President Donald Trump “benefits from cynicism” as he erodes Americans’ faith in key democratic institutions, according to a prosecutor speaking with a conservativePresident Donald Trump “benefits from cynicism” as he erodes Americans’ faith in key democratic institutions, according to a prosecutor speaking with a conservative

Betrayed voters turn on Trump as former prosecutor details how cynicism fuels his power

2026/03/11 10:01
5 min di lettura
Per feedback o dubbi su questo contenuto, contattateci all'indirizzo [email protected].

President Donald Trump “benefits from cynicism” as he erodes Americans’ faith in key democratic institutions, according to a prosecutor speaking with a conservative commentator.

“One of the things I think about when listening to voters is how Trump benefits from a certain kind of cynicism that has now taken root, which is that all politicians lie,” Andrew Weissman, a former prosecutor and author of the book “Liar’s Kingdom,” was asked by The Bulwark’s Sarah Longwell. “And it gets tough sometimes to disaggregate between a politician spinning, trying to put a positive light on things, saying things about their opposition that are maybe overstated — versus something like "’the 2020 election was stolen, and we've got to do something about it, so we better march to the Capitol because if we don't fight like hell, we're not going to have a country anymore.’ How do you pull those apart?”

Weissmann responded that because he could not address every one of Trump’s 30,000 lies, he was able to dissect it by focusing on one example — the 2020 presidential election.

“Where it does start getting gray — and here is where having been both a prosecutor and a defense lawyer for longer than I care to say comes in — that is what the law does,” Weissmann said. “It has to be intentional. It cannot be a mistake. It also has to be material, meaning it can't be something trivial.” He argued that Trump’s lies about the 2020 presidential election meets all of those standards, and that the law needs to catch up with these cynical attempts to manipulate the public in bad faith.

“I tried to think of things that could be a statutory fix — something that could happen at the state level or the federal level. I deal with: could you pass a statute, and what kinds of things would it say?” Weissmann told Longwell. “I walk people through the argument as to why this is a good idea, what models there are, what we could do, and why I think it could pass constitutional muster.”

He also argued there are many institutions that need to be rebuilt.

“When I was thinking about how to rebuild — what structures have to change, what kinds of laws can you put in place — I was also thinking about what institutions have held up,” Weissmann argued. “And what has held up as a way of separating truth from fiction is what courts do, day in and day out. Frankly, the district courts right now are one of the last — no pun intended, Sarah — bulwarks of liberty. The kinds of things I'm talking about involve using the courts to help separate truth from fiction.”

He added, “I also spend a fair amount of time talking about the late-19th, early-20th-century idea of a ‘marketplace of ideas"’— this fictional marketplace where all ideas confront each other and come out in the wash. For a whole variety of reasons, that doesn't apply to factual issues; it applies to opinions. And two, I'm not sure we even have a functioning marketplace anymore in the way Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. envisioned, because we have such a balkanized information landscape — just these little bubbles. This is a nutshell; there's a lot more explication in the book as to how I piece this all together.”

Earlier in March, Longwell bluntly explained that she believes Trump has “betrayed” his own voters by failing to deliver on the affordability issues that matter most to them, a further example of his cynicism.

“When you have a Biden to Trump voter, they tend to have voted for Donald Trump for one specific reason, which is that he promised he was going to lower prices and make America more affordable. That's what they heard. That's what they believed,” Longwell explained to MS NOW anchor Nicole Wallace. “… [T]he way these voters process anything that Trump is doing is they just ask ‘is what he is doing making my life more affordable? Because that's what I hired him to do.’ And so, whether it's building the ballroom, whether it is the aggressive way that they are shooting Americans in the streets and going after immigrants, or whether it is this war with Iran, they see it as not what they were promised.”

“Betrayed” is also the term used by conservative podcaster Joe Rogan to describe Trump’s broken promise to those voters who supported him because he promised to keep America out of wars.

“This is why a lot of people feel betrayed, right?” Rogan said during the Tuesday episode of his podcast. “He ran on, ‘No more wars,’ ‘End these stupid, senseless wars,’ and then we have one that we can’t even really clearly define why we did it.”

  • george conway
  • noam chomsky
  • civil war
  • Kayleigh mcenany
  • Melania trump
  • drudge report
  • paul krugman
  • Lindsey graham
  • Lincoln project
  • al franken bill maher
  • People of praise
  • Ivanka trump
  • eric trump
Disclaimer: gli articoli ripubblicati su questo sito provengono da piattaforme pubbliche e sono forniti esclusivamente a scopo informativo. Non riflettono necessariamente le opinioni di MEXC. Tutti i diritti rimangono agli autori originali. Se ritieni che un contenuto violi i diritti di terze parti, contatta [email protected] per la rimozione. MEXC non fornisce alcuna garanzia in merito all'accuratezza, completezza o tempestività del contenuto e non è responsabile per eventuali azioni intraprese sulla base delle informazioni fornite. Il contenuto non costituisce consulenza finanziaria, legale o professionale di altro tipo, né deve essere considerato una raccomandazione o un'approvazione da parte di MEXC.

Potrebbe anche piacerti

Time Traveler to XRP Investor: Once It Starts, There Is No Stopping This Perfect Catalyst

Time Traveler to XRP Investor: Once It Starts, There Is No Stopping This Perfect Catalyst

Time Traveler (@Traveler2236), a well-known crypto commentator and enthusiast, has shared a detailed projection for XRP’s price progression in 2026. His forecast
Condividi
Timestabloid2026/03/11 21:31
The path to clarity: BIR’s new audit framework

The path to clarity: BIR’s new audit framework

The first quarter of 2026 has been anything but quiet for taxpayers. Along with the preparations for filing income tax returns, the Bureau of Internal Revenue’s
Condividi
Bworldonline2026/03/11 20:30
PYUSD Token Burn: Unpacking the Astonishing 600 Million Vanish

PYUSD Token Burn: Unpacking the Astonishing 600 Million Vanish

BitcoinWorld PYUSD Token Burn: Unpacking the Astonishing 600 Million Vanish The cryptocurrency world is abuzz with a significant event: a massive PYUSD token burn involving 600 million units of the stablecoin. This astonishing development, first reported by Whale Alert, saw a substantial portion of PYUSD removed from circulation from an unknown wallet. Such an event naturally sparks curiosity and raises questions about its implications for the stablecoin’s stability and future trajectory. What does it mean when such a large sum simply vanishes? What Exactly is a PYUSD Token Burn? Before diving into the specifics of this event, it is crucial to understand what a token burn entails. In simple terms, a token burn is the permanent removal of cryptocurrency tokens from circulation. This is achieved by sending tokens to an unspendable wallet address, often referred to as a “burner” address, where they can never be retrieved or used again. This process effectively reduces the total supply of the cryptocurrency. Why Burn Tokens? Token burns are often executed for several reasons: To reduce supply and potentially increase scarcity, which could lead to an increase in value if demand remains constant. To stabilize a cryptocurrency’s price, particularly for stablecoins. As part of a deflationary mechanism or to implement specific tokenomics strategies. To signal commitment to the project’s long-term health and value. The 600 Million PYUSD Token Burn: What Happened? Whale Alert, a well-known blockchain tracker, recently flagged a colossal transaction: 600 million PYUSD being transferred to an unknown wallet, which was subsequently identified as a burn address. The details surrounding the origin and specific intent behind this particular burn remain somewhat mysterious. However, the outcome is clear: these 600 million PYUSD tokens are now permanently out of circulation. This scale of a PYUSD token burn is not an everyday occurrence. It represents a substantial reduction in the overall supply of the stablecoin. While the exact reasoning from the entity initiating the burn is not public, such large-scale actions are typically strategic, aimed at influencing market dynamics or fulfilling predefined tokenomic policies. Why Does This PYUSD Token Burn Matter for the Stablecoin? A burn of this magnitude carries significant weight, especially for a stablecoin like PYUSD. Stablecoins are designed to maintain a stable value, often pegged to a fiat currency like the US dollar. Reducing the supply can have several implications: Scarcity and Value: By decreasing the total available supply, the burn could theoretically enhance the scarcity of PYUSD. For a stablecoin, this often means reinforcing its peg rather than driving up its price above the peg. Peg Stability: A controlled burn can be a mechanism to help maintain the stablecoin’s peg to its underlying asset. If the stablecoin’s market price deviates below its peg, reducing supply can help bring it back into line. Market Confidence: Large, well-communicated burns can sometimes boost investor confidence, signaling that the issuers are actively managing the token’s supply to ensure its stability and health. However, an ‘unknown wallet’ aspect adds a layer of intrigue. What Are the Potential Impacts of Such a Large PYUSD Token Burn? The immediate impact of the 600 million PYUSD token burn is a reduction in the total circulating supply. This action, while seemingly straightforward, can ripple through the broader cryptocurrency ecosystem. For PYUSD holders and potential investors, understanding these potential impacts is key. One primary effect is on the supply-demand equilibrium. With fewer tokens available, if demand for PYUSD remains consistent or grows, the stablecoin’s peg could be strengthened. Moreover, such a substantial burn might also be part of a larger strategy to comply with regulatory requirements or to adjust the stablecoin’s backing reserves. It is important to consider the transparency surrounding such events. While the act of burning is verifiable on the blockchain, the ‘unknown wallet’ aspect of this particular burn leaves room for speculation about its origins and ultimate goals. Transparency in such large-scale operations often builds greater trust within the community. In conclusion, the recent 600 million PYUSD token burn is a remarkable event that underscores the dynamic nature of the stablecoin market. While the exact motivations behind this specific burn from an unknown wallet remain to be fully clarified, its immediate effect is a significant reduction in PYUSD’s circulating supply. This move has the potential to influence the stablecoin’s scarcity, strengthen its peg, and shape market perceptions, ultimately contributing to the ongoing evolution of the digital asset landscape. Frequently Asked Questions About the PYUSD Token Burn Here are some common questions regarding token burns and the recent PYUSD event: Q1: What is a cryptocurrency token burn? A1: A token burn is the process of permanently removing cryptocurrency tokens from circulation by sending them to an unspendable wallet address. This reduces the total supply of the token. Q2: Why do projects conduct token burns? A2: Projects burn tokens for various reasons, including reducing supply to potentially increase scarcity, maintaining a stable price (especially for stablecoins), implementing deflationary tokenomics, or signaling commitment to the project’s long-term health. Q3: How does a PYUSD token burn affect its value? A3: For a stablecoin like PYUSD, a token burn is typically used to help maintain its peg to the US dollar by adjusting supply. While it reduces scarcity, its primary goal is usually to reinforce stability rather than to increase its price above the peg. Q4: Is the 600 million PYUSD burn a positive or negative event? A4: Generally, a controlled token burn is considered a positive mechanism for managing supply and potentially strengthening a stablecoin’s peg. The specific details, like the ‘unknown wallet’ in this case, might raise questions about transparency, but the act of burning itself is a common strategy. Q5: How can I verify a token burn? A5: Token burns are recorded on the blockchain. You can typically verify a burn by looking up the transaction on a blockchain explorer, where you will see tokens sent to a known burn address (an address with no private key, making the funds irretrievable). The world of stablecoins is constantly evolving, and events like this PYUSD token burn are crucial to understanding its dynamics. If you found this article insightful, please consider sharing it with your network on social media. Your shares help us bring important crypto news and analysis to a wider audience! To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping stablecoin market stability. This post PYUSD Token Burn: Unpacking the Astonishing 600 Million Vanish first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Condividi
Coinstats2025/09/18 01:40