Bitcoin dominates crypto market sentiment, and when it drops, everything drops with it. Software engineer Vincent Van Code (@vincent_vancode) argues that this dynamic won’t be permanent for XRP. He laid out a technical case for why it may not be.
Van Code points to the XRP Ledger’s automated market makers as the core mechanism. At the institutional scale, XRPL AMMs create a price relationship that external market panic cannot easily override. When Bitcoin sells off and drags XRP down on centralized exchanges, a price gap opens between those exchanges and the on-chain pools.
Arbitrageurs close that gap fast. They buy discounted XRP externally, move it into XRPL AMMs, and extract premium assets. That activity pushes the external price back up.
The XRPL’s Continuous Auction Mechanism further strengthens this process. CAM auctions 1-second arbitrage slots at the protocol level. This eliminates latency and keeps price synchronization near-instant across venues.
Van Code also highlights liquidity providers as a stabilizing force. He describes them as a “macroeconomic buffer.” Pools absorb external selling pressure rather than collapsing under it. The key condition is consistent transaction throughput. Without that volume, the rebalancing does not happen organically.
That is where XRP’s utility enters the equation. Van Code argues that as cross-token use cases scale, including FX routing and stablecoin movement, XRP’s value anchors to network transaction volume. Bitcoin’s price action becomes less relevant as organic activity independently drives demand.
Van Code acknowledges that manipulation remains a real factor in crypto markets today, and he has previously exposed instances of it. Thin order books make it cheap to move prices, and coordinated selling can overwhelm retail participants. The XRPL mechanics Van Code describes do not eliminate manipulation, but they create structural resistance to it at scale.
The arbitrage cushion, the automated price floor, and the CAM all require that the protocol operate with sufficient liquidity and throughput to function as designed. Scale is the prerequisite.
Van Code points to one specific catalyst: finalization of the CLARITY Act. That catalyst just moved closer to reality as the Senate Banking Committee advanced the bill on May 14.
Regulatory clarity could trigger a flood of capital into XRPL liquidity pools. Institutional participation in cross-border settlement depends on legal certainty. The CLARITY Act provides that foundation.
Van Code’s argument is conditional. The technical conditions for decoupling exist, and institutional adoption brings them to life. Regulatory clarity will accelerate that adoption, with each element depending on the one before it.
Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.
Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News
The post Expert States When XRP Will Break Away from Bitcoin and Exchange Manipulation appeared first on Times Tabloid.


