The post Matt Mahan: California’s spending has risen 75% with no improved outcomes, bureaucratic inefficiencies are paralyzing governance, and San Jose’s tax-freeThe post Matt Mahan: California’s spending has risen 75% with no improved outcomes, bureaucratic inefficiencies are paralyzing governance, and San Jose’s tax-free

Matt Mahan: California’s spending has risen 75% with no improved outcomes, bureaucratic inefficiencies are paralyzing governance, and San Jose’s tax-free strategies are reducing crime and homelessness

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]


San José’s innovative approach reduces crime and homelessness without raising taxes, challenging California’s spending inefficiencies.

Key takeaways

  • California’s government spending has increased significantly, but outcomes have not improved.
  • Bureaucratic inefficiencies in California lead to project delays and increased costs.
  • Extensive environmental reviews contribute to high project costs in California.
  • Fraud during the pandemic resulted in over $30 billion in fraudulent unemployment claims in California.
  • Waste and inefficiency are prevalent due to a focus on growing programs rather than achieving outcomes.
  • San Jose reduced crime and homelessness by changing processes and reallocating funding without raising taxes.
  • California’s legislature focuses on passing more bills, increasing costs without improving outcomes.
  • Less government intervention may be more effective in solving housing and education issues.
  • Focusing solely on revenue is a misguided approach to solving California’s problems.
  • Setting public goals allows for accountability in government spending and outcomes.
  • California’s political climate emphasizes performative politics over effective governance.
  • The disconnect between legislative actions and public welfare is a critical issue in California.
  • Government policies can inadvertently make housing more expensive.
  • Accountability and goal-setting are crucial for effective governance.
  • Public accountability mechanisms can improve government effectiveness.

Guest intro

Matt Mahan is the 66th Mayor of San José, California’s third-largest city. He previously co-founded Brigade, the world’s first voter network, which reached millions of users before its acquisition in 2019 by Pinterest and Countable. As mayor, he has dramatically reduced street homelessness, made San José the safest big city in America, and prioritized pragmatic solutions on housing, public safety, and affordability.

California’s government spending and outcomes

  • — Matt Mahan

  • Increased spending has not translated into improved public services or outcomes.
  • The disconnect between spending and outcomes highlights issues in government accountability.
  • Understanding fiscal policies is crucial to addressing inefficiencies in California’s governance.
  • There is a need for better oversight and evaluation of government programs.
  • The focus should shift from spending to achieving tangible results.
  • — Matt Mahan

  • Evaluating the effectiveness of spending is essential for improving governance.

Bureaucratic inefficiencies in California

  • — Matt Mahan

  • Bureaucratic processes contribute to project delays and inefficiencies.
  • Inefficiencies lead to increased costs without corresponding benefits.
  • Streamlining processes could improve project execution and reduce costs.
  • Understanding specific bureaucratic regulations is crucial for reform.
  • — Matt Mahan

  • The focus should be on simplifying processes to enhance efficiency.
  • Reforming bureaucratic processes can lead to better outcomes and cost savings.

Environmental reviews and project costs

  • — Matt Mahan

  • Extensive environmental reviews contribute to high project costs.
  • The role of consultants in project development adds to financial inefficiencies.
  • Understanding environmental regulations is key to addressing cost issues.
  • Streamlining review processes could reduce costs and expedite projects.
  • Balancing environmental concerns with project efficiency is crucial.
  • Reforming environmental review processes can lead to cost savings.
  • — Matt Mahan

Fraud and inefficiency during the pandemic

  • — Matt Mahan

  • Fraud during the pandemic highlights vulnerabilities in the unemployment system.
  • Addressing fraud is crucial for improving public administration.
  • Understanding the scale of fraud is essential for implementing reforms.
  • Strengthening oversight mechanisms can reduce fraud and inefficiency.
  • — Matt Mahan

  • Focusing on outcomes rather than program growth can improve efficiency.
  • Fraud and inefficiency are systemic issues that require comprehensive solutions.

San Jose’s successful governance strategies

  • — Matt Mahan

  • San Jose’s approach to governance emphasizes process changes and funding reallocation.
  • Successful governance does not necessarily require increased taxes.
  • Effective strategies can lead to improved outcomes in urban management.
  • San Jose’s model challenges conventional funding approaches.
  • — Matt Mahan

  • Other cities can learn from San Jose’s governance model.
  • Emphasizing efficiency and effectiveness can lead to better public services.

Legislative focus and accountability in California

  • — Matt Mahan

  • The focus on passing more bills increases costs without improving outcomes.
  • Legislative actions often prioritize process over effectiveness.
  • Understanding the political climate is crucial for addressing governance issues.
  • — Matt Mahan

  • Reducing government intervention could lead to more effective solutions.
  • Accountability and goal-setting are essential for legislative effectiveness.
  • The disconnect between legislative actions and public welfare needs addressing.

Revenue focus and governance challenges

  • — Matt Mahan

  • Focusing solely on revenue is a misguided approach to solving problems.
  • Accountability and goal-setting are crucial for effective governance.
  • Understanding fiscal challenges is essential for addressing governance issues.
  • — Matt Mahan

  • Public accountability mechanisms can improve government effectiveness.
  • Emphasizing outcomes over revenue can lead to better governance.
  • The political mindset needs to shift from revenue generation to accountability.

Public accountability and governance effectiveness

  • — Matt Mahan

  • Setting public goals enhances accountability in government spending.
  • Public accountability mechanisms can improve decision-making and effectiveness.
  • Understanding accountability mechanisms is crucial for improving governance.
  • Emphasizing goal-setting can lead to better public services and outcomes.
  • — Matt Mahan

  • Holding officials accountable for their actions is essential for effective governance.
  • Accountability and transparency are key to improving public administration.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

San José’s innovative approach reduces crime and homelessness without raising taxes, challenging California’s spending inefficiencies.

Key takeaways

  • California’s government spending has increased significantly, but outcomes have not improved.
  • Bureaucratic inefficiencies in California lead to project delays and increased costs.
  • Extensive environmental reviews contribute to high project costs in California.
  • Fraud during the pandemic resulted in over $30 billion in fraudulent unemployment claims in California.
  • Waste and inefficiency are prevalent due to a focus on growing programs rather than achieving outcomes.
  • San Jose reduced crime and homelessness by changing processes and reallocating funding without raising taxes.
  • California’s legislature focuses on passing more bills, increasing costs without improving outcomes.
  • Less government intervention may be more effective in solving housing and education issues.
  • Focusing solely on revenue is a misguided approach to solving California’s problems.
  • Setting public goals allows for accountability in government spending and outcomes.
  • California’s political climate emphasizes performative politics over effective governance.
  • The disconnect between legislative actions and public welfare is a critical issue in California.
  • Government policies can inadvertently make housing more expensive.
  • Accountability and goal-setting are crucial for effective governance.
  • Public accountability mechanisms can improve government effectiveness.

Guest intro

Matt Mahan is the 66th Mayor of San José, California’s third-largest city. He previously co-founded Brigade, the world’s first voter network, which reached millions of users before its acquisition in 2019 by Pinterest and Countable. As mayor, he has dramatically reduced street homelessness, made San José the safest big city in America, and prioritized pragmatic solutions on housing, public safety, and affordability.

California’s government spending and outcomes

  • — Matt Mahan

  • Increased spending has not translated into improved public services or outcomes.
  • The disconnect between spending and outcomes highlights issues in government accountability.
  • Understanding fiscal policies is crucial to addressing inefficiencies in California’s governance.
  • There is a need for better oversight and evaluation of government programs.
  • The focus should shift from spending to achieving tangible results.
  • — Matt Mahan

  • Evaluating the effectiveness of spending is essential for improving governance.

Bureaucratic inefficiencies in California

  • — Matt Mahan

  • Bureaucratic processes contribute to project delays and inefficiencies.
  • Inefficiencies lead to increased costs without corresponding benefits.
  • Streamlining processes could improve project execution and reduce costs.
  • Understanding specific bureaucratic regulations is crucial for reform.
  • — Matt Mahan

  • The focus should be on simplifying processes to enhance efficiency.
  • Reforming bureaucratic processes can lead to better outcomes and cost savings.

Environmental reviews and project costs

  • — Matt Mahan

  • Extensive environmental reviews contribute to high project costs.
  • The role of consultants in project development adds to financial inefficiencies.
  • Understanding environmental regulations is key to addressing cost issues.
  • Streamlining review processes could reduce costs and expedite projects.
  • Balancing environmental concerns with project efficiency is crucial.
  • Reforming environmental review processes can lead to cost savings.
  • — Matt Mahan

Fraud and inefficiency during the pandemic

  • — Matt Mahan

  • Fraud during the pandemic highlights vulnerabilities in the unemployment system.
  • Addressing fraud is crucial for improving public administration.
  • Understanding the scale of fraud is essential for implementing reforms.
  • Strengthening oversight mechanisms can reduce fraud and inefficiency.
  • — Matt Mahan

  • Focusing on outcomes rather than program growth can improve efficiency.
  • Fraud and inefficiency are systemic issues that require comprehensive solutions.

San Jose’s successful governance strategies

  • — Matt Mahan

  • San Jose’s approach to governance emphasizes process changes and funding reallocation.
  • Successful governance does not necessarily require increased taxes.
  • Effective strategies can lead to improved outcomes in urban management.
  • San Jose’s model challenges conventional funding approaches.
  • — Matt Mahan

  • Other cities can learn from San Jose’s governance model.
  • Emphasizing efficiency and effectiveness can lead to better public services.

Legislative focus and accountability in California

  • — Matt Mahan

  • The focus on passing more bills increases costs without improving outcomes.
  • Legislative actions often prioritize process over effectiveness.
  • Understanding the political climate is crucial for addressing governance issues.
  • — Matt Mahan

  • Reducing government intervention could lead to more effective solutions.
  • Accountability and goal-setting are essential for legislative effectiveness.
  • The disconnect between legislative actions and public welfare needs addressing.

Revenue focus and governance challenges

  • — Matt Mahan

  • Focusing solely on revenue is a misguided approach to solving problems.
  • Accountability and goal-setting are crucial for effective governance.
  • Understanding fiscal challenges is essential for addressing governance issues.
  • — Matt Mahan

  • Public accountability mechanisms can improve government effectiveness.
  • Emphasizing outcomes over revenue can lead to better governance.
  • The political mindset needs to shift from revenue generation to accountability.

Public accountability and governance effectiveness

  • — Matt Mahan

  • Setting public goals enhances accountability in government spending.
  • Public accountability mechanisms can improve decision-making and effectiveness.
  • Understanding accountability mechanisms is crucial for improving governance.
  • Emphasizing goal-setting can lead to better public services and outcomes.
  • — Matt Mahan

  • Holding officials accountable for their actions is essential for effective governance.
  • Accountability and transparency are key to improving public administration.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Loading more articles…

You’ve reached the end


Add us on Google

`;
}

function createMobileArticle(article) {
const displayDate = getDisplayDate(article);
const editorSlug = article.editor ? article.editor.toLowerCase().replace(/\s+/g, ‘-‘) : ”;
const captionHtml = article.imageCaption ? `

${article.imageCaption}

` : ”;
const authorHtml = article.isPressRelease ? ” : `
`;

return `


${captionHtml}

${article.subheadline ? `

${article.subheadline}

` : ”}

${createSocialShare()}

${authorHtml}
${displayDate}

${article.content}

${article.isPressRelease ? ” : article.isSponsored ? `

Disclosure: This is sponsored content. It does not represent Crypto Briefing’s editorial views. For more information, see our Editorial Policy.

` : `

Disclosure: This article was edited by ${article.editor}. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

`}

`;
}

function createDesktopArticle(article, sidebarAdHtml) {
const editorSlug = article.editor ? article.editor.toLowerCase().replace(/\s+/g, ‘-‘) : ”;
const displayDate = getDisplayDate(article);
const captionHtml = article.imageCaption ? `

${article.imageCaption}

` : ”;
const categoriesHtml = article.categories.map((cat, i) => {
const separator = i < article.categories.length – 1 ? ‘|‘ : ”;
return `${cat}${separator}`;
}).join(”);
const desktopAuthorHtml = article.isPressRelease ? ” : `
`;

return `

${categoriesHtml}

${article.subheadline ? `

${article.subheadline}

` : ”}

${desktopAuthorHtml}
${displayDate}
${createSocialShare()}

${captionHtml}

${article.content}
${article.isPressRelease ? ” : article.isSponsored ? `
Disclosure: This is sponsored content. It does not represent Crypto Briefing’s editorial views. For more information, see our Editorial Policy.

` : `

Disclosure: This article was edited by ${article.editor}. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

`}

`;
}

function loadMoreArticles() {
if (isLoading || !hasMore) return;

isLoading = true;
loadingText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);

// Build form data for AJAX request
const formData = new FormData();
formData.append(‘action’, ‘cb_lovable_load_more’);
formData.append(‘current_post_id’, lastLoadedPostId);
formData.append(‘primary_cat_id’, primaryCatId);
formData.append(‘before_date’, lastLoadedDate);
formData.append(‘loaded_ids’, loadedPostIds.join(‘,’));

fetch(ajaxUrl, {
method: ‘POST’,
body: formData
})
.then(response => response.json())
.then(data => {
isLoading = false;
loadingText.classList.add(‘hidden’);

if (data.success && data.has_more && data.article) {
const article = data.article;
const sidebarAdHtml = data.sidebar_ad_html || ”;

// Check for duplicates
if (loadedPostIds.includes(article.id)) {
console.log(‘Duplicate article detected, skipping:’, article.id);
// Update pagination vars and try again
lastLoadedDate = article.publishDate;
loadMoreArticles();
return;
}

// Add to mobile container
mobileContainer.insertAdjacentHTML(‘beforeend’, createMobileArticle(article));

// Add to desktop container with fresh ad HTML
desktopContainer.insertAdjacentHTML(‘beforeend’, createDesktopArticle(article, sidebarAdHtml));

// Update tracking variables
loadedPostIds.push(article.id);
lastLoadedPostId = article.id;
lastLoadedDate = article.publishDate;

// Execute any inline scripts in the new content (for ads)
const newArticle = desktopContainer.querySelector(`article[data-article-id=”${article.id}”]`);
if (newArticle) {
const scripts = newArticle.querySelectorAll(‘script’);
scripts.forEach(script => {
const newScript = document.createElement(‘script’);
if (script.src) {
newScript.src = script.src;
} else {
newScript.textContent = script.textContent;
}
document.body.appendChild(newScript);
});
}

// Trigger Ad Inserter if available
if (typeof ai_check_and_insert_block === ‘function’) {
ai_check_and_insert_block();
}

// Trigger Google Publisher Tag refresh if available
if (typeof googletag !== ‘undefined’ && googletag.pubads) {
googletag.cmd.push(function() {
googletag.pubads().refresh();
});
}

} else if (data.success && !data.has_more) {
hasMore = false;
endText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);
} else if (!data.success) {
console.error(‘AJAX error:’, data.error);
hasMore = false;
endText.textContent=”Error loading more articles”;
endText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);
}
})
.catch(error => {
console.error(‘Fetch error:’, error);
isLoading = false;
loadingText.classList.add(‘hidden’);
hasMore = false;
endText.textContent=”Error loading more articles”;
endText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);
});
}

// Set up IntersectionObserver
const observer = new IntersectionObserver(function(entries) {
if (entries[0].isIntersecting) {
loadMoreArticles();
}
}, { threshold: 0.1 });

observer.observe(loadingTrigger);
})();

© Decentral Media and Crypto Briefing® 2026.

Source: https://cryptobriefing.com/matt-mahan-californias-spending-has-risen-75-with-no-improved-outcomes-bureaucratic-inefficiencies-are-paralyzing-governance-and-san-joses-tax-free-strategies-are-reducing-crime-and-homelessnes/

Market Opportunity
PUBLIC Logo
PUBLIC Price(PUBLIC)
$0.01539
$0.01539$0.01539
+0.13%
USD
PUBLIC (PUBLIC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Fed Decides On Interest Rates Today—Here’s What To Watch For

Fed Decides On Interest Rates Today—Here’s What To Watch For

The post Fed Decides On Interest Rates Today—Here’s What To Watch For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline The Federal Reserve on Wednesday will conclude a two-day policymaking meeting and release a decision on whether to lower interest rates—following months of pressure and criticism from President Donald Trump—and potentially signal whether additional cuts are on the way. President Donald Trump has urged the central bank to “CUT INTEREST RATES, NOW, AND BIGGER” than they might plan to. Getty Images Key Facts The central bank is poised to cut interest rates by at least a quarter-point, down from the 4.25% to 4.5% range where they have been held since December to between 4% and 4.25%, as Wall Street has placed 100% odds of a rate cut, according to CME’s FedWatch, with higher odds (94%) on a quarter-point cut than a half-point (6%) reduction. Fed governors Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman, both Trump appointees, voted in July for a quarter-point reduction to rates, and they may dissent again in favor of a large cut alongside Stephen Miran, Trump’s Council of Economic Advisers’ chair, who was sworn in at the meeting’s start on Tuesday. It’s unclear whether other policymakers, including Kansas City Fed President Jeffrey Schmid and St. Louis Fed President Alberto Musalem, will favor larger cuts or opt for no reduction. Fed Chair Jerome Powell said in his Jackson Hole, Wyoming, address last month the central bank would likely consider a looser monetary policy, noting the “shifting balance of risks” on the U.S. economy “may warrant adjusting our policy stance.” David Mericle, an economist for Goldman Sachs, wrote in a note the “key question” for the Fed’s meeting is whether policymakers signal “this is likely the first in a series of consecutive cuts” as the central bank is anticipated to “acknowledge the softening in the labor market,” though they may not “nod to an October cut.” Mericle said he…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:23
DWF Labs partners with MemeCore, with MemeCore token up 333% since September

DWF Labs partners with MemeCore, with MemeCore token up 333% since September

PANews reported on September 18 that according to official news from DWF Labs, it announced a partnership with MemeCore to support the first L1 project designed specifically for Meme 2.0. The project's token M has risen 20.56% in the past 24 hours and is currently priced at $2.94, up 333% since September.
Share
PANews2025/09/18 15:10
Wormhole token soars following tokenomics overhaul, W reserve launch

Wormhole token soars following tokenomics overhaul, W reserve launch

                                                                               Wormhole’s native token has had a tough time since launch, debuting at $1.66 before dropping significantly despite the general crypto market’s bull cycle.                     Wormhole, an interoperability protocol facilitating asset transfers between blockchains, announced updated tokenomics to its native Wormhole (W) token, including a token reserve and more yield for stakers. The changes could affect the protocol’s governance, as staked Wormhole tokens allocate voting power to delegates.According to a Wednesday announcement, three main changes are coming to the Wormhole token: a W reserve funded with protocol fees and revenue, a 4% base yield for staking with higher rewards for active ecosystem participants, and a change from bulk unlocks to biweekly unlocks.“The goal of Wormhole Contributors is to significantly expand the asset transfer and messaging volume that Wormhole facilitates over the next 1-2 years,” the protocol said. According to Wormhole, more tokens will be locked as adoption takes place and revenue filters back to the company.Read more
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 02:41