U.S. community banks are urging lawmakers to close a perceived “loophole” in the GENIUS Act that allows crypto exchanges to offer yield on stablecoins, arguing it creates unfair competition with traditional banks and could accelerate deposit outflows.U.S. community banks are urging lawmakers to close a perceived “loophole” in the GENIUS Act that allows crypto exchanges to offer yield on stablecoins, arguing it creates unfair competition with traditional banks and could accelerate deposit outflows.
U.S. Community Banks Push to Close GENIUS Act Stablecoin “Yield Loophole”
News Brief
U.S. community banks are urging lawmakers to close a perceived “loophole” in the GENIUS Act that allows crypto exchanges to offer yield on stablecoins, arguing it creates unfair competition with traditional banks and could accelerate deposit outflows.
Summary
U.S. community banks are urging lawmakers to close a perceived “loophole” in the GENIUS Act that allows crypto exchanges to offer yield on stablecoins, arguing it creates unfair competition with traditional banks and could accelerate deposit outflows.
What Banks Are Objecting To
- Stablecoin yield products offered by exchanges
- Ability to provide interest‑like returns without being banks
- Potential for consumers to treat yield‑bearing stablecoins as deposit substitutes
Banks argue this activity looks economically similar to deposits but operates outside the full banking regulatory framework.
Why This Matters
- Competitive pressure: Yield‑bearing stablecoins can attract funds away from community banks
- Regulatory boundary debate: Where to draw the line between payments, securities, and banking
- Policy precedent: How this issue is resolved could shape the future of on‑chain finance in the U.S.
At stake is whether stablecoin issuers and exchanges can compete on yield without bank charters.
The Counterargument
Crypto advocates contend that:
- Stablecoin yields often come from market activity or reserves, not lending deposits
- Users are not guaranteed principal the same way bank deposits are
- Innovation should not be constrained to protect incumbents
They argue consumer disclosure—not prohibition—is the right approach.
Broader Implications
- Could influence final GENIUS Act language
- May determine whether stablecoins evolve into cash‑like instruments or yield‑bearing financial products
- Signals rising tension as crypto competes directly with traditional banking services
Bottom Line
Community banks’ push to close the GENIUS Act’s stablecoin yield “loophole” highlights a core conflict: stablecoins are starting to compete with bank deposits. How lawmakers respond will shape whether yield remains a feature of U.S.‑regulated stablecoins—or is pushed back into the traditional banking system.
Market Opportunity
Union Price(U)
$0.00214
$0.00214$0.00214
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles published on this page are written by independent contributors and do not necessarily reflect the official views of MEXC. All content is intended for informational and educational purposes only and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile — please conduct your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
You May Also Like
What is the best way for a teenager to start investing?
This article helps parents and teenagers understand how to start investing as a teenager, with clear explanations of legal account options, basic tax issues, sensible
Share
Coinstats2026/01/31 05:14
United Kingdom CFTC GBP NC Net Positions climbed from previous £-22K to £-16.2K
The post United Kingdom CFTC GBP NC Net Positions climbed from previous £-22K to £-16.2K appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Information on these pages contains
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/31 05:36
ABC Also Pulled Jimmy Kimmel’s Predecessor After Controversial Comments
The post ABC Also Pulled Jimmy Kimmel’s Predecessor After Controversial Comments appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jimmy Kimmel (Photo by Media Access Awards Presented By Easterseals/Getty Images for Easterseals) Getty Images for Easterseals The shock decision by ABC to pull Jimmy Kimmel Live! “indefinitely” after the late-night host’s remarks about the killing of Charlie Kirk has created a rare moment in modern TV media: A major show abruptly taken off the air, with its network forced into crisis-management mode. Rare, that is, but not unprecedented. What might go unnoticed by many people reacting to the news about Kimmel and his potential cancellation is that this is not the first time ABC has made such a move. In fact, a version of the same thing happened to Kimmel’s predecessor program — Bill Maher’s Politically Incorrect, which once had Kimmel’s slot and which ABC cancelled in the wake of a firestorm around comments Maher made in the immediate aftermath of the September 11 terrorist attacks. (Notice, by the way, that I said cancelled “in the wake of” and not “because of.” More on that in a moment.) Here’s what happened: Less than a week after 9/11, Maher and a panel were talking about then-President George W. Bush’s use of the word “cowards” to describe the hijackers. “We have been the cowards,” Maher interjected, referencing the practice of “lobbing cruise missiles from 2,000 miles away. That’s cowardly.” But Maher then went even farther over the line: Actually staying in an airplane as it hits a building? “Not cowardly.” You can read more about the ensuing uproar in this ABC news story from 2001, which includes a statement that Maher issued through his publicist: “In no way was I intending to say, nor have I ever thought, that the men and women who defend our nation in uniform are anything but courageous and valiant, and I offer my apologies to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 11:02