Europe is now clinched between two wars that are cutting off the Old Continent from oil, and the dire straits are raising tensions in its union of nation statesEurope is now clinched between two wars that are cutting off the Old Continent from oil, and the dire straits are raising tensions in its union of nation states

The conflicts in Iran and Ukraine are cutting oil deliveries to Europe

2026/03/19 03:20
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

Europe is now clinched between two wars that are cutting off the Old Continent from oil, and the dire straits are raising tensions in its union of nation states.

While the Iran conflict is disrupting supplies from the Persian Gulf region, the ongoing invasion of Ukraine is stopping the flow of Russian oil and making it unacceptable.

Calls from some corners of the EU for easing oil sanctions on Moscow, now that Washington has done that, are being met with resistance in Brussels, while the Kremlin threatens to slam the door first.

Europe to fund Druzhba pipeline repairs in Ukraine

Oil deliveries from Russia are becoming the apple of discord between certain EU member states that are heavily reliant on Moscow’s energy and the Brussels administration.

The Druzhba pipeline, which supplies Eastern European nations with Russian crude, has been dry since the end of January, with Ukraine blaming the stoppage on a Russian drone attack.

However, Hungary and Slovakia are accusing Kyiv of the continuing disruption. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, who is running in contested elections in April, says the Ukrainian government is intentionally delaying repairs.

His Slovak counterpart, Robert Fico, claims the facility in Brody, Lviv region, is not even damaged. Both leaders favor ending the war and restoring European economic ties with Russia.

Meanwhile, Ukraine accepted the technical and financial support offered by the European Union to fix the pipeline and restore oil deliveries through Druzhba.

The EU hopes this will convince Orbán to lift his veto on a €90 billion loan for Ukraine and the 20th package of sanctions against the Russian Federation.

But even if Russian oil starts flowing again, its days on the European market are numbered. Announcing the Druzhba deal on social media, the President of the European Commission (EC), Ursula von der Leyen, made that clear on Tuesday:

Brussels rules out return to Russian energy dependence

Earlier this week, the executive body in Brussels urged member states, including Hungary and Slovakia, which still have derogations for Russian oil, to prepare for its full prohibition.

European Commissioner for Energy Dan Jorgensen indicated at a briefing that the EU has no intentions to become dependent on Russian energy again, despite surging prices amid an escalating war in Iran. Quoted by Politico, he told reporters:

Earlier this month, von der Leyen said that a return to Russian oil and gas would be a “strategic blunder” for the European Union, as this would make it weaker.

The EC plans to put forward a proposal for a full ban on Russian oil imports into the European Union in mid-April, on top of a phase-out of Russian gas. However, calls have been mounting to suspend sanctions on Moscow, something the U.S. has already done regarding Russian oil stranded at sea.

Belgian Prime Minister Bart de Wever insisted on Sunday that the EU must negotiate with Russia to “regain access to cheap energy.”

Completely ending oil purchases from Russia in the current situation, with rising fuel costs, “will be a serious blow to the European economy,” Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto warned.

In a post on X, he called on the head of the European Commission and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to “stop this political theatre” and “immediately” lift the “oil blockade” on his country.

Meanwhile, the Russian government is now mulling whether to stop its energy supplies to the European market even before they are banned by the EU.

On Wednesday, the Kremlin’s spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, confirmed the matter is still under consideration as it requires an “in-depth analysis.”

President Vladimir Putin ordered the assessment earlier, stating that Russia may not wait until the door is slammed in its face but redirect its deliveries elsewhere.

In these circumstances, Europe seems to be facing increasingly limited options to ensure its energy security, at prices that would be acceptable for all of its members.

Still letting the bank keep the best part? Watch our free video on being your own bank.

Market Opportunity
FLOW Logo
FLOW Price(FLOW)
$0.03096
$0.03096$0.03096
-0.92%
USD
FLOW (FLOW) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

The post Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson has weighed in on whether the Federal Reserve should make a 25 basis points (bps) Fed rate cut or 50 bps cut. This comes ahead of the Fed decision today at today’s FOMC meeting, with the market pricing in a 25 bps cut. Bitcoin and the broader crypto market are currently trading flat ahead of the rate cut decision. Franklin Templeton CEO Weighs In On Potential FOMC Decision In a CNBC interview, Jenny Johnson said that she expects the Fed to make a 25 bps cut today instead of a 50 bps cut. She acknowledged the jobs data, which suggested that the labor market is weakening. However, she noted that this data is backward-looking, indicating that it doesn’t show the current state of the economy. She alluded to the wage growth, which she remarked is an indication of a robust labor market. She added that retail sales are up and that consumers are still spending, despite inflation being sticky at 3%, which makes a case for why the FOMC should opt against a 50-basis-point Fed rate cut. In line with this, the Franklin Templeton CEO said that she would go with a 25 bps rate cut if she were Jerome Powell. She remarked that the Fed still has the October and December FOMC meetings to make further cuts if the incoming data warrants it. Johnson also asserted that the data show a robust economy. However, she noted that there can’t be an argument for no Fed rate cut since Powell already signaled at Jackson Hole that they were likely to lower interest rates at this meeting due to concerns over a weakening labor market. Notably, her comment comes as experts argue for both sides on why the Fed should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:36
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Fed Makes First Rate Cut of the Year, Lowers Rates by 25 Bps

Fed Makes First Rate Cut of the Year, Lowers Rates by 25 Bps

The post Fed Makes First Rate Cut of the Year, Lowers Rates by 25 Bps appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Federal Reserve has made its first Fed rate cut this year following today’s FOMC meeting, lowering interest rates by 25 basis points (bps). This comes in line with expectations, while the crypto market awaits Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s speech for guidance on the committee’s stance moving forward. FOMC Makes First Fed Rate Cut This Year With 25 Bps Cut In a press release, the committee announced that it has decided to lower the target range for the federal funds rate by 25 bps from between 4.25% and 4.5% to 4% and 4.25%. This comes in line with expectations as market participants were pricing in a 25 bps cut, as against a 50 bps cut. This marks the first Fed rate cut this year, with the last cut before this coming last year in December. Notably, the Fed also made the first cut last year in September, although it was a 50 bps cut back then. All Fed officials voted in favor of a 25 bps cut except Stephen Miran, who dissented in favor of a 50 bps cut. This rate cut decision comes amid concerns that the labor market may be softening, with recent U.S. jobs data pointing to a weak labor market. The committee noted in the release that job gains have slowed, and that the unemployment rate has edged up but remains low. They added that inflation has moved up and remains somewhat elevated. Fed Chair Jerome Powell had also already signaled at the Jackson Hole Conference that they were likely to lower interest rates with the downside risk in the labor market rising. The committee reiterated this in the release that downside risks to employment have risen. Before the Fed rate cut decision, experts weighed in on whether the FOMC should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:36