. This approach helps fill a significant gap by making it easier for teams to access funds and community support.  As the industry has matured, this model has revealed its limitations. Many launchpads remain focused on raising funds rather than achieving long-term success. In this sense, they are stuck in the past, acting like decentralized Shark Tanks rather than engines of innovation. Instead of leading the way for technical innovation, launchpads have removed it as a category altogether.  The problem with ‘launch whatever’  Many launchpads pride themselves on being chain-agnostic, positioning themselves as neutral arenas for protocols to raise funds. This neutrality also creates a lack of focus and standards, turning themselves into free-for-alls that fail to help the best projects stand out and grow. Some argue that innovation should not be policed, and anyone should be able to fundraise. But without a focus… The post Launchpads Are Funding Ideas, Not Products appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Opinion by: Tim Hafner, founder and CEO of OpenServ Launchpads were introduced to give Web3 projects access to early investors. As they operate today, however, they too often result in cash grabs over long-term success. This has resulted in a flood of half-formed products hitting the market without real support for builders.  Virtuals Protocol has facilitated over 17,000 AI agent token launches as of February 2025, indicating that infrastructure for token launches is not slowing down. Questions remain, however, regarding the long-term sustainability and accountability of launchpads.  Projects with no substance are securing funding, ultimately resulting in failure, reflecting a deeper problem in the industry. Launchpads have become hollow funnels that fund projects without requiring a real product or technical foundation. What launchpads were meant to be Designed as the meeting point for builders and believers, launchpads help new projects raise funds and increase brand awareness while allowing global investors to get in early on promising technologies. This approach helps fill a significant gap by making it easier for teams to access funds and community support.  As the industry has matured, this model has revealed its limitations. Many launchpads remain focused on raising funds rather than achieving long-term success. In this sense, they are stuck in the past, acting like decentralized Shark Tanks rather than engines of innovation. Instead of leading the way for technical innovation, launchpads have removed it as a category altogether.  The problem with ‘launch whatever’  Many launchpads pride themselves on being chain-agnostic, positioning themselves as neutral arenas for protocols to raise funds. This neutrality also creates a lack of focus and standards, turning themselves into free-for-alls that fail to help the best projects stand out and grow. Some argue that innovation should not be policed, and anyone should be able to fundraise. But without a focus…

Launchpads Are Funding Ideas, Not Products

4 min read

Opinion by: Tim Hafner, founder and CEO of OpenServ

Launchpads were introduced to give Web3 projects access to early investors. As they operate today, however, they too often result in cash grabs over long-term success. This has resulted in a flood of half-formed products hitting the market without real support for builders. 

Virtuals Protocol has facilitated over 17,000 AI agent token launches as of February 2025, indicating that infrastructure for token launches is not slowing down. Questions remain, however, regarding the long-term sustainability and accountability of launchpads. 

Projects with no substance are securing funding, ultimately resulting in failure, reflecting a deeper problem in the industry. Launchpads have become hollow funnels that fund projects without requiring a real product or technical foundation.

What launchpads were meant to be

Designed as the meeting point for builders and believers, launchpads help new projects raise funds and increase brand awareness while allowing global investors to get in early on promising technologies. This approach helps fill a significant gap by making it easier for teams to access funds and community support. 

As the industry has matured, this model has revealed its limitations. Many launchpads remain focused on raising funds rather than achieving long-term success. In this sense, they are stuck in the past, acting like decentralized Shark Tanks rather than engines of innovation. Instead of leading the way for technical innovation, launchpads have removed it as a category altogether. 

The problem with ‘launch whatever’ 

Many launchpads pride themselves on being chain-agnostic, positioning themselves as neutral arenas for protocols to raise funds. This neutrality also creates a lack of focus and standards, turning themselves into free-for-alls that fail to help the best projects stand out and grow.

Some argue that innovation should not be policed, and anyone should be able to fundraise. But without a focus on genuine, sophisticated tech or clear guardrails for token design, launchpads become a cut-throat arena where no one wins. Investors are bombarded with half-baked pitches and superficial hype cycles while builders try to raise capital without meaningful support. 

Related: Grayscale adds AI launchpads, Solana DeFi apps to Q1 2025 top tokens

This approach worked for earlier iterations of Web3 projects, which prioritized token distribution over long-term growth. However, this model no longer benefits this market. The days of quick wins and low-effort launches are no more. With increased regulatory scrutiny, the next generation of launchpads must move beyond theory and into action, only launching projects with real products. 

Developers need better infrastructure

Most builders juggle three to four disconnected tools to ship a project. There are numerous factors to consider, including building backends, maintaining costs, server hosting and security systems. It’s no surprise that promising projects stall before they even begin properly.

Building a real product requires a lot of work. Traditional launchpads have narrowly focused on helping projects raise capital. But capital doesn’t help solve operational bottlenecks. Builders, especially those without deep pockets or pedigrees, need launchpads that support them end-to-end to simplify the entire journey. 

The ethos of launchpads needs to be: ‘giving builders the tools they need to focus on their products,’ not on patching together the scaffolding around them as they go.

Projects need multi-agent support

Beyond better tooling, launchpads need to evolve to enable developers to build genuinely powerful applications that solve real user problems. Instead of simply deploying token contracts, modern platforms must provide the infrastructure for creating applications with real utility, user adoption and revenue generation.

As 2025 has become the year of AI agents, projects will capitalize by introducing a robust platform for building applications first, then building a launchpad around those applications. This creates a cycle where successful applications drive platform adoption, attracting more developers and creating network effects of valuable applications, builders and users solving real problems at scale.

Building better, not just raising more

If launchpads want to be part of the solution, they must get out of their own way. They are uniquely positioned to drive technical innovation, but we won’t have better projects without better tools.

The next generation of launchpads must move past token distribution toward helping builders build better. This means providing end-to-end support through building and growing products, and offering clear incentives and guardrails to ensure everyone’s interests are aligned. 

Opinion by: Tim Hafner, founder and CEO of OpenServ.

This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/launchpads-funding-ideas-not-products?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.000384
$0.000384$0.000384
-6.86%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Marathon Digital BTC Transfers Highlight Miner Stress

Marathon Digital BTC Transfers Highlight Miner Stress

The post Marathon Digital BTC Transfers Highlight Miner Stress appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a tense week for crypto markets, marathon digital has drawn
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/06 15:16
This U.S. politician’s suspicious stock trade just returned over 200% in weeks

This U.S. politician’s suspicious stock trade just returned over 200% in weeks

The post This U.S. politician’s suspicious stock trade just returned over 200% in weeks appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. United States Representative Cloe Fields has seen his stake in Opendoor Technologies (NASDAQ: OPEN) stock return over 200% in just a matter of weeks. According to congressional trade filings, the lawmaker purchased a stake in the online real estate company on July 21, 2025, investing between $1,001 and $15,000. At the time, the stock was trading around $2 and had been largely stagnant for months. Receive Signals on US Congress Members’ Stock Trades Stocks Stay up-to-date on the trading activity of US Congress members. The signal triggers based on updates from the House disclosure reports, notifying you of their latest stock transactions. Enable signal The trade has since paid off, with Opendoor surging to $10, a gain of nearly 220% in under two months. By comparison, the broader S&P 500 index rose less than 5% during the same period. OPEN one-week stock price chart. Source: Finbold Assuming he invested a minimum of $1,001, the purchase would now be worth about $3,200, while a $15,000 stake would have grown to nearly $48,000, generating profits of roughly $2,200 and $33,000, respectively. OPEN’s stock rally Notably, Opendoor’s rally has been fueled by major corporate shifts and market speculation. For instance, in August, the company named former Shopify COO Kaz Nejatian as CEO, while co-founders Keith Rabois and Eric Wu rejoined the board, moves seen as a return to the company’s early innovative spirit.  Outgoing CEO Carrie Wheeler’s resignation and sale of millions in stock reinforced the sense of a new chapter. Beyond leadership changes, Opendoor’s surge has taken on meme-stock characteristics. In this case, retail investors piled in as shares climbed, while short sellers scrambled to cover, pushing prices higher.  However, the stock is still not without challenges, where its iBuying model is untested at scale, margins are thin, and debt tied to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:02
Apollo secures $50 million in backing to launch new tokenized credit fund

Apollo secures $50 million in backing to launch new tokenized credit fund

PANews reported on September 18 that according to CoinDesk, the blockchain-based RWA institution Centrifuge and Plume jointly launched the "Anemoy Tokenized Apollo Diversified Credit Fund (ACRDX)", which received a $50 million anchor investment from Grove, a credit infrastructure protocol within the Sky ecosystem. The fund enables blockchain investors to participate in Apollo's diversified global credit strategy, covering direct corporate loans, asset-backed loans, and mismatched credit. ACRDX will be issued through Plume's Nest Credit Vault with the token code nACRDX, enabling institutional investors to participate in the strategy on-chain. Chronicle will serve as the oracle provider, and Wormhole will be responsible for cross-chain connections. After approval, Anemoy will serve as the fund's manager.
Share
PANews2025/09/18 10:26