An XRP/BTC long-term chart shared by pseudonymous market technician Dr Cat (@DoctorCatX) points to a delayed—but potentially explosive—upswing for XRP versus Bitcoin, with the analyst arguing that “the next monster leg up” cannot begin before early 2026 if key Ichimoku conditions are to be satisfied on the highest time frames. Posting a two-month (2M) XRP/BTC chart with Ichimoku overlays and date markers for September/October, November/December and January/February, Dr Cat framed the setup around the position of the Chikou Span (CS) relative to price candles and the Tenkan-sen. “Based on the 2M chart I expect the next monster leg up to start no earlier than 2026,” he wrote. “Because the logical time for CS to get free above the candles is Jan/Feb 2026 on an open basis and March 2026 on a close basis, respectively.” XRP/BTC Breakout Window Opens Only In 2026 In Ichimoku methodology, the CS—price shifted back 26 periods—clearing above historical candles and the Tenkan-sen (conversion line) is used to confirm the transition from equilibrium to trending conditions. That threshold, in Dr Cat’s view, hinges on XRP/BTC defending roughly 2,442 sats (0.00002442 BTC). “As you see, the price needs to hold 2442 so that CS is both above the candles and Tenkan Sen,” he said. Related Reading: Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory Should that condition be met, the analyst sees the market “logically” targeting the next major resistance band first around ~7,000 sats, with an extended 2026 objective in a 7,000–12,000 sats corridor on the highest time frames. “If that happens, solely looking at the 2M timeframe the logical thing is to attack the next resistance at ~7K,” he wrote, before adding: “Otherwise on highest timeframes everything still looks excellent and points to 7K–12K in 2026, until further notice.” The roadmap is not without nearer-term risks. Dr Cat flagged a developing signal on the weekly Ichimoku cloud: “One more thing to keep an eye on till then: the weekly chart. Which, if doesn’t renew the yearly high by November/December will get a bearish kumo twist. Which still may not be the end of the world but still deserves attention. So one more evaluation is needed at late 2025 I guess.” A bearish kumo twist—when Senkou Span A crosses below Senkou Span B—can foreshadow a medium-term loss of momentum or a period of consolidation before trend resumption. The discussion quickly turned to the real-world impact of the satoshi-denominated targets. When asked what ~7,000 sats might mean in dollar terms, the analyst cautioned that the conversion floats with Bitcoin’s price but offered a rough yardstick for today’s market. “In current BTC prices are roughly $7.8,” he replied. The figure is illustrative rather than predictive: XRP’s USD price at any future XRP/BTC level will depend on BTC’s own USD value at that time. The posted chart—which annotates the likely windows for CS clearance as “Jan/Feb open CS free” and “March close” following interim checkpoints in September/October and November/December—underscores the time-based nature of the call. On multi-month Ichimoku settings, the lagging span has to “work off” past price structure before a clean upside trend confirmation is possible; forcing the move earlier would, in this framework, risk a rejection back into the cloud or beneath the Tenkan-sen. Contextually, XRP/BTC has been basing in a broad range since early 2024 after a multi-year downtrend from the 2021 peak, with intermittent upside probes failing to reclaim the more consequential resistances that sit thousands of sats higher. The 2,442-sats area Dr Cat highlights aligns with the need to keep the lagging span above both contemporaneous price and the conversion line, a condition that tends to reduce whipsaws on very high time frames. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons Whether the market ultimately delivers the 7,000–12,000 sats advance in 2026 will, by this read, depend on two things: XRP/BTC’s ability to hold above the ~2,442-sats pivot as the calendar turns through early 2026, and the weekly chart avoiding or quickly invalidating a bearish kumo twist if new yearly highs are not set before November/December. “If that happens… the logical thing is to attack the next resistance at ~7K,” Dr Cat concludes, while stressing that the weekly cloud still “deserves attention.” As with any Ichimoku-driven thesis, the emphasis is on alignment across time frames and the interaction of price with the system’s five lines—Tenkan-sen, Kijun-sen, Senkou Spans A and B (the “kumo” cloud), and the Chikou Span. Dr Cat’s thread leans on the lagging span mechanics to explain why an earlier “monster leg” is statistically less likely, and why the second half of 2025 will be a critical checkpoint before any 2026 trend attempt. For now, the takeaway is a timeline rather than an imminent trigger: the analyst’s base case defers any outsized XRP outperformance versus Bitcoin until after the CS clears historical overhead in early 2026, with interim monitoring of the weekly cloud into year-end. As he summed up, “On highest timeframes everything still looks excellent… until further notice.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.119. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.comAn XRP/BTC long-term chart shared by pseudonymous market technician Dr Cat (@DoctorCatX) points to a delayed—but potentially explosive—upswing for XRP versus Bitcoin, with the analyst arguing that “the next monster leg up” cannot begin before early 2026 if key Ichimoku conditions are to be satisfied on the highest time frames. Posting a two-month (2M) XRP/BTC chart with Ichimoku overlays and date markers for September/October, November/December and January/February, Dr Cat framed the setup around the position of the Chikou Span (CS) relative to price candles and the Tenkan-sen. “Based on the 2M chart I expect the next monster leg up to start no earlier than 2026,” he wrote. “Because the logical time for CS to get free above the candles is Jan/Feb 2026 on an open basis and March 2026 on a close basis, respectively.” XRP/BTC Breakout Window Opens Only In 2026 In Ichimoku methodology, the CS—price shifted back 26 periods—clearing above historical candles and the Tenkan-sen (conversion line) is used to confirm the transition from equilibrium to trending conditions. That threshold, in Dr Cat’s view, hinges on XRP/BTC defending roughly 2,442 sats (0.00002442 BTC). “As you see, the price needs to hold 2442 so that CS is both above the candles and Tenkan Sen,” he said. Related Reading: Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory Should that condition be met, the analyst sees the market “logically” targeting the next major resistance band first around ~7,000 sats, with an extended 2026 objective in a 7,000–12,000 sats corridor on the highest time frames. “If that happens, solely looking at the 2M timeframe the logical thing is to attack the next resistance at ~7K,” he wrote, before adding: “Otherwise on highest timeframes everything still looks excellent and points to 7K–12K in 2026, until further notice.” The roadmap is not without nearer-term risks. Dr Cat flagged a developing signal on the weekly Ichimoku cloud: “One more thing to keep an eye on till then: the weekly chart. Which, if doesn’t renew the yearly high by November/December will get a bearish kumo twist. Which still may not be the end of the world but still deserves attention. So one more evaluation is needed at late 2025 I guess.” A bearish kumo twist—when Senkou Span A crosses below Senkou Span B—can foreshadow a medium-term loss of momentum or a period of consolidation before trend resumption. The discussion quickly turned to the real-world impact of the satoshi-denominated targets. When asked what ~7,000 sats might mean in dollar terms, the analyst cautioned that the conversion floats with Bitcoin’s price but offered a rough yardstick for today’s market. “In current BTC prices are roughly $7.8,” he replied. The figure is illustrative rather than predictive: XRP’s USD price at any future XRP/BTC level will depend on BTC’s own USD value at that time. The posted chart—which annotates the likely windows for CS clearance as “Jan/Feb open CS free” and “March close” following interim checkpoints in September/October and November/December—underscores the time-based nature of the call. On multi-month Ichimoku settings, the lagging span has to “work off” past price structure before a clean upside trend confirmation is possible; forcing the move earlier would, in this framework, risk a rejection back into the cloud or beneath the Tenkan-sen. Contextually, XRP/BTC has been basing in a broad range since early 2024 after a multi-year downtrend from the 2021 peak, with intermittent upside probes failing to reclaim the more consequential resistances that sit thousands of sats higher. The 2,442-sats area Dr Cat highlights aligns with the need to keep the lagging span above both contemporaneous price and the conversion line, a condition that tends to reduce whipsaws on very high time frames. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons Whether the market ultimately delivers the 7,000–12,000 sats advance in 2026 will, by this read, depend on two things: XRP/BTC’s ability to hold above the ~2,442-sats pivot as the calendar turns through early 2026, and the weekly chart avoiding or quickly invalidating a bearish kumo twist if new yearly highs are not set before November/December. “If that happens… the logical thing is to attack the next resistance at ~7K,” Dr Cat concludes, while stressing that the weekly cloud still “deserves attention.” As with any Ichimoku-driven thesis, the emphasis is on alignment across time frames and the interaction of price with the system’s five lines—Tenkan-sen, Kijun-sen, Senkou Spans A and B (the “kumo” cloud), and the Chikou Span. Dr Cat’s thread leans on the lagging span mechanics to explain why an earlier “monster leg” is statistically less likely, and why the second half of 2025 will be a critical checkpoint before any 2026 trend attempt. For now, the takeaway is a timeline rather than an imminent trigger: the analyst’s base case defers any outsized XRP outperformance versus Bitcoin until after the CS clears historical overhead in early 2026, with interim monitoring of the weekly cloud into year-end. As he summed up, “On highest timeframes everything still looks excellent… until further notice.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.119. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com

Next XRP ‘Monster Leg’ Will Start No Earlier Than 2026: Analyst

2025/09/19 03:00
5 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

An XRP/BTC long-term chart shared by pseudonymous market technician Dr Cat (@DoctorCatX) points to a delayed—but potentially explosive—upswing for XRP versus Bitcoin, with the analyst arguing that “the next monster leg up” cannot begin before early 2026 if key Ichimoku conditions are to be satisfied on the highest time frames.

Posting a two-month (2M) XRP/BTC chart with Ichimoku overlays and date markers for September/October, November/December and January/February, Dr Cat framed the setup around the position of the Chikou Span (CS) relative to price candles and the Tenkan-sen. “Based on the 2M chart I expect the next monster leg up to start no earlier than 2026,” he wrote. “Because the logical time for CS to get free above the candles is Jan/Feb 2026 on an open basis and March 2026 on a close basis, respectively.”

XRP/BTC Breakout Window Opens Only In 2026

In Ichimoku methodology, the CS—price shifted back 26 periods—clearing above historical candles and the Tenkan-sen (conversion line) is used to confirm the transition from equilibrium to trending conditions. That threshold, in Dr Cat’s view, hinges on XRP/BTC defending roughly 2,442 sats (0.00002442 BTC). “As you see, the price needs to hold 2442 so that CS is both above the candles and Tenkan Sen,” he said.

Should that condition be met, the analyst sees the market “logically” targeting the next major resistance band first around ~7,000 sats, with an extended 2026 objective in a 7,000–12,000 sats corridor on the highest time frames. “If that happens, solely looking at the 2M timeframe the logical thing is to attack the next resistance at ~7K,” he wrote, before adding: “Otherwise on highest timeframes everything still looks excellent and points to 7K–12K in 2026, until further notice.”

XRP price prediction

The roadmap is not without nearer-term risks. Dr Cat flagged a developing signal on the weekly Ichimoku cloud: “One more thing to keep an eye on till then: the weekly chart. Which, if doesn’t renew the yearly high by November/December will get a bearish kumo twist. Which still may not be the end of the world but still deserves attention. So one more evaluation is needed at late 2025 I guess.” A bearish kumo twist—when Senkou Span A crosses below Senkou Span B—can foreshadow a medium-term loss of momentum or a period of consolidation before trend resumption.

The discussion quickly turned to the real-world impact of the satoshi-denominated targets. When asked what ~7,000 sats might mean in dollar terms, the analyst cautioned that the conversion floats with Bitcoin’s price but offered a rough yardstick for today’s market. “In current BTC prices are roughly $7.8,” he replied. The figure is illustrative rather than predictive: XRP’s USD price at any future XRP/BTC level will depend on BTC’s own USD value at that time.

The posted chart—which annotates the likely windows for CS clearance as “Jan/Feb open CS free” and “March close” following interim checkpoints in September/October and November/December—underscores the time-based nature of the call. On multi-month Ichimoku settings, the lagging span has to “work off” past price structure before a clean upside trend confirmation is possible; forcing the move earlier would, in this framework, risk a rejection back into the cloud or beneath the Tenkan-sen.

Contextually, XRP/BTC has been basing in a broad range since early 2024 after a multi-year downtrend from the 2021 peak, with intermittent upside probes failing to reclaim the more consequential resistances that sit thousands of sats higher. The 2,442-sats area Dr Cat highlights aligns with the need to keep the lagging span above both contemporaneous price and the conversion line, a condition that tends to reduce whipsaws on very high time frames.

Whether the market ultimately delivers the 7,000–12,000 sats advance in 2026 will, by this read, depend on two things: XRP/BTC’s ability to hold above the ~2,442-sats pivot as the calendar turns through early 2026, and the weekly chart avoiding or quickly invalidating a bearish kumo twist if new yearly highs are not set before November/December. “If that happens… the logical thing is to attack the next resistance at ~7K,” Dr Cat concludes, while stressing that the weekly cloud still “deserves attention.”

As with any Ichimoku-driven thesis, the emphasis is on alignment across time frames and the interaction of price with the system’s five lines—Tenkan-sen, Kijun-sen, Senkou Spans A and B (the “kumo” cloud), and the Chikou Span. Dr Cat’s thread leans on the lagging span mechanics to explain why an earlier “monster leg” is statistically less likely, and why the second half of 2025 will be a critical checkpoint before any 2026 trend attempt.

For now, the takeaway is a timeline rather than an imminent trigger: the analyst’s base case defers any outsized XRP outperformance versus Bitcoin until after the CS clears historical overhead in early 2026, with interim monitoring of the weekly cloud into year-end. As he summed up, “On highest timeframes everything still looks excellent… until further notice.”

At press time, XRP traded at $3.119.

XRP price
Market Opportunity
Sentio Protocol Logo
Sentio Protocol Price(SEN)
$0.0006318
$0.0006318$0.0006318
-2.15%
USD
Sentio Protocol (SEN) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Tennis Death Threats & Match Fixing: WTA Players Targeted

Tennis Death Threats & Match Fixing: WTA Players Targeted

Cryptsy - Latest Cryptocurrency News and Predictions Cryptsy - Latest Cryptocurrency News and Predictions - Experts in Crypto Casinos WTA players Panna Udvardy
Share
Cryptsy2026/03/10 18:37
Swiss Crypto Bank Just Became the First Regulated Bank Inside the EU’s Blockchain Trading System

Swiss Crypto Bank Just Became the First Regulated Bank Inside the EU’s Blockchain Trading System

AMINA Bank AG joined 21X as its first fully regulated bank participant, connecting institutional-grade custody to the European Union’s only DLT-regulated trading
Share
Ethnews2026/03/10 18:10
Nasdaq Proposal Analysis: How Tokenized Securities Will Reshape the U.S. Stock Trading Ecosystem

Nasdaq Proposal Analysis: How Tokenized Securities Will Reshape the U.S. Stock Trading Ecosystem

Author: Aki Wu on Blockchain On September 8, 2025, Nasdaq submitted a landmark proposal to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), seeking to amend its exchange rules to allow tokenized securities to be traded on its market. This means that Nasdaq-listed US stocks like Apple and Amazon could potentially be listed, traded, and settled on Nasdaq in the form of blockchain tokens. If approved, this proposal would be the first time a major US stock exchange has permitted tokenized stock trading, marking the first large-scale introduction of blockchain technology into the core markets of Wall Street. This article will systematically review the key points of Nasdaq's proposal, the motivations behind it, the potential market shifts it could bring, its impact on the "US stock blockchain" initiative and related sectors, and explore the potential development paths for this innovative initiative. Proposal Highlights: Detailed Explanation of Nasdaq Trading Rules Amendments The core of Nasdaq's 19b-4 Rule amendments submitted to the SEC is to allow member brokerages and investors to choose to trade and settle Nasdaq-listed equity securities and exchange-traded products (ETPs) in tokenized form. Specifically, the rule amendments include the following: 1. Expanding the definition of “securities” to include tokenized forms of securities in Equity 1, Section 1 The proposal first amended the exchange’s definition of “securities,” emphasizing that “tokenized securities are still securities,” rejecting the “isolated” trading model that is decoupled from the main market and expanding it to include two forms: Traditional form: This refers to a digital record of asset ownership and rights, but does not utilize distributed ledgers or blockchain technology. This refers to the electronic record-keeping method currently used in US stocks, which essentially still corresponds to the electronic registration of paper securities. Tokenization: This refers to the digital representation of asset ownership and rights, recorded and transferred using blockchain (distributed ledger) technology. Simply put, the rights associated with a stock are issued on the blockchain and represented as tokens. Nasdaq explicitly stipulates that a tokenized security is considered an equivalent security and can be traded on the same order book as its traditional counterpart only if it is fully homogeneous. This means that the token must be fungible with traditional shares, share the same CUSIP (Uniform Securities Identification Number), and confer upon the holder the same substantive rights and privileges as traditional shares—including rights to equity returns, dividends, voting rights, and the right to distribute residual assets upon liquidation. If the tokenized security does not confer the same rights as the original share (e.g., no voting rights, no shareholder equity), or does not share the same CUSIP, the exchange will not treat it as equivalent to the traditional security and will instead treat it as a different product, such as a derivative or American Depositary Receipt (ADR). Because of this high standard, most so-called "tokenized stocks" currently on the market, such as Robinhood "Stock Tokens" and Xstocks, do not actually meet the above conditions. At best, they are just shadow tokens that reflect stock prices, do not represent real equity, and usually do not confer voting rights; dividends are mostly reflected in the form of reinvestment or cash equivalents; the legal relationship is mostly directed to the SPV or issuing vehicle rather than the listed company itself, and most products are mainly redeemed in cash. Direct "exchange for original shares" will be subject to custody and compliance restrictions. 2. Unified matching and distributed settlement: trading and clearing mechanism Equity 4, Rule 4757 Nasdaq plans to fully integrate tokenized securities with traditional securities at the trading level. The proposal stipulates that as long as the tokenized version of a stock meets the aforementioned homogeneity requirements, it will share the same order book as traditional stocks and be matched according to the same order matching and priority rules. In other words, the exchange's matching engine will treat tokenized and non-tokenized buy and sell orders equally. Indeed, Nasdaq emphasizes that "at the trading stage, there is no difference between the two; the fundamental trade execution process is identical." Equity 4, Rule 4756、4758 The difference lies in the settlement process. Currently, U.S. stock transactions are typically cleared and settled through the Depository Trust Company (DTC). By introducing tokenization, Nasdaq will offer trading participants a new option: they can use tokens for settlement. The specific process is as follows: When brokers enter orders with the exchange, they can choose to specify that they wish to have their orders settled in tokens. If the order is executed and marked as token-settled, Nasdaq will pass the clearing instructions for the trade to DTC, which will then execute the security transfer in the background via blockchain. DTC will register stock ownership as on-chain tokens based on its own business rules and systems (including its currently developing blockchain settlement platform). The entire process will be transparent to front-end investors. Trades will still be matched on Nasdaq, but clearing and settlement will shift from traditional electronic bookkeeping to blockchain-based registration. Ultimately, the shares will be held as tokens on-chain. It's worth noting that Nasdaq's move isn't about creating a new market from scratch. Instead, it's leveraging existing market infrastructure, introducing blockchain as the underlying record-keeping technology without altering front-end trading mechanisms. This ensures that traditional stocks and tokenized shares maintain unified prices during trading, share market depth and liquidity, and maintain consistent information transparency and risk management. As Nasdaq explains in its filing, this plan aims to prevent different versions of tokenized shares from operating independently on multiple blockchains, fragmenting liquidity and ensuring that core mechanisms of the national market system, such as price discovery and best execution, are not impacted. This approach addresses the pain points of tokenized shares, including the lack of liquidity caused by the fragmentation of market-making capital and order books, resulting from multiple chains (ETH/SOL, etc.), multiple markets (regulated on-exchange trading versus crypto exchanges/DEXs), and geographical compliance restrictions. 3. Trading hours: 24/7 trading is not currently available Since their launch, tokenized stocks have been plagued by issues of deep liquidity and high impact during US stock market holidays. This misalignment in trading hours has also contributed to insufficient liquidity and price decoupling. Consequently, many investors are concerned about whether tokenized stocks can transcend existing US stock market trading hours and achieve 24/7 trading. Nasdaq's proposal offers a cautious answer: at this stage, tokenized securities will only be traded during existing trading hours, with no extensions or breaks in trading hours. Tokenized stocks cannot be traded outside of regular or extended trading hours, and will continue to follow US stock market practices, trading only during regular trading hours (9:30–16:00) and pre- and post-market hours, Monday through Friday, Eastern Time. Weekend or late-night trading is not currently supported. 4. Implementation path of on-chain settlement Nasdaq's tokenized stock trading relies on the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTC), a core clearinghouse in traditional financial markets. Notably, DTC has been exploring distributed ledger technology (DLT) clearing in recent years. Its "Project Ion" is a blockchain-based stock settlement platform designed to achieve T+0 and even real-time delivery. According to public information, Project Ion launched in a parallel pilot environment in 2022 and processes settlement instructions for over 100,000 stock trades daily. DTC developed the platform in collaboration with enterprise blockchain technology provider R3, using R3's Corda distributed ledger software and building a private permissioned blockchain as its underlying architecture. This network is a non-public consortium blockchain. This suggests that Nasdaq's tokenized transactions are more likely to be run on DTC's permissioned blockchain platform, rather than on public blockchains such as Ethereum, which have been widely discussed in the community. This would allow DTC to maintain its legacy system as the authoritative record, running it in parallel with the new DLT system to ensure security redundancy. Therefore, under Nasdaq's proposal, on-chain settlement would likely occur within a controlled "consortium blockchain" environment, with nodes maintained by financial infrastructure operators such as DTC. This ensures transaction privacy, network reliability, and regulatory control, meeting Wall Street's high standards for trade settlement systems. Consortium blockchains allow participants to undergo access control, ensuring greater control over data privacy and transaction speed, thus complying with regulatory requirements. Therefore, it is foreseeable that records of Nasdaq's tokenized shares will not appear on public blockchain explorers, but will instead be stored in a distributed ledger jointly maintained by Nasdaq, DTC, and related custodians. While Nasdaq has not specified the specifics of how its smart contracts will be deployed in its public documents, it is clear that Nasdaq does not intend to introduce a completely open token trading environment. Instead, it intends to utilize blockchain technology as a "behind-the-scenes" tool to enhance efficiency, while front-end transactions will still occur within a controlled system. The only change is to use blockchain records for bookkeeping. This means that investors will hold on-chain records approved by regulators, rather than crypto tokens that circulate freely outside the traditional system. Why did Nasdaq apply for tokenized securities? Blockchain has enormous potential to improve the efficiency of financial market infrastructure. Currently, US stock trades are settled on a delayed basis (T+1) (or T+2 in some markets). Blockchain technology can achieve near-real-time settlement (T+0 or even within seconds), reducing the time it takes for funds and securities to be held, and mitigating counterparty risk. Furthermore, blockchain's transparent and immutable distributed ledger provides a comprehensive audit trail, reducing reconciliation and manual errors. Nasdaq hopes to introduce tokenized settlement to expedite post-trade processes while reducing costs in clearing and custody. This is an attempt to revolutionize securities settlement mechanisms from the ground up. Nasdaq stated in its filing: "Today, securities, including stocks, have evolved from paper to electronic records, and tokenization is simply another method of digitally representing assets." By embracing blockchain, exchanges have demonstrated their determination to promote financial technology innovation so as not to fall behind in the new wave of technology. It is expected that the scale of the asset tokenization market is experiencing explosive growth, and the total market value of global tokenized assets will soar from approximately US$2.1 trillion in 2024 to approximately US$41.9 trillion in 2032, with a compound annual growth rate of 45.8%. Consequently, investors and issuers are showing strong interest in security tokenization, which represents a significant emerging market opportunity. Regulators and market participants in many countries are actively exploring the potential of blockchain-based securities, and the US cannot afford to lag behind. As a market organizer, Nasdaq hopes to capitalize on this trend, offering clients new trading options and thereby attracting more capital to the US market. By taking an early approach, Nasdaq can solidify its competitiveness in the digital asset era, especially as the White House actively promotes crypto-asset innovation and fosters a digital asset-friendly regulatory environment. It is crucial to ensure that tokenized securities develop within a compliant framework and prevent market fragmentation. As mentioned earlier, many tokenized stocks are currently traded on unregulated offshore platforms, lacking investor protections. Different platforms operate independently, leading to fragmented liquidity and market opacity. Nasdaq's proposal aims to incorporate these innovations into the mainstream regulatory system, thereby preventing investors from being drawn into unregulated markets by chasing novel concepts. While exchanges won't aggressively open up dazzling features in the short term, in the long term, stock tokenization opens up new possibilities for financial innovation. For example, stocks can be used as on-chain collateral in decentralized finance (DeFi), and equity tokens can be programmatically integrated into smart contracts to automate dividends, voting, and even the creation of entirely new derivatives and index products. These scenarios, difficult to achieve under traditional architectures, are expected to gradually become possible with tokenization. However, it's important to note that Nasdaq's tokenized securities trading venue remains on Nasdaq, meaning it's brokered within a compliant, centralized environment. This doesn't mean anyone can trade anonymously and freely on-chain. Conclusion: Long-term opportunities and industry outlook Nasdaq's promotion of tokenized securities trading is undoubtedly a major innovation in the underlying technology of securities trading. It marks a crucial step for traditional financial markets towards the blockchain era. From regulatory approval to technological preparation, this transformation will not be achieved overnight. According to Nasdaq's application documents, the relevant blockchain settlement infrastructure may not be ready until the end of the third quarter of 2026. Nasdaq anticipates that, assuming the proposal is approved by the SEC and the DTC's distributed ledger settlement system is launched, US investors could expect to see the first securities transactions settled in token form by the end of the third quarter of 2026. Investors need to recognize that this is a long-term theme. The GENIUS Act ushers in a new era of stablecoin compliance, and Nasdaq tokenized securities could become the next game-changing milestone. In the coming years, policy advancements and technological milestones related to this theme will continue to be a market focus, fostering cyclical investment opportunities in sectors such as oracles and RWAs. As Nasdaq management has stated, innovation should occur within national market systems to protect investors, not in the unregulated offshore wilderness. As Nasdaq tokenized stocks gradually launch, it will unlock greater potential for institutional capital to participate in on-chain equities. For example, large institutions can obtain real stock tokens through official channels and then confidently invest them in DeFi to generate returns. This represents a high level of capital that shadow token platforms currently struggle to attract. For the average user, once sovereign-level exchanges offer compliant stock tokens, holding shadow versions without shareholder rights becomes unnecessary. While the prospects are promising, potential limitations must be addressed. First, in the initial stages, the direct benefits for average investors may be limited. Currently, US retail investors can easily trade stocks through brokerages, and Nasdaq's tokenization will not immediately significantly reduce their trading costs or barriers to entry. While benefits such as 24/7 trading are not necessarily desirable for non-professional investors, they may not want to be constantly trading and experiencing volatility. Smart contracts are also subject to the risk of vulnerabilities and hacking, and if problems arise with tokenized stock contracts, it remains unclear who will bear liability. Furthermore, significant price deviations have been observed in some unregulated tokenized stock transactions abroad, exposing issues of insufficient liquidity and potential manipulation. Under Nasdaq's proposal, these deviations are expected to be reduced because the tokens are backed by real stocks and traditional market makers participate in pricing. Nasdaq's tokenized stock trading will mark a major milestone in the commercial application of blockchain technology. It signifies that blockchain is no longer confined to the cryptocurrency world, but has truly entered the core landscape of mainstream finance. From an industry perspective, this is an authoritative endorsement of the blockchain and Web3 ecosystem, inspiring more companies and developers to invest in this field. From a financial history perspective, this event may be seen as the starting point for the digital transformation of the traditional securities market, similar to the transition of exchanges from paper-based trading to electronic trading decades ago. For the Web3 community, this is an opportunity to put ideals into practice: concepts like decentralization and tokenization can only unlock their greatest value when integrated with the real economy. While this may not be the most utopian outcome for purist decentralization enthusiasts, it has significantly advanced the process of large-scale blockchain adoption.
Share
PANews2025/09/18 13:00