Circle has extended the Cross‑Chain Transfer Protocol (CCTP) on Stellar, enabling native and direct transfers of USDC across more than 15 blockchains.Circle has extended the Cross‑Chain Transfer Protocol (CCTP) on Stellar, enabling native and direct transfers of USDC across more than 15 blockchains.

CCTP V2 on Stellar: Native USDC, cross-chain transfers 15+

Circle has extended the Cross‑Chain Transfer Protocol (CCTP) on Stellar, enabling native and direct transfers of USDC across more than 15 blockchains, including Ethereum, Solana, and Base (CryptoNews).

In this context, the burn‑and‑mint 1:1 mechanism eliminates the need for external bridges, ensuring faster settlements and verifiable compliance rules throughout the entire transfer process.

For technical details and a list of supported chains, refer to Circle’s official documentation: Circle – Multi‑chain USDC on Stellar.

According to data collected from public on-chain monitoring and integration reports updated in 2025, the average latencies observed on fast-finality networks consistently result in being under 60 seconds.

Industry analysts also note that the elimination of wrapped tokens simplifies reconciliation and audit, measurably reducing operational complexities for exchanges and wallets.

In Brief

  • USDC transferable between Stellar and over 15 blockchains (e.g., Ethereum, Solana, Base) for native cross-chain movements.
  • Mechanism of burn at the source / mint at the destination without wrapped token (Circle Developers).
  • Typical times: from seconds to a few minutes, depending on the purpose of the chain (CryptoNews).
  • Benefits for DEX/CEX, wallets, and dApps; fiat access thanks to the MoneyGram network with over 475,000 physical locations (Circle).

What changes with the integration on Stellar

With CCTP V2, USDC is transferred natively between Stellar and other networks, without resorting to the creation of “wrapped” assets.

The transfer operation occurs through the burning of USDC on the origin chain and the subsequent minting of the equivalent on the destination, maintaining the 1:1 parity. In fact, this process significantly reduces the counterparty risks typical of custodial bridges and simplifies liquidity management between ecosystems.

The updated list of supported blockchains is available in Circle’s official documentation and provides an accurate overview of effective interoperability.

How it works: burn/mint and attestations

The protocol sends a burn request on the source chain and, after adequate attestation (CryptoNews), proceeds with the mint on the destination chain. The operation is orchestrated through Circle’s attestation services and specific smart contracts, which validate the event and authorize the minting.

That said, the timings are indicative: for fast-finality blockchains, like Solana or Stellar, the transfer occurs in about 4–60 seconds, while on probabilistic finality networks, like Ethereum, it may take a few minutes depending on congestion (during peak periods on Ethereum, the window can extend beyond 10 minutes). The result is a verifiable end-to-end flow that maintains supply parity.

Impact on Markets and Traders

For DEX, the cross-chain flow of USDC promises to improve prices and the depth of the book, while CEX can consolidate liquidity instead of fragmenting it into isolated pools.

Wallets and DeFi protocols benefit from more efficient access to USDC across multiple networks, also supported by fiat on/off-ramps thanks to the MoneyGram network (Circle).

For institutional operators, the elimination of wrapped tokens facilitates reporting, reconciliation, and audits, reducing operational complexities and the risk of mismatching between assets. In this context, the uniformity of the transfer model also positively impacts risk management.

Programmable Transfers for dApps

CCTP V2 allows attaching metadata to transfers, triggering automatic actions on the destination chain (such as credits, fund unlocking, or internal routing).

On Stellar, this integration facilitates the implementation of multi‑chain logic without the need for complex liquidity routers, offering developers more modular pipelines and programmable transfers with predictable paths and greater event traceability. Yet, the ease of use does not compromise the necessary controls during the attestation phase.

Limitations and Risks to Consider

  • Centralization of attestation: the attestation service is managed by Circle; its availability and policy can affect the continuity of the flow.
  • Chain finality: confirmation times vary; on slow finality networks, transfers might take several minutes.
  • Costs: the fees, both on the source chain and on the destination chain (gas or commissions), vary depending on the traffic and network congestion, with L1 potentially being more expensive.
  • Compliance: USDC has blacklist and freeze functions in regulatory cases, therefore it is important to evaluate the applicable policies and jurisdictions.
  • Infrastructure dependencies: potential downtimes of RPC, oracles, or other related services can introduce temporary disruptions.
  • Partial coverage: not all blockchains or assets are supported; it is necessary to check the limits and versions of the SDK.

Key Numbers

  • Interoperable networks: 15+ (refer to the updated Circle documentation).
  • Model: burn/mint 1:1 with attestation.
  • Execution time: from seconds to a few minutes depending on the blockchain; on Stellar/Solana typically 4–60 seconds, on Ethereum in congestion conditions up to >10 minutes.
  • Off-ramp network: MoneyGram with over 475,000 physical locations (Circle).

Quick FAQ

Can Stellar Become a Multi-Chain Liquidity Hub?

Yes, the integration of CCTP V2 allows USDC to be transferred natively between Stellar and other networks, facilitating global payments, treasury management, and cross‑chain lending. The final impact will depend on the adoption by DEX, CEX, and dApp on each blockchain. Ultimately, what matters is the real connectivity put into production by the operators.

Are wrapped tokens involved?

No. The transfer is based on the process of burn of USDC at the source and the subsequent mint at the destination, thus maintaining the overall supply balance.

What are the typical costs?

The costs vary depending on the fees applied on the source and destination blockchains and the network congestion. On L2 or high-efficiency networks, the costs are generally contained, while on L1 during periods of high congestion, they can be higher. For more details, it is advisable to consult the updated documentation from Circle.

  • All articles on USDC
  • Latest news on Stellar
  • Practical Guide to CCTP V2

Editorial Note: The exact date of the announcement and the complete list of the “15+ chains” will be updated as soon as Circle releases further details in their official communications.

Market Opportunity
Moonveil Logo
Moonveil Price(MORE)
$0.0006456
$0.0006456$0.0006456
+0.82%
USD
Moonveil (MORE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Tokyo’s Metaplanet Launches Miami Subsidiary to Amplify Bitcoin Income

Tokyo’s Metaplanet Launches Miami Subsidiary to Amplify Bitcoin Income

Metaplanet Inc., the Japanese public company known for its bitcoin treasury, is launching a Miami subsidiary to run a dedicated derivatives and income strategy aimed at turning holdings into steady, U.S.-based cash flow. Japanese Bitcoin Treasury Player Metaplanet Opens Miami Outpost The new entity, Metaplanet Income Corp., sits under Metaplanet Holdings, Inc. and is based […]
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:32
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37
Market Records Largest Long-Term Bitcoin Supply Release In History, Here’s What It Means For BTC

Market Records Largest Long-Term Bitcoin Supply Release In History, Here’s What It Means For BTC

Bitcoin has recorded what analysts describe as the largest long-term supply release in its history, coinciding with a sharp rise in leverage across derivatives
Share
Coinstats2026/02/08 07:06